1
|
Taylor RS, Bentley A, Metcalfe K, Lobo MD, Kirtane AJ, Azizi M, Clark C, Murphy K, Boer JH, van Keep M, Ta AT, Barman NC, Schwab G, Akehurst R, Schmieder RE. Cost Effectiveness of Endovascular Ultrasound Renal Denervation in Patients with Resistant Hypertension. PHARMACOECONOMICS - OPEN 2024; 8:525-537. [PMID: 38289517 PMCID: PMC11252101 DOI: 10.1007/s41669-024-00472-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 01/07/2024] [Indexed: 05/09/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Resistant hypertension (rHTN) is defined as blood pressure (BP) of ≥ 140/90 mmHg despite treatment with at least three antihypertensive medications, including a diuretic. Endovascular ultrasound renal denervation (uRDN) aims to control BP alongside conventional BP treatment with antihypertensive medication. This analysis assesses the cost effectiveness of the addition of the Paradise uRDN System compared with standard of care alone in patients with rHTN from the perspective of the United Kingdom (UK) health care system. METHODS Using RADIANCE-HTN TRIO trial data, we developed a state-transition model. Baseline risk was calculated using Framingham and Prospective Cardiovascular Münster (PROCAM) risk equations to estimate the long-term cardiovascular risks in patients treated with the Paradise uRDN System, based on the observed systolic BP (SBP) reduction following uRDN. Relative risks sourced from a meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials were then used to project cardiovascular events in patients with baseline SBP ('control' patients); utility and mortality inputs and costs were derived from UK data. Costs and outcomes were discounted at 3.5% per annum. Modelled outcomes were validated against trial meta-analyses and the QRISK3 algorithm and real-world evidence of RDN effectiveness. One-way and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were conducted to assess the uncertainty surrounding the model inputs and sensitivity of the model results to changes in parameter inputs. Results were reported as incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs). RESULTS A mean reduction in office SBP of 8.5 mmHg with uRDN resulted in an average improvement in both absolute life-years (LYs) and quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) gained compared with standard of care alone (0.73 LYs and 0.67 QALYs). The overall base-case ICER with uRDN was estimated at £5600 (€6500) per QALY gained (95% confidence interval £5463-£5739 [€6341-€6661]); modelling demonstrated > 99% probability that the ICER is below the £20,000-£30,000 (€23,214-€34,821) per QALYs gained willingness-to-pay threshold in the UK. Results were consistent across sensitivity analyses and validation checks. CONCLUSIONS Endovascular ultrasound RDN with the Paradise system offers patients with rHTN, clinicians, and healthcare systems a cost-effective treatment option alongside antihypertensive medication.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rod S Taylor
- MRC/CSO Social and Public Health Sciences Unit and Robertson Centre for Biostatistics, Institute of Health and Well Being, University of Glasgow, 90 Byres Rd, Glasgow, G12 8TB, UK.
