Removable rigid dressings versus soft dressings: a randomized, controlled study with dysvascular, trans-tibial amputees

The effect of medium-tension bandage and stump stocking on residual limb maturation in earthquake survivors

BACKGROUND

Residual limb maturation is a crucial stage in postamputation care.

OBJECTIVE

It was aimed to examine the effect of medium tension bandages and stump stockings on postamputation stump maturation in patients who underwent lower extremity amputations.

STUDY DESIGN

In this prospective observational study, patients who were earthquake survivors and had undergone emergency amputation of their lower extremities were included.

METHODS

Medium-tension elastic bandage or personalized stump stockings were used for stump maturation. Residual limb volume was measured once a week for 3 weeks.

RESULTS

The study included 23 patients and 29 amputated limbs. Because of the larger stump volume of transfemoral amputations and the higher number of these patients in the stocking group ( p < 0.001), the stump volume differed across groups before and during the follow-up ( p < 0.001). There was no difference in mean volumetric measurement between the bandage and stocking groups over time ( p = 0.272). Although the group interaction was significant (p < 0.001), the group × time interaction was not ( p = 0.306).

CONCLUSION

Medium-tension bandages and stump stockings had a similar effect on postamputation stump maturation in patients with lower extremity amputations. So, depending on the patient's and physician's preferences, both procedures can be used for stump maturation.

Amputation and prosthetics of the lower extremity: The 2020 Dutch evidence-based multidisciplinary guideline

BACKGROUND

Lower-limb amputations are rare but debilitating events in the lives of affected persons. Treatment of persons with amputation inherently involves many different health care professions at different stages leading to and after an amputation. There are prevailing clinical questions within the work field related to different facets of care including peri/postoperative aspects, prosthetic components, rehabilitation treatment, and health care processes.

OBJECTIVES

To provide an up-to-date multidisciplinary evidence-based guideline for health care professionals involved in the treatment of persons with lower-limb amputation in the Netherlands.

METHODS

Identification of key questions in a focus group, systematic review of the evidence (up to March 2019, using Embase and MEDLINE databases), and weighing considerations, culminating in clinical recommendations.

RESULTS

Twelve key questions were formulated. Recommendations of two key questions were upheld in line with the previous 2012 guideline. Ten systematic literature searches were performed, leading to the inclusion of 59 studies.

CONCLUSION

A summary of evidence-based conclusions, considerations, and recommendations of the 2020 guideline is presented.

Determinants of healing and readiness for prosthetic fitting after transtibial amputation: Integrative literature review

BACKGROUND

Healing after an amputation is a critical step in the recovery process. Delayed wound healing can lead to deconditioning and flexion contractures which reduce a patient's ability to use a prosthesis, ambulate independently, and return to community participation. The purpose of this integrative literature review was to determine the evidence-based physiological factors, comorbidities, postoperative management, and outcome measures associated with healing after transtibial amputation and address how these factors clinically guide readiness for prosthetic intervention.

METHODS

Authors completed Google Scholar searches to identify the most effective search terms to locate salient publications. Authors also completed literature searches of Ovid MEDLINE and Epub Ahead of Print, In-Process, and Other Nonindexed Citations and Daily <1946 to August 6, 2020>; Embase Classic + Embase <1947 to August 6, 2020>; and CINAHL Complete <1946 to August 6, 2020> databases using the following search terms: "transtibial," "trans-tibial," "below knee," "BKA," "amputation," amputation stump," "amputee," "wound healing," and "heal/s/ed/ing." The authors decided to include all levels of evidence to capture the maximum number of articles related to the determinants of healing and readiness for prosthetic fitting after transtibial amputation.

RESULTS

The searches identified 2067 potential articles for review, and after removing articles not relevant to the topic, authors completed full-text assessment on 20 articles. These included review and synthesis on three randomized controlled trials and 12 cohort studies.

