Effect of angiotensin receptor blockers on blood pressure and renal function in patients with concomitant hypertension and chronic kidney disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Nanotechnology-Based Strategies for Extended-Release Delivery of Angiotensin Receptor Blockers (ARBs): A Comprehensive Review

There has been a significant shift in the perception of hypertension as an important contributor to the global disease burden. Approximately 6 % and 8 % of pregnancies are affected by hypertension, which can adversely affect the mother and the fetus. Furthermore, a hypertensive individual is at increased risk of developing kidney disease, arterial hardening, eye damage, and strokes. Using angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) is widespread in treating hypertension, heart failure, coronary artery disease, and diabetic nephropathy. Despite this, some ARBs have limited use due to their poor oral bioavailability and water solubility. To tackle this, a variety of nanoparticle (NP)-based systems, such as polymeric NPs (i. e., dendrimers), polymeric micelles, polymer-drug conjugates, lipid NPs, nanoemulsions, self-emulsifying drug delivery systems (SEDDS), solid lipid NPs (SLNs), nanostructured lipid carriers (NLCs), carbon-based nanocarriers, inorganic NPs, and nanocrystals, have been recently developed for efficient delivery of losartan, Valsartan (Val), Olmesartan (OLM), Telmisartan (TEL), Candesartan, Eprosartan, Irbesartan, and Azilsartan to target cells. This review article provides a literature-based comparison of the various classes of ARBs, their mechanisms of action, and an overview of the nanoformulations developed for ARB delivery and successfully applied to managing hypertension, diabetic complications, and other conditions.

Pharmacological Nephroprotection in Non-Diabetic Chronic Kidney Disease-Clinical Practice Position Statement of the Polish Society of Nephrology

Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is a modern epidemic worldwide. Introducing renin-angiotensin system (RAS) inhibitors (i.e., ACEi or ARB) not only as blood-pressure-lowering agents, but also as nephroprotective drugs with antiproteinuric potential was a milestone in the therapy of CKD. For decades, this treatment remained the only proven strategy to slow down CKD progression. This situation changed some years ago primarily due to the introduction of drugs designed to treat diabetes that turned into nephroprotective strategies not only in diabetic kidney disease, but also in CKD unrelated to diabetes. In addition, several drugs emerged that precisely target the pathogenetic mechanisms of particular kidney diseases. Finally, the role of metabolic acidosis in CKD progression (and not only the sequelae of CKD) came to light. In this review, we aim to comprehensively discuss all relevant therapies that slow down the progression of non-diabetic kidney disease, including the lowering of blood pressure, through the nephroprotective effects of ACEi/ARB and spironolactone independent from BP lowering, as well as the role of sodium-glucose co-transporter type 2 inhibitors, acidosis correction and disease-specific treatment strategies. We also briefly address the therapies that attempt to slow down the progression of CKD, which did not confirm this effect. We are convinced that our in-depth review with practical statements on multiple aspects of treatment offered to non-diabetic CKD fills the existing gap in the available literature. We believe that it may help clinicians who take care of CKD patients in their practice. Finally, we propose the strategy that should be implemented in most non-diabetic CKD patients to prevent disease progression.

Comparison of Efficacy and Safety of Azilsartan and Amlodipine Combination Versus Telmisartan and Amlodipine Combination in Hypertensive Patients: A Non-inferiority Trial

Introduction Hypertension (HTN) is one of the most common conditions encountered in daily practice in hospitals. Combination therapy is mostly initiated in the management of HTN when target blood pressure is not achieved with monotherapy. There are few studies comparing the antihypertensive effect of a combination of azilsartan and amlodipine with a combination of amlodipine and other angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs), however, the results are contradictory. The objective of this study was to compare the efficacy and safety of the azilsartan and amlodipine combination versus the telmisartan and amlodipine combination in hypertensive patients. Methods The present study was a prospective, randomized, active-controlled, open-label, parallel-group clinical trial. Hypertensive patients were randomized into two groups of 25 patients each. Baseline evaluations of systolic blood pressure (SBP), diastolic blood pressure (DBP), and high-sensitivity troponin I (hsTnI) were done. Patients were reassessed after 12 weeks of drug therapy with azilsartan 40 mg and amlodipine 5 mg combination or telmisartan 40 mg once daily (QD) and amlodipine 5 mg combination QD. Results The response rate (defined as a reduction of more than 20 mm Hg in SBP or 10 mm Hg in DBP or both from baseline at 12 weeks) for HTN in the test group and control groups was found to be 88% and 96% respectively. The response rate of the azilsartan amlodipine group was found to be non-inferior to the telmisartan amlodipine group (odds ratio, OR, 0.31, p = 0.61) at the end of 12 weeks of drug therapy. At 12 weeks of follow-up, there was a significant decrease in SBP (p < 0.001), DBP (p < 0.001), and hsTnI levels (p < 0.001) in both groups from baseline values. However, differences between the test and control groups for blood pressure and hsTnI were found to be not statistically significant at 12 weeks of follow-up. The most commonly reported adverse effect in both groups was headache. Conclusion Azilsartan amlodipine combination had an 88% response rate, which was non-inferior to the telmisartan and amlodipine combination. Biomarkers such as hsTnI showed a significant decrease in both groups after 12 weeks of follow-up. However, there was no significant difference between the two groups.

