1
|
El-Hanafy GM, El-Komy MHM, Nashaat MA, Rady NH, Abd El-Salam H, Said ER. The impact of methotrexate therapy with vitamin D supplementation on the cardiovascular risk factors among patients with psoriasis; a prospective randomized comparative study. J DERMATOL TREAT 2021; 33:1617-1622. [PMID: 33390056 DOI: 10.1080/09546634.2021.1871581] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/22/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Controlling psoriasis with various systemic treatments, including methotrexate, may significantly decrease associated cardiovascular risk problems. OBJECTIVE To assess the value of vitamin D supplementation on clinical response as well as changes in cardiovascular risk parameters in psoriasis patients treated with methotrexate. METHODS This prospective randomized comparative study included 30 patients with moderate to severe psoriasis divided randomly to receive either methotrexate alone (Mtx) or methotrexate plus intramuscular vitamin D (MtxD) for 3 months. Lipid profile, HsCRP, carotid intima-media thickness (CIMT) and blood pressure (BP) measurements were recorded before and after the therapy. RESULTS At end of study period, significant clinical improvement in both groups was observed. CIMT and systolic BP decreased in both groups but only statistically significant in Mtx group. HsCRP decreased in both groups but didn't reach statistical significance. We also observed, an increase in triglycerides and cholesterol levels in the Mtx group with the latter decreasing in the combined Mtx and vitamin D therapy group. CONCLUSION Treating psoriasis with methotrexate may decrease cardiovascular disease risk factors. Adding vitamin D supplementation to methotrexate may protect lipid homeostasis, specifically cholesterol and triglycerides.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Mona Ali Nashaat
- Department of Internal Medicine, Kasr Al-Ainy Vascular Lab, Faculty of Medicine Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt
| | - Normeen Hany Rady
- Clinical and Chemical Pathology Department, Faculty of Medicine Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt
| | - Heba Abd El-Salam
- Dermatology Department, Faculty of Medicine Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt
| | - Eman Raafat Said
- Dermatology Department, Kasr Al-Ainy Psoriasis Unit, Faculty of Medicine Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Nayeri H, Babaknejad N. Evaluation of novel biomarkers in nephrotoxicity. Biomark Med 2016; 10:1209-1213. [DOI: 10.2217/bmm-2016-0235] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Hashem Nayeri
- Department of Biochemistry, Falavarjan Branch, Islamic Azad University, Isfahan, Iran
| | - Nasim Babaknejad
- Department of Biochemistry, Falavarjan Branch, Islamic Azad University, Isfahan, Iran
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Hall JJ, Bolina M, Chatterley T, Jamali F. Interaction Between Low-Dose Methotrexate and Nonsteroidal Anti-inflammatory Drugs, Penicillins, and Proton Pump Inhibitors. Ann Pharmacother 2016; 51:163-178. [DOI: 10.1177/1060028016672035] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective: To review the potential drug interactions between low-dose methotrexate (LD-MTX) and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), penicillins, and proton-pump inhibitors (PPIs) given the disparity between interactions reported for high-dose and low-dose MTX to help guide clinicians. Data Sources: A literature search was performed in MEDLINE (1946 to September 2016), EMBASE (1974 to September 2016), and International Pharmaceutical Abstracts (1970 to January 2015) to identify reports describing potential drug interactions between LD-MTX and NSAIDS, penicillins, or PPIs. Reference lists of included articles were reviewed to find additional eligible articles. Study Selection and Data Extraction: All English-language observational, randomized, and pharmacokinetic (PK) studies assessing LD-MTX interactions in humans were analyzed to determine clinical relevance in making recommendations to clinicians. Clinical case reports were assigned a Drug Interaction Probability Scale score. Data Synthesis: A total of 32 articles were included (28 with NSAIDs, 3 with penicillins, and 2 with PPIs [1 including both PPI and NSAID]). Although there are some PK data to describe increased LD-MTX concentrations when NSAIDs are used concomitantly, the clinical relevance remains unclear. Based on the limited data on LD-MTX with penicillins and PPIs, no clinically meaningful interaction was identified. Conclusion: Given the available evidence, the clinical importance of the interaction between LD-MTX and NSAIDs, penicillins, and PPIs cannot be substantiated. Health care providers should assess the benefit and risk of LD-MTX regardless of concomitant drug use, including factors known to predispose patients to MTX toxicity, and continue to monitor clinical and laboratory parameters per guideline recommendations.