CONCLUSION

Preamputation assessment is most critical in patients who present with a longer list of comorbidities and suboptimal physiologic factors known to predict wound complications. Clinical judgment is most subjective when determining the degree of healing over time. Readiness for prosthetic treatment need not wait for complete healing of the residuum. Future research is needed to assess transcutaneous oxygen profusion along with other noninvasive measures of blood flow and perfusion as a more objective way to track progression of healing over time. This objective methodology would quantify healing, reduce subjectivity, and promote research to compare different enhanced recovery after surgery protocols for their impact on healing after amputation.

Comparison of Removable Rigid Dressing and Elastic Bandage for Residual Limb Maturation in Transtibial Amputees: A Randomized Controlled Trial

OBJECTIVE

To determine the effect of a removable rigid dressing (RRD) on the time to residual limb maturation compared with elastic bandage (EB) in transtibial amputees.

DESIGN

Experimental single-blinded (assessor-blinded) randomized controlled trial.

SETTING

Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital.

PARTICIPANTS

Transtibial amputees (N=25) with immature residual limb.

INTERVENTION

Participants were allocated to use RRD or EB to achieve residual limb maturation, and all participants in both groups were trained with the same preprosthetic program.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The time to residual limb maturation, patient satisfaction, and complications were compared between the 2 groups.

RESULTS

Median time to residual limb maturation was significantly lower in the RRD group (median, 28d [interquartile range, 17-51d]) than in the EB group (median, 54d [interquartile range, 30-77d]; P=.020). After accounting for time since amputation, maturation time remained significantly lower in the RRD group (adjusted hazard ratio, 3.32; 95% CI, 1.08-10.20; P=.036). There was no significant difference in complications or patient satisfaction.

CONCLUSION

In postoperative management of transtibial amputation, the use of RRD had a significantly shorter period to residual limb maturation when compared with the EB group.

Rigid dressings versus soft dressings for transtibial amputations

BACKGROUND

Dressings are part of the routine postoperative management of people after transtibial amputation. Two types of dressings are commonly used; soft dressings (e.g. elastic bandages, crepe bandages) and rigid dressings (e.g. non-removable rigid dressings, removable rigid dressings, immediate postoperative protheses). Soft dressings are the conventional dressing choice as they are cheap and easy to apply, while rigid dressings are costly, more time consuming to apply and require skilled personnel to apply the dressings. However, rigid dressings have been suggested to result in faster wound healing due to the hard exterior providing a greater degree of compression to the stump.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the benefits and harms of rigid dressings versus soft dressings for treating transtibial amputations.

SEARCH METHODS

In December 2018 we searched the Cochrane Wounds Specialised Register, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), Ovid MEDLINE, Ovid Embase, EBSCO CINAHL Plus, Ovid AMED and PEDro to identify relevant trials. To identify further published, unpublished and ongoing studies, we also searched clinical trial registries, the grey literature, the reference lists of relevant studies and reviews identified in prior searches. We used the Cited Reference Search facility on ThomsonReuters Web of Science and contacted relevant individuals and organisations. There were no restrictions with respect to language, date of publication or study setting.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and quasi-RCTs that enrolled people with transtibial amputations. There were no restrictions on the age of participants and reasons for amputation. Trials that compared the effectiveness of rigid dressings with soft dressings were the main focus of this review.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors independently screened titles, abstracts and full-text publications for eligible studies. Two review authors also independently extracted data on study characteristics and outcomes, and performed risk of bias and GRADE assessments.