[18 F]Fluoropyridine-losartan: A new approach toward human Positron Emission Tomography imaging of Angiotensin II Type 1 receptors

Angiotensin II type 1 receptors (AT₁ R) blocker losartan is used in patients with renal and cardiovascular diseases. [¹⁸ F]fluoropyridine-losartan has shown favorable binding profile for quantitative renal PET imaging of AT₁ R with selective binding in rats and pigs, low interference of radiometabolites and appropriate dosimetry for clinical translation. A new approach was developed to produce [¹⁸ F]fluoropyridine-losartan in very high molar activity. Automated radiosynthesis was performed in a three-step, two-pot, and two-HPLC-purification procedure within 2 h. Pure [¹⁸ F]FPyKYNE was obtained by radiofluorination of NO₂ PyKYNE and silica-gel-HPLC purification (40 ± 9%), preventing the formation of nitropyridine-losartan in the second step. Conjugation with trityl-losartan azide via click chemistry, followed by acid hydrolysis, C18-HPLC purification and reformulation provided [¹⁸ F]fluoropyridine-losartan in 11 ± 2% (decay-corrected from [¹⁸ F]fluoride, EOB). Using tris[(1-(3-hydroxypropyl)-1H-1,2,3-triazol-4-yl)methyl]-amine (THPTA) as a Cu(I)-stabilizing agent for coupling [¹⁸ F]FPyKYNE to the unprotected losartan azide afforded [¹⁸ F]fluoropyridine-losartan in similar yields (11 ± 3%, decay-corrected from [¹⁸ F]fluoride, EOB). Reverse-phase HPLC was optimized by reducing the pH of the mobile phase to achieve complete purification and high molar activities (467 ± 60 GBq/μmol). The use of radioprotectants prevented tracer radiolysis for 10 h (RCP > 99%). The product passed the quality control testing. This reproducible automated radiosynthesis process will allow in vivo PET imaging of AT₁ R expression in several diseases.

Urate Transporter 1 Can Be a Therapeutic Target Molecule for Chronic Kidney Disease and Diabetic Kidney Disease: A Retrospective Longitudinal Study

Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is a major global health problem for which there are no curative drug treatments. Hyperuricemia is one of risk factors for CKD. The evidence on effects of uric acid (UA)-lowering treatments on the progression of CKD was very limited and previous meta-analyses used only trials which primarily used xanthin oxidase (XO) inhibitors because the reports on fulminant hepatitis due to benzbromarone kept us from using uricosuric agents for hyperuricemia patients. Dotinurad, a novel selective urate reabsorption inhibitor for the treatment of hyperuricemia, reduces serum UA levels by selectively inhibiting urate transporter 1 (URAT1). We retrospectively picked up patients who had taken dotinurad from June 2018 to August 2021 and compared metabolic parameters at baseline with the data at 3 and 6 months after the start of dotinurad. We found 84 patients, and approximately 74% of patients were complicated with CKD. After the start of dotinurad, improvements in serum lipids, systolic blood pressure, body weight, and albuminuria, in addition to reduction in serum UA, were observed. Dotinurad increased urinary UA excretion, and was effective to reduce serum UA in patients with both UA underexcretion type and renal UA overload type. Furthermore, urinary UA excretion was significantly and negatively correlated with serum creatine levels at baseline and at 6 months after the start of dotinurad, and the change in urinary UA excretion after 3 months was significantly and negatively correlated with change in serum creatine levels. The property of dotinurad, which selectively inhibits URAT1, but not other UA transporters, such as ATP-binding cassette, subfamily G, and 2 (ABCG2), which ABCG2 is a UA and uremic toxin exporter, may be beneficially associated with pathology of CKD. URAT1 can be a therapeutic target molecule for CKD and DKD.

