Recognition Rules for Binding of Homeodomains to Operator DNA

Molecular dynamics simulations show altered secondary structure of clawless in binary complex with DNA providing insights into aristaless-clawless-DNA ternary complex formation

Aristaless (Al) and clawless (Cll) homeodomains that are involved in leg development in Drosophila melanogaster are known to bind cooperatively to 5'-(T/C)TAATTAA(T/A)(T/A)G-3' DNA sequence, but the mechanism of their binding to DNA is unknown. Molecular dynamics (MD) studies have been carried out on binary, ternary, and reconstructed protein-DNA complexes involving Al, Cll, and DNA along with binding free energy analysis of these complexes. Analysis of MD trajectories of Cll-3A01, binary complex reveals that C-terminal end of helixIII of Cll, unwind in the absence of Al and remains so in reconstructed ternary complex, Cll-3A01-Al. In addition, this change in secondary structure of Cll does not allow it to form protein-protein interactions with Al in the ternary reconstructed complex. However, secondary structure of Cll and its interactions are maintained in other reconstructed ternary complex, Al-3A01-Cll where Cll binds to Al-3A01, binary complex to form ternary complex. These interactions as observed during MD simulations compare well with those observed in ternary crystal structure. Thus, this study highlights the role of helixIII of Cll and protein-protein interactions while proposing likely mechanism of recognition in ternary complex, Al-Cll-DNA.

Recognition rules for binding of Zn-Cys2His2 transcription factors to operator DNA

The molecules of Zn-finger transcription factors consist of several similar small protein units. We analyzed the crystal structures 46 basic units of 22 complexes of Zn-Cys2His2 family with the fragments of operator DNA. We showed that the recognition of DNA occurs via five protein contacts. The canonical binding positions of the recognizing α-helix were -1, 3, 6, and 7, which make contacts with the tetra-nucleotide sequence ZXYZ of the coding DNA strand; here the canonical binding triplet is underlined. The non-coding DNA strand forms only one contact at α-helix position 2. We have discovered that there is a single highly conservative contact His7α with the phosphate group of nucleotide Z, which precedes each triplet XYZ of the coding DNA chain. This particular contact is invariant for the all Zn-Cys2His2 family with high frequency of occurrence 83%, which we considered as an invariant recognition rule. We have also selected a previously unreported Zn-Cys2His2-Arg subfamily of 21 Zn-finger units bound with DNA triplets, which make two invariant contacts with residues Arg6α and His7α with the coding DNA chain. These contacts show frequency of occurrence 100 and 90%, and are invariant recognition rule. Three other variable protein-DNA contacts are formed mainly with the bases and specify the recognition patterns of individual factor units. The revealed recognition rules are inherent for the Zn-Cys2His2 family and Zn-Cys2His2-Arg subfamily of different taxonomic groups and can distinguish members of these families from any other family of transcription factors.

Mutations in DNA-binding loop of NFAT5 transcription factor produce unique outcomes on protein-DNA binding and dynamics

The nuclear factor of activated T cells 5 (NFAT5 or TonEBP) is a Rel family transcriptional activator and is activated by hypertonic conditions. Several studies point to a possible connection between nuclear translocation and DNA binding; however, the mechanism of NFAT5 nuclear translocation and the effect of DNA binding on retaining NFAT5 in the nucleus are largely unknown. Recent experiments showed that different mutations introduced in the DNA-binding loop and dimerization interface were important for DNA binding and some of them decreased the nuclear–cytoplasm ratio of NFAT5. To understand the mechanisms of these mutations, we model their effect on protein dynamics and DNA binding. We show that the NFAT5 complex without DNA is much more flexible than the complex with DNA. Moreover, DNA binding considerably stabilizes the overall dimeric complex and the NFAT5 dimer is only marginally stable in the absence of DNA. Two sets of NFAT5 mutations from the same DNA-binding loop are found to have different mechanisms of specific and nonspecific binding to DNA. The R217A/E223A/R226A (R293A/E299A/R302A using isoform c numbering) mutant is characterized by significantly compromised binding to DNA and higher complex flexibility. On the contrary, the T222D (T298D in isoform c) mutation, a potential phosphomimetic mutation, makes the overall complex more rigid and does not significantly affect the DNA binding. Therefore, the reduced nuclear–cytoplasm ratio of NFAT5 can be attributed to reduced binding to DNA for the triple mutant, while the T222D mutant suggests an additional mechanism at work.