| | | | | | - Melvin D Lobo
- Barts NIHR Biomedical Research Centre, William Harvey Research Institute, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
| | - Ajay J Kirtane
- Columbia University Irving Medical Center/New York-Presbyterian Hospital and the Cardiovascular Research Foundation, New York, NY, USA
| | - Michel Azizi
- Université de Paris, Paris, France
- Hypertension Department and DMU CARTE, AP-HP, Hôpital Européen Georges-Pompidou, Paris, France
- INSERM, CIC1418, Paris, France
| | - Christopher Clark
- Primary Care Research Group, University of Exeter Medical School, Exeter, UK
| | | | | | | | - An Thu Ta
- BresMed Netherlands, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | | | | | - Ron Akehurst
- BresMed Health Solutions, Sheffield, UK
- University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - Roland E Schmieder
- Nephrology and Hypertension, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich Alexander University, Erlangen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Messerli FH, Bavishi C, Brguljan J, Burnier M, Dobner S, Elijovich F, Ferdinand KC, Kjeldsen S, Laffer CL, S Ram CV, Rexhaj E, Ruilope LM, Shalaeva EV, Siontis GC, Staessen JA, Textor SC, Vongpatanasin W, Vogt L, Volpe M, Wang J, Williams B. Renal denervation in the antihypertensive arsenal - knowns and known unknowns. J Hypertens 2022; 40:1859-1875. [PMID: 36052518 PMCID: PMC10010701 DOI: 10.1097/hjh.0000000000003171] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/13/2022] [Revised: 03/26/2022] [Accepted: 03/26/2022] [Indexed: 01/21/2023]
Abstract
Even though it has been more than a decade since renal denervation (RDN) was first used to treat hypertension and an intense effort on researching this therapy has been made, it is still not clear how RDN fits into the antihypertensive arsenal. There is no question that RDN lowers blood pressure (BP), it does so to an extent at best corresponding to one antihypertensive drug. The procedure has an excellent safety record. However, it remains clinically impossible to predict whose BP responds to RDN and whose does not. Long-term efficacy data on BP reduction are still unconvincing despite the recent results in the SPYRAL HTN-ON MED trial; experimental studies indicate that reinnervation is occurring after RDN. Although BP is an acceptable surrogate endpoint, there is complete lack of outcome data with RDN. Clear indications for RDN are lacking although patients with resistant hypertension, those with documented increase in activity of the sympathetic system and perhaps those who desire to take fewest medication may be considered.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Franz H. Messerli
- Department of BioMedical Research, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
- Jagiellonian University Krakow, Krakow, Poland
| | - Chirag Bavishi
- Department of Cardiology, University of Missouri, Columbia, Missouri, USA
| | - Jana Brguljan
- University Medical Centre Ljubljana, Department of Hypertension, Medical University Ljubljana, Slovenia
| | - Michel Burnier
- University of Lausanne. Faculty of Biology and Medicine, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Stephan Dobner
- Department of Cardiology, Bern University Hospital University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Fernando Elijovich
- Division of Clinical Pharmacology, Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt University, USA
| | | | - Sverre Kjeldsen
- Department of Cardiology, University of Oslo Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Cheryl L. Laffer
- Division of Clinical Pharmacology, Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
| | - C. Venkata S Ram
- Apollo Hospitals and Medical College, Hyderabad, Telangana, India
| | - Emrush Rexhaj
- Department of Cardiology, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
- Department of BioMedical Research, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Luis M. Ruilope
- Cardiorenal Translational Laboratory and Hypertension Unit, Institute of Research i+12, CIBER-CV, Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre, Madrid, Spain
| | - Evgeniya V. Shalaeva
- Division of Public Health Science, Westminster International University in Tashkent, Tashkent, Uzbekistan
- Department of Cardiology, Tashkent Medical Academy, Tashkent, Uzbekistan
| | - George C.M. Siontis
- Department of Cardiology, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Jan A. Staessen
- NPO Research Institute Alliance for the Promotion of Preventive Medicine, Mechelen, Belgium
- Biomedical Science Group, Faculty of Medicine, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Stephen C. Textor
- Division of Hypertension and Nephrology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Wanpen Vongpatanasin
- Hypertension Section, Cardiology Division, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA
| | - Liffert Vogt
- Department of Internal Medicine, section Nephrology, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Massimo Volpe
- Department of Clinical and Molecular Medicine, University of Rome Sapienza, Rome, Italy
| | - Jiguang Wang
- The Shanghai Institute of Hypertension, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Bryan Williams
