1
|
Kim WS, Langer S, Todd M, Larkey L, Jo S, Bangerter LR, Khera N. Feasibility of a Digital Storytelling Intervention for Hematopoietic Cell Transplant Patients. JOURNAL OF CANCER EDUCATION : THE OFFICIAL JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ASSOCIATION FOR CANCER EDUCATION 2022; 37:1275-1285. [PMID: 33389660 DOI: 10.1007/s13187-020-01948-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 12/21/2020] [Indexed: 06/12/2023]
Abstract
Patients undergoing hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) are at risk for psychological and social impairment given the rigors and multiple sequelae of treatment. The purpose of this pilot study was to test the feasibility of a digital storytelling (DS) intervention for HCT patients, and to examine limited efficacy of the intervention relative to control arm on psychological distress and perceived social support. Adult HCT patients (n = 40, M age = 59.2 years) were enrolled immediately post-HCT and randomly assigned to either DS intervention or information control (IC). DS participants viewed four 3-min personal, emotionally rich digital stories, and IC condition participants viewed four videos containing information about post-HCT care. Feasibility regarding recruitment, enrollment efforts, and change scores from pre- to post-intervention (Δs) on depression, anxiety, and perceived social support were tracked. Fifty-four (51.4%) of 105 eligible patients consented. Forty (74%) patients completed the intervention. All but one completed the post-intervention assessments demonstrating that HCT patients can be recruited and retained for this intervention. On average, perceived social support increased for the DS group (Δ = 0.06) but decreased for the IC group (Δ = - 0.05). Anxiety and depression improved over time in both conditions. Viewing digital stories with content evoking emotional contexts similar to one's own health challenges may improve perceptions of social support among HCT patients. How DS can improve perceived social support for both short-term and longer-term sustained effects in a longitudinal study is an area ripe for additional investigation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wonsun Sunny Kim
- Edson College of Nursing and Health Innovation, Arizona State University, 500 N. 3rd St. MC. 3020, Phoenix, AZ, 85004, USA.
| | - Shelby Langer
- Edson College of Nursing and Health Innovation, Arizona State University, 500 N. 3rd St. MC. 3020, Phoenix, AZ, 85004, USA
| | - Michael Todd
- Edson College of Nursing and Health Innovation, Arizona State University, 500 N. 3rd St. MC. 3020, Phoenix, AZ, 85004, USA
| | - Linda Larkey
- Edson College of Nursing and Health Innovation, Arizona State University, 500 N. 3rd St. MC. 3020, Phoenix, AZ, 85004, USA
| | - Soojung Jo
- Edson College of Nursing and Health Innovation, Arizona State University, 500 N. 3rd St. MC. 3020, Phoenix, AZ, 85004, USA
| | | | - Nandita Khera
- College of Medicine, Mayo Clinic of Arizona, Phoenix, AZ, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Health-Related and Economic Burden Among Family Caregivers of Patients with Acute Myeloid Leukemia or Hematological Malignancies. Adv Ther 2021; 38:5002-5024. [PMID: 34499319 PMCID: PMC8478752 DOI: 10.1007/s12325-021-01872-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/21/2021] [Accepted: 07/21/2021] [Indexed: 01/04/2023]
Abstract
Introduction Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is associated with lower survival and greater unmet need compared with some other hematologic malignancies (HMs). Despite differences in acuteness between AML and other HMs, the burden of family caregivers (FCs) of patients with these malignancies offer similar patient experiences. A targeted literature review was conducted to explore FC burden of patients with AML and HM with and without hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT). Instruments to measure and interventions to address FC burden were identified. Methods Studies on economic burden and compromised health-related quality of life (HRQoL) associated with FC burden, family affairs, and childcare from 1 January 2010 to 30 June 2019 were identified through database and hand searches. Published English articles on randomized controlled trials or standardized qualitative or quantitative observational studies were included. FCs were those in close familial proximity to the patient (i.e., spouse, parents, children, relatives, other family members, significant others). Results Seventy-one publications were identified (AML, n = 3; HM, n = 29; HSCT, n = 39). Predominant burden categories included humanistic (n = 33), economic (n = 17), and interventions (n = 22); one study was classified as humanistic and economic. FCs lack sufficient resources to manage stressors and experience negative psychological, behavioral, and physiological effects. FCs of patients with HMs reported post-traumatic stress disorder, significant sleep problems, moderate-to-poor HRQoL, and negative impacts on family relationships. Instruments designed to measure caregiver burden were generic and symptom-specific. Educational, expressional, and self-adjustment interventions were used to improve FC burden. Conclusion Findings indicate a need for additional research, public health approaches to support FCs, and effective interventions to address FC burden. Minimizing FC burden and improving quality of life may reduce the overall healthcare service use and allow FCs to more effectively fulfill caregiver tasks. Support systems to alleviate caregiver burden may create reinforced integrators, thus positively affecting quality of life and possibly the outcomes of patients. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s12325-021-01872-x.