MAIN RESULTS

We included nine RCTs and quasi-RCTs involving 436 participants (441 limbs). All studies recruited participants from acute and/or rehabilitation hospitals from seven different countries (the USA, Australia, Indonesia, Thailand, Canada, France and the UK). In all but one study, it was clearly stated that amputations were secondary to vascular conditions.Primary outcomes Wound healing We are uncertain whether rigid dressings decrease the time to wound healing compared with soft dressings (MD -25.60 days; 95% CI -49.08 to -2.12; one study, 56 participants); very low-certainty evidence, downgraded twice for very high risk of bias and once for serious imprecision. It is not clear whether rigid dressings increase the proportion of wounds healed compared with soft dressings (RR 1.14; 95% CI 0.74 to 1.76; one study, 51 participants); very low-certainty evidence, downgraded twice for very high risk of bias and twice for very serious imprecision.Adverse events It is not clear whether rigid dressings increase the proportion of skin-related adverse events compared with soft dressings (RR 0.65; 95% CI 0.32 to 1.32; I² = 0%; six studies, 336 participants (340 limbs)); very low-certainty evidence, downgraded twice for very high risk of bias and once for serious imprecision.It is not clear whether rigid dressings increase the proportion of non skin-related adverse events compared with soft dressings (RR 1.09; 95% CI 0.60 to 1.99; I² = 0%; six studies, 342 participants (346 limbs)); very low-certainty evidence, downgraded twice for very high risk of bias and once for serious imprecision. In addition, we are uncertain whether rigid dressings decrease the time to no pain compared with soft dressings (MD -0.35 weeks; 95% CI -2.11 to 1.41; one study of 23 participants); very low-certainty evidence, downgraded twice for very high risk of bias and twice for very serious imprecision.Secondary outcomesWe are uncertain whether rigid dressings decrease the time to walking compared with soft dressings (MD -3 days; 95% CI -9.96 to 3.96; one study, 56 participants); very low-certainty evidence, downgraded twice for very high risk of bias and twice for very serious imprecision. We are also uncertain whether rigid dressings decrease the length of hospital stay compared with soft dressings (MD -30.10 days; 95% CI -49.82 to -10.38; one study, 56 participants); very low-certainty evidence, downgraded twice for very high risk of bias and once for serious imprecision. It is also not clear whether rigid dressings decrease the time to readiness for prosthetic prescription and swelling compared with soft dressings, as results are based on very low-certainty evidence, downgraded twice for very high risk of bias and once/twice for serious/very serious imprecision. None of the studies reported outcomes on patient comfort, quality of life and cost.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

We are uncertain of the benefits and harms of rigid dressings compared with soft dressings for people undergoing transtibial amputation due to limited and very low-certainty evidence. It is not clear if rigid dressings are superior to soft dressings for improving outcomes related to wound healing, adverse events, prosthetic prescription, walking function, length of hospital stay and swelling. Clinicians should exercise clinical judgement as to which type of dressing they use, and consider the pros and cons of each for patients (e.g. patients with high risk of falling may benefit from the protection offered by a rigid dressing, and patients with poor skin integrity may have less risk of skin breakdown from a soft dressing).

The burden of amputation in patients with peripheral arterial disease in the Netherlands

INTRODUCTION

Peripheral arterial disease (PAD) can lead to severe cases of critical limb ischemia (CLI), which in turn might lead to amputation. Amputation can have substantial consequences for patients. This publication aims to give a better understanding of the amputation-related burden in patients with PAD in the Netherlands.

EVIDENCE ACQUISITION

A systematic review and grey literature searches were conducted followed by qualitative interviews with a multidisciplinary team of clinical experts in amputation. Subsequently, IQVIA's Dutch hospital claims data were analyzed.

EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS

Twenty-seven publications were identified. Dutch claims data identified claims for 2328 patients after amputation for PAD. Data for the following topics were found: incidence, mortality, complications, mobility, daily functioning, quality of life, utilities, length of stay (LoS), costs, and resource use. Annually, 90% of the 3300 amputations carried out in the Netherlands were due to vascular disease. One-year mortality in patients with an amputation ranged from 49.6% (above-the-knee amputation) to 9% (specialized care). Patients' quality of life was substantially affected and utility of post-major amputation for PAD was 0.54. LoS after amputation varied from 11.4 (general rehabilitation) to 53.4 days (amputation of the leg). Total budget incurred based on frequently claimed DBC's from Dutch claims data in patients with PAD undergoing an amputation over 2012 to 2016 was € 136,651,374. Mean cost per patient was € 17,821.

CONCLUSIONS

Amputation leads to substantial burden in patients with PAD in the Netherlands. Identified results give a better understanding of the specific Dutch burden of amputation.

