Extended gene analysis can increase specificity of neonatal screening for cystic fibrosis

A New Targeted CFTR Mutation Panel Based on Next-Generation Sequencing Technology

Searching for mutations in the cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator gene (CFTR) is a key step in the diagnosis of and neonatal and carrier screening for cystic fibrosis (CF), and it has implications for prognosis and personalized therapy. The large number of mutations and genetic and phenotypic variability make this search a complex task. Herein, we developed, validated, and tested a laboratory assay for an extended search for mutations in CFTR using a next-generation sequencing-based method, with a panel of 188 CFTR mutations customized for the Italian population. Overall, 1426 dried blood spots from neonatal screening, 402 genomic DNA samples from various origins, and 1138 genomic DNA samples from patients with CF were analyzed. The assay showed excellent analytical and diagnostic operative characteristics. We identified and experimentally validated 159 (of 188) CFTR mutations. The assay achieved detection rates of 95.0% and 95.6% in two large-scale case series of CF patients from central and northern Italy, respectively. These detection rates are among the highest reported so far with a genetic test for CF based on a mutation panel. This assay appears to be well suited for diagnostics, neonatal and carrier screening, and assisted reproduction, and it represents a considerable advantage in CF genetic counseling.

Implementation of newborn screening for cystic fibrosis in Norway. Results from the first three years

BACKGROUND

Norway introduced newborn screening for cystic fibrosis (CF) March 1, 2012. We present results from the first three years of the national newborn CF screening program.

METHODS

Positive primary screening of immunoreactive trypsinogen (IRT) was followed by DNA testing of the Cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) gene. Infants with two CFTR mutations were reported for diagnostic follow-up.

RESULTS

Of 181,859 infants tested, 1454 samples (0.80%) were assessed for CFTR mutations. Forty children (1:4546) had two CFTR mutations, of which only 21 (1:8660) were confirmed to have a CF diagnosis. The CFTR mutations differed from previously clinically diagnosed CF patients, and p.R117H outnumbered p.F508del as the most frequent mutation. One child with a negative IRT screening test was later clinically diagnosed with CF.

CONCLUSIONS

The CF screening program identified fewer children with a conclusive CF diagnosis than expected. Our data suggest a revision of the IRT/DNA protocol.

Cost-effectiveness of newborn screening for cystic fibrosis determined with real-life data

BACKGROUND

Previous cost-effectiveness studies using data from the literature showed that newborn screening for cystic fibrosis (NBSCF) is a good economic option with positive health effects and longer survival.

METHODS

We used primary data to compare cost-effectiveness of four screening strategies for NBSCF, i.e. immunoreactive trypsinogen-testing followed by pancreatitis-associated protein-testing (IRT-PAP), IRT-DNA, IRT-DNA-sequencing, and IRT-PAP-DNA-sequencing, each compared to no-screening. A previously developed decision analysis model for NBSCF was fed with model parameters mainly based on a study evaluating two novel screening strategies among 145,499 newborns in The Netherlands.

RESULTS

The four screening strategies had cost-effectiveness ratios varying from €23,600 to €29,200 per life-year gained. IRT-PAP had the most favourable cost-effectiveness ratio. Additional life-years can be gained by IRT-DNA but against higher costs. When treatment costs reduce with 5% due to early diagnosis, screening will lead to financial savings.

CONCLUSION

NBSCF is as an economically justifiable public health initiative. Of the four strategies tested IRT-PAP is the most economic and this finding should be included in any decision making model, when considering implementation of newborn screening for CF.

Molecular testing for cystic fibrosis carrier status practice guidelines: recommendations of the National Society of Genetic Counselors

