Exposure of medical students to body fluids

Interdisciplinary differences in needlestick injuries among healthcare professionals in training: Improving situational awareness to prevent high-risk injuries

BACKGROUND

Needlestick injuries among healthcare professionals continue to be an occupational hazard, frequently and incorrectly regarded as low-risk, and exacerbated by underreporting. We aimed to investigate rates of needlestick injury, reasons for underreporting, and how explicit announcements that patients are "high-risk" (i.e., human immunodeficiency virus, hepatitis, or intravenous drug abuse history) might affect the actions of those at risk of sustaining an injury.

METHODS

A cross-sectional survey was administered to medical students (MS), nursing students (NS), and residents.

RESULTS

30/224 (13%) of MS, 6/65 (9%) of NS, and 67/126 (53%) of residents experienced needlestick injuries. 37% of MS, 33% of NS, and 46% of residents attributed "lack of concentration" as cause of injury. Residents had the lowest percentage of underreporting (33%), with rates of 40% and 83% among MS and NS, respectively. Top reasons for non-reporting included the injury being perceived as "trivial" (22%) and patient being "low-risk" (18%). A majority stated pre-operative "high-risk" announcements should be required (91%), and would promote "culture of safety" (82%), reporting of injuries (85%), and increased concentration during procedures (70%).

CONCLUSIONS

We recommend routine announcements during pre-operative time-out and nursing/resident hand-offs that state a patient is "high-risk" if applicable. We hypothesize such policy will promote a "culture of safety," situational awareness, and incident reporting.

The ethical and pedagogical effects of modeling "not-so-universal" precautions

AIM

We sought to understand current medical students' levels of training and knowledge, and their attitudes regarding universal precautions practices and underlying professional and ethical issues.

METHOD

A total of 54 US medical students at two schools were interviewed to determine the level of understanding and training students receive about universal precautions, their feelings about the effectiveness (or ineffectiveness) of universal precautions, the frequency and kinds of universal precautions used by healthcare professionals as observed by medical students, and students' perspectives about the lack of or inconsistent use of universal precautions.

RESULTS

Pre-clinical students focused on safe-sex practices among students and professionals, as well as simple, important acts to protect oneself against infection and disease, such as hand-washing. Clinical students, on the other hand, had more exposure to observing and practicing universal precautions, thus presented us with more, in-depth responses pertaining to inconsistent and ineffective use of universal precautions among peers and role models. Several themes were noted from students' responses.

CONCLUSION

This study confirms previously acquired data that universal precautions are not consistently or appropriately used by healthcare professionals, it is a significant and novel study in that it reveals a hidden, ethical, and clinical problem in medical education.

Profiles of rural nurses' use of personal protective equipment: a cluster analysis

This study examined the relationship between profiles of rural registered nurses' levels of compliance with the use of personal protective equipment and HIV-related attitudes. Survey data were collected from 395 practicing registered nurses in nine rural counties in New York and Pennsylvania. Cluster analysis grouped respondents according to their use of protective equipment by patient HIV status. Seven profiles were identified from the resulting 13 clusters. Profiles were named according to the characteristics of the protective equipment usage that were most evident in each profile. Usage levels included minimal users, appropriate users, anticipatory users, glove users, discriminate users, maximal users, and optimal users. Of these, three were classified as compliant, one as undercompliant, and three as overcompliant. Selective compliance (changing usage in response to patients' HIV status) was characteristic of five profiles. Knowledge that patients were HIV-positive accounted for overcompliance and selective compliance and was related to nurses' HIV attitudes. Undercompliance was related to care of patients who were HIV-negative or unknown. Rural nurses' use of personal protective equipment is not homogenous but discrete and idiosyncratic. This analysis expands current knowledge and redefines nursing practice of standard precautions.

Health professional students' occupational exposures to blood-borne pathogens: primary and secondary prevention strategies

Health science students, along with the health professionals they hope to become, are at increased risk for certain occupational injuries and illnesses. One of these risks is occupational exposure to blood-borne pathogens, such as human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) and hepatitis, which may result in severe illnesses or even death. Two case studies demonstrate postexposure care of exposed individuals at the University of Texas Medical Branch Student Health Services before and after policy changes and prevention strategies were strengthened in response to exposure incidents.

Contagious diseases in competitive sport: what are the risks?

Great concern is often expressed over the possibility of contagion among athletes in competitive sports, particularly sports with much person-to-person contact. Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) is only the most notorious of infectious agents; potentially, other viruses, bacteria, and even fungi may be involved. Because of the concern, however, special attention is paid to HIV and hepatitis B infections. For most of the infections considered, the athlete is more at risk during activities off the playing field than while competing. Inclusion of immunizations against measles and hepatitis B among prematriculation immunization requirements (PIRs) for colleges and universities would eliminate these two diseases from the list of dangers to college athletes and all students. Education, rather than regulations, should remain the cornerstone in considering the risks to athletes from contagious diseases.