- Institute of Cardiovascular Science, University College London, London, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Implications of Oncology Trial Design and Uncertainties in Efficacy-Safety Data on Health Technology Assessments. Curr Oncol 2022; 29:5774-5791. [PMID: 36005193 PMCID: PMC9406873 DOI: 10.3390/curroncol29080455] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/18/2022] [Revised: 08/10/2022] [Accepted: 08/11/2022] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: Advances in cancer medicines have resulted in tangible health impacts, but the magnitude of benefits of approved cancer medicines could vary greatly. Health Technology Assessment (HTA) is a multidisciplinary process used to inform resource allocation through a systematic value assessment of health technology. This paper reviews the challenges in conducting HTA for cancer medicines arising from oncology trial designs and uncertainties of safety-efficacy data. Methods: Multiple databases (PubMed, Scopus and Google Scholar) and grey literature (public health agencies and governmental reports) were searched to inform this policy narrative review. Results: A lack of robust efficacy-safety data from clinical trials and other relevant sources of evidence has made HTA for cancer medicines challenging. The approval of cancer medicines through expedited pathways has increased in recent years, in which surrogate endpoints or biomarkers for patient selection have been widely used. Using these surrogate endpoints has created uncertainties in translating surrogate measures into patient-centric clinically (survival and quality of life) and economically (cost-effectiveness and budget impact) meaningful outcomes, with potential effects on diverting scarce health resources to low-value or detrimental interventions. Potential solutions include policy harmonization between regulatory and HTA authorities, commitment to generating robust post-marketing efficacy-safety data, managing uncertainties through risk-sharing agreements, and using value frameworks. Conclusion: A lack of robust efficacy-safety data is a central problem for conducting HTA of cancer medicines, potentially resulting in misinformed resource allocation.
Collapse
|
4
|
Kjeldsen SE, Narkiewicz K, Burnier M, Oparil S. The five RADIANCE-HTN and SPYRAL-HTN randomised studies suggest that the BP lowering effect of RDN corresponds to the effect of one antihypertensive drug. Blood Press 2021; 30:327-331. [PMID: 34714185 DOI: 10.1080/08037051.2021.1995975] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Sverre E Kjeldsen
- Departments of Cardiology and Nephrology, University of Oslo, Ullevaal Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Krzysztof Narkiewicz
- Department of Hypertension and Diabetology, Medical University of Gdansk, Gdańsk, Poland
| | - Michel Burnier
- Service of Nephrology and Hypertension, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Suzanne Oparil
- Vascular Biology and Hypertension Program, Department of Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Daval L, Nze Ossima A, Clément MC, Michel M, Chevreul K. Estimation of the Width of Uncertainty in Care Consumption and Costs When Using Common Data Collection Tools in Economic Evaluations: A Benchmark for Sensitivity Analyses. VALUE IN HEALTH : THE JOURNAL OF THE INTERNATIONAL SOCIETY FOR PHARMACOECONOMICS AND OUTCOMES RESEARCH 2021; 24:1416-1422. [PMID: 34593164 DOI: 10.1016/j.jval.2021.05.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/11/2020] [Revised: 04/19/2021] [Accepted: 05/18/2021] [Indexed: 06/13/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES This study aimed to evaluate the uncertainty related to the use of common collection tools to assess costs in economic evaluations compared with an exhaustive administrative database. METHODS A pragmatic study was performed using preexisting cost-effectiveness studies. Patients were probabilistically matched with themselves in the French National Health Data System (Système National des Données de Santé [SNDS]), and all their reimbursed hospital and ambulatory care data during the study were extracted. Outcomes included the ratio of the number of each type of resources consumed using trial data (case report forms for ambulatory care and local hospital data for hospital care) versus the SNDS and the ratio of corresponding costs. Mean ratios and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using bootstrapping. The impact of the collection tool on the result of the economic evaluation was calculated with the difference in costs between the 2 treatment arms with both collection methods. RESULTS Five cost-effectiveness studies were included in the analysis. A total of 397 patients had the SNDS hospital data, and 321 had ambulatory care data. Common collection tools underestimated hospital admissions by 13% (95% CI 8-20), corresponding costs by 5% (95% CI 2-14), and ambulatory acts by 41% (95% CI 33-51), with large variations in costs depending on the study. There was no change in the economic conclusion in any study. CONCLUSIONS The use of common collection tools underestimates healthcare resource consumption and its associated costs, particularly for ambulatory care. Our results could provide useful evidence-based estimates to inform sensitivity analyses' parameters in future cost-effectiveness analyses.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laure Daval
- Hôtel-Dieu, URC Eco Ile-de-France, Assistance Publique - Hopitaux de Paris (AP-HP), Paris, France; INSERM, ECEVE, U1123, Paris, France; Université de Paris, Paris, France.
