Primary Systemic Therapy in Breast Cancer: Past Lessons and New Approaches

Trends in pre-operative needle biopsy use in invasive breast cancer diagnosis: a Dutch nationwide population study

INTRODUCTION

In recent decades, the use of pre-operative needle biopsy for breast cancer diagnosis has shifted. There is also an increased demand for availability of predictive factors. This study aims to quantify these changes.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

From the Dutch nationwide pathology database (PALGA), all reports on breast cancer for five periods of 3 months between 1996 and 2016 were retrieved. Reports were categorised using automatic recognition of keywords. Classification was checked manually for the first 200 reports per period. The first 100 resected cases in each period underwent detailed investigation.

RESULTS

For automatic analysis 34,639 reports were retrieved. Accuracy was 98% compared to manual assessment. Fine needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) decreased from 77% (1996) to 58% (2001), 34% (2006), 25% (2011), and 17% (2016). For detailed assessment, 498 cases were analysed. Diagnostic surgical excision decreased from 24% in 1996 to 3% in 2016, cases with only cytology from 65% to 1%, respectively. Cytology and core needle biopsy (CNB) were combined in 21% of cases in 2016. Pre-operative availability of ER status increased from 3% in 1996 to 36% in 2006 and 78% in 2016 (as compared to 47%, 92%, and 97% for post-operative availability, respectively) and for HER2 status from 0% to 13% and 66% (as compared to 1%, 89%, and 96% for post-operative availability, respectively).

CONCLUSION

Results suggest that nationwide, clinics prioritise reliability and availability of ER and HER2 status, replacing FNAC by CNB. However, for optimal treatment planning for all patients, availability of pre-operative receptor status warrants further improvement.

Exploring patient experiences of neo-adjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Neo-adjuvant chemotherapy is recommended for 'inoperable' locally advanced and inflammatory breast cancers. For operable breast cancers, trials indicate no survival differences between chemotherapy given pre or post-surgery. Communicating evidence based information to patients is complex and studies examining patient experiences of neo-adjuvant chemotherapy are lacking. This study aims to explore the experiences of women who received neo-adjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer.

METHODS

A qualitative approach using in-depth interviews with 20 women who had completed neo-adjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer. Interview data were analysed using thematic analysis.

RESULTS

The sample included a relatively young group of women, with caring responsibilities. Five main themes emerged: coping with the rapid transition from 'well' to 'ill', information needs and decision making, needing support and empathy, impact on family, and creating a new 'normal'. More support was needed towards the end of chemotherapy, when side effects were at their most toxic, and decisions about forthcoming surgery were being made. Some women were referred to psychological services, but usually when a crisis point had been reached.

CONCLUSION

Information and support would have been beneficial at key time points. This information is vital in developing services and interventions to meet the complex needs of these patients and potentially prevent late referral to psychological services. Specialist oncology nurses are able to develop empathetic relationships with patients and have the experience, knowledge and skills to inform and support women experiencing neo-adjuvant chemotherapy. Targeting key time points and maintaining relationship throughout neo-adjuvant chemotherapy would be highly beneficial.