Collapse
|
3
|
Perceived Benefits and Facilitators and Barriers to Providing Psychosocial Interventions for Informal Caregivers of People with Rare Diseases: A Scoping Review. PATIENT-PATIENT CENTERED OUTCOMES RESEARCH 2021; 13:471-519. [PMID: 32785886 DOI: 10.1007/s40271-020-00441-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/19/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Little is known about the benefits, and barriers and facilitators to providing psychosocial support to caregivers to a loved one with a rare disease. OBJECTIVE The aim of our scoping review was to map evidence on (1) perceived benefits and (2) barriers and facilitators of establishing and maintaining services. METHODS The CINAHL and PubMed databases were searched in December 2018. Qualitative and quantitative studies in any language that described perceived or tested benefits of participating in psychosocial interventions for caregivers, or the barriers and facilitators of providing these interventions, were eligible. RESULTS Thirty-four studies were included. Interventions were behavioural or psychological, supportive, educational, or multicomponent. All included studies reported on the benefits of participating in psychosocial interventions; 14 (41%) studies also reported on facilitators and 19 (56%) reported on barriers. Benefits that were most commonly found included statistically significant improvements in emotional states (e.g. stress) and caregiver burden and narrative reports of intervention helpfulness. Statistically significant improvements in mental health outcomes (e.g. depression symptoms) were rarely detected. Four themes for facilitators were identified, including intervention characteristics, intervention delivery characteristics, provision of necessary resources, and support provided outside of the intervention. Four barrier themes were also identified: misalignment of intervention to caregiver needs, inability to make time for intervention, practical barriers, emotional barriers. CONCLUSIONS Psychosocial interventions for caregivers to a loved one with a rare disease may be helpful in reducing stress, burden, and feelings of isolation among caregivers. Future research should design interventions for caregivers that take into account facilitators and barriers to establishing and maintaining such interventions.
Collapse
|
4
|
Langer SL, Yi JC, Chi NC, Lindhorst T. Psychological Impacts and Ways of Coping Reported by Spousal Caregivers of Hematopoietic Cell Transplant Recipients: A Qualitative Analysis. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant 2020; 26:764-771. [DOI: 10.1016/j.bbmt.2019.11.023] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/16/2019] [Revised: 11/08/2019] [Accepted: 11/18/2019] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
|
5
|
Kim W, Bangerter LR, Jo S, Langer S, Larkey L, Griffin J, Khera N. Feasibility and Acceptability of a 3-Day Group-Based Digital Storytelling Workshop among Caregivers of Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation Patients: A Mixed-Methods Approach. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant 2019; 25:2228-2233. [PMID: 31265918 DOI: 10.1016/j.bbmt.2019.06.030] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/20/2019] [Revised: 05/13/2019] [Accepted: 06/26/2019] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
Abstract
Family caregivers are essential partners for patients undergoing hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT). The caregiving role is emotionally, physically, and financially demanding. Intervention efforts to provide relief for caregiver stress during HCT are highly warranted. Storytelling interventions are accruing evidence for efficacy in therapeutic contexts. The purpose of this study was to conduct a 3-full consecutive day digital storytelling (DST) workshop to build knowledge on caregivers' lived experiences during HCT, to pilot test DST with a small group of HCT caregivers, and to demonstrate feasibility and acceptability using qualitative and quantitative measures. Six adult caregivers of allogeneic HCT recipients (mean age, 60.2 years) attended a 3-day DST program (66% female, 83% white). All successfully created their personal audiovisual digital story (2 to 3 minutes long) and completed a survey. All participants rated the DST workshop as highly acceptable and therapeutic (mean score 5, on a scale of 1 to 5). Group discussions and interviews with participants further demonstrated high satisfaction and acceptability of the workshop format, setting, process, and structure. The survey results showed decreases in anxiety and depression from before to after the DST workshop with all participants showing change in the expected direction. This study demonstrates the feasibility and acceptability of a 3-day DST workshop as a distress-relieving tool for HCT caregivers. Future research is needed to test the efficacy of DST relative to a control condition.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wonsun Kim
- College of Nursing and Health Innovation, Arizona State University, Phoenix, Arizona; Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, Phoenix, Arizona.