Removable Rigid Dressings for Postoperative Management of Transtibial Amputations: A Review of Published Evidence

Forty years of clinical experience and peer-reviewed research studies support the use of nonweight-bearing removable rigid dressings (RRDs) as an effective means of postoperative management of transtibial amputations. We reviewed the published medical evidence regarding the use of RRDs as a postoperative management strategy, culminating in an evidence-based practice recommendation. Published peer-reviewed literature on the topic was searched and classified by level of evidence based on the research design using the scale recommended by the PM&R (level I through V). The search uncovered a total of 15 articles, including 5 level I randomized controlled trials, 6 level III retrospective matched controlled trials, and 4 level V case reports. A number of benefits associated with the application of RRDs compared with soft dressings were reported across these 15 studies. These included faster healing times, reduced limb edema, preparatory contouring of the residual limb in anticipation of prosthetic use, the prevention of knee flexion contractures, and reduced external trauma to the limb. Also described were an increased probability of successful prosthetic use and pain reduction. The RRDs studied permitted regular inspection of surgical wounds with greater ease and consistency of application than traditional soft dressing approaches. Rigid dressings provide all the same benefits of RRDs except ease of wound inspection, therefore rendering them impractical for the 82% of patients receiving an amputation for ischemic disease that are at high risk of developing wound dehiscence. Weight-bearing immediate postoperative prostheses are almost exclusively reserved for use on trauma patients who usually do not show evidence of vascular or neurologic impairment. The inherent risks of falls and inconsistent pressure on the surgical wound have further restricted their use in practice to a limited patient type. The benefits of RRDs compared with soft dressings are universally recognized in the published peer-reviewed medical evidence to be superior to soft dressings. Based on the best-available current published evidence, nonweight-bearing removable rigid dressings should be considered the first treatment choice for the postoperative care of transtibial amputees to optimize outcomes with regard to reductions in injury due to falls, knee flexion contractures, edema, healing time, time to prosthetic fitting, and pain.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

II.

The Impact of the Immediate Postoperative Prosthesis on Patient Mobility and Quality of Life after Transtibial Amputation

BACKGROUND

The immediate postoperative prosthesis has been purported to allow early mobilization with potential physical and psychologic benefits to patients. This study used accelerometers and validated questionnaires to prospectively examine activity level and quality of life data for patients receiving an immediate postoperative prosthesis after transtibial amputation.

METHODS

A total of 10 patients were included in the study. Mean age was 58 yrs (range, 22-69 yrs), there were 9 men and 1 woman, and reason for amputation was nonhealing gangrenous ulcer in 9 patients and ischemic limb in 1 patient. Patients were followed for 6 wks. Activity data were collected on ActiGraph GT3X accelerometers and analyzed using ActiLife 6 Data Analysis Software. At the 6-wk postoperative visit, an Amputee Mobility Predictor clinician-rated performance evaluation was conducted and a Short Form-36 questionnaire was completed.

RESULTS

Patients in the cohort spent an average of 88% (range, 83%-92%) of their time sedentary, 11.5% (range, 7.6%-16.9%) of their time in light physical activity, and 0.3% (range, 0.12%-1.36%) of their time in moderate to vigorous physical activity. No statistically significant relationships were observed between expected level of function and recorded activity level. Patients had low physical and emotional Short Form-36 component scores.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with transtibial amputations were extremely sedentary in the early postoperative period despite their immediate postoperative prosthesis dressings.

Results of prosthetic rehabilitation on managing transtibial vascular amputation with silicone liner after wound closure

Objective

To investigate the effect of a standardized silicone liner programme on the duration of prosthetic rehabilitation in patients who underwent transtibial amputation as a result of peripheral arterial disease.

Methods

This retrospective study enrolled patients who underwent transtibial amputation followed by one of two stump management programmes at the same rehabilitation centre over a period of 14 years. The study compared the duration of rehabilitation following a standardized silicone liner programme compared with that following a conventional soft dressing programme.

Results

This study included 16 patients who underwent the silicone liner programme and 11 patients who underwent the soft dressing programme. There were no significant differences between the two groups in age, sex, interval between amputation and admission to the rehabilitation centre and stump length. The duration required for the completion of the rehabilitation programme was significantly shorter for the silicone liner programme compared with the soft dressing programme (mean ± SD: 77.3 days ± 13.4 versus 125.4 days ± 66.4 days, respectively).

