Updated systematic-narrative review on communication intervention in Rett Syndrome: 2010-2022

International workshop: what is needed to ensure outcome measures for Rett syndrome are fit-for-purpose for clinical trials? June 7, 2023, Nashville, USA

INTRODUCTION

The clinical, research and advocacy communities for Rett syndrome are striving to achieve clinical trial readiness, including having fit-for-purpose clinical outcome assessments. This study aimed to (1) describe psychometric properties of clinical outcome assessment for Rett syndrome and (2) identify what is needed to ensure that fit-for-purpose clinical outcome assessments are available for clinical trials.

METHODS

Clinical outcome assessments for the top 10 priority domains identified in the Voice of the Patient Report for Rett syndrome were compiled and available psychometric data were extracted. The clinical outcome assessments measured clinical severity, functional abilities, comorbidities and quality of life, and electrophysiological biomarkers. An international and multidisciplinary panel of 29 experts with clinical, research, psychometric, biostatistical, industry and lived experience was identified through International Rett Syndrome Foundation networks, to discuss validation of the clinical outcome assessments, gaps and next steps, during a workshop and in a follow-up questionnaire. The identified gaps and limitations were coded using inductive content analysis.

RESULTS

Variable validation profiles across 26 clinical outcome assessments of clinical severity, functional abilities, and comorbidities were discussed. Reliability, validity, and responsiveness profiles were mostly incomplete; there were limited content validation data, particularly parent-informed relevance, comprehensiveness and comprehensibility of items; and no data on meaningful change or cross-cultural validity. The panel identified needs for standardised administration protocols and systematic validation programmes.

CONCLUSION

A pipeline of collaborative clinical outcome assessment development and validation research in Rett syndrome can now be designed, aiming to have fit-for-purpose measures that can evaluate meaningful change, to serve future clinical trials and clinical practice.

Use of a low-tech tool in the improvement of social interaction of patients with Rett Syndrome: an observational study

Introduction

The main aim of the present study was to examine whether the use of a low-tech tool, called click4all, inserted into cognitive and motor training can increase social interaction of patients with Rett Syndrome (RTT) with classmates in a school setting.

Methods

Twenty-seven participants with RTT were randomly assigned to two groups: the experimental group received treatment with click4all, and the control group received traditional treatment without click4all. Parameters were measured before treatment (T1), 6 months after treatment (T2), 6 months after the second treatment phase (T3) and at the end of the third treatment phase (T4).

Results

The results demonstrated an increase in levels of social interaction among classmates and patients with RTT in the experimental group, over time, compared to the control group, 95% CI [5.20-15.30]. Classmates also showed a higher level of knowledge related to participants of the experimental group, and this increased over time, 95% CI [24.98-63.52]. The level of knowledge related to the control group was stable over time and lower than the experimental group.

Discussion

This study demonstrated that the use of a low-tech tool can increase social interactions of patients with RTT in a school setting. This is important, as patients with RTT are often restricted in an isolation condition.

Trofinetide Treatment Demonstrates a Benefit Over Placebo for the Ability to Communicate in Rett Syndrome

BACKGROUND

Trofinetide was approved by the US Food and Drug Administration for the treatment of Rett syndrome (RTT) in March 2023. Benefiting the ability to communicate in RTT is often identified as the most important caregiver goal for new therapies. This analysis reports the communication-related end points from the phase 3 LAVENDER study of trofinetide in RTT.

METHODS

Females with RTT, aged five to 20 years, were randomized 1:1 to trofinetide or placebo for 12 weeks. Secondary efficacy end points related to communication were based on change from baseline to week 12 and included the caregiver-rated Communication and Symbolic Behavior Scales Developmental Profile™ Infant-Toddler Checklist (CSBS-DP-IT) Social Composite score (key secondary end point; scores ranged from 0 to 26 [higher scores indicated better communication]) and novel clinician rating scales (0 [normal] to 7 [severe impairment]) measuring the ability to communicate choices nonverbally (RTT-COMC) and verbally (RTT-VCOM).

RESULTS

Trofinetide demonstrated a statistically significant difference versus placebo for the CSBS-DP-IT Social Composite score (least squares mean [LSM] difference = 1.0; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.3 to 1.7; P = 0.0064; Cohen's d effect size = 0.43) and a nominally significant difference for the RTT-COMC (LSM difference: -0.3; 95% CI, -0.6 to -0.0; P = 0.0257; Cohen's d effect size = 0.36). As expected, there was no difference for the RTT-VCOM.

CONCLUSIONS

Significant treatment benefit for trofinetide versus placebo was observed in scales measuring the ability to communicate. These scales may be appropriate for future clinical studies in RTT and other neurodevelopmental disorders.