Degenerative and traumatic changes in the lower cervical spine facet joints

Magnetic Resonance Imaging Investigation of Cervical-Spine Meniscoid Composition: A Validation Study

OBJECTIVE

The composition of cervical-spine meniscoids may have clinical significance in neck-pain conditions, but the accuracy of assessment of meniscoid composition in vivo using magnetic resonance imaging has not been established. The aim of this study was to compare cervical-spine meniscoid composition by magnetic resonance imaging with histologic composition.

METHODS

Four embalmed cadaveric cervical spines (mean [standard deviation] age, 79.5 [3.7] years; 1 female, 3 male) underwent magnetic resonance imaging, allowing radiologic classification of lateral atlantoaxial- and zygapophyseal-joint (C2-3 to C6-7) meniscoids as either mostly fatty, mixed tissue, or mostly connective tissue. Subsequently, each joint was dissected and disarticulated to allow excision of meniscoids for histologic processing. Each meniscoid was sectioned sagittally, stained with hematoxylin and eosin, examined using light microscopy, and classified as adipose, fibroadipose, or fibrous in composition. Data were analyzed using the kappa statistic with linear weighting.

RESULTS

From dissection, 62 meniscoids were identified, excised, and processed; 46 of these 62 were visualized with magnetic resonance imaging. For single-rater identifying structures, agreement between assessment of meniscoid composition by magnetic resonance imaging and by microscopy was fair (κ = 0.24; 95% confidence interval, 0.02-0.46; P = .02).

CONCLUSION

Findings suggest that the accuracy of this method of magnetic resonance imaging assessment of cervical-spine meniscoid composition may be limited. This should be considered when planning or interpreting research investigating meniscoid composition using magnetic resonance imaging.

Histological Osteoarthritic Changes in the Human Cervical Spine Facet Joints Related to Age and Sex

STUDY DESIGN

Cross-sectional autopsy study.

OBJECTIVE

Quantify histological changes in the lower cervical spine facet joints with regard to age and sex using systematic random sampling of entire joints.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Neck pain is a common debilitating musculoskeletal condition and one of the highest ranked causes of years lived with disability. The cause of neck pain is multifactorial and osteoarthritis is one potential cause. The cervical spine facet joints have been implicated in the etiology of chronic neck pain. Hence, a detailed description of their anatomy and age- and sex-related changes is needed.

METHODS

The lower four cervical spine segments (C4-C7 included) were obtained from 72 subjects during autopsy; 29 women (median age 53 years [22-77]) and 43 men (median age 38 years [20-78]). A total of 1132 articular facets were embedded in toto in hard plastic and sliced into 3-mm thick sections from where 10 μm thick histological sections were produced. Morphological variables were evaluated microscopically and histomorphometric variables were retrieved using random sampling methods. Data were analyzed with a linear regression model.

RESULTS

Significant associations were found between increasing age and in particular splitting, fissures, osteophytes, thickness of the calcified cartilage, and subchondral bone plate. The thickness of the calcified cartilage and subchondral bone plate increased with increasing age, whereas the hyaline cartilage thickness decreased. Males had more extensive degenerative changes in the cartilage.

CONCLUSION

Using semiquantitative histological methods, degenerative findings were observed at all spinal levels involving the articular cartilage and the osseous structures of the cervical spine facet joints similar to those observed in larger weight-bearing joints. In particular, the thickening of the calcified cartilage and the subchondral bone identified the osteocartilaginous junction as an important area in osteoarthritis. These findings may be relevant for the pathogenesis of osteoarthritis.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

3.

Facet Joints of the Spine: Structure–Function Relationships, Problems and Treatments, and the Potential for Regeneration

The zygapophysial joint, a diarthrodial joint commonly referred to as the facet joint, plays a pivotal role in back pain, a condition that has been a leading cause of global disability since 1990. Along with the intervertebral disc, the facet joint supports spinal motion and aids in spinal stability. Highly susceptible to early development of osteoarthritis, the facet is responsible for a significant amount of pain in the low-back, mid-back, and neck regions. Current noninvasive treatments cannot offer long-term pain relief, while invasive treatments can relieve pain but fail to preserve joint functionality. This review presents an overview of the facet in terms of its anatomy, functional properties, problems, and current management strategies. Furthermore, this review introduces the potential for regeneration of the facet and particular engineering strategies that could be employed as a long-term treatment.

The biomechanical impact of facet tropism on the intervertebral disc and facet joints in the cervical spine

BACKGROUND CONTEXT

Facet tropism is defined as the angular difference between the left and the right facet orientation. Facet tropism was suggested to be associated with the disc degeneration and facet degeneration in the lumbar spine. However, little is known about the relationship between facet tropism and pathologic changes in the cervical spine and the mechanism behind.

PURPOSE

This study was conducted to investigate the biomechanical impact of facet tropism on the intervertebral disc and facet joints.

STUDY DESIGN

A finite element analysis study.