Conclusion

A standardized silicone liner programme reduced the duration of rehabilitation and could be a valuable replacement for soft dressing-based stump management.

Dutch evidence-based guidelines for amputation and prosthetics of the lower extremity: Amputation surgery and postoperative management. Part 1

BACKGROUND

Surgeons still use a range of criteria to determine whether amputation is indicated. In addition, there is considerable debate regarding immediate postoperative management, especially concerning the use of 'immediate/delayed fitting' versus conservative elastic bandaging.

OBJECTIVES

To produce an evidence-based guideline for the amputation and prosthetics of the lower extremities. This guideline provides recommendations in support of daily practice and is based on the results of scientific research and further discussions focussed on establishing good medical practice. Part 1 focuses on amputation surgery and postoperative management.

STUDY DESIGN

Systematic literature design.

METHODS

Literature search in five databases. Quality assessment on the basis of evidence-based guideline development.

RESULTS

An evidence-based multidisciplinary guideline on amputation and prosthetics of the lower extremity.

CONCLUSION

The best care (in general) for patients undergoing amputation of a lower extremity is presented and discussed. This part of the guideline provides recommendations for diagnosis, referral, assessment, and undergoing amputation of a lower extremity and can be used to provide patient information.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

This guideline provides recommendations in support of daily practice and is based on the results of scientific research and further discussions focussed on establishing good medical practice.

Do rigid dressings reduce the time from amputation to prosthetic fitting? A systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

To investigate whether application of a rigid dressing (RD) to the residual limb soon after transtibial amputation reduces the time from amputation to the first prosthetic casting/fitting compared with the residual limb managed with a soft dressing (SD).

DATA SOURCES

Studies in humans were identified by a systematic search of MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials to December 2013. Search terms were based on appropriate medical subject headings and other free-text headings combining the following key words: "amputation," "amputation stumps," "transtibial," "lower limb," "post operative dressing," "removable rigid dressing," "rigid dressing," "wound healing," "rehabilitation," and "prosthetic." Reference lists of the relevant retrieved studies were checked for further studies. Papers could be published in English or other languages.

STUDY SELECTION

Randomized controlled trials (RCT) and cross-sectional studies that included adults who had an amputation of the lower limb were included. Initial literature search identified 356 potentially relevant articles. Review of abstracts and subsequently full text identified 6 studies included in the meta-analysis. Of these studies, 2 were RCT and 4 were retrospective cross-sectional studies.

DATA EXTRACTION

Data were extracted by one reviewer and then checked by another reviewer.

DATA SYNTHESIS

The use of RD resulted in significantly shorter time from amputation to casting or fitting of the prosthesis. Pooled standardized mean difference (SMD) from meta-analysis using DerSimonian and Laird random effect model was 0.46 (95% confidence interval: 0.19-0.73; P = 0.001), with 54% variation in SMD attributable to heterogeneity (I(2) = 0.539, P = 0.06). No evidence of small study effect has been found. The quality of reporting of the results varied, with some important elements omitted in the publications.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients who are fitted with RD post transtibial amputation commence prosthetic management sooner than those managed with SD.

Early protection and compression of residual limbs may improve and accelerate prosthetic fit: a preliminary study

BACKGROUND

The goal of rehabilitation following lower extremity amputation is to restore the highest level of independent function. As much as possible, this includes the functional use of a prosthetic device fitted to the residual limb. Early prosthetic fit depends, in turn, on rapid healing of the amputation site.

METHODS

We hypothesized that compliance with a novel custom-designed amputation protection and compression system (CAPCS) to the residual limb can accelerate and improve the likelihood of successful prosthesis use. We conducted a retrospective study of all patients who were offered CAPCS by certified prosthetists (Hanger Prosthetics and Orthotics, Bethesda, MD) during the period between April 2004 and November 2009. Variables included age, sex, indication for amputation, and compliance with CAPCS. Compliance was defined as consistent observed wearing of the CAPCS as directed. The primary end point was the fitting of a prosthetic device to the amputated limb, with time to prosthetic fit being the secondary outcome.