Collapse
|
4
|
Cheon JH, Kim SY, Son JY, Kang YR, An JH, Kwon JH, Song HS, Moon A, Lee BM, Kim HS. Pyruvate Kinase M2: A Novel Biomarker for the Early Detection of Acute Kidney Injury. Toxicol Res 2016; 32:47-56. [PMID: 26977258 PMCID: PMC4780241 DOI: 10.5487/tr.2016.32.1.047] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/14/2015] [Revised: 12/22/2015] [Accepted: 12/23/2015] [Indexed: 02/02/2023] Open
Abstract
The identification of biomarkers for the early detection of acute kidney injury (AKI) is clinically important. Acute kidney injury (AKI) in critically ill patients is closely associated with increased morbidity and mortality. Conventional biomarkers, such as serum creatinine (SCr) and blood urea nitrogen (BUN), are frequently used to diagnose AKI. However, these biomarkers increase only after significant structural damage has occurred. Recent efforts have focused on identification and validation of new noninvasive biomarkers for the early detection of AKI, prior to extensive structural damage. Furthermore, AKI biomarkers can provide valuable insight into the molecular mechanisms of this complex and heterogeneous disease. Our previous study suggested that pyruvate kinase M2 (PKM2), which is excreted in the urine, is a sensitive biomarker for nephrotoxicity. To appropriately and optimally utilize PKM2 as a biomarker for AKI requires its complete characterization. This review highlights the major studies that have addressed the diagnostic and prognostic predictive power of biomarkers for AKI and assesses the potential usage of PKM2 as an early biomarker for AKI. We summarize the current state of knowledge regarding the role of biomarkers and the molecular and cellular mechanisms of AKI. This review will elucidate the biological basis of specific biomarkers that will contribute to improving the early detection and diagnosis of AKI.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ji Hyun Cheon
- School of Pharmacy, Sungkyunkwan University, Suwon, Korea
| | - Sun Young Kim
- College of Pharmacy, Duksung Women's University, Seoul, Korea
| | - Ji Yeon Son
- School of Pharmacy, Sungkyunkwan University, Suwon, Korea
| | - Ye Rim Kang
- School of Pharmacy, Sungkyunkwan University, Suwon, Korea
| | - Ji Hye An
- School of Pharmacy, Sungkyunkwan University, Suwon, Korea
| | - Ji Hoon Kwon
- School of Pharmacy, Sungkyunkwan University, Suwon, Korea
| | - Ho Sub Song
- School of Pharmacy, Sungkyunkwan University, Suwon, Korea
| | - Aree Moon
- College of Pharmacy, Duksung Women's University, Seoul, Korea
| | - Byung Mu Lee
- School of Pharmacy, Sungkyunkwan University, Suwon, Korea
| | - Hyung Sik Kim
- School of Pharmacy, Sungkyunkwan University, Suwon, Korea
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Rodieux F, Wilbaux M, van den Anker JN, Pfister M. Effect of Kidney Function on Drug Kinetics and Dosing in Neonates, Infants, and Children. Clin Pharmacokinet 2015; 54:1183-204. [PMID: 26138291 PMCID: PMC4661214 DOI: 10.1007/s40262-015-0298-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 84] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
Neonates, infants, and children differ from adults in many aspects, not just in age, weight, and body composition. Growth, maturation and environmental factors affect drug kinetics, response and dosing in pediatric patients. Almost 80% of drugs have not been studied in children, and dosing of these drugs is derived from adult doses by adjusting for body weight/size. As developmental and maturational changes are complex processes, such simplified methods may result in subtherapeutic effects or adverse events. Kidney function is impaired during the first 2 years of life as a result of normal growth and development. Reduced kidney function during childhood has an impact not only on renal clearance but also on absorption, distribution, metabolism and nonrenal clearance of drugs. 'Omics'-based technologies, such as proteomics and metabolomics, can be leveraged to uncover novel markers for kidney function during normal development, acute kidney injury, and chronic diseases. Pharmacometric modeling and simulation can be applied to simplify the design of pediatric investigations, characterize the effects of kidney function on drug exposure and response, and fine-tune dosing in pediatric patients, especially in those with impaired kidney function. One case study of amikacin dosing in neonates with reduced kidney function is presented. Collaborative efforts between clinicians and scientists in academia, industry, and regulatory agencies are required to evaluate new renal biomarkers, collect and share prospective pharmacokinetic, genetic and clinical data, build integrated pharmacometric models for key drugs, optimize and standardize dosing strategies, develop bedside decision tools, and enhance labels of drugs utilized in neonates, infants, and children.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Frederique Rodieux
- Department of Pediatric Clinical Pharmacology, Pediatric Pharmacology and Pharmacometrics Research Center, University Children's Hospital (UKBB), University of Basel, Spitalstrasse 33, CH-4056, Basel, Switzerland.