METHODS

The computed tomography (CT) scans of a 28-year-old male volunteer was used to construct the finite element model. First, a symmetrical cervical model from C2 to C7 was constructed. The facet orientations at each level were simulated using the data from our previously published study. Second, the facet orientations at the C5-C6 level were altered to simulate facet tropism with respect to the sagittal plane. The angular difference of the moderate facet tropism model was set to be 7 degrees, whereas the severe facet tropism model was set to be 14 degrees. The inferior of the C7 vertebra was fixed. A 75 N follower loading was applied to simulate the weight of the head. A 1.0 N⋅m moments was applied on the odontoid process of the C2 to simulate flexion, extension, lateral bending, and axial rotation.

RESULTS

The intradiscal pressure (IDP) at the C5-C6 level of the severe facet tropism model increased by 49.02%, 57.14%, 39.06%, and 30.67%, under flexion, extension, lateral bending, and axial rotation moments, in comparison with the symmetrical model. The contact force of the severe facet tropism model increased by 35.64%, 31.74%, 79.26%, and 59.47% from the symmetrical model under flexion, extension, lateral bending, and axial rotation, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Facet tropism with respect to the sagittal plane at the C5-C6 level increased the IDP and facet contact force under flexion, extension, lateral bending, and axial rotation. The results suggested that facet tropism might be the anatomic risk factor of the development of cervical disc degeneration or facet degeneration. Future clinical studies are in need to verify the biomechanical impact of facet tropism on the development of degenerative changes in the cervical spine.

Relationship between facet tropism and facet joint degeneration in the sub-axial cervical spine

Background

Facet tropism is the angular asymmetry between the left and right facet joint orientation. Although debatable, facet tropism was suggested to be associated with disc degeneration, facet degeneration and degenerative spondylolisthesis in the lumbar spine. The purpose of this study was to explore the relationship between facet tropism and facet degeneration in the sub-axial cervical spine.

Methods

A total of 200 patients with cervical spondylosis were retrospectively analyzed. Facet degeneration was categorized into 4 grade: grade I, normal; grade II, degenerative changes including joint space narrowing, cyst formation, small osteophytes (<3 mm) without joint hypertrophy; grade III, joint hypertrophy secondary to large osteophytes (>3 mm) without fusion of the joint; grade IV, bony fusion of the facet joints. Facet orientations and facet tropisms with respect to the transverse, sagittal and coronal plane were calculated from the reconstructed cervical spine, which was based on the axial CT scan images. The paired facet joints were then categorized into three types: symmetric, moderated tropism and severe tropism. Univariate and multivariate analysis were performed to evaluate the relationship between any demographic and anatomical factor and facet degeneration.

Results

The mean age of enrolled patients was 46.23 years old (ranging from 30 to 64 years old). There were 114 males and 86 females. The degrees of facet degeneration varied according to cervical levels and ages. Degenerated facet joints were most common at C2-C3 level and more common in patients above 50 years old. The facet orientations were also different from level to level. By univariate analysis, genders, ages, cervical levels, facet orientations and facet tropisms were all significantly different between the normal facets and degenerated facets. However, results from multivariate logistic regression suggested only age and facet tropism with respect to the sagittal plane were related to facet degeneration.

Conclusion

Facet degeneration were more common at C2-C3 level. Older age and facet tropism with respect to the sagittal plane were associated with the facet degeneration.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12891-017-1448-x) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Facet joint degeneration of the cervical spine: a computed tomographic analysis of 320 patients

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective study.

OBJECTIVE

To determine the frequency of facet arthrosis according to age, sex, and cervical level. In addition, we propose and evaluate a new grading system for cervical facet degeneration.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Cervical facets can play an important role in symptomatology. However, there is only one computed tomographic grading system for cervical facet joints.

METHODS

From January 2003 to January 2012, 1944 patients underwent computed tomography of the cervical spine in our institution. We randomly selected 40 males and 40 females from each of the following age groups: 40 to 49, 50 to 59, 60 to 69, and 70 to 79, such that we had a total of 320 patients. We then graded the degree of arthrosis of the facet joints from C2 to C7 on the axial, sagittal, or coronal images according to 4 grades. These categories were: grade I, normal; grade II, degenerative changes including joint space narrowing, cyst formation, small osteophytes without joint hypertrophy seen; grade III, facet joint hypertrophy from large osteophytes without fusion; and grade IV, bony fusion of the facet joint. The intra- and interobserver reliabilities for the grading system were calculated using reliability statistics by intraclass correlation.

RESULTS

Facet arthrosis is common with older patients and at C2-C3, C3-C4, and C4-C5. Facet arthrosis was more common on the left side and in males. Greater than grade III facet joint arthrosis was common in patients older than 60 and at C2-C3, C3-C4, and C4-C5. The reliability statistics by intraclass correlation for the grading system was 0.878 for the intraobserver reliability and 0.869 for the interobserver reliability.

