Induction of Angiotensinogen Synthesis and Secretion by Angiotensin II

The response of hepatic angiotensinogen secretion to experimental inflammatory stimuli. A comparison with acute-phase proteins

Angiotensinogen is thought to be an acute-phase protein, since its plasma concentrations increase in response to some inflammatory conditions, e.g. partial hepatectomy, nephrectomy or lipopolysaccharide (LPS) injection. However, this response of angiotensinogen has never been related to that of established acute-phase proteins. We have, therefore, examined plasma concentrations and hepatic secretion of angiotensinogen in two widely used inflammation models, i.e. turpentine or LPS injection in the rat, as well as in nephrectomized and sham-nephrectomized rats, in comparison to the response of two established acute-phase proteins, alpha 1-acid glycoprotein (AGP) and alpha 2-macroglobulin (AMG). Plasma concentrations and secretion rates of AGP and AMG increased significantly in all the conditions examined. The magnitude of the response decreased in the order turpentine > nephrectomy = LPS > sham nephrectomy. Angiotensinogen secretion was stimulated in LPS-injected (2.5-fold) and nephrectomized rats (2.6-fold), whereas no changes were seen in sham-nephrectomized rats. Surprisingly, a significant decrease both in secretion rates and plasma concentrations of angiotensinogen occurred in turpentine-injected rats. Intraperitoneal injection of interleukin 6, a major inductor of hepatic acute-phase proteins, increased plasma concentrations and hepatic secretion rates of AGP, AMG and angiotensinogen. Changes in liver angiotensinogen mRNA correlated well with angiotensinogen secretion rates in all groups, indicating that alterations in angiotensinogen synthesis are responsible for the observed changes in secretion rates and plasma concentrations. The response of angiotensinogen to turpentine is difficult to reconcile with the conventional definition of an acute-phase protein.