Factors associated with diagnostic discrepancy for left ventricular hypertrophy between electrocardiography and echocardiography

The Groningen electrocardiographic criteria for left ventricular hypertrophy: a sex-specific analysis

The sensitivity of electrocardiogram (ECG) criteria to detect left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) is low, especially in women. We determined sex-specific sensitivities of ECG-LVH criteria, and developed new criteria, using cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging (CMR). Sensitivities of ECG-LVH criteria were determined in participants of the UK Biobank (N = 3632). LVH was defined when left ventricular mass was > 95% confidence interval (CI) according to age and sex. In a training cohort (75%, N = 2724), sex-specific ECG-LVH criteria were developed by investigating all possible sums of QRS-amplitudes in all 12 leads, and selecting the sum with the highest pseudo-R² and area under the curve to detect LVH. Performance was assessed in a validation cohort (25%, N = 908), and association with blood pressure change was investigated in an independent cohort. Sensitivities of ECG-LVH criteria were low, especially in women. Newly developed Groningen-LVH criterion for women (Q_V2 + R_I + R_V5 + R_V6 + S_V2 + S_V4 + S_V5 + S_V6) outperformed all ECG-LVH criteria with a sensitivity of 42% (95% CI 35-49%). In men, newly developed criterion ((R_I + R_V5 + S_II + S_V2 + S_V6) × QRS duration) was equally sensitive as 12-lead sum with a sensitivity of 44% (95% CI 37-51%) and outperformed the other criteria. In an independent cohort, the Groningen-LVH criteria were strongest associated with change in systolic blood pressure. Our proposed CMR sex-specific Groningen-LVH criteria improve the sensitivity to detect LVH, especially in women. Further validation and its association with clinical outcomes is warranted.

Combining ECG Criteria for Left Ventricular Hypertrophy Improves Risk Prediction in Patients With Hypertension

BACKGROUND

Patients with hypertension with ECG left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) have higher cardiovascular morbidity and mortality, but single ECG criteria may underestimate risk. Whether continued presence or new development of ECG LVH by 2 criteria can further concentrate risk during blood pressure lowering is unclear.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Incident stroke, myocardial infarction, cardiovascular death, the composite of these outcomes, and all-cause mortality were examined in relation to the presence of on-treatment ECG LVH by Cornell product and/or Sokolow-Lyon voltage during a mean of 4.8±0.9 years follow-up in 9193 patients with hypertension randomized to losartan- or atenolol-based regimens. Patients were categorized into 4 groups according to the presence or absence of ECG LVH by each criterion at baseline and yearly during the study. At baseline, LVH by both criteria was present in 960 patients (10.4%). Compared with the absence of ECG LVH by both criteria, persistence or development of ECG LVH by both criteria entered as a time-varying covariate was associated with >3-fold increased risks of events in multivariable Cox analyses adjusting for randomized treatment, baseline risk factors, and on-treatment heart rate and systolic and diastolic blood pressures. Patients with ECG LVH by either Cornell product or Sokolow-Lyon voltage had 45% to 140% higher risks of all end points.

CONCLUSIONS

Persistence or development of ECG LVH by both Cornell product and Sokolow-Lyon voltage criteria during antihypertensive therapy is associated with markedly increased risks of cardiovascular end points and all-cause mortality. Further study is indicated to determine whether additional therapy in these patients can reduce their risk.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT00338260.

The emerging role of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance in the evaluation of hypertensive heart disease

BACKGROUND

Arterial hypertension is the commonest cause of cardiovascular death. It may lead to hypertensive heart disease (HHD), including heart failure (HF), ischemic heart disease (IHD) and left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH).

MAIN BODY

According to the 2007 ESH/ESC guidelines, the recommended imaging technique is echocardiography (echo), when a more sensitive detection of LVH than that provided by ECG, is needed. Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance (CMR), a non-invasive, non-radiating technique, offers the following advantages, beyond echo: a) more reliable and reproducible measurements of cardiac parameters such as volumes, ejection fraction and cardiac mass b) more accurate differentiation of LVH etiology by providing information about tissue characterisation c) more accurate evaluation of myocardial ischemia, specifically if small vessels disease is present d) technique of choice for diagnosis of renovascular, aortic tree/branches lesions and quantification of aortic valve regurgitation e) technique of choice for treatment evaluation in clinical trials. The superiority of CMR against echocardiography in terms of reproducibility, operator independency, unrestricted field of view and capability of tissue characterization makes the technique ideal for evaluation of heart, quantification of aortic valve regurgitation, aorta and aortic branches.

CONCLUSIONS

CMR has a great potential in early diagnosis, risk stratification and treatment follow up of HHD. However, an international consensus about CMR in HHD, taking under consideration the cost-benefit ratio, expertise and availability, is still warranted.