A 38 kDa nuclear protein is involved in the retention of an antisense oligonucleotide directed against cytosolic phospholipase A2

Proteins involved in binding and cellular uptake of nucleic acids

The study of mechanisms of nucleic acid transport across the cell membrane is valuable both for understanding the biological function of extracellular nucleic acids and the practical use of nucleic acids in gene therapy. It has been clearly demonstrated that cell surface proteins are necessary for transport of nucleic acids into cells. A large amount of data has now been accumulated about the proteins that participate in nucleic acid transport. The methods for revealing and identification of these proteins, possible mechanisms of protein-mediated transport of nucleic acids, and cellular functions of these proteins are described.

Knock down of cytosolic phospholipase A2: an antisense oligonucleotide having a nuclear localization binds a C-terminal motif of glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase

We have previously shown that an antisense, effective in the knock down of cytosolic phospholipase A2 (cPLA2), localizes mainly in the nucleus of human endothelial cells and monocytes and that glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) is involved in its nuclear localization. In this study, we clarify how GAPDH participates in the nuclear localization of this antisense oligodeoxynucleotide (ODN) directed against cPLA2 mRNA. A central TAAAT motif providing specificity and high affinity binding was assumed to interact with the enzyme Rossmann fold region on the basis of competition to this site by NAD+. To asses whether the TAAAT motif interacts directly with the enzyme Rossmann fold region, we evaluated the binding to GAPDH of different oligonucleotides and the effect of competitors such as NAD+, NADH, mononucleotides, DNA, polyribonucleic acids and polyanions. We found that the dissociation constant for TAAAT containing oligonucleotides was three--to fivefold higher with respect to oligo not containing this motif. By covalently linking 32P-labeled cPLA2p(N)16 to GAPDH and after executing hydrolysis with hydroxylamine, the labeling was exclusively found in the C-terminal domain (aa 286-334). These results indicate that the antisense oligonucleotide interacts with a site not having a defined function but which can be negatively allosterically regulated when NAD+ or polynucleotides are bound to Rossmann fold.

Antisense oligodeoxynucleotide and ribozyme design

The overwhelming advances of the last few years in the field of nucleic acid-based technologies laid the basis for the development of this new technology as a frontier method not only to combat diseases and infections but also to study gene function. The development of antisense strategies has generated considerable expectations in the neurosciences and, in particular, behavioral neurobiology. Antisense application in the brain has become a technology with tremendous impact, especially for determining the molecular pathways and substrates of behavior of an organism controlled by independent stimuli. The antisense agents, either oligodeoxynucleotides or ribozymes, interfere in the genetic flow of information from DNA via RNA to protein. According to the literature it seems clear that appropriately modified antisense compounds successfully and stably bind to their target ribonucleic acid molecules. This antisense binding leads to a decrease in the corresponding protein levels. If the targeted protein exerts detrimental effects on the cell or tissue, its reduction should be beneficial from a therapeutic point of view. If the investigator wants to study the function of a specific gene product the selective and transient downregulation of the corresponding target protein will help in functional analysis. In the following article I describe the chemical nature of the antisense oligodeoxynucleotides and some of the most commonly used derivatives and give some guidelines on antisense construction and application. The possible mode of action is discussed, as is expansion of the oligonucleotide-based application to ribozyme-mediated gene inhibition. Finally, problems that may be encountered during antisense application are discussed.

Knockdown of caveolin-1 by antisense oligonucleotides impairs angiogenesis in vitro and in vivo

Knock-out of the gene coding for caveolin-1, the main organizer of caveolae, has not yet been performed. We devised a strategy to knock-down caveolin-1 gene expression using antisense oligodeoxynucleotides (ODNs). Seven ODNs, covering different regions of caveolin-1 mRNA, were screened by Western blot analysis of caveolin-1 levels. The most active and specific was found to reduce caveolin-1 protein levels by 70% at 1 microM concentration and its action, as demonstrated by a marked reduction (about 50%) in caveolin-1 mRNA levels, was due to a true antisense mechanism. In HUVEC treated with the active ODN, caveolae were undetectable by confocal and electron microscopy, while their number was not affected when cells were treated with a scrambled ODN. Using the fibrin gel 3 D angiogenesis test we established that the active (but not the scrambled) ODN strongly suppressed capillary-like tube formation. Moreover, an antisense tailored against chicken caveolin-1 mRNA, when tested using the chorio-allantoic membrane technique, dramatically reduced vessel formation at doses (10-20 microg) under which control ODNs were ineffective and devoid of toxicity. Thus, it is likely that caveolin-1 down regulation, followed by caveolae disruption, impairs angiogenesis in vitro and in vivo.