Feasibility of text messaging to augment brief advice and nicotine replacement therapy for smoking cessation in college students

Emerging Adults' Experiences with E-Cigarette Cessation

Background: The use of electronic nicotine delivery systems (ENDS) is one of the most common substance use behaviors in college students, yet most individuals show some interest in quitting. The current study added to the limited literature on ENDS cessation by examining readiness to quit and the use and perceived efficacy of ENDS cessation methods in a heterogeneous sample of college students. Methods: Students 18-24 years in Psychology courses (N = 1563; 73% female) from six US universities completed an online survey between September 2021-April 2022. Results: Nearly half the sample (n = 738, 47%) reported lifetime ENDS use and nearly half of lifetime users (n = 356, 48%) reported a quit attempt. Most ENDS users reported some readiness to quit (n = 251, 67%). Quitting "cold turkey", using willpower, and replacing ENDS use with another activity were endorsed most frequently; strategies were perceived as more helpful if students had direct experience with them. Social support (e.g., counseling, groups, family/friend support) and nicotine replacement products were perceived as effective but were utilized infrequently. Digital tools (i.e., apps, text messaging) were perceived to be least helpful and were utilized infrequently. Conclusion: Most college students who use ENDS are interested in quitting and have relied on unassisted methods for cessation. Our data suggest a significant opportunity for college personnel and public health officials to further enhance awareness and uptake of ENDS cessation resources for this demographic. Digital tools that integrate social support may be especially effective given their low cost, demonstrated efficacy, and alignment with students' preferences for social support.

Ecological momentary interventions for smoking cessation: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Tobacco use is an important cause of preventable mortality and morbidity worldwide. Only 7% of smokers successfully quit annually, despite numerous evidence-based smoking cessation treatments. An important reason for failure is barriers to accessing appropriate smoking cessation interventions, which can be minimized by technology-delivered interventions, such as ecological momentary interventions. Ecological momentary interventions provide the right type and intensity of treatment in real time, based on ecological momentary assessments of relevant variables. The aim of this review was to assess the effectiveness of ecological momentary interventions in smoking cessation.

METHODS

We searched MEDLINE, Scopus, CENTRAL, psychINFO, and ProQuest without applying any filters on 19 September, 2022. One author screened search results for obvious irrelevant and duplicate studies. The remaining studies were independently reviewed by two authors to exclude irrelevant studies, and then they extracted data from the included studies. We collated study findings, transformed data into a common rubric, and calculated a weighted treatment effect across studies using Review Manager 5.

FINDINGS

We analyzed 10 studies with a total of 2391 participants. Assessment methods included exhaled CO analyzers, bidirectional SMS, data input in apps, and hand movement detection. Interventions were based on acceptance and commitment therapy and cognitive behavioral therapy. Smoking abstinence was significantly higher in participants of intervention groups compared to control groups (RR = 1.24; 95% CI 1.07-1.44, P = 0.004; I2 = 0%).

CONCLUSION

Ecological momentary intervention is a novel area of research in behavioral science. The results of this systematic review based on the available literature suggest that these interventions could be beneficial for smoking cessation.

Campus tobacco control policies and cessation interventions in college students: a commentary calling for research and action to address tobacco-related health disparities

Tobacco-related health disparities (TRHDs) have a significant impact on population health in the USA. Effectively preventing and controlling TRHDs among young adult populations require multiple prevention and cessation points, including within college/university contexts. This commentary addresses current campus tobacco control policies and cessation interventions for U.S. college students, with an emphasis on TRHDs and opportunities for research and research translation to reduce these disparities. This commentary is informed by literature published between 2010 and 2020 regarding (a) prevalence and impact of campus tobacco control policies; and/or (b) behavioral outcomes from cessation interventions for young adults attending colleges. Despite a doubling of college campuses adopting tobacco-free policies from 2012 to 2017, roughly two-thirds continue to operate without such policies. Few policies address alternative tobacco products (e.g., e-cigarettes, cigars/cigarillos, and hookah), and communication about and enforcement of existing policies is extremely limited. A broad range of cessation intervention strategies have targeted individuals in this age group, but with little focus on TRHDs and limited intervention dissemination. Importantly, college students representing populations at risk for TRHDs (e.g., racial/ethnic/sexual/gender minorities, low socioeconomic status) are less likely to be exposed to strong tobacco control policies or supports for cessation. There are untapped opportunities for behavioral medicine approaches to reduce TRHDs in college settings. Research findings regarding multilevel (policy, community-level, and individual-level) interventions must be translated to policy/practice in order to address tobacco use, particularly among vulnerable college student populations.