A meta-analysis on randomized controlled trials of treating eosinophilic esophagitis with budesonide

Biologics for eosinophilic oesophagitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

Advancing the understanding of the pathophysiology of eosinophilic oesophagitis (EoE) and other eosinophilic gastrointestinal diseases (EGIDs) has spurred research into targeted biological therapies, while the conclusive therapeutic efficacy of biologics remains uncertain. In this review, we conducted a meta-analysis of all RCTS of biologics in the treatment of EoE to evaluate their efficacy and safety and discussed their treatment of non-EoE EGIDs.

METHODS

We searched the PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science databases. Double-blind randomized controlled trials comparing biologics with placebo in patients with EoE and non-EoE EGIDs were collected and further screened for inclusion and exclusion. The caliber of the included literature was evaluated using the Cochrane risk assessment tool findings. Data extraction and meta-analysis were conducted using RevMan 5.4 and Stata 17.0. Clinical response and histological remission were the major endpoints.

RESULTS

Our search retrieved 3,237 articles. There were seven trials in total, comprising 792 people with EoE. Key outcomes of this meta-analysis include the following: Anti-IL-5 biologics exhibited statistically significant benefits in histological remission (RR 2.03 [CI 1.45-2.85]; p < 0.0001) compared to the placebo, but there was no significant difference in symptom relief (RR 1.06 [CI 0.88 to 1.28]; p = 0.53); anti-IL-4/13 biologics had significant effects on histologic improvement (RR 10.48 [CI 5.54-19.82]; p < 0.00001) and symptom related score reduction (RR 1.44 [CI 1.08-1.93]; p = 0.01), with a better outcome for endoscopic remission than with placebo (SMD-1.06 [CI-1.26-0.86], p < 0.00001); no statistically significant differences in adverse effects were observed between the intervention and control groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings suggest that the biologics currently being investigated are considered safe and effective treatments for EoE, while their efficiency varies. However, the discussion of biologics in non-pharyngitis EGID is hampered by a lack of research, necessitating more research in high-quality trials.

Satisfaction With and Adherence to Off-Label Corticosteroids in Adolescents and Adults With Eosinophilic Esophagitis: Results of a Web-Based Survey in the United States

GOALS

We assessed satisfaction with and adherence to off-label corticosteroids in patients with eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) in the United States.

BACKGROUND

EoE is a chronic inflammatory disease for which there are currently no US Food and Drug Administration-approved swallowed topical corticosteroids.

STUDY

This noninterventional, cross-sectional, web-based survey included caregivers of adolescents (aged 11 to 17 y) and adults (aged 18 years or older) with a self-reported [or caregiver-reported (adolescents)] physician diagnosis of EoE who were receiving corticosteroids. Participants were recruited through 2 nonprofit, patient advocacy groups. The 9-item Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication (TSQM-9) was used to assess satisfaction across effectiveness, convenience, and global satisfaction domains (scale: 1 to 100 per domain); higher scores indicated greater satisfaction. The 4-item Morisky Green Levine Medication Adherence Scale (MGL-4) was used to assess adherence; an MGL-4 score of <3 indicated adherence. Participants also reported reasons for nonadherence.

RESULTS

Overall, 201 participants (caregivers of adolescents, n=98; adults, n=103) were included in this study. Mean TSQM-9 scores indicated low satisfaction with off-label corticosteroids across all 3 satisfaction domains in adolescents (≤61.1) and adults (≤55.7). Slightly fewer adolescents (37.1%) than adults (40.8%) were considered adherent. Forgetfulness was the most frequently reported reason for nonadherence; some patients chose not to take their medications, owing to poor palatability (adolescents), difficulty taking medications at specific times (adults), or feeling depressed/overwhelmed (adolescents and adults).

CONCLUSIONS

Satisfaction with and adherence to off-label corticosteroids were low in this web-based survey of adolescents and adults with EoE in the United States.

The Effectiveness of Budesonide Once Daily as Maintenance Treatment of Eosinophilic Esophagitis

BACKGROUND

Swallowed topical corticosteroids (STC) are an effective first-line therapy for patients with eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE), both for induction and maintenance of remission. All interventional trials with STC used twice-daily dosing regimens. However, in other inflammatory gastrointestinal disorders, corticosteroids are given once daily (OD) with equal outcomes and improved compliance.