| | - Melanie Wilbaux
- Department of Pediatric Clinical Pharmacology, Pediatric Pharmacology and Pharmacometrics Research Center, University Children's Hospital (UKBB), University of Basel, Spitalstrasse 33, CH-4056, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Johannes N van den Anker
- Department of Pediatric Clinical Pharmacology, Pediatric Pharmacology and Pharmacometrics Research Center, University Children's Hospital (UKBB), University of Basel, Spitalstrasse 33, CH-4056, Basel, Switzerland.
- Division of Pediatric Clinical Pharmacology, Children's National Health System, Washington, DC, USA.
- Intensive Care, Erasmus Medical Center-Sophia Children's Hospital, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
| | - Marc Pfister
- Department of Pediatric Clinical Pharmacology, Pediatric Pharmacology and Pharmacometrics Research Center, University Children's Hospital (UKBB), University of Basel, Spitalstrasse 33, CH-4056, Basel, Switzerland
- Quantitative Solutions LP, Menlo Park, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
The concomitant use of meloxicam and methotrexate does not clearly increase the risk of silent kidney and liver damages in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Rheumatol Int 2013; 34:833-40. [PMID: 24362788 DOI: 10.1007/s00296-013-2920-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/02/2013] [Accepted: 12/06/2013] [Indexed: 01/08/2023]
Abstract
We investigated whether the concomitant use of meloxicam and methotrexate might induce kidney and liver damages in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). We enrolled 101 RA patients with normal kidney and liver functions taking meloxicam and methotrexate concomitantly for more than 6 months. Blood and urine tests were performed. Estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) and liver stiffness measurement (LSM) were used for evaluating silent kidney and liver damages. Ultrasonography was also performed to exclude structural abnormalities. We adopted 90 mL/min/1.73 mm(2) and 5.3 kPa as the cutoff for an abnormal eGFR and LSM. The mean age (85 women) was 51.9 years. The mean eGFR was 97.0 mL/min/1.73 m(2) and the mean LSM was 4.7 kPa. The mean weekly dose of methotrexate was 13.4 mg. The mean weekly dose of methotrexate did not correlate with eGFR or LSM. Neither the cumulative dose of meloxicam or methotrexate nor the mean weekly dose of methotrexate showed the significant odds ratio or relative risk for abnormal eGFR and LSM values. The use of higher-dose MTX, above 15 mg per week, with meloxicam did not significantly increase the risk for abnormal LSM and eGFR (RR = 2.042, p = 0.185; RR = 0.473, p = 0.218). The concomitant use of meloxicam and MTX did not clearly increase the risk of silent kidney or liver damage in RA patients with normal laboratory results taking MTX and meloxicam concurrently for over 6 months.