| | - Lauren R Bangerter
- Mayo Clinic Robert D. and Patricia E. Kern Center for the Science of Healthcare Delivery, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Soojung Jo
- College of Nursing and Health Innovation, Arizona State University, Phoenix, Arizona
| | - Shelby Langer
- College of Nursing and Health Innovation, Arizona State University, Phoenix, Arizona; Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, Phoenix, Arizona
| | - Linda Larkey
- College of Nursing and Health Innovation, Arizona State University, Phoenix, Arizona; Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, Phoenix, Arizona
| | - Joan Griffin
- Mayo Clinic Robert D. and Patricia E. Kern Center for the Science of Healthcare Delivery, Rochester, Minnesota
| | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Treanor CJ, Santin O, Prue G, Coleman H, Cardwell CR, O'Halloran P, Donnelly M. Psychosocial interventions for informal caregivers of people living with cancer. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2019; 6:CD009912. [PMID: 31204791 PMCID: PMC6573123 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd009912.pub2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 35] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/30/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Increasingly, cancer is recognised as a chronic condition with a growing population of informal caregivers providing care for cancer patients. Informal caregiving can negatively affect the health and well-being of caregivers. We need a synthesised account of best evidence to aid decision-making about effective ways to support caregivers for individuals 'living with cancer'. OBJECTIVES To assess the effectiveness of psychosocial interventions designed to improve the quality of life (QoL), physical health and well-being of informal caregivers of people living with cancer compared with usual care. SEARCH METHODS We searched CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO, ProQuest, Open SIGLE, Web of Science from inception up to January 2018, trial registries and citation lists of included studies. SELECTION CRITERIA We included randomised and quasi-randomised controlled trials comparing psychosocial interventions delivered to adult informal caregivers of adults affected by cancer on a group or individual basis with usual care. Psychosocial interventions included non-pharmacological interventions that involved an interpersonal relationship between caregivers and healthcare professionals. We included interventions delivered also to caregiver-patient dyads. Interventions delivered to caregivers of individuals receiving palliative or inpatient care were excluded. Our primary outcome was caregiver QoL. Secondary outcomes included patient QoL, caregiver and patient depression, anxiety, psychological distress, physical health status and intervention satisfaction and adverse effects. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS Pairs of review authors independently screened studies for eligibility, extracted data and conducted 'Risk of bias' assessments. We synthesised findings using meta-analysis, where possible, and reported remaining results in a narrative synthesis. MAIN RESULTS Nineteen trials (n = 3, 725) were included in the review. All trials were reported in English and were undertaken in high-income countries. Trials targeted caregivers of patients affected by a number of cancers spanning newly diagnosed patients, patients awaiting treatment, patients who were being treated currently and individuals post-treatment. Most trials delivered interventions to caregiver-patient dyads (predominantly spousal dyads) and there was variation in intervention delivery to groups or individual participants. There was much heterogeneity across interventions though the majority were defined as psycho-educational. All trials were rated as being at 'high risk of bias'.Compared to usual care, psychosocial interventions may improve slightly caregiver QoL immediately post intervention (standardised mean difference (SMD) 0.29, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.04 to 0.53; studies = 2, 265 participants) and may have little to no effect on caregiver QoL at 12 months (SMD 0.14, 95% CI - 0.11 to 0.40; studies = 2, 239 participants) post-intervention (both low-quality evidence).Psychosocial interventions probably have little to no effect on caregiver depression immediately to one-month post-intervention (SMD 0.01, 95% CI -0.14 to 0.15; studies = 9, 702 participants) (moderate-quality evidence). Psychosocial interventions may have little to no effect on caregiver anxiety immediately post-intervention (SMD -0.12, 95 % CI -0.33 to 0.10; studies = 5, 329 participants), depression three-to-six months (SMD 0.03, 95% CI -0.33 to 0.38; studies = 5. 