Clinical and radiographic outcomes of meniscus surgery and future targets for biologic intervention: A review of data from the MOON Group

Clinical and MRI Outcomes of Repaired Peripheral Longitudinal Tears of the Posterior Horn of the Medial Meniscus With ACL Reconstruction: Results According to Tear Size

Background

Arthroscopic repair of longitudinal tears in the medial meniscal posterior horn (MMPH) has been reported to result in high rates of meniscal healing when performed alongside anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR). However, studies that have focused on longitudinal tears and their impact on clinical outcomes after arthroscopic repair are insufficient.

Purpose

To investigate the clinical outcome and healing status after concomitant arthroscopic ACLR and repair of MMPH peripheral longitudinal tears, with respect to the tear length.

Study Design

Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3.

Methods

A total of 263 patients who underwent concurrent arthroscopic suture repair of longitudinal tears of the MMPH and ACLR were enrolled. All patients had 2-year postoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) evaluations, and 61% of patients underwent a second-look arthroscopy. The exclusion criteria were partial meniscectomies and multiligament injuries. Patients were assessed pre- and postoperatively for clinical scores, amount of anterior translation, grade of pivot shift, and presence of meniscal tear extension. According to the length of longitudinal tears, patients were classified into 2 groups: (1) patients with tears that were located in the posterior compartment and (2) patients with tears that extended to the midbody of the meniscus. Binary stepwise logistic regression analysis was used to evaluate the risk factors for unhealed menisci as identified by MRI.

Results

A total of 83 patients were included in this study-52 patients (group 1) had MMPH tears without tear extension and 31 patients (group 2) had MMPH tears with tear extension. There were no differences in outcomes between the groups, including the healing rate after meniscal repair (P > .05). Based on postoperative MRI scans, 67 patients (80.7%) were categorized as completely healed and 16 patients (19.3%) as unhealed. There were no significant differences between the completely healed and unhealed groups in outcomes or the rate of preoperative midbody tear extension. Higher body mass index and lower preoperative Lysholm scores were identified as risk factors for unhealed menisci.

Conclusion

Overall, the rate of complete healing of MMPH tears repaired concomitantly with ACLR was 80.7% (67/83), and midbody tear extension did not affect the healing rate of the repaired meniscus. Results indicate that suture repair for unstable MMPH tears should be considered regardless of tear size.

Characterization of Cartilage Injury and Associated Treatment at the Time of Primary Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction

Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) tears with concomitant cartilage injuries resulting in ACL reconstruction (ACLR) with cartilaginous procedures are common in the young, high-demand population. The purpose of this study was to report and characterize cartilage treatments performed at the time of index ACLR reconstruction and to determine if those treatments are associated with revision surgery (of any kind) in the 4-year follow-up. We performed a consecutive series of active duty service members in the Military Health System Data Repository with ACLR with and without concomitant cartilage procedures done at military facilities between October 2008 and September 2011. Patients were continuously enrolled with no history of knee surgeries for 2 years prior to primary ACLR. ACLR failure was defined as revision ACLR within 4 years following the primary ACLR. Of the 2,735 primary ACLRs included in the study, 5.3% (143/2,735) underwent isolated ACLR with a cartilage procedure. Of these patients, 23.07% (33/143) experienced ACLR failure within 4 years after ACLR with cartilage procedures, including 33.33% (11/33) undergoing revision ACLR. We found concomitant cartilage procedures at time of index ACLR to have the following rates of revision 35.59% (21/59) for microfracture, 14.63% (6/41) for chondroplasty, and 13.95% (6/43) for osteochondral grafts. The overall clinical failure rate of service members with ACLR plus concomitant cartilage procedure is 23.07% with minimum 4-year follow-up. Further research should be done to identify modifiable demographic and surgical factors associated with failure. This is a retrospective case-control study that reflects level of evidence III.

Periodical assessment of four horns of knee meniscus using MR T2 mapping imaging in volunteers before and after amateur marathons

To observe the changes and recovery of T2 values of menisci in amateur marathon participants at different times, and to examine the effect of marathon exercise on meniscal microstructure. Twelve healthy marathon volunteers were recruited continuously, including 5 males and 7 females, with mean (± SD) age of 27.5 ± 5.2 years. The body mass indices (BMIs) ranged from 17.6 to 27.2 kg/m², with a mean of 21.9 ± 2.5 kg/m². The 24 knee joints were scanned using a 3 T MR scanner at 1 week before the event, and at 12 h and 2 months after the event. T2 values of the anterior horn of the medial meniscus (MMAH), posterior horn of the medial meniscus (MMPH), anterior horn of the lateral meniscus (LMAH), and posterior horn of the lateral meniscus (LMPH) were measured by drawing the regions of interest (ROIs) on the T2 map images. Wilcoxon sign rank test was used to compare the T2 values between 1 week before and 12 h after the event, and between 1 week before and 2 months after the event in each anatomical region, respectively. The T2 values of the menisci at 12 h after the event were significantly higher (P < 0.05) than those at 1 week before the event. No statistically significant differences in the T2 values of the menisci were found between 2 months after and 1 week before the event (P > 0.05). The T2 values of MMAH, MMPH, LMAH, and LMPH showed a trend of "increasing first and then decreasing" over time, suggesting that the T2 values may reflect meniscal microstructure in amateur marathon runner.