| | - Arnaud Nze Ossima
- Hôtel-Dieu, URC Eco Ile-de-France, Assistance Publique - Hopitaux de Paris (AP-HP), Paris, France; INSERM, ECEVE, U1123, Paris, France; Université de Paris, Paris, France
| | - Marie-Caroline Clément
- Hôtel-Dieu, URC Eco Ile-de-France, Assistance Publique - Hopitaux de Paris (AP-HP), Paris, France
| | - Morgane Michel
- Hôtel-Dieu, URC Eco Ile-de-France, Assistance Publique - Hopitaux de Paris (AP-HP), Paris, France; INSERM, ECEVE, U1123, Paris, France; Université de Paris, Paris, France; Unité d'Epidémiologie Clinique, Hôpital Robert Debré, AP-HP, Paris, France
| | - Karine Chevreul
- Hôtel-Dieu, URC Eco Ile-de-France, Assistance Publique - Hopitaux de Paris (AP-HP), Paris, France; INSERM, ECEVE, U1123, Paris, France; Université de Paris, Paris, France; Unité d'Epidémiologie Clinique, Hôpital Robert Debré, AP-HP, Paris, France
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Mahfoud F, Azizi M, Ewen S, Pathak A, Ukena C, Blankestijn PJ, Böhm M, Burnier M, Chatellier G, Durand Zaleski I, Grassi G, Joner M, Kandzari DE, Kirtane A, Kjeldsen SE, Lobo MD, Lüscher TF, McEvoy JW, Parati G, Rossignol P, Ruilope L, Schlaich MP, Shahzad A, Sharif F, Sharp ASP, Sievert H, Volpe M, Weber MA, Schmieder RE, Tsioufis C, Wijns W. Proceedings from the 3rd European Clinical Consensus Conference for clinical trials in device-based hypertension therapies. Eur Heart J 2021; 41:1588-1599. [PMID: 32211888 PMCID: PMC7174031 DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehaa121] [Citation(s) in RCA: 63] [Impact Index Per Article: 21.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/12/2019] [Revised: 12/19/2019] [Accepted: 02/10/2020] [Indexed: 12/22/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Felix Mahfoud
- Klinik für Innere Medizin III, Kardiologie, Angiologie und Internistische Intensivmedizin, Universitätsklinikum des Saarlandes, Saarland University, Homburg, Germany.,Institute for Medical Engineering and Science, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, USA
| | - Michel Azizi
- Université de Paris, INSERM CIC1418, F-75015 Paris, France.,APHP, Hôpital Européen Georges Pompidou, Hypertension Unit, F-75015 Paris, France.,F-CRIN INI-CRCT Network, Nancy, France
| | - Sebastian Ewen
- Klinik für Innere Medizin III, Kardiologie, Angiologie und Internistische Intensivmedizin, Universitätsklinikum des Saarlandes, Saarland University, Homburg, Germany
| | - Atul Pathak
- F-CRIN INI-CRCT Network, Nancy, France.,Department of Cardivascular Medicine, INSERM 1048, Princess Grace Hospital (CHPG), Avenue Pasteur, 98000 Monaco, Monaco
| | - Christian Ukena
- Klinik für Innere Medizin III, Kardiologie, Angiologie und Internistische Intensivmedizin, Universitätsklinikum des Saarlandes, Saarland University, Homburg, Germany
| | | | - Michael Böhm
- Klinik für Innere Medizin III, Kardiologie, Angiologie und Internistische Intensivmedizin, Universitätsklinikum des Saarlandes, Saarland University, Homburg, Germany
| | | | - Gilles Chatellier
- Université de Paris, INSERM CIC1418, F-75015 Paris, France.,APHP, Hôpital Européen Georges Pompidou, Clinical Trial Unit, F-75015 Paris, France
| | | | - Guido Grassi
- Clinica Medica, University of Milano Bicocca, Milan, Italy
| | - Michael Joner
- Deutsches Herzzentrum München, Munich, Germany.,Deutsches Zentrum für Herz- und Kreislauf-Forschung (DZHK) e.V. (German Center for Cardiovascular Research), Partner Site Munich, Munich, Germany
| | | | - Ajay Kirtane
- Columbia University Irving Medical Center/NewYork-Presbyterian Hospital and the Cardiovascular Research Foundation, New York, NY, USA
| | | | - Melvin D Lobo
- William Harvey Research Institute, Centre for Clinical Pharmacology, Barts NIHR Cardiovascular Biomedical Research Centre, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
| | - Thomas F Lüscher
