Effect of semicrystalline copolymers in solid dispersions of pioglitazone hydrochloride: in vitro-in vivo correlation

Optimization of Meloxicam Solid Dispersion Formulations for Dissolution Enhancement and Storage Stability Using 33 Full Factorial Design Based on Response Surface Methodology

This study aimed to formulate and optimize solid-dispersion of meloxicam (MX) employing response-surface-methodology (RSM). RSM allowed identification of the main effects and interactions between studied factors on MX dissolution and acceleration of the optimization process. 3³ full factorial design with 27 different formulations was proposed. Effects of drug loading percentage (A), carriers' ratio (B), method of preparation (C), and their interactions on percent MX dissolved after 10 and 30 min (Q_10min & Q_30min) from fresh and stored samples were studied in distilled water. The considered levels were 2.5%, 5.0%, and 7.5% (factor A), three ratios of Soluplus®/Poloxamer-407 (factor B). Physical mixture (PM), fusion method (FM), and hot-melt-extrusion (HME) were considered factor (C). Stability studies were carried out for 3 months under stress conditions. The proposed optimization design was validated by 3-extra checkpoints formulations. The optimized formulation was selected via numerical optimization and investigated by DSC, XRD, PLM, and in vitro dissolution study. Results showed that HME technique gave the highest MX dissolution rate compared to other techniques (FM & PM). At constant level of factor (C), the amount of MX dissolved increased by decreasing MX loading and increasing Soluplus in carriers' ratio. Actual responses of the optimized formulation were in close consistency with predicted data. Amorphous form of MX in the optimized formulation was proved by DSC, XRD, and PLM. Selected factors and their levels of the optimization design were significantly valuable for demonstrating and adapting the expected formulation characteristics for rapid dissolution of MX (Q_10min= 89.09%) from fresh and stored samples.

Preparation and Evaluation of Polyvinylpyrrolidone Electrospun Nanofiber Patches of Pioglitazone for the Treatment of Atopic Dermatitis

Nanofibers have many promising biomedical applications. They can be used for designing transdermal and dermal drug delivery systems. This project aimed to prepare and characterize polyvinylpyrrolidone-based nanofibers as a dermal and transdermal drug delivery system using pioglitazone. Pioglitazone is an oral antidiabetic drug. In addition, it can act as an inflammatory process modulator, making it a good candidate for managing different skin inflammatory conditions such as atopic dermatitis, skin ulcers, and diabetic foot wound healing. Several nanofiber formulations were prepared using the electrospinning method at different drug loadings, polyvinylpyrrolidone concentrations, and flow rates. A cast film with the exact composition of selected nanofiber formulations was prepared as a control. Nanofibers were characterized using a scanning electron microscope to calculate the diameter. Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy, differential scanning calorimetry, thermogravimetric analysis, and powder X-ray diffraction were performed for physical and biochemical characterizations. In vitro release, drug loading efficiency, and swelling studies were performed. Ex vivo permeation studies were performed using Franz diffusion cells with or without applying a solid microneedle roller. Round uniform nanofibers with a smooth surface were obtained. The diameter of nanofibers was affected by the drug loading and polymer concentration. Fourier-transform infrared spectra showed a potential physical interaction between the drug and the polymer. According to X-ray diffraction, pioglitazone existed in an amorphous form in prepared nanofibers, with partial crystallinity in the casted film. Nanofibers showed a higher swelling rate compared to the casted film. The drug dissolution rate for nanofibers was 2.3-folds higher than the casted films. The polymer concentration affected the drug dissolution rate for nanofibers; however, drug loading and flow rate did not affect the drug dissolution rate for nanofibers. The application of solid microneedles slightly enhances the total amount of drug permeation. However, it did not affect the flux of the drug through the separated epidermis layer for pioglitazone. The drug permeation flux in nanofibers was approximately five times higher than the flux of the casted film. It was observed that pioglitazone is highly retained in skin layers. Graphical abstract.

Preparation, characterization and in-Vitro/in-Vivo evaluation of meloxicam extruded pellets with enhanced bioavailability and stability

OBJECTIVE

The present study involved enhancement of Meloxicam (MX) oral absorption for rapid onset of therapeutic action. A challenging approach using hot-melt-extrusion technique (HME) for production of stable novel preparation of MX pellets was successfully proposed.

METHODS

Manipulating HME processing parameters (barrel-temperatures and screw-speed) and proper polymer(s) selection (Soluplus, a combination of Soluplus/Poloxamar and Polyethylene Glycol 6000) were the main strategies involved for productive extrusion of MX. Evaluation of MX solid-state (TGA, DSC and PLM), absolute percent crystallinity, in-vitro dissolution (in acidic/aqueous pHs), and stability testing in accelerated conditions up to 6-months as well as a long-term shelf for 36-months were performed. A comparative bioavailability study of selected MX-Pellets was carried-out against the innovator product (Mobic^®) in 6 healthy volunteers under fed-conditions.

RESULTS

TGA, DSC and PLM analyses proved the dispersion of MX in amorphous-state within polymeric matrix by HME. MX/Soluplus pellets exhibited the lowest crystallinity % and best dissolution performance among other polymers in both pHs. In addition, presence of Soluplus safeguards final pellets stability under different storage conditions. MX rate of absorption (T_max) from Soluplus-based pellets attained a value of 45 min, which was 6-times faster than Mobic^® (4.5 hr).

CONCLUSION

A promising oral MX formula prepared by HME was successfully developed with a rapid onset of analgesic action (T_max of 45 mins; almost 2-times faster than reported intramuscular injection), hence appropriate in the early relief of pain associated with rheumatoid arthritis and osteoarthritis. Moreover, the proposed formula was physico-chemically stable up to 36 months of shelf-life storage.

Crystallization tendency of APIs possessing different thermal and glass related properties in amorphous solid dispersions

The correlation between glass forming ability (GFA) and several thermophysical or physicochemical properties of APIs with the formation and the physical stability of amorphous solid dispersions (ASDs) was evaluated in the present study. Eight poorly water-soluble APIs belonging in different GFA classes (i.e. a) GFA Class I: Carbamazepine, CBZ, b) GFA Class II: Agomelatine, AGO, Aprepitant, APT, Rivaroxaban, RIV, and c) GFA Class III: Indomethacin, IND, Pioglitazone, PIO, Piroxixam, PIR, and Simvastatin, SIM) were tested, in addition to six commonly used matrix-carriers (namely povidone, PVP, hydroxypropyl cellulose, HPC-SL, copovidone, coPVP, Soluplus®, SOL, and gelatin) in order to prepared ASDs via film casting approach. Results using polarized light microscopy (PLM) showed a similar drug crystallization tendency from ASDs independently of their GFA classification, glass stability or glass fragility. X-ray diffraction analysis verified the formation and the physical stability of ASD (independently of GFA class) when a suitable matrix-carrier was selected (i.e. SOL for AGO, RIV and SIM, PVP for APT, CBZ and IND, coPVP for PIO and gelatin for PIR). Further attempts to correlate some physicochemical properties (i.e. component's binding affinity and miscibility) with the formation and the crystallization tendency of the prepared ASDs showed no apparent correlation in regards to the different drug GFA classes. Finally, the evaluation of molecular interactions via FTIR analysis also failed to adequately distinguish the differences in regards to the formation and the physical stability of the prepared systems.