CONCLUSION

It seems that upper cervical levels are more likely to degenerate and to have more advanced degrees of degeneration than the lower cervical levels. As expected, age correlates with worsening degeneration. The proposed computed tomographic grading system for cervical facet arthrosis seemed to be reliable.

Development of a clinical prediction rule to identify patients with neck pain likely to benefit from thrust joint manipulation to the cervical spine

STUDY DESIGN

Prospective cohort/predictive validity study.

OBJECTIVE

To determine the predictive validity of selected clinical examination items and to develop a clinical prediction rule to determine which patients with neck pain may benefit from cervical thrust joint manipulation (TJM) and exercise.

BACKGROUND

TJM to the cervical spine has been shown to be effective in patients presenting with a primary report of neck pain. It would be useful for clinicians to have a decision-making tool, such as a clinical prediction rule, that could accurately identify which subgroup of patients would respond positively to cervical TJM.

METHODS

Consecutive patients who presented to physical therapy with a primary complaint of neck pain completed a series of self-report measures, then received a detailed standardized history and physical examination. After the clinical examination, all patients received a standardized treatment regimen consisting of cervical TJM and range-of-motion exercise. Depending on response to treatment, patients were treated for 1 or 2 sessions over approximately 1 week. At the end of their participation in the study, patients were classified as having experienced a successful outcome based on a score of +5 ("quite a bit better") or higher on the global rating of change scale. Sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative likelihood ratios were calculated for all potential predictor variables. Univariate techniques and stepwise logistic regression were used to determine the most parsimonious set of variables for prediction of treatment success. Variables retained in the regression model were used to develop a multivariate clinical prediction rule.

RESULTS

Eighty-two patients were included in data analysis, of whom 32 (39%) achieved a successful outcome. A clinical prediction rule with 4 attributes (symptom duration less than 38 days, positive expectation that manipulation will help, side-to-side difference in cervical rotation range of motion of 10° or greater, and pain with posteroanterior spring testing of the middle cervical spine) was identified. If 3 or more of the 4 attributes (positive likelihood ratio of 13.5) were present, the probability of experiencing a successful outcome improved from 39% to 90%.

CONCLUSION

The clinical prediction rule may improve decision making by providing the ability to a priori identify patients with neck pain who are likely to benefit from cervical TJM and range-of-motion exercise. However, this is only the first step in the process of developing and testing a clinical prediction rule, as future studies are necessary to validate the results and should include long-term follow-up and a comparison group.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Prognosis, level 2b.

Morphometry of the synovial folds of the lateral atlanto-axial joints: the anatomical basis for understanding their potential role in neck pain

PURPOSE

Intra-articular synovial folds of the cervical spine are considered to be a potential source of neck pain and disability. The purpose of the present study was to devise and validate a method to determine the normal morphometry of the synovial folds as a basis for understanding their functional and clinical significance.

METHODS

Nine cadaver cervical spines were sectioned in the sagittal plane. The presence of the synovial folds at the lateral atlanto-axial joints was determined and their morphology described. Depth of projection, cross-sectional area and volume of the ventral and dorsal synovial folds of the right and left lateral atlanto-axial joints were measured from sagittal sections and compared. The relationship between synovial fold dimensions and subject age and cartilage degeneration were determined. Repeat measurements were made for the calculation of method reliability, and the water displacement method was used to determine method validity.

RESULTS

There was a trend for ventral synovial folds to be larger than dorsal synovial folds. There was no correlation between synovial fold dimensions and age and extent of cartilage degeneration. Measurement reliability ranged from intraclass correlation coefficient 0.95-1.00 (intra-observer), 0.95-1.00 (test-retest) and 0.61-1.00 (inter-observer). Limits of agreement for the sectional and water displacement methods for the measurement of synovial fold volume were -1.04 ± 3.35 mm(3).

CONCLUSIONS

A reliable method for quantifying synovial fold dimensions was devised. The results of this study provide a basis for the determination and diagnosis of pathologies affecting the synovial folds.

Synovial folds - a pain in the neck?

The synovial folds of the cervical spine are regarded as a potential source of neck pain and headache, especially following whiplash injury. Damage to the synovial folds following motor vehicle trauma has been well documented in post-mortem studies. However, methods of identifying injury to the synovial folds in the survivors of motor vehicle trauma have proven elusive to date. Recently, it has been made possible to image the synovial folds in vivo using magnetic resonance imaging. This now makes it feasible to investigate the potential involvement of synovial folds in the generation of neck pain and headache and its relief using spinal manipulation. This paper reviews critically the morphology of the synovial folds of the cervical spine that underpins the hypotheses proposed to explain their functional and clinical significance and a new system of naming and classifying the synovial folds is presented. Although there is some evidence to support the contribution of the synovial folds to neck pain, several theories have little or no support and require investigation and further evaluation. These findings have implications for understanding the anatomical basis of neck pain and headache and the rationale for the use of spinal manipulation in their management.