- Center for Molecular Cardiology, Schlieren Campus, Zürich, Switzerland.,Royal Brompton and Harefield Hospital Trust, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | | | - Gianfranco Parati
- Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Milano-Bicocca-Istituto Auxologico Italiano, IRCCS, Milano, Italy
| | - Patrick Rossignol
- F-CRIN INI-CRCT Network, Nancy, France.,Université de Lorraine, Inserm, Centre d'Investigations cliniques-plurithématique 1433, Inserm U1116, Nancy, France.,CHRU Nancy, Nancy, France
| | - Luis Ruilope
- Institute of Research i+12 and CIBER CV, Hospital 12 de Octubre and Faculty of Sport Medicine, European University, Madrid, Spain
| | - Markus P Schlaich
- Dobney Hypertension Centre, The University of Western Australia-Royal Perth Hospital Campus, Perth, Australia.,Baker Heart and Diabetes Institute, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Atif Shahzad
- National University of Ireland Galway, Galway, Ireland.,Galway University Hospital, Galway, Ireland
| | - Faisal Sharif
- National University of Ireland Galway, Galway, Ireland.,Galway University Hospital, Galway, Ireland
| | - Andrew S P Sharp
- University Hospital of Wales, Cardiff, UK.,University of Exeter, Exeter, UK
| | - Horst Sievert
- CardioVascular Center Frankfurt CVC, Frankfurt, Germany.,Anglia Ruskin University, Chelmsford, UK.,University California San Francisco UCSF, San Francisco, USA.,Yunnan Hospital Fuwai, Kunming, China
| | - Massimo Volpe
- Sapienza University of Rome-Sant'Andrea Hospital Rome and IRCCS Neuromed, Pozzilli, Italy
| | | | - Roland E Schmieder
- Department of Nephrology and Hypertension, University Hospital, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Costas Tsioufis
- First Cardiology Clinic, Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Hippokration Hospital, Athens, Greece
| | - William Wijns
- The Lambe Institute for Translational Medicine, National University of Ireland Galway, Galway, Ireland
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Grigore B, Ciani O, Dams F, Federici C, de Groot S, Möllenkamp M, Rabbe S, Shatrov K, Zemplenyi A, Taylor RS. Surrogate Endpoints in Health Technology Assessment: An International Review of Methodological Guidelines. PHARMACOECONOMICS 2020; 38:1055-1070. [PMID: 32572825 DOI: 10.1007/s40273-020-00935-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/11/2023]
Abstract
In the drive towards faster patient access to treatments, health technology assessment (HTA) agencies are increasingly faced with reliance on evidence from surrogate endpoints, leading to increased decision uncertainty. This study undertook an updated survey of methodological guidance for using surrogate endpoints across international HTA agencies. We reviewed HTA and economic evaluation methods guidance from European, Australian and Canadian HTA agencies. We considered how guidelines addressed the methods for handling surrogate endpoints, including (1) level of evidence, (2) methods of validation, and (3) thresholds of acceptability. Across the 73 HTA agencies surveyed, 29 (40%) had methodological guidelines that made specific reference to consideration of surrogate outcomes. Of the 45 methods documents analysed, the majority [27 (60%)] were non-technology specific, 15 (33%) focused on pharmaceuticals and three (7%) on medical devices. The principles of the European network for Health Technology Assessment (EUnetHTA) guidelines published in 2015 on the handling of surrogate endpoints appear to have been adopted by many European HTA agencies, i.e. preference for final patient-relevant outcomes and reliance on surrogate endpoints with biological plausibility and epidemiological evidence of the association between the surrogate and final endpoint. Only a small number of HTA agencies (UK National Institute for Care and Excellence; the German Institute for Medical Documentation and Information and Institute for Quality and Efficiency