379 participants) post-intervention and patient QoL six to 12 months (SMD -0.05, 95% CI -0.37 to 0.26; studies = 3, 294 participants) post-intervention (all low-quality evidence). There was uncertainty whether psychosocial interventions improve patient QoL immediately (SMD -0.03, 95 %CI -0.50 to 0.44; studies = 2, 292 participants) or caregiver anxiety three-to-six months (SMD-0.25, 95% CI -0.64 to 0.13; studies = 4, 272 participants) post-intervention (both very low-quality evidence). Two studies which could not be pooled in a meta-analysis for caregiver physical health status found little to no effect immediately post-intervention and a small intervention effect 12 months post-intervention. Caregiver or patient satisfaction or cost-effectiveness of interventions were not assessed in any studies. Interventions demonstrated good feasibility and acceptability.Psychosocial interventions probably have little to no effect on patient physical health status immediately post-intervention (SMD 0.17, 95 % CI -0.07 to 0.41; studies = 4, 461 participants) and patient depression three to six months post-intervention (SMD-0.11, 95% CI -0.33 to 0.12; studies = 6, 534 participants) (both moderate-quality evidence).Psychosocial interventions may have little to no effect on caregiver psychological distress immediately to one-month (SMD -0.08, 95% CI -0.42 to 0.26; studies = 3, 134 participants), and seven to 12 months (SMD 0.08, 95% CI -0.42 to 0.58; studies = 2, 62 participants) post-intervention; patient depression immediately (SMD -0.12, 95% CI -0.31 to 0.07; studies = 9, 852 participants); anxiety immediately (SMD -0.13, 95% CI -0.41 to 0.15;studies = 4, 422 participants), and three to six months (SMD -0.22, 95% CI -0.45 to 0.02; studies = 4, 370 participants); psychological distress immediately (SMD -0.02, 95% CI -0.47 to 0.44; studies = 2, 74 participants) and seven to 12 months (SMD -0.27, 95% CI -0.78 to 0.24; studies = 2, 61 participants); and physical health status six to 12 months (SMD 0.06, 95% CI -0.18 to 0.30; studies = 2, 275 participants) post-intervention (all low-quality evidence).Three trials reported adverse effects associated with the interventions, compared with usual care, including higher distress, sexual function-related distress and lower relationship satisfaction levels for caregivers, higher distress levels for patients, and that some content was perceived as insensitive to some participants.Trials not able to be pooled in a meta-analysis did not tend to report effect size and it was difficult to discern intervention effectiveness. Variable intervention effects were reported for patient and caregiver outcomes. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS Heterogeneity across studies makes it difficult to draw firm conclusions regarding the effectiveness of psychosocial interventions for this population. There is an immediate need for rigorous trials with process evaluations and clearer, detailed intervention descriptions. Cost-effectiveness studies should be conducted alongside future trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Charlene J Treanor
- Queen's University BelfastCentre for Public HealthInstitute of Clinical Sciences Block B, Royal Victoria Hospital SiteGrosvenor RoadBelfastNorthern IrelandUKBT12 6BJ
| | - Olinda Santin
- Queen's University BelfastSchool of Nursing and Midwifery97 Lisburn RoadBelfastUKBT9 7BL
| | - Gillian Prue
- Queen's University BelfastSchool of Nursing and Midwifery97 Lisburn RoadBelfastUKBT9 7BL
| | - Helen Coleman
- Queen's University BelfastCentre for Public HealthInstitute of Clinical Sciences Block B, Royal Victoria Hospital SiteGrosvenor RoadBelfastNorthern IrelandUKBT12 6BJ
| | - Chris R Cardwell
- Queen's University BelfastCentre for Public HealthInstitute of Clinical Sciences Block B, Royal Victoria Hospital SiteGrosvenor RoadBelfastNorthern IrelandUKBT12 6BJ
| | - Peter O'Halloran
- Queen's University BelfastSchool of Nursing and Midwifery97 Lisburn RoadBelfastUKBT9 7BL
| | - Michael Donnelly
- Queen's University BelfastCentre for Public HealthInstitute of Clinical Sciences Block B, Royal Victoria Hospital SiteGrosvenor RoadBelfastNorthern IrelandUKBT12 6BJ
| | | |
Collapse
|
7
|
Badr H. New frontiers in couple-based interventions in cancer care: refining the prescription for spousal communication. Acta Oncol 2017; 56:139-145. [PMID: 27937437 DOI: 10.1080/0284186x.2016.1266079] [Citation(s) in RCA: 53] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/05/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The diagnosis and treatment of cancer is a life-altering experience that signals profound changes in a person's life. However, most people do not experience cancer in isolation or cope alone. Despite the fact that partners (i.e. spouses, significant others) provide emotional support and play a critical role in caregiving, cancer exacts a heavy toll on them and challenges their relationship with the patient by altering established communication patterns and roles. In recognition of this, a burgeoning literature involving couple-based interventions to improve patient and partner quality of life and adaptation has emerged. However, questions remain regarding how we can improve these interventions to exact greater impact on patient and partner outcomes. MATERIAL AND METHODS A narrative review of the literature on couples' communication processes in cancer was conducted in order to describe knowledge gaps and directions for future research. RESULTS Most couple-based