Collapse
|
7
|
Spasovski D, Latifi A, Marina N, Calovski J, Kafedziska I, Božinovski G, Percinkova S, Slaninka-Micevska M, Balkanov T, Dejanova B, Alabakovska S, Krstevska-Balkanov S, Spasovski G, Spasovski D. Symmetric dimethyl arginine and N-acetyl-β-D-glucosaminidase lysozimuria of proximal renal tubules as a target for nephrotoxicity in patients with rheumatoid arthritis treated with disease modifying antirheumatic drugs. J Nephropathol 2013; 2:36-52. [PMID: 24475424 DOI: 10.5812/nephropathol.8989] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/01/2012] [Revised: 09/30/2012] [Accepted: 09/20/2012] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The aim of this study was to determine the effect of initial therapy with some disease modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) (Methotrexate and Ketoprofen) on glomerular and tubular integrity in patients with Rheumatoid arthritis (RA). OBJECTIVES OBJECTIVES To determine whether there is a change in clinical and laboratory indicators of renal function in course of the follow up of treatment and whether that change correlates with the dynamics of the quantity of enzymes excreted in urine and reactants of the acute phase. MATERIALS AND METHODS Using colorimetric method for determination of NAG, samples of 70 participants were examined (35 RA patients treated with Ketoprofen only, 35 RA patients treated with combined use of Methotrexate and Ketoprofen). The follow up was 5 time-intervals in the course of 24 weeks. RESULTS There was moderate correlation between NAG and microalbuminuria (r=0,34) in the group of patients treated with Ketoprofen only, while statistically significant correlation (r=0,21) was seen in group of patients with combined use of Methotrexate and Ketoprofen. NAG enzymuria in size, number of patients registered, and time of appearance were greater and appears earlier in the group with the combined use of Methotrexate and Ketoprofen compared with the mono-therapy with Ketoprofen. Mean urinary NAG induction was increasing with the concomitant use of Methotrexate and Ketoprofen. CONCLUSIONS Methotrexate is more potent NAG inductor than Ketoprofen and provokes greater tubular enzymuria than Ketoprofen.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Dejan Spasovski
- Department of Rheumatology, University Clinical Centre, Skopje, Republic of Macedonia
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Waring WS, Moonie A. Earlier recognition of nephrotoxicity using novel biomarkers of acute kidney injury. Clin Toxicol (Phila) 2011; 49:720-8. [PMID: 21970770 DOI: 10.3109/15563650.2011.615319] [Citation(s) in RCA: 119] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/20/2023]
Abstract
CONTEXT A broad range of drugs and chemicals are capable of evoking acute kidney injury, which is conventionally determined by rising serum creatinine concentrations. However there are important limitations to this approach, and there has been interest in alternative biomarkers that might provide a more sensitive and rapid means of detecting acute kidney injury. Most of the available clinical data have thus far been ascertained in patients requiring critical care or with acute sepsis. However, if a sensitive indicator of acute kidney injury were developed, then this could provide a significantly improved means of detecting the effects of acute drug or toxin exposure. OBJECTIVE To review the available data concerning potential biomarkers of acute kidney injury and to assess their relative strengths and weaknesses in comparison to existing methods based on serum creatinine concentrations. A large number of possible biomarkers have been proposed. Evidence for individual biomarkers is reviewed with a particular emphasis on those with potential application in clinical toxicology. Where available, comparative data are presented. METHODS There were 236 papers identified using Medline, Embase, and Google Scholar databases, of which 52 were considered directly relevant. CREATININE: Creatinine is subject to glomerular filtration and, to a lesser extent tubular secretion. Serum concentrations are an insensitive marker of acute kidney injury, and the speed of an increase from baseline depends on the magnitude of the acute injury and pre-existing kidney functional reserve. A wide range of inter-individual concentrations means that single time-point determinations are difficult to interpret, and acute kidney injury may not manifest as a detectable increase in serum creatinine concentrations until at least 24-48 h after the primary insult. KIDNEY ENZYMES: Enzymes are often localised to specific anatomical locations, and acute injury may cause a detectable increase in urinary activity due to up-regulated activity or leakage due to cell membrane disruption. Key examples include gamma-glutamyl transpeptidase (GGT), glutathione-S-transferase (GST), and N-acetyl-glucosaminidase (NAG), which are found predominantly in the proximal tubule and urinary enzyme activity increases after acute exposure to heavy metals and other nephrotoxins. NEUTROPHIL GELATINASE-ASSOCIATED LIPOCALIN: Neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin (NGAL) is expressed by renal tubular epithelium, and a rise in urinary concentrations may provide an indicator of acute renal injury caused by any one of a broad range of provoking factors that is detectable before a rise in serum creatinine concentrations. CYSTATIN C: Serum and urinary cystatin C concentrations are closely related to kidney function and, for example, in acute tubular necrosis allow better prediction of the need for renal replacement therapy than serum creatinine concentrations. KIDNEY INJURY MOLECULE 1: Kidney injury molecule 1 (KIM-1) is expressed in the proximal tubule in the setting of acute ischaemia. For example, urinary KIM-1 concentrations becomes detectable within 24 h of acute tubular necrosis. Urinary KIM-1 expression may be detected after exposure to a variety of nephrotoxic agents, even when serum creatinine concentrations do not increase, and this has been accepted by regulatory authorities as a sensitive biomarker of acute kidney injury during early drug development. CONCLUSIONS Novel biomarkers appear capable of offering a more sensitive means of detecting acute kidney injury than existing approaches. Certain of these allow discrimination between the various mechanisms and anatomical site of acute injury. Ultimately, clinical assessment might incorporate a panel of different biomarkers, each informing on the integrated aspects of glomerular, tubular and interstitial function. Presence of biomarkers may in some cases detect mild or transient renal dysfunction that is presently undetected, and the clinical relevance needs further exploration. Whilst many potentially useful biomarkers have been proposed, comparatively few clinical data exist to support their validity in routine practice. Further prospective clinical studies are required to examine the validity of biomarkers after acute drug or toxin exposure, and to establish whether they might offer improved clinical outcomes in the setting of clinical toxicology.