GOALS

To evaluate the effectiveness of topical budesonide maintenance treatment in a once-daily dosing schedule.

STUDY

Retrospective analysis of confirmed patients with EoE, treated with topical budesonide as maintenance therapy OD, with adequate follow-up available. Patients currently treated with budesonide were contacted to fill out online questionnaires regarding symptoms and health-related quality of life (HRQOL). The primary end point was histologic remission, defined as peak eosinophil count (PEC) <15 eosinophils per high power field (HPF) after >12 weeks of budesonide OD.

RESULTS

We included 29 patients on STC OD (1 mg, N=28; 0.5 mg, N=1), either budesonide orodispersible tablet (BOT, Jorveza, Dr. Falk Pharma; N=12) or budesonide viscous solution (BVS; N=17). After a median follow-up of 767 days on OD dosing (range: 103 to 2396), 86% of patients were in histologic remission. Four patients had histologic disease activity, of which one was treated with BOT. Two patients experienced a slight increase in PEC after dose reduction of BVS to OD (to PEC of 25 and 35/HPF, respectively). However, after switching the formulation to BOT OD they achieved histologic remission.

CONCLUSIONS

In this retrospective study, we demonstrated favorable results in the majority of patients treated with budesonide 1 mg OD as maintenance treatment for eosinophilic esophagitis.

Comparing budesonide treatment in eosinophilic esophagitis: a specialized center cohort versus a population-based cohort

OBJECTIVE

Eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) is a chronic immune-mediated disease. The budesonide orodispersible tablet (BOT) is recommended as second-line treatment according to the Danish guideline. This study aimed to compare potential treatment disparities before BOT initiation, follow-up practices, clinico-histologic remission rates during BOT treatment, and adherence to the national guideline between the highly specialized EoE-Cph cohort and the population-based DanEoE cohort.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

This cohort study compared 65 adult patients from the EoE-Cph cohort with 65 patients from the DanEoE cohort. All patients were diagnosed between 2015-2021. The diagnosis of EoE was defined according to the AGREE consensus. Data were extracted manually from medical records and registries.

RESULTS

In the EoE-Cph cohort, 88% were prescribed proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) before started on BOT compared to 100% in the DanEoE cohort (p = 0.0035). Symptomatic follow-up occurred in 89% of EoE-Cph patients compared to 97% of DanEoE patients after BOT treatment (p = 0.0841). No difference was found between patients who underwent histologic follow-up after topical steroid treatment (83% versus 82%, p = 0.8162). Complete clinico-histologic remission was frequently observed, and no significant difference was observed between the two cohorts (67% versus 80%, p =0.1789). One out of four patients had conflicting symptomatic and histological responses.

CONCLUSIONS

This study did not provide conclusive evidence favoring the treatment of EoE patients exclusively at highly specialized EoE centers. However, the authors acknowledge that further evidence is necessary before considering changes in clinical practice. Conflicting treatment responses, and discontinuation of treatment due to side effects remains a notable concern.

Effectiveness of treatment with budesonide orodispersible tablets in 76 patients with eosinophilic oesophagitis - real-life experience from the population-based DanEoE cohort

BACKGROUND

Eosinophilic oesophagitis (EoE) is a chronic immune-mediated disease. In Denmark, the budesonide orodispersible tablet (BOT) is recommended as a second-line treatment for proton pump inhibitor-refractory EoE patients.

AIMS

To evaluate the effectiveness of treatment with BOT in adult EoE patients in a population-based setting in Denmark.

METHODS

This was a retrospective, registry-based, DanEoE cohort study of all 76 adult EoE patients treated with BOT and diagnosed between 2007 and 2021 in the North Denmark Region. After medical record revision, the EoE diagnosis was defined according to the AGREE consensus. Symptomatic response was based on the information found in the patients' medical reports and histologic remission was defined as <15 eosinophils per high-power field (eos/hpf).

RESULTS

Histologic remission was achieved in 89% of the patients treated with BOT who underwent histologic evaluation. Clinicohistologic remission was achieved in 71% of the patients who underwent both symptomatic and histologic evaluation. Despite histologic remission, 18% of patients still experienced symptoms. Non-responders were found in 7% of the patients. Complications were rare, with dilation of strictures performed in 7% and food bolus obstruction (FBO) occurring in 3%. Discontinuation of the treatment due to unacceptable side effects was observed in 11% of the treated patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Treatment with BOT effectively induced histologic remission in most of the EoE patients. Despite achieving histologic remission, approximately 1/5 of the patients were still symptomatic. Complications were rare. In non-responders and those with unacceptable side effects, alternative treatment options such as biologic agents might be needed.

