Less difference between office and ambulatory blood pressure in women than in men both before and during antihypertensive treatment

Nurse-recorded clinic and ambulatory blood pressures correlate equally well with left ventricular mass and carotid intima-media thickness

OBJECTIVE

To assess relationships between noninvasive ambulatory blood pressure (BP), clinic BP (mean value of three readings in the seated position measured by nurses), structural cardiac indices, intima-media thickness of the common carotid artery and several hormones.

DESIGN

Cross-sectional study of 75 subjects with hypertension and left ventricular hypertrophy (HTH) according to echocardiography, 35 subjects with hypertension and normal left ventricular dimensions (HT) and 23 normotensive subjects (NT).

RESULTS

We found an excellent correlation between mean 24-h ambulatory BP and clinic BP, the r-value for systolic BP being 0.82 and for diastolic levels 0.78 (both P < 0.0001). Clinic and ambulatory BP correlated equally well with left ventricular (LV) mass index (r-values between 0.55 and 0.64, all P < 0.0001) and to intima-media thickness of the carotid artery (r = 0.18-0.34, P < 0.01). The systolic white-coat effect (clinic BP - day-time BP) was higher in the HTH and HT compared with NT and was weakly correlated to LV mass index (r = 0.18, P = 0.04). Nondippers (mean arterial night/day BP ratio of > 0.9) had higher brain (6.1 +/- 7.5 pmol L(-1) vs. 3.7 +/- 3.2 pmol L(-1), P = 0.01) and atrial (14 +/- 3.4 pmol L(-1) vs. 9.3 +/- 5.4 pmol L(-1), P = 0.04) natriuretic peptide levels, and also exhibited a lower ejection fraction (49 +/- 8% vs. 57 +/- 9%, P = 0.006), than dippers.

CONCLUSION

Clinic BP recordings performed by nurses as three measurements 1 min apart provide excellent relationship to target organ damage. Nondippers exhibited signs of a more advanced hypertensive organ damage than dippers which corresponds well with the poor prognosis linked to this condition.

Nurse-recorded and ambulatory blood pressure predicts treatment-induced reduction of left ventricular hypertrophy equally well in hypertension: results from the Swedish irbesartan left ventricular hypertrophy investigation versus atenolol (SILVHIA) study

OBJECTIVE

To compare the relationships of treatment-induced reductions of left ventricular hypertrophy to the changes in clinic and ambulatory blood pressure (BP).

DESIGN

Double-blind and randomized treatment with irbesartan or atenolol for 48 weeks.

PATIENTS

Patients with hypertension and left ventricular hypertrophy (n = 66) with a seated diastolic BP 90-115 mmHg (average of three measurements one minute apart by nurses).

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Registrations of echocardiographic left ventricular (LV) mass. Clinic and ambulatory BP.

RESULTS

In the total material, nurse-measured BP was reduced by 23 +/- 15/16 +/- 7.7 mmHg and 24-h ambulatory BP fell 20 +/- 15/14 +/- 8.5 mmHg by treatment. The correlation between the change in nurse-measured BP and LV mass index (LVMI) induced by treatment was r = 0.35, P = 0.004 for systolic BP and r = 0.26, P = 0.03 for diastolic BP. Corresponding values for 24-h ambulatory BP were r = 0.29, P = 0.02 and r = 0.35, P = 0.004, respectively, with similar correlations for day- and night-time ambulatory BP. The nurse-recorded BP was slightly higher than ambulatory BP (systolic clinic - systolic 24-h ambulatory BP = 5 mmHg). Using 130/80 mmHg as a cut-off value for normal 24-h ambulatory BP, eight subjects had normal diastolic or systolic ambulatory BP, or both. Interestingly, these patients also experienced LVMI regression following treatment (low/normal ABP, -13 +/- 21 g/m2; remaining patients, -18 +/- 22 g/m2, P > 0.5).

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with hypertension and left ventricular hypertrophy, ambulatory BP is not superior to carefully standardized nurse-recorded seated BP in terms of associations with treatment-induced changes in LV mass.