interventions have included a communication skills training component because communication is an important process through which couples make sense of cancer, engage in social support, negotiate role changes and coordinate coping responses. However, scholars still know very little about what they should instruct couples to talk about, how often they should talk and when talking (or not talking) is beneficial (and for whom - the patient, partner, or both). CONCLUSION In order push this field forward, we need to develop a more nuanced view of couples' communication that acknowledges that there are multiple ways to talk, different aspects of the cancer experience to talk about, and preexisting communication patterns and preferences for different couples that may influence the utility of talk. Interventions that replace the unilateral and generic prescription to talk openly about cancer with targeted questions that prompt reflection on couples' unique strengths, preexisting communication patterns and support resources may thus help bolster the impact of couple-based interventions on patient and partner quality of life.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hoda Badr
- Department of Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Applebaum AJ, Bevans M, Son T, Evans K, Hernandez M, Giralt S, DuHamel K. A scoping review of caregiver burden during allogeneic HSCT: lessons learned and future directions. Bone Marrow Transplant 2016; 51:1416-1422. [PMID: 27295270 DOI: 10.1038/bmt.2016.164] [Citation(s) in RCA: 54] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/15/2016] [Revised: 04/11/2016] [Accepted: 05/05/2016] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
Abstract
The extant literature documents burden among caregivers of patients undergoing a hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT), but little is known about the burden of caregivers of patients receiving outpatient and homebound HSCTs. This scoping study sought to evaluate what is known about the burden of the increasing number of adult caregivers of patients receiving outpatient HSCTs and to create practice guidelines for how to best support this vulnerable group. Online databases were searched for studies that evaluated caregiver burden in adult caregivers of HSCT patients since 2010 (the publication date of the most recent systematic review on HSCT caregiver burden). Of the 1271 articles retrieved, 12 met the inclusion criteria, though none specifically examined outpatient or homebound caregivers. Overall, studies corroborated existing literature on the experience of significant burden among HSCT caregivers across the HSCT trajectory, and highlighted the emotional costs of outpatient transplants on caregivers and the need to identify caregivers at high risk for burden early in the transplant process. Future studies of outpatient caregivers should include a comprehensive assessment of burden and seek to identify points along the transplant trajectory at which caregivers are at particular risk for negative outcomes and when intervention is most appropriate.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A J Applebaum
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - M Bevans
- National Institutes of Health Clinical Center, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - T Son
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - K Evans
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - M Hernandez
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - S Giralt
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - K DuHamel
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Jim HSL, Quinn GP, Barata A, Cases M, Cessna J, Gonzalez B, Gonzalez L, Koskan A, Montiel-Ishino F, Pidala J. Caregivers' quality of life after blood and marrow transplantation: a qualitative study. Bone Marrow Transplant 2014; 49:1234-6. [PMID: 24887387 DOI: 10.1038/bmt.2014.118] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- H S L Jim
- Health Outcomes and Behavior Department, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - G P Quinn
- Health Outcomes and Behavior Department, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - A Barata
- 1] Health Outcomes and Behavior Department, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, USA [2] Psychiatry and Legal Medicine PhD Program, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - M Cases
- Health Outcomes and Behavior Department, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - J Cessna
- Department of Psychology, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - B Gonzalez
- Health Outcomes and Behavior Department, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - L Gonzalez
- Health Outcomes and Behavior Department, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - A Koskan
- Health Outcomes and Behavior Department, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - F Montiel-Ishino
- Health Outcomes and Behavior Department, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - J Pidala
- Blood and Marrow Transplant Department, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, USA
| |
Collapse
|