Eosinophilic esophagitis: Current concepts in diagnosis and management

ABSTRACT

Eosinophilic esophagitis is an antigen-mediated chronic inflammatory disorder that has risen in incidence and prevalence over the past 2 decades. The clinical presentation is variable and consists of mainly esophageal symptoms such as dysphagia, heartburn, food impaction, and vomiting. Current management relies on dietary elimination, proton-pump inhibitors, and topical corticosteroids with different response rates and relapses after treatment discontinuation. With a better understanding of the underlying pathophysiology, many molecules emerged recently as targeted treatment including dupilumab (IL4/IL13 blocker), as the first FDA-approved biological treatment, which has changed the management paradigm.

Swallowed topical corticosteroids for eosinophilic esophagitis: Utilization and real-world efficacy from the EoE CONNECT registry

BACKGROUND

Swallowed topical corticosteroids (tC) are common therapy for patients with eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE). Widely heterogeneous results have occurred due to their active ingredients, formulations and doses.

OBJECTIVE

To assess the effectiveness of topical corticosteroid therapy for EoE in real-world practice.

METHODS

Cross-sectional study analysis of the multicentre EoE CONNECT registry. Clinical remission was defined as a decrease of ≥50% in dysphagia symptom scores; histological remission was defined as a peak eosinophil count below 15 per high-power field. The effectiveness in achieving clinico-histological remission (CHR) was compared for the main tC formulations.

RESULTS

Overall, data on 1456 prescriptions of tC in monotherapy used in 866 individual patients were assessed. Of those, 904 prescriptions with data on formulation were employed for the induction of remission; 234 reduced a previously effective dose for maintenance. Fluticasone propionate formulations dominated the first-line treatment, while budesonide was more common in later therapies. A swallowed nasal drop suspension was the most common formulation of fluticasone propionate. Doses ≥0.8 mg/day provided a 65% CHR rate and were superior to lower doses. Oral viscous solution prepared by a pharmacist was the most common prescription of budesonide; 4 mg/day provided no benefit over 2 mg/day (CHR rated being 72% and 80%, respectively). A multivariate analysis revealed budesonide orodispersible tablets as the most effective therapy (OR 18.9, p < 0.001); use of higher doses (OR 4.3, p = 0.03) and lower symptom scores (OR 0.9, p = 0.01) were also determinants of effectiveness.

CONCLUSION

Reduced symptom severity, use of high doses, and use of budesonide orodispersible tablets particularly were all independent predictors of tC effectiveness.

The Efficacy of Budesonide as Intrapolyp Injection Agent in the Management of Type 2 CRSwNP

OBJECTIVES

To assess the efficacy and safety of budesonide as an intrapolyp injection in chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP) in comparison to control and systemic steroids.

METHOD

In a prospective double-blinded controlled randomized clinical trial, 150 patients with CRSwNP were divided into 3 groups in a ratio 1:1:1 where group (A) was given oral prednisolone 1 mg/kg tapered daily for 2 weeks, group (B) was given budesonide intrapolyp injection weekly for 5 consecutive weeks, and group (C) was given intrapolyp injection with saline as the control group. Patients were assessed upon Sinonasal Outcome Test (SNOT-22) score, Total Nasal Polyp score (TNPS), Serum IgE, absolute eosinophilic count, and morning cortisol level before treatment, 1 week and 6 months after completing their treatment protocol.

RESULTS

SNOT 22 score improved significantly in all groups compared to those at baseline. Reduction in the oral and injection groups was much greater than the control group (P2 < 0.001), (P3 < 0.001), and the same trend concerning TNPS score (P2 < 0.001), (P3 < 0.001) but with no significant change in the control group.