Collapse
|
9
|
Colebatch AN, Marks JL, Edwards CJ. Safety of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, including aspirin and paracetamol (acetaminophen) in people receiving methotrexate for inflammatory arthritis (rheumatoid arthritis, ankylosing spondylitis, psoriatic arthritis, other spondyloarthritis). Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2011:CD008872. [PMID: 22071858 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd008872.pub2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 34] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Methotrexate is routinely used in the treatment of inflammatory arthritis. There have been concerns regarding the safety of using concurrent non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), including aspirin, or paracetamol (acetaminophen), or both, in these people. OBJECTIVES To systematically appraise and summarise the scientific evidence on the safety of using NSAIDs, including aspirin, or paracetamol, or both, with methotrexate in inflammatory arthritis; and to identify gaps in the current evidence, assess the implications of those gaps and to make recommendations for future research to address these deficiencies. SEARCH METHODS We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (The Cochrane Library, second quarter 2010); MEDLINE (from 1950); EMBASE (from 1980); the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (CDSR) and the Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effects (DARE). We also handsearched the conference proceedings for the American College of Rheumatology (ACR) and European League against Rheumatism (EULAR) (2008 to 2009) and checked the websites of regulatory agencies for reported adverse events, labels and warnings. SELECTION CRITERIA Randomised controlled trials and non-randomised studies comparing the safety of methotrexate alone to methotrexate with concurrent NSAIDs, including aspirin, or paracetamol, or both, in people with inflammatory arthritis. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS Two authors independently assessed the search results, extracted data and assessed the risk of bias of the included studies. MAIN RESULTS Seventeen publications out of 8681 identified studies were included in the review, all of which included people with rheumatoid arthritis using various NSAIDs, including aspirin. There were no identified studies for other forms of inflammatory arthritis.For NSAIDs, 13 studies were included that used concurrent NSAIDs, of which nine studies examined unspecified NSAIDs. The mean number of participants was 150.4 (range 19 to 315), mean duration 2182.9 (range 183 to 5490) days, although the study duration was not always clearly defined, and the studies were mainly of low to moderate quality. Two of these studies reported no evidence for increased risk of methotrexate-induced pulmonary disease; one study assessed the effect of concurrent NSAIDs on renal function and found no adverse effect; one study identified no adverse effect on liver function; three studies demonstrated no increase in methotrexate withdrawal; and one study showed no increase in all adverse events, including major toxic reactions. However, transient thrombocytopenia was demonstrated in one study, specifically when NSAIDs were taken on the same week day as methotrexate. This study was a retrospective review that involved small numbers only and was of moderate quality; these finding have not been replicated since.Four studies looked at specific NSAIDs (etodolac, piroxicam, celecoxib and etoricoxib), with a mean number of participants of 25.8 (range 14 to 50) and mean study duration of 16.8 (range 14 to 23) days. These studies were mainly of moderate quality. The studies were primarily pharmacokinetic studies but also reported adverse events as secondary outcomes. There were no clinically significant adverse effects with concomitant piroxicam or etodolac; and only mild adverse events with celecoxib or etoricoxib, such as nausea and vomiting, and headaches.For aspirin, seven studies provided data on adverse events with the use of aspirin and methotrexate. These studies included a mean number of participants of 100 (range 11 to 232), had a mean duration of 1325 (range 8 to 2928) days and were mainly of low to moderate quality. Two of the studies reported no evidence for increased risk of methotrexate-induced pulmonary disease and two studies showed no increase in all adverse events including major toxic reactions; however, none of these studies specified the dose of aspirin that was used. One study demonstrated that concurrent aspirin adversely affected liver function at a mean dose of 6.84 tablets of aspirin per day, which is a possible daily dose of 2.1 g presuming that 300 mg aspirin tablets were given. A further study described a partially reversible decline in renal function with 2 g daily of aspirin. One study reported no increase in adverse events with 975 g aspirin daily, however the study duration was only one week.For paracetamol, no studies were identified for inclusion. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS In the management of rheumatoid arthritis, the concurrent use of NSAIDs with methotrexate appears to be safe provided appropriate monitoring is performed. The use of anti-inflammatory doses of aspirin should be avoided.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexandra N Colebatch
- Department of Rheumatology, Southampton General Hospital, Southampton; Consultant Rheumatologist Yeovil District Hospital,Somerset, UK.