RESULTS

Out of 100 patients who were offered CAPCS (n = 100) during the study period, 76% were considered compliant (n = 76). Sixty five patients (65%) were ultimately fitted with prosthetic limbs. In multivariate analysis, we found that patients who had compliant use of CAPCS were significantly more likely to be successfully fit with prosthesis (72 vs. 42%, p = 0.005). At 100 days post amputation, the cumulative incidence of prosthesis fitting was significantly higher in CAPCS compliant patients (69.7 vs. 22.2%, p = 0.012).

CONCLUSIONS

Compliant use of a CAPCS following amputation is associated with earlier and more frequent use of a prosthetic. Based on this limited data set, a conclusion can be drawn that the potential exists to significantly improve functional outcomes after amputation, but well-designed prospective studies are needed to confirm this association.

Traumatic and trauma-related amputations: part I: general principles and lower-extremity amputations

Deliberate attention to the management of soft tissue is imperative when performing an amputation. Identification and proper management of the nerves accompanied by the performance of a stable myodesis and ensuring robust soft-tissue coverage are measures that will improve patient outcomes. Limb length should be preserved when practicable; however, length preservation at the expense of creating a nonhealing or painful residual limb with poor soft-tissue coverage is contraindicated. While a large proportion of individuals with a trauma-related amputation remain severely disabled, a chronically painful residual limb is not inevitable and late revision amputations to improve soft-tissue coverage, stabilize the soft tissues (revision myodesis), or remove symptomatic neuromas can dramatically improve patient outcomes. Psychosocial issues may dramatically affect the outcomes after trauma-related amputations. A multidisciplinary team should be consulted or created to address the multiple complex physical, mental, and psychosocial issues facing patients with a recent amputation.

Knee disarticulation: survival, wound healing and ambulation. A historic cohort study

The aim of this study was to analyze survival, wound healing and ambulation after knee disarticulation (KD). A historic cohort study using medical records and nursing home records was performed. Data included demographics, reason for amputation, concomitant diseases, survival, wound healing, re-amputation and ambulation. Data of 80 patients (71 unilateral and nine bilateral amputees) were available for evaluation. Median follow-up was 9.9 years (IQR: 4.1; 14.3 years). Mean age of amputation was 76.9 (+/- 9.6) years. Reason for amputation was gangrene in 72 patients. Most common concomitant (96%) disease was peripheral arterial disease (PAD). Survival after 1, 6 and 12 months was 87%, 65% and 52%, respectively. Delayed wound healing occurred in 42% (n = 16) of the patients with two or three concomitant diseases and in 15% (n = 6) of the patients with no or one concomitant disease. Trans-femoral re-amputation was performed in nine (12%) patients. Of the 61 discharged KD amputees, 36 (59%) were provided with a prosthesis. Eventually 21 (34%) patients became household walkers.

Removable rigid dressings: a retrospective case-note audit to determine the validity of post-amputation application

This study investigated the validity of post-amputation application of removable rigid dressings (RRDs) for trans-tibial amputees, regarding preparation for prosthetic management and key rehabilitation timelines. It was hypothesised that the use of RRDs would result in faster preparation of the residual limb for prosthetic management and shorter rehabilitation times, compared with conventional soft dressings. A retrospective case-note audit was conducted, in which consecutive trans-tibial amputees who underwent amputation in the 2 years before RRD implementation (non-RRD group, n = 37) and in the 2 years after RRD implementation (RRD group, n = 28) were eligible for inclusion. There was a significant reduction in the geometric mean time-to-first-prosthetic-casting in the RRD group, compared with the soft-dressing group (36.4 days vs. 27.6 days, respectively, p < 0.05). A significant reduction in acute length of stay (LOS) for the RRD group was also identified (15.9 days vs. 8.7 days, respectively, p < 0.001). There were no significant differences in other rehabilitation timeframes, such as rehabilitation LOS, total LOS, outpatient rehabilitation days, and total rehabilitation days between the two groups. This study shows that the application of RRDs reduces acute LOS and time-to-first-prosthetic-casting, thereby providing substantial benefits in preparing the trans-tibial amputee for early rehabilitation and prosthetic intervention.