Xanthine-7-Ribosides as Adenosine AlReceptor Antagonists: Further Evidence for Adenosine's Anti Mode of Binding

Nucleosides 9: Design and synthesis of new 8-nitro and 8-amino xanthine nucleosides of expected biological activity

The coupling reaction of 1,3-dimethylxanthine (theophylline), 3-benzylxanthine and 3-benzyl-1-methylxanthine with 1-O-acetyl-2,3,5-tri-O-benzoyl-β-D-ribofuranose afforded the corresponding protected nucleosides, respectively. Nitration of each of the theophylline and 3-benzy-1-methyllxanthine protected nucleosides yielded the corresponding 8-nitronucleosides derivatives, which were reduced to give the corresponding 8-aminonucleoside derivatives. Debenzoylation of protected nucleosides formed by using methanolic sodium methoxide afforded the corresponding free N-nucleosides, respectively. The structures of products have been elucidated and reported and also some of the products were screened for their antimicrobial activity. Some of tested products showed moderate activity.

Theophylline-7β-d-Ribofuranoside (Theonosine), a New Theophylline Metabolite Generated in Human and Animal Lung Tissue

While assessing the ability of mammalian lung tissue to metabolize theophylline, a new metabolite was isolated and characterized. The metabolite was produced by the microsomal fraction of lungs from several species, including rat, rabbit, dog, pig, sheep and human tissue. Metabolite production was blocked by boiling the microsomal tissue. This new metabolite, theophylline-7β-d-ribofuranoside (theonosine), was confirmed by several spectral methods and by comparison to an authentic synthetic compound. Tissue studies from rats, rabbits, dogs, and humans for cofactor involvement demonstrated an absolute requirement for NADP and enhanced metabolite production in the presence of magnesium ion. It remains to be demonstrated whether theonosine may contribute to the known pharmacological effects of theophylline.

2- and 8-alkynyladenosines: conformational studies and docking to human adenosine A3 receptor can explain their different biological behavior

Adenosine (Ado) derivatives substituted at the C2 position with an alkynyl chain are endowed with high affinity for A(1), A(2A) and A(3) human adenosine receptors, while being less active at the low affinity A(2B) subtype. On the other hand, the introduction of an alkynyl chain at the C8 position of adenosine is detrimental for the affinity and potency at A(1), A(2A), and A(2B) receptors, while is more tolerated by the A(3) receptor. The evaluation of the stimulation of [35S]GTPgammaS binding revealed that 2-alkynyladenosines behave as adenosine receptors agonists while, on the contrary, 8-alkynyladenosines behave as antagonists. With this work we demonstrated, by means of an NMR-based and a computational conformational analysis, that 8-alkynyladenosines, differently from 2-alkynyladenosines, cannot adopt the sugar-base anti conformation required for adenosine receptor activation.Furthermore, using the recently reported X-ray crystal structure of bovine rhodopsin as template, we built a 3D model of the seven transmembrane domains of the human adenosine A(3) receptor with the homology modeling. After identification of the binding site we carried out docking experiments, demonstrating that the two class of molecules have different binding modes that explain their different degree of affinity and the shift of their activity from agonism to antagonism.

8-substituted adenosine and theophylline-7-riboside analogues as potential partial agonists for the adenosine A1 receptor

A series of 8-substituted adenosine and theophylline-7-riboside analogues (28 and 9 compounds, respectively) was tested on adenosine A1 and A2A receptors as an extensive exploration of the adenosine C8-region. Alkylamino substituents at the 8-position cause an affinity decrease for adenosine analogues, but an affinity increase for theophylline-7-riboside derivatives. The affinity decrease is probably due to a direct steric hindrance between the C8-substituent and the binding site as well as to electronic effects, not to a steric influence on the ribose moiety to adopt the anti conformation. The 8-substituents increase the affinity of theophylline-7-riboside analogues probably by binding to a lipophilic binding site. The intrinsic activity was tested in vitro for some 8-substituted adenosine analogues, by determining the GTP shift in receptor binding studies and the inhibition of adenylate cyclase in a culture of rat thyroid FRTL-5 cells, and in vivo in the rat cardiovascular system for 8-butylaminoadenosine. Thus, it was shown that 8-ethyl-, 8-butyl-, and 8-pentylamino substituted analogues of adenosine may be partial agonists in vitro, and that 8-butylaminoadenosine is a partial agonist for the rat cardiovascular A1 receptor in vivo.

Relative binding orientations of adenosine A1 receptor ligands--a test case for Distributed Multipole Analysis in medicinal chemistry

The electrostatic properties of adenosine-based agonists and xanthine-based antagonists for the adenosine A1 receptor were used to assess various proposals for their relative orientation in the unknown binding site. The electrostatic properties were calculated from distributed multipole representations of SCF wavefunctions. A range of methods of assessing the electrostatic similarity of the ligands were used in the comparison. One of the methods, comparing the sign of the potential around the two molecules, gave inconclusive results. The other approaches, however, provided a mutually complementary and consistent picture of the electrostatic similarity and dissimilarity of the molecules in the three proposed relative orientations. This was significantly different from the results obtained previously with MOPAC AM1 point charges. In the standard model overlay, where the aromatic nitrogen atoms of both agonists and antagonists are in the same position relative to the binding site, the electrostatic potentials are so dissimilar that binding to the same receptor site is highly unlikely. Overlaying the N6-region of adenosine with that near C8 of theophylline (the N6-C8 model) produces the greatest similarity in electrostatic properties for these ligands. However, N6-cyclopentyladenosine (CPA) and 1,3-dipropyl-8-cyclopentyl-xanthine (DPCPX) show greater electrostatic similarity when the aromatic rings are superimposed according to the flipped model, in which the xanthine ring is rotated around its horizontal axis. This difference is mainly attributed to the change in conformation of N6-substituted adenosines and could result in a different orientation for theophylline and DPCPX within the receptor binding site. However, it is more likely that DPCPX also binds according to the N6-C8 model, as this model gives the best steric overlay and would be favoured by the lipophilic forces, provided that the binding site residues could accommodate the different electrostatic properties in the N6/N7-region. Finally, we have shown that Distributed Multipole Analysis (DMA) offers a new, feasible tool for the medicinal chemist, because it provides the use of reliable electrostatic models to determine plausible relative binding orientations.

Adenosine receptors and their modulators

The identification and characterization of adenosine receptors and the development of potent, receptor subtype-selective agonists and antagonists has been an active area of research for the past 20 years. Major recent advances in the field have been the cloning of several adenosine receptor subtypes of different species, including the discovery of a new subtype, designated A3, the discovery and development of new agonists and antagonists, particularly those with selectivity for the A2a adenosine receptor, the characterization of signal transduction pathways, and the development of agents which act indirectly on the adenosine receptor system. The present article focusses on aspects of pharmaceutical/medicinal chemistry related to adenosine receptors.

Adenosine A1 Receptor and Ligand Molecular Modeling

This symposium provided a forum for presentations by the relevant groups on ligand design and ligand binding on the adenosine A1, receptor. Agreement appears to exist that the "N6-C8" model of ligand binding to the receptor is the preferred mode. A consensus has not yet been reached on the actual placement of the ligand in the receptor and the exact amino acids which interact in its binding. Two viable models exist at present. Both can be tested with selective site-directed mutagenic studies on the A1 receptor as well as with additional designed ligands.