PURPOSE

To provide practice recommendations for genetic counselors whose clients are considering cystic fibrosis (CF) carrier testing or seeking information regarding CF molecular test results. The goals of these recommendations are to: 1) Provide updated information about the natural history, diagnosis, and treatment of CF and related conditions. 2) Supplement genetic counselors' knowledge and understanding of the available carrier screening and diagnostic testing options. 3) Describe the current state of genotype/phenotype correlations for CFTR mutations and an approach to interpreting both novel and previously described variants. 4) Provide a framework for genetic counselors to assist clients' decision-making regarding CF carrier testing, prenatal diagnosis, and pregnancy management. Disclaimer The practice guidelines of the National Society of Genetic Counselors (NSGC) are developed by members of the NSGC to assist genetic counselors and other health care providers in making decisions about appropriate management of genetic concerns; including access to and/or delivery of services. Each practice guideline focuses on a clinical or practice-based issue, and is the result of a review and analysis of current professional literature believed to be reliable. As such, information and recommendations within the NSGC practice guidelines reflect the current scientific and clinical knowledge at the time of publication, are only current as of their publication date, and are subject to change without notice as advances emerge.In addition, variations in practice, which take into account the needs of the individual patient and the resources and limitations unique to the institution or type of practice, may warrant approaches, treatments and/or procedures that differ from the recommendations outlined in this guideline. Therefore, these recommendations should not be construed as dictating an exclusive course of management, nor does the use of such recommendations guarantee a particular outcome. Genetic counseling practice guidelines are never intended to displace a health care provider's best medical judgment based on the clinical circumstances of a particular patient or patient population.Practice guidelines are published by NSGC for educational and informational purposes only, and NSGC does not "approve" or "endorse" any specific methods, practices, or sources of information.

To know or not to know, disclosure of a newborn carrier screening test result for cystic fibrosis

PURPOSE

Most newborn screening (NBS) strategies for Cystic Fibrosis (CF) also identify carriers. However, it is unclear if parents want to be informed about their child's carrier status or not.

METHODS

Focus group discussions with pregnant couples to explore their opinions about disclosure of a carrier result for CF of their newborn.

RESULTS

All (n = 30) wanted to be informed when newborn screening would show their newborn being a CF-carrier. Their main reason was the implication of this knowledge for further family planning. Other family members could be informed and children within the family could be tested. Parents stated they have the right to know, but others also expressed that the choice of not being informed should be offered as well.

CONCLUSION

Most parents want to be informed when NBS for CF reveals that their child is a CF-carrier, but the choice of not being informed should also be offered.

Newborn screening for cystic fibrosis: techniques and strategies

Newborn screening for cystic fibrosis has been carried out for over 25 years, and clinical and cost benefits have been documented. There is still much variation in the methods and strategies adopted. All current screening programmes use a measurement of immunoreactive trypsin as a primary screening test, and in most, a second tier test involves analysing DNA mutations. The choice of DNA mutations depends on the genetic background in the region, and considerations of cost. Using DNA analysis as part of a screening procedure has introduced unwanted carrier detection, and protocols have now been devised in an attempt to avoid this. There are at least seven distinct protocols in use, all of which have different advantages and disadvantages, and no method or strategy will suit every region. Further careful study of performance and costs of various strategies is needed.

Cost-effectiveness of 4 neonatal screening strategies for cystic fibrosis

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this work was to assess the costs of 4 neonatal screening strategies for cystic fibrosis in relation to health effects. In each strategy, the first test was the measurement of serum concentration of immunoreactive trypsin. The second step consisted of either a second immunoreactive trypsin test (strategy 1) or a multiple mutation analysis (strategy 2). In strategies 3 and 4, a third step was added to strategy 2: a second immunoreactive trypsin test (strategy 3) or an extended mutation analysis of the cystic fibrosis gene, that is, a denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis analysis (strategy 4).

METHODS

We conducted an economic-modeling exercise in the Netherlands based on published data and expert opinions. Subjects were a hypothetical cohort of 200 000 neonates, the approximate number of children born annually in the Netherlands, and we assessed the costs and number of life-years gained as a result of neonatal screening for cystic fibrosis. The costs and effects of changes in reproductive decisions because of neonatal screening were also assessed.

RESULTS

Immunoreactive trypsin + immunoreactive trypsin had the most favorable cost-effectiveness ratio of 24,800 euro per life-year gained. Immunoreactive trypsin + DNA + denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis achieved more health effects than immunoreactive trypsin + DNA + immunoreactive trypsin at lower cost. The incremental costs per life-year gained of the immunoreactive trypsin + DNA + denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis strategy compared with the immunoreactive trypsin + immunoreactive trypsin strategy were 130,700 euro, whereas the incremental costs of the immunoreactive trypsin + DNA strategy compared with the immunoreactive trypsin + DNA + denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis strategy were 2,154,300 euro. When changes in reproductive decisions as a result of neonatal screening are also taken into account, neonatal screening for cystic fibrosis may lead to financial savings of approximately 1.8 million euro annually, depending on the screening strategy used.

CONCLUSIONS

Cystic fibrosis screening for neonates is a good economic option, and positive health effects can also be expected. Immunoreactive trypsin + immunoreactive trypsin and immunoreactive trypsin + DNA + denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis are the most cost-effective strategies.