Localization of histone H1 binding sites within the nucleosome by UV-induced H1-DNA crosslinking in vivo

Epigenetic modification is central to genome reprogramming in somatic cell nuclear transfer

The recent high-profile reports of the derivation of human embryonic stem cells (ESCs) from human blastocysts produced by somatic cell nuclear transfer (SCNT) have highlighted the possibility of making autologous cell lines specific to individual patients. Cell replacement therapies have much potential for the treatment of diverse conditions, and differentiation of ESCs is highly desirable as a means of producing the ranges of cell types required. However, given the range of immunophenotypes of ESC lines currently available, rejection of the differentiated cells by the host is a potentially serious problem. SCNT offers a means of circumventing this by producing ESCs of the same genotype as the donor. However, this technique is not without problems because it requires resetting of the gene expression program of a somatic cell to a state consistent with embryonic development. Some remodeling of parental DNA does occur within the fertilized oocyte, but the somatic genome presented in a radically different format to those of the gametes. Hence, it is perhaps unsurprising that many genes are expressed aberrantly within "cloned" embryos and the ESCs derived from them. Epigenetic modification of the genome through DNA methylation and covalent modification of the histones that form the nucleosome is the key to the maintenance of the differentiated state of the cell, and it is this that must be reset during SCNT. This review focuses on the mechanisms by which this is achieved and how this may account for its partial failure in the "cloning" process. We also highlight the potential dangers this may introduce into ESCs produced by this technology.

Binding of barrier to autointegration factor (BAF) to histone H3 and selected linker histones including H1.1

Barrier to autointegration factor (BAF) is an essential conserved double-stranded DNA-binding protein in metazoans. BAF binds directly to LEM domain nuclear proteins (e.g. LAP2, Emerin, and MAN1), lamin A, homeodomain transcription factors, and human immunodeficiency virus type 1-encoded proteins. BAF influences higher order chromatin structure and is required to assemble nuclei. BAF also facilitates retroviral preintegration complex insertion into target DNA in vitro, through unknown mechanisms. We report that BAF binds directly and selectively to linker histone H1.1 (among three subtypes tested) and core histone H3 with affinities of approximately 700 nm and approximately 100-200 nm, respectively, in vitro and in vivo. Mutations at the bottom and top surfaces of the BAF dimer disrupted or enhanced, respectively, this binding and affected H1 and H3 similarly. Biochemical studies showed that C-terminal residues 108-215 of histone H1.1 and the N-terminal tail plus helix alphaN in the core of histone H3.1 were each necessary and sufficient to bind BAF. Based on its interactions with histones and DNA, we propose BAF might bind nucleosomes in vivo.

Histone H1: location and role

Recent experiments have shown directly that, in bulk chromatin, the globular domain of histone H1 is positioned close to the dyad axis and is asymmetrically disposed, consistent with a polar arrangement of H1 molecules along the nucleosome filament. In addition to a structural role, H1 may also have gene-specific effects on transcription. The positioning of a core particle relative to a transcription factor binding-site may favour either transcription factor binding or H1 binding, depending on the location of the site.