The effects of music therapy on peripherally inserted central catheter in hospitalized children with leukemia

Maintenance of peripherally inserted central catheters in general pediatric wards

BACKGROUND

The peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC) has emerged as a useful option for long-term intravenous access in children, which has been increasingly required with the advancements in pediatric care. Long-term maintenance of PICCs is important for their functions, but little is known about this. We aimed to describe the PICC dwelling time in general pediatric wards, taking both complications and intentional routine removal into consideration, and explore the factors for long-term maintenance.

METHODS

We retrospectively examined the records of procedures performed by the pediatric PICC team between April 2020 and September 2023 at a children's hospital in Japan. We conducted a survival time analysis to depict PICC dwelling time and regression analyses to explore factors associated with successful PICC insertion and long-term maintenance of catheters.

RESULTS

The PICC team conducted 78 procedures during the study period, 66 (85%) achieved central venous access, and 57 (78%) of 73 inserted PICCs could be used until treatment completion. The most common indication was administration of antibiotics. Radioscopy was utilized in 18% of procedures. The median PICC survival time was 170 days, and the 75% PICC survival time was 52 days. Failure of PICC insertion was associated with the 4.5 Fr double catheter (odds ratio (OR), 0.16) and lower extremity puncture (OR, 0.24). Longer catheter survival was associated with the catheter tip in the superior vena cava (SVC; hazard ratio (HR), 0.15), which was confirmed by additional multivariate analysis (HR, 0.14).

CONCLUSIONS

PICCs could be used for several months in children until complications required removal. Single-lumen catheter insertion into the SVC might be associated with longer catheter survival. Developing appropriate methods to reach the SVC remains our task.

The Effectiveness of Nonpharmacological Interventions to Reduce Procedural Pain of Pediatric Oncology Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Relieving procedural pain in pediatric oncology is an important facilitator of the cancer treatment process.

OBJECTIVE

To synthesize the effect of nonpharmacological interventions on reducing the procedural pain of pediatric oncology patients in randomized controlled trials.

METHODS

A meta-analysis and systematic review for randomized controlled trials. The PROSPERO has registered the meta-analytic approach used in this review. For studies published in English from the earliest record to May 2023, comprehensive and systematic literature searches were carried out using PubMed, Web of Science, CINAHL (Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature), Science Direct, Springer Link, Scopus, EMBASE, Ovid, ELSEVIER, ProQuest and the CENTRAL, and Taylor & Francis. Two researchers used the Cochrane Collaboration method to assess the risk of bias in the included studies.

RESULTS

Four hundred ninety-four participants in 7 trials met the eligibility requirements. The primary findings showed no evidence of a significant publishing bias. This study revealed that nonpharmacological therapies significantly reduced procedural pain. Virtual reality techniques outperform nondigital distraction techniques in subgroup analysis of intervention types when it comes to lowering procedural pain in pediatric oncology patients.

CONCLUSION

In pediatric oncology, nonpharmacological therapies significantly and positively reduce procedural pain. No adverse events were reported in the included studies. Nonpharmacological therapies can be utilized by pediatric oncology nurses to mitigate procedural pain associated with needles.

IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE

The findings of this study will contribute to the application of effective nonpharmacological interventions by clinical nurses and will provide guidance for the planning of further research.

Effectiveness of Occupation-Based Nursing Program on Chemotherapy-Related Symptoms and Satisfaction Among Pediatric Oncology Patients: A Randomized Controlled Trial

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to determine the effect of an occupation-based nursing program (OBaNuP) on chemotherapy-induced symptoms and satisfaction in pediatric oncology patients.

DATA SOURCES

This study was a randomized controlled trial. The study sample consisted of 60 hospitalized children with cancer who were aged 7 to 12. Participants were randomly assigned to an OBaNuP (intervention group, n = 30) or clinical routine care only (control group, n = 30). The intervention group participated in an OBaNuP for an average of 30 minutes per day for 5 days. The Memorial Symptom Assessment Scale 7-12 and Psychosocial Symptoms in Hospitalized Children and Child Satisfaction Questionnaire were completed by participants at baseline, the first meeting immediately after intervention, and 7 days and 14 days after the intervention.

CONCLUSION

The average scores of chemotherapy-related symptoms differed over time between the intervention and control groups (P < .05). The psychosocial symptom score averages of the children in the intervention group significantly decreased at all time points compared to the control group (P < .05). The satisfaction mean scores of the children in the intervention group increased significantly at all time points compared to the control group (P < .05).

IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING PRACTICE

The OBaNuP initiative supported the decrease of chemotherapy-related and psychosocial symptoms, while also promoting an increase in satisfaction among children undergoing cancer treatment at the hospital consistently over all observed time periods.