Association of Zinc Status with Matrix Metalloproteinases, Advanced Glycation End-Products, and Blood Pressure in Patients with Chronic Kidney Disease

Inflammation, oxidative stress, and hypertension trigger the development of chronic kidney disease (CKD). Zinc is known to have antioxidant and anti-inflammatory properties and a possible role in regulating blood pressure. The aim of this study was to investigate the correlation of serum zinc with matrix metalloproteinase-2 and-9 (MMP-2, MMP-9), advanced glycation end products (AGEs), and blood pressure in patients with CKD. This cross-sectional study included 90 patients with CKD. Serum zinc and the levels of MMP-2, MMP-9, AGEs, and creatinine were measured using validated biochemical methods. Three 24-h food recalls were completed to evaluate dietary zinc intake. Systolic and diastolic blood pressure (SBP, DBP) were measured using a digital sphygmomanometer. Participants' mean age was 60.68 ± 8.81 years. The prevalence of zinc deficiency in our participants was 10%. Serum zinc was negatively correlated with MMP-9 (r =  - 0.231, p = 0.032) and creatinine (r =  - 0.304, p = 0.004). However, after adjusting for confounding variables, the association between serum zinc and MMP-9 was near the significance level (β =  - 0.174, p = 0.09) and zinc remained in the model as one of the predictors. Serum zinc was positively correlated with the dietary intake of zinc (r = 0.241, p = 0.025) and estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) (r = 0.259, p = 0.015). In conclusion, our results showed that serum zinc might be one of the predictors of serum MMP-9 in patients with CKD. In addition, serum zinc was positively associated with its dietary intake and eGFR. Future longitudinal studies or clinical trials are required to reveal any causal association between zinc status and profibrotic or inflammatory biomarkers among patients with CKD.

Effects of inhibition of the renin-angiotensin system on hypertension-induced target organ damage: clinical and experimental evidence

The dysregulation of renin-angiotensin-system (RAS) plays a pivotal role in hypertension and in the development of the related target organ damage (TOD). The main goal of treating hypertension is represented by the long-term reduction of cardiovascular (CV) risk. RAS inhibition either by angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE)-inhibitors or by type 1 Angiotensin II receptors blockers (ARBs), reduce the incidence of CV events in hypertensive patients. Actually, ACE-inhibitors and ARBs have been demonstrated to be effective to prevent, or delay TOD like left ventricular hypertrophy, chronic kidney disease, and atherosclerosis. The beneficial effects of RAS blockers on clinical outcome of hypertensive patients are due to the key role of angiotensin II in the pathogenesis of TOD. In particular, Angiotensin II through an inflammatory-mediated mechanism plays a role in the initiation, progression and vulnerability of atherosclerotic plaque. In addition, Angiotensin II can be considered the hormonal transductor of the pressure overload in cardiac myocytes, and through an autocrine-paracrine mechanism plays a role in the development of left ventricular hypertrophy. Angiotensin II by modulating the redox status and the immune system participates to the development of chronic kidney disease. The RAS blocker should be considered the first therapeutic option in patients with hypertension, even if ACE-inhibitors and ARBs have different impact on CV prevention. ARBs seem to have greater neuro-protective effects, while ACE-inhibitors have greater cardio-protective action.

Sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitor-induced reduction in the mean arterial pressure improved renal composite outcomes in type 2 diabetes mellitus patients with chronic kidney disease: A propensity score-matched model analysis in Japan

Aims/Introduction

Large‐scale clinical trials have reported that, in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus, sodium–glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitor treatment affords favorable renal outcomes; the underlying mechanisms, however, remain unclear. Thus, this study investigated how SGLT2 inhibitor‐induced changes in the mean arterial pressure (MAP; denoted as ΔMAP) are associated with renal outcomes in type 2 diabetes mellitus patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD).

Materials and Methods

We retrospectively assessed the data of 624 Japanese type 2 diabetes mellitus patients with CKD who had been using SGLT2 inhibitors for >1 year. For propensity score matching (1:1 nearest neighbor match, with caliper value = 0.053, no replacement), patients were categorized into two groups based on the ΔMAP (>−4 mmHg [n = 329] and ≤−4.0 mmHg [n = 295]). Composite albuminuria progression or a ≥15% annual reduction in the estimated glomerular filtration rate was regarded as the end‐point.

Results

Per group, 173 propensity‐matched patients were compared. Patients with ΔMAP ≤−4 mmHg had a significantly lower incidence of composite renal outcomes than those with ΔMAP ≥−4 mmHg (5.8% [n = 10] vs 15.6% [n = 27], P = 0.003). Although the between‐group differences in the estimated glomerular filtration rates were non‐significant, patients with a ΔMAP ≤−4 mmHg had significantly larger reductions in the logarithmic urine albumin‐to‐creatinine ratio (P = 0.005).

Conclusions

The degree of blood pressure reduction after SGLT2 inhibitor treatment influenced renal composite outcomes in Japanese type 2 diabetes mellitus patients with CKD, confirming the importance of blood pressure management in type 2 diabetes mellitus patients with CKD, even when they are under SGLT2 inhibitor treatment.