Current Concept Review: Inclusion and Analysis of Diverse Study Populations in Orthopaedic Research

As disparities in healthcare access and outcomes have been increasingly identified across medical specialties, the importance of recognizing and understanding the diversity of our patient populations and the influence of individual characteristics such as age, sex, gender, race, and ethnicity on clinical outcomes has been emphasized. Orthopaedic literature has advanced dramatically in the quality and quantity of research generated over the past 25 years, yet a consistent, sustained focus on studying musculoskeletal health in the context of these unique patient-specific variables has not been maintained. The result of this inattention may be the provision of orthopaedic care that is ill-suited for the individual patient whose biologic characteristics, life experiences, and cultural constructs differ from that of the typical research subject. The recent proliferation of meta-analyses-whose intention is to optimize statistical power-likely compounds the problem because improper, inconsistent, or absent categorization of patients in research articles precludes meaningful subgroup analysis. This article describes the current variability in demographic reporting in the orthopaedic literature, highlights the importance of complete, consistent demographic reporting and subgroup analysis, and reviews specific examples of orthopaedic conditions that illustrate how clinical outcomes may be affected by patient-specific variables such as age, sex, gender, race, and ethnicity.

High incidence of subsequent re-operation following treatments for medial meniscus tears combined with anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: second-look arthroscopic study

Background

The Multicenter Orthopaedic Outcomes Network (MOON) group recently reported that medial meniscus (MM) repairs are associated with more frequent re-operations when compared to lateral meniscus (LM) repairs. The purpose of this study was to compare the meniscal healing and the incidence of subsequent re-operation of medial and lateral meniscal tears that occurred concurrently with anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injuries.

Methods

We retrospectively reviewed patients who underwent second-look arthroscopy after primary ACL reconstruction (ACLR) between June 2005 to December 2016. The healing of meniscal tears following repair or left in situ, and re-tear following partial meniscectomy, were evaluated via second-look arthroscopy and compared between medial and lateral meniscus. Moreover, the incidence of subsequent meniscal re-operation after the index ACLR were investigated and compared between medial and lateral meniscus. Subsequent meniscal re-operation was performed in cases of the following three symptomatic meniscus tears: re-tears at the meniscectomy site; new tears; and failed healing of repaired or left in situ meniscus.

Results

There were 148 meniscal tears in 121 patients at index ACLR. There were 62 MM tears, 38 LM tears, and 24 bilateral meniscus tears. At second-look arthroscopy, the “successful healing” rate for tears following repair was higher in LM tears (91.2%) compared to MM tears (80.0%), although it was not statistically significant (p > 0.05). No significant differences were observed in the healing of left in situ tears or re-tear of meniscectomy site between medial and lateral meniscus. Patients with MM tears combined with ACL injuries had a higher incidence of subsequent meniscal re-operation compared to patients with LM tears (25.6% vs 16.1%, p = 0.025).

Conclusions

There was a trend for the successful healing rate to be higher in LM repairs than MM repairs. Subsequent meniscal re-operations after ACLR were more frequent in patients with medial meniscal tears concurrently with ACL injuries in comparison to patients with lateral meniscal tears.

Level of study

Level IV, retrospective case series.

Cost-Effective Medical Care Optimizes Value Over Time

Researchers are encouraged to consider value (cost in addition to outcome) when analyzing the results of arthroscopic and related treatments. Given increasing health care costs, value calculations are critical, particularly in cases of clinical equipoise-uncertainty as to which of various treatment options is optimal. Value calculations must not be shortsighted, and rigor is required to determine direct costs as well as more obscure indirect costs. In addition, sometimes the published literature is ambiguous or conflicting with regard to outcomes. Thus, investigations of cost-effectiveness require sensitivity analyses, where a range of possible results for cost-effectiveness (i.e., the dependent variable) could be reported based on a range of values for the independent variables (costs or outcomes). What is more, value analyses should not be shortsighted; costs and outcomes must be considered over the long term. Ultimately, the most cost-effective treatments may be preferred.

Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injury, Reconstruction, and the Optimization of Outcome

Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) provides an established surgical intervention to control pathological tibiofemoral translational and rotational movement. ACLR is a safe and reproducible intervention, but there remains an underlying rate of failure to return to preinjury sporting activity levels. Postoperative pathological laxity and graft reinjury remain concerns. Previously, unrecognized meniscal lesions, disruption of the lateral capsule, and extracapsular structures offer potential avenues to treat and to therefore improve kinematic outcome and functional results, following reconstruction. Addressing laterally based injuries may also improve the durability of intraarticular ACLR. Improving the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) graft replication of the normal ACL attachment points on the femur and the tibia, using either double bundle or anatomical single bundle techniques, improves kinematics, which may benefit outcome and functionality, following reconstruction.