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
10
|
Katchamart W, Bourré-Tessier J, Donka T, Drouin J, Rohekar G, Bykerk VP, Haraoui B, Leclerq S, Mosher DP, Pope JE, Shojania K, Thomson J, Thorne JC, Bombardier C. Canadian recommendations for use of methotrexate in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. J Rheumatol 2010; 37:1422-30. [PMID: 20516029 DOI: 10.3899/jrheum.090978] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To develop recommendations for the use of methotrexate (MTX) in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. METHODS Canadian rheumatologists who participated in the international 3e Initiative in Rheumatology (evidence, expertise, exchange) in 2007-2008 formulated 5 unique Canadian questions. A bibliographic team systematically reviewed the relevant literature on these 5 topics. An expert committee consisting of 26 rheumatologists from across Canada was convened, and a set of recommendations was proposed based on the results of systematic reviews combined with expert opinions using a nominal group consensus process. RESULTS The 5 questions addressed drug interactions, predictors of response, strategies to reduce non-serious side effects, variables to assess clinical response, and incorporating patient preference into decision-making. The systematic review retrieved 93 pertinent articles; this evidence was presented to the expert committee during the interactive workshop. After extensive discussion and voting, a total of 9 recommendations were formulated: 2 on drug interactions, 1 on predictors of response, 2 on strategies to reduce non-serious side effects, 3 on variables to assess clinical response, and 1 on incorporating patient preferences into decision-making. The level of evidence and the strength of recommendations are reported. Agreement among panelists ranged from 85% to 100%. CONCLUSION Nine recommendations pertaining to the use of MTX in daily practice were developed using an evidence-based approach followed by expert/physician consensus with high level of agreement.
Collapse
|
11
|
Bourré-Tessier J, Haraoui B. Methotrexate drug interactions in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis: a systematic review. J Rheumatol 2010; 37:1416-21. [PMID: 20436072 DOI: 10.3899/jrheum.090153] [Citation(s) in RCA: 73] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) often have comorbidities that require multiple medications. Several of these medications may alter the efficacy or increase the toxicity of methotrexate (MTX). The purpose of our study was to determine which drugs used in combination with MTX (excluding disease modifying antirheumatic drugs, folic and folinic acid, corticosteroids, and biologic agents) enhance side effects or toxicity of MTX or lower its efficacy. METHODS A systematic literature search was performed with Medline, Embase, Cochrane Register and Database, and abstracts from the 2006/2007 annual congresses of the American College of Rheumatology and the European League Against Rheumatism. A manual search of the citation lists of retrieved publications was performed. RESULTS Of the 1172 articles identified, 67 were included: 21 pharmacokinetics studies, 5 observational studies, and 78 case reports. Most medications do not significantly affect the pharmacokinetics profile of MTX. Among the clinical studies, cytopenia and elevation of liver enzymes were the main reported toxicities. The use of trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (TMP-SMX) was mentioned as a risk factor for developing cytopenia in one observational study and in 17 case reports. Thirty case reports of cytopenia were attributed to the use of concomitant nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs, including acetylsalicylic acid. Two studies described mild abnormalities of liver enzymes with the use of isoniazid, and one study with the use of high-dose ASA. CONCLUSION Based on the published literature, MTX has limited drug interactions, with the exception of TMP-SMX and high-dose ASA, which can exacerbate toxicity of MTX. The clinical significance of these interactions has not been substantiated by extensive clinical observations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Josiane Bourré-Tessier
- Department of Medicine, Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal, Université de Montréal,Montréal, Québec, Canada.