CONCLUSION

Intrapolyp steroid injection is considered a safe and effective method in nasal polyposis with limited side effects in comparison to systemic steroids. Using Budesonide as an agent for intrapolyp injection appears to be promising. It's advisable in patients with multiple relapses or high-risk patients to avoid repeated courses of oral steroids.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

2 Laryngoscope, 134:2085-2092, 2024.

The role of budesonide intrapolyp injection in the management of type 2 chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps: a randomised clinical trial

PROBLEM

To assess the efficacy of budesonide intrapolyp injection in chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps.

METHOD

Ninety patients were divided into three groups; group A was given oral prednisolone, group B was given budesonide intrapolyp injection weekly for five consecutive weeks and group C was given budesonide as nasal irrigation for one month. Patients were assessed using Sino-Nasal Outcome Test 22 score, total nasal polyp score, serum immunoglobulin E, absolute eosinophilic count, and morning cortisol level before treatment, one week and three months after completing their treatment.

RESULTS

Total nasal polyp score decreased significantly in all groups compared to those at baseline. Reduction in the oral and injection groups was greater than the wash group (p2 = 0.004), (p3 < 0.001), and the same trend concerning Sino-Nasal Outcome Test 22 score (p2 < 0.001), (p3 < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Budesonide is an effective agent used in intrapolyp injection with no documented systemic or visual side effects that has comparable results with oral steroids.

Dietary and Nutritional Support in Gastrointestinal Diseases of the Upper Gastrointestinal Tract (I): Esophagus

The esophagus is the centerpiece of the digestive system of individuals and plays an essential role in transporting swallowed nutrients to the stomach. Diseases of the esophagus can alter this mechanism either by causing anatomical damage that obstructs the lumen of the organ (e.g., peptic, or eosinophilic stricture) or by generating severe motility disorders that impair the progression of the alimentary bolus (e.g., severe dysphagia of neurological origin or achalasia). In all cases, nutrient assimilation may be compromised. In some cases (e.g., ingestion of corrosive agents), a hypercatabolic state is generated, which increases resting energy expenditure. This manuscript reviews current clinical guidelines on the dietary and nutritional management of esophageal disorders such as severe oropharyngeal dysphagia, achalasia, eosinophilic esophagitis, lesions by caustics, and gastroesophageal reflux disease and its complications (Barrett's esophagus and adenocarcinoma). The importance of nutritional support in improving outcomes is also highlighted.

A New Viscous Budesonide Formulation for the Treatment of Eosinophilic Esophagitis in Children: A Preliminary Experience and Review of the Literature

Eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) is a chronic disease, characterized clinically by esophageal disfunction. Topical corticosteroids (tCS), predominantly fluticasone and budesonide, are considered the effective first line treatment, as well as an option of maintenance therapy in EoE. The way that tCS are administered significantly affects their effectiveness. There is still no ready-to-use steroid drug to be applied topically to the esophagus in children-a few experimental viscous slurries (mainly of budesonide) have been shown in trials to be more effective than steroids administered via metered dose inhalers (MDIs) and swallowed. The best examined steroid solvent of all is sucralose, a high-intensity artificial sweetener. Although it has been shown in a critical review that it is non-toxic and safe for all consumers, there are still some concerns among patients about its potential adverse effect on humans. Due to that fact, we developed a new viscous formulation and evaluated its effectiveness in the treatment of children with EoE. In an open, prospective, single-center study, we administered our new formulation of viscous budesonide twice daily for 8 weeks in patients with an active EoE. After treatment, we performed a control gastroscopy with the collection and evaluation of histopathological samples. We have proven our formulation effectiveness at 64%, as far as histological remission is concerned. We have also shown a reduction in the mean endoscopic reference score (EREFS) from 3.1 points at the beginning of the study to 1.6 points at the end of the study. Bearing in mind how important the acceptance of the solvent is for long-time compliance, especially among children, we also decided to assess the taste of the formulation. Therefore, we asked 46 adults and 10 children to swallow a sample of the solvent and fill in a short anonymous questionnaire about its taste, smell, consistency and easiness of swallowing. General acceptance for the proprietary solvent was high, reaching 7.5/10 among adults and 6.5/10 in children. To be able to compare the results of our preliminary experience, we reviewed the studies which evaluated substances that have been used so far as steroid solvents for the treatment of EoE. The overall effectiveness of the oral viscous budesonide (OVB) ranged from 65% to 90%, which is consistent with the results obtained in our study. Unfortunately, the high heterogeneity of the studies did not allow us to draw reliable conclusions.