in Health Care; the Australian Pharmaceutical Benefits Advisory Committee; and the Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in Health) have developed more detailed prescriptive criteria for the acceptance of surrogate endpoints, e.g. meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials showing strong association between the treatment effect on the surrogate and final outcomes. As the decision uncertainty associated with reliance on surrogate endpoints carries a risk to patients and society, there is a need for HTA agencies to develop more detailed methodological guidance for consistent selection and evaluation of health technologies that lack definitive final patient-relevant outcome evidence at the time of the assessment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bogdan Grigore
- Evidence Synthesis and Modelling for Health Improvement, College of Medicine and Health, Institute of Health Research, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK.
| | - Oriana Ciani
- Evidence Synthesis and Modelling for Health Improvement, College of Medicine and Health, Institute of Health Research, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK
- Center for Research on Health and Social Care Management, SDA Bocconi, Milan, Italy
| | - Florian Dams
- KPM Center for Public Management, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Carlo Federici
- Center for Research on Health and Social Care Management, SDA Bocconi, Milan, Italy
| | - Saskia de Groot
- Institute for Medical Technology Assessment, Erasmus School of Health Policy and Management, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Meilin Möllenkamp
- Hamburg Center for Health Economics, Universität Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Stefan Rabbe
- Hamburg Center for Health Economics, Universität Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Kosta Shatrov
- KPM Center for Public Management, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Antal Zemplenyi
- Syreon Research Institute, Budapest, Hungary
- Division of Pharmacoeconomics, Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Pécs, Pécs, Hungary
| | - Rod S Taylor
- Evidence Synthesis and Modelling for Health Improvement, College of Medicine and Health, Institute of Health Research, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK
- MRC/CSO Social and Public Health Sciences Unit and Robertson Centre for Biostatistics, Institute of Health and Well Being, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, Scotland
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Mensa Sorato M, Davari M, Kebriaeezadeh A, Naderi N, Sarrafzadegan N, Shibru T, Nikfar S, Arero AG. Cost-effectiveness of Interventional therapies for management of Treatment-resistant hypertension: systematic review of pharmacoeconomic studies. JOURNAL OF PHARMACEUTICAL HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH 2020. [DOI: 10.1111/jphs.12384] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/19/2023]
Abstract
Abstract
Background
Treatment resistant hypertension (TRH) is defined as uncontrolled blood pressure (>140/90 mm Hg) after treatment with the intensified dose of three standard antihypertensive drugs. Management of TRH involves addition of fourth line drugs on standard care or interventional therapies (Renal denervation, Baroreceptor activation, Central venous anastomosis). However, evidence concerning cost-effectiveness of interventional therapies is inconclusive. Objective: This systematic review was conducted to extract the level of evidence on cost-effectiveness of interventional therapies for TRH.
Method
We systematically searched articles written in English language since January 2000 to January 2020 from the following databases: PubMed/Medline, Ovid/Medline, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science, Google scholar and other relevant sources.