| | | |
Collapse
|
12
|
The Diagnostic Value of N-Acetyl-β-D-Glucosaminidase and Microalbumin Concentrations in Rheumatoid Arthritis. J Med Biochem 2007. [DOI: 10.2478/v10011-007-0038-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
The Diagnostic Value of N-Acetyl-β-D-Glucosaminidase and Microalbumin Concentrations in Rheumatoid ArthritisThe purpose of this research was to compare the diagnostic values of laboratory variables, to present quantitative evaluations of the diagnostic sifted test with reference to sensitivity and specificity, the predictive value of the positive and negative test and precision of the test for N-acetyl-β-D-glucosa-minidase (NAG), microalbumin, rheumatoid factor (RF), Creactive protein (CRP), DAS 28 index, in early diagnosis of untreated rheumatoid arthritis (RA), and to define the effect of untreated rheumatoid arthritis on glomerular and tubular function. Using a colorimetric assay for the determination of Nacetyl-β-D-glucosaminidase and an immunoturbidimetric assay for the determination of urinary albumin, the samples of serum and urine have been examined in 70 participants (35 RA who were not treated, 35 healthy controls). RF was defined with the test for agglutination (Latex RF test) in the same participants. Out of 35 examined patients with RA, in 13 we found the presence of NAG enzymuria (sensitivity of the test 37.14%), while microalbuminuria appeared in 4 patients (sensitivity of the test 11.42%). RF appeared in 17 patients (sensitivity of the test 48.57%). Four patients were NAG and RF positive, while 3 patients were microalbuminuria and RF positive. Among 18 RF negative patients, 9 patients were NAG positive, and 1 patient presented with microalbuminuria. Among 17 RF positive RA, the presence of NAG was found in 4 patients, and the presence of microalbuminuria in 3 patients. Among 18 RF negative RA, NAG enzymuria appeared in 9 patients. Microalbuminuria was present in 1 patient. In the healthy control group, 8 patients were NAG positive, 2 patients were positive for microalbuminuria. RF appeared in 2 patients. NAG has higher sensitivity than microalbuminuria in the detection of asymptomatic renal lesions in untreated RA.
Collapse
|
13
|
Morita Y, Fukazawa T, Hirashima M, Kaga K, Kusaoi M, Morita T, Touyama S, Morita K, Takasaki Y, Hashimoto H. The effect of methotrexate (MTX) on expression of signalling lymphocytic activation molecule (SLAM) in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and its role in the regulation of cytokine production. Scand J Rheumatol 2006; 35:268-72. [PMID: 16882589 DOI: 10.1080/03009740600588186] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/24/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To investigate the effect of methotrexate (MTX) on cytokine production by activated CD4+ T-cells in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). METHODS The effect of MTX on intracellular expression of interferon-gamma (IFN-gamma) and interleukin-4 (IL-4), and cell surface expression of signalling lymphocytic activation molecule (SLAM) from freshly isolated peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs), and after in vitro culture with or without MTX, was analysed with flow cytometry in 18 patients with RA and 20 healthy controls. RESULTS Intracellular expression of IFN-gamma and IL-4 on freshly isolated CD4+ T-cells was significantly higher in patients with RA than in the controls (p<0.05). Intracellular expression of both IFN-gamma and IL-4 after culture with MTX was significantly lower than those after culture without MTX in patients with RA. Although no significant difference was observed in SLAM expression on freshly isolated CD4+ T-cells between patients with RA and the controls, MTX significantly decreased SLAM expression on both activated IFN-gamma+ and IL-4+CD4+ T-cells in patients with RA. CONCLUSION In vitro modulation of the cytokine network by MTX, IFN-gamma, and IL-4 is one of the major targets for MTX, and production of IFN-gamma and IL-4 by PBMCs may be suppressed by SLAM on activated CD4+ T-cell in patients with RA.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Y Morita
- Department of Internal Medicine and Rheumatology, Juntendo University School of Medicine, 2-1-1 Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 113-8421, Japan.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|