Four distinct clinical phenotypes of vasculitis affecting medium-sized arteries

Recent topics related to etiology and clinical manifestations of cutaneous arteritis

Cutaneous polyarteritis nodosa (cPAN) was first reported by Lindberg in 1931. It has been recognized as a skin-limited vasculitis whose cutaneous histopathological features are indistinguishable from those of PAN. Cutaneous arteritis (CA) was defined as a form of single-organ vasculitis in the revised Chapel Hill Classification and was recognized as the same disease as cPAN. It became known that deficiency of adenosine deaminase 2 (DADA2) cases were included in cases that had been diagnosed with CA. Because of their similarity and differences in the treatment methods, DADA2 should be considered in CA cases, especially if they are diagnosed or developed in early childhood. Cutaneous arteritis may be classified as an immune complex-mediated vasculitis. It was reported that the pathogenesis of anti-lysosomal-associated membrane protein-2 (LAMP-2) antibodies and anti-phosphatidylserine-prothrombin complex (PS/PT) antibodies as good parameters in CA. The main skin manifestations include livedo racemosa, subcutaneous nodules, and ulcers. Although CA is recognized to have a benign clinical course, it has become known that it is easy to relapse. The existence of skin ulcers upon diagnosis or sensory neuropathies was suggested to be a predictor of poor prognosis. Cutaneous arteritis with them may need to be treated with more intensive therapies.

Off-Label Uses of Rituximab in Dermatology

Purpose of Review

Rituximab has transformed the treatment of B-cell malignancies and rheumatoid arthritis in the past 2 decades. More recently, this anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody has seen increasing usage in the field of dermatology. This review highlights the evidence supporting its use in several important dermatologic conditions.

Recent Findings

Key recent findings include the 2018 FDA approval of rituximab for the treatment of moderate-to-severe pemphigus.

Summary

Data from randomized controlled trials have demonstrated the efficacy of rituximab in pemphigus, ANCA-associated vasculitis, and cryoglobulinemic vasculitis. More limited data suggests its use in recalcitrant cases of diseases such as pemphigoid, epidermolysis bullosa acquisita, and dermatomyositis. There is scarce evidence and mixed results for rituximab when studied in cutaneous polyarteritis nodosa and cutaneous lupus erythematosus.

Therapeutic options for cutaneous polyarteritis nodosa: a systematic review

OBJECTIVE

Cutaneous polyarteritis nodosa (CPAN) is a necrotizing vasculitis of the middle-size vessels, confined to the skin. We conducted a systematic review in order to identify studies evaluating the different treatment modalities used in CPAN.

METHODS

This systematic review was conducted according to PRISMA guidelines, registered in PROSPERO: CRD42020222195. PubMed/Medline databases were searched from inception to December of 2020 using the terms: (Polyarteritis nodosa[Title/Abstract]) AND ((therapy[Title/Abstract]) OR (management[Title/Abstract]) OR (treatment[Title/Abstract]))' and 'Cutaneous arteritis [Title/Abstract]'. Articles evaluating pertaining to the management of CPAN in adults were eligible for inclusion.

RESULTS

A total of seven eligible case series with 325 unique patients were included. No study included a control population. In general, systemic corticosteroids were widely used as induction treatment. Immunosuppressive agents combined with corticosteroids were AZA, hydroxychloroquine, sulfasalazine, sulphapyridine, CYC, MTX, mycophenolate, tacrolimus, rituxima and thalidomide. Other agents utilized in the studies were dapsone, colchicine, non-steroid anti-inflammatory drugs, salicylates, warfarin and clopidogrel. In some studies, the presence of ulcerations was associated with an increased risk of relapse.

CONCLUSION

The evidence available regarding the management of patients with CPAN is limited at best. Further studies are needed in order to evaluate the effect of treatment on disease remission, relapses and mortality.

Clinical Characteristics and Outcomes of Mexican Patients With Polyarteritis Nodosa: A Single-Center Study Over 40 Years

METHODS

We conducted a medical records review study (1975-2018) that included patients with childhood- and adult-onset PAN. Demographics, organ involvement, phenotype, treatment, and outcomes were assessed and compared against previously published cohorts.

RESULTS

Thirty-one patients were included, 20 (64.5%) female, with a median age at diagnosis of 28 years (interquartile range [IQR], 16-42). Seven (23%) were classified as cutaneous; 23 (74%), systemic; and 1 (3%), progressive systemic phenotype. Eleven patients (35%) had childhood-onset PAN. Most common manifestations were musculoskeletal (71%), cutaneous (68%), constitutional (61%), peripheral neuropathy (39%), and gastrointestinal (29%). The median Birmingham Vasculitis Activity Score and Five-Factor Score at diagnosis were 9 (IQR, 4-13) and 1 (IQR, 0-1), respectively. Most patients were treated with glucocorticoids (94%). Twenty-four (80%) achieved complete and 6 (20%) partial remission at a median follow-up time of 30 months (8-192 months). The median Vasculitis Damage Index at last follow-up was 1 (IQR, 0-1). Nineteen (66%) experienced relapses. Patients with childhood-onset PAN more frequently had central nervous system and gastrointestinal involvement (36% vs 5%, p = 0.04 and 64% vs 10%, p = 0.003, respectively), microaneurysms (100% vs 38%, p = 0.02), and lower levels of C-reactive protein (0.3 vs 15.4 mg/dL, p = 0.03), compared with adult-onset PAN patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Our cohort of PAN patients showed predominantly a systemic phenotype. Outcomes were generally good, with most patients achieving complete remission. Childhood-onset differed from adult-onset PAN in terms of clinical and serological characteristics, whereas clinical manifestations and outcomes may be different than the ones reported in other cohorts.

Efficacy and safety of treatments in cutaneous polyarteritis nodosa: A French observational retrospective study

BACKGROUND

Cutaneous polyarteritis nodosa is a form of medium-sized vessel vasculitis. Despite a disabling and prolonged course, data on treatment efficacy and safety remain scarce.

OBJECTIVES

We aimed to describe treatment efficacy and safety in patients with cutaneous polyarteritis nodosa.

METHODS

This multicenter retrospective, observational study, recorded clinical and biologic data together with treatments received. The primary outcome was the rate of complete response at month 3. Secondary outcomes assessed drug survival and safety.

RESULTS

We included 68 patients who received a median of 2 therapeutic lines (interquartile range, 1-3). Overall, complete response was achieved in 13 of 42 (31%) patients with colchicine, 4 of 17 (23%) with dapsone, 11 of 25 (44%) with glucocorticoids (GCs) alone, 1 of 9 (11%) with nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, 11 of 13 (84%) with GCs+azathioprine, and 7 of 15 (47%) with GCs+methotrexate. GCs+azathioprine had the best drug survival (median duration, 29.5 months; interquartile range, 19.5-36.0). Response at month 3 was decreased with peripheral neurologic involvement (odds ratio, 0.19; 95% confidence interval, 0.03-0.81; P = .04). Overall, the rate of treatment-related adverse events was 18%, which led to the discontinuation of treatment in 7% of patients.

LIMITATION

Retrospective study.

CONCLUSION

Colchicine seems to confer good benefit-risk balance in cutaneous polyarteritis nodosa without peripheral sensory neuropathy. GCs+azathioprine seem the best treatment in the event of relapse.