Key findings
Twelve pharmacoeconomic studies were included in this systematic review. Renal denervation (RDN) is the most commonly studied intervention therapy for treatment of TRH. Participants included in the study vary from age 18-99 years. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of RDN ranged from $1,709.84 per QALY gained in Netherlands to 66,380.3 per QALY gained in Australia. RDN was cost-effective in high-risk patients in UK, Australia, Canada, Netherlands, USA, Germany, Russia and Korea. The cost-effectiveness was influenced by the magnitude of effect of RDN on systolic blood pressure, the rate of RDN nonresponders, and the procedure costs of RDN and assumption of long-term time horizon. However, the ICER of RDN in Mexico was above MXN$ 139,000 GDP/capita of the country. The ICER of implantable carotid body stimulator was $64,400 per QALYs gained. The cost-effectiveness of baroreceptor activation didn’t improve with age.
Conclusion
Overall cost-effectiveness of interventional therapies for treatment of TRH was inconclusive based on the current available evidence. Therefore, strong clinical trials and pharmacoeconomic evaluations from different perspectives in various candidate populations are needed to generate adequate clinical and cost-effectiveness evidence for using interventional therapies in treatment of treatment resistant hypertension.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mende Mensa Sorato
- Department of Pharmacy, Arba Minch University College of Medicine and Health Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Majid Davari
- Department of Pharmacoeconomics and Pharmaceutical Administration, Faculty of Pharmacy, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Abbas Kebriaeezadeh
- Department of Pharmacoeconomics and Pharmaceutical Administration, Faculty of Pharmacy, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Nasim Naderi
- Rajaie Cardiovascular Medical and Research Center, Tehran, Iran
| | | | - Tamiru Shibru
- College of Medicine and Health Sciences, Arba Minch University, Arba Minch, Ethiopia
| | - Shekoufeh Nikfar
- Department of Pharmacoeconomics and Pharmaceutical Administration, Faculty of Pharmacy, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Amanuel Godana Arero
- Students' Scientific Research Center, Tehran University of Medical sciences, Tehran, Iran
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Kvasnička J, Lambert L, Waldauf P, Zelinka T, Petrák O, Štrauch B, Holaj R, Indra T, Krátká Z, Klímová J, Václavík J, Kociánová E, Nykl I, Jiravský O, Rappová G, Táborský M, Branny M, Widimský J, Rosa J. (Prediction of long-term renal denervation efficacy). COR ET VASA 2019. [DOI: 10.1016/j.crvasa.2018.09.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/28/2022]
|
10
|
Kjeldsen SE, Narkiewicz K, Burnier M, Oparil S. Renal denervation achieved by endovascular delivery of ultrasound in RADIANCE-HTN SOLO or by radiofrequency energy in SPYRAL HTN-OFF and SPYRAL-ON lowers blood pressure. Blood Press 2018; 27:185-187. [DOI: 10.1080/08037051.2018.1486178] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/28/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Sverre E. Kjeldsen
- Department of Cardiology, University of Oslo, Ullevaal Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Krzysztof Narkiewicz
- Department of Hypertension and Diabetology, Medical University of Gdansk, Gdansk, Poland
| | - Michel Burnier
- Service of Nephrology and Hypertension, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Suzanne Oparil
- Vascular Biology and Hypertension Program, Department of Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, AL, USA
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Kjeldsen SE, Esler MD. Take a blood pressure pill or undergo renal denervation? Lancet 2018; 391:2298-2300. [PMID: 29803587 DOI: 10.1016/s0140-6736(18)31126-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/13/2018] [Accepted: 05/16/2018] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Sverre E Kjeldsen
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway; Section for Cardiovascular and Renal Research and Department of Cardiology, Ullevaal University Hospital, Oslo N-0407, Norway.
| | - Murray D Esler
- Baker Heart and Diabetes Institute, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| |
Collapse
|