Factors influencing left ventricular mass in salt sensitive and salt resistant essential hypertensive patients

Inverse salt sensitivity: an independent risk factor for cardiovascular damage in essential hypertension

OBJECTIVE

Salt sensitivity is a powerful risk factor for cardiovascular (CV) disease and mortality in both normotensive and hypertensive patients. We investigated the predictive value of the salt sensitivity phenotype in the development of CV events and hypertensive target organ damage (TOD) among essential hypertensive patients.

METHODS

Eight hundred forty-four naive hypertensive patients were recruited and underwent an acute saline test during which blood pressure (BP) displayed either no substantial variation (salt-resistant, SR individuals), an increase (salt-sensitive, SS), or a paradoxical decrease (inverse salt-sensitive, ISS). Sixty-one patients with the longest monitored follow-up (median 16 years) for blood pressure and organ damage were selected for the present study. A clinical score for TOD development based on the severity and the age of onset was set up by considering hypertensive heart disease, cerebrovascular damage, microalbuminuria, and vascular events.

RESULTS

CV events were significantly higher among SS and ISS than in SR patients. The relative risk of developing CV events was 12.67 times higher in SS than SR and 5.94 times higher in ISS than SR patients. The development of moderate to severe TOD was 10-fold higher in SS and over 15-fold higher in ISS than in SR patients. Among the three phenotypes, changes in plasma endogenous ouabain were linked with the blood pressure effects of saline.

CONCLUSIONS

Salt sensitivity and inverse salt sensitivity appear to be equivalent risk factors for CV events. The response to an acute saline test is predictive of CV damage for newly identified ISS individuals.

Sodium Intake and Target Organ Damage in Hypertension-An Update about the Role of a Real Villain

Salt intake is too high for safety nowadays. The main active ion in salt is sodium. The vast majority of scientific evidence points out the importance of sodium restriction for decreasing cardiovascular risk. International Guidelines recommend a large reduction in sodium consumption to help reduce blood pressure, organ damage, and cardiovascular risk. Regulatory authorities across the globe suggest a general restriction of sodium intake to prevent cardiovascular diseases. In spite of this seemingly unanimous consensus, some researchers claim to have evidence of the unhealthy effects of a reduction of sodium intake, and have data to support their claims. Evidence is against dissenting scientists, because prospective, observational, and basic research studies indicate that sodium is the real villain: actual sodium consumption around the globe is far higher than the safe range. Sodium intake is directly related to increased blood pressure, and independently to the enlargement of cardiac mass, with a possible independent role in inducing left ventricular hypertrophy. This may represent the basis of myocardial ischemia, congestive heart failure, and cardiac mortality. Although debated, a high sodium intake may induce initial renal damage and progression in both hypertensive and normotensive subjects. Conversely, there is general agreement about the adverse role of sodium in cerebrovascular disease. These factors point to the possible main role of sodium intake in target organ damage and cardiovascular events including mortality. This review will endeavor to outline the existing evidence.

Influence of regression of left ventricular hypertrophy on left atrial size and function in patients with moderate hypertension

OBJECTIVES

The aim of the study was to evaluate the effect of regression of left ventricular (LV) hypertrophy on left atrial (LA) size and function in patients treated with telmisartan, an angiotensin II receptor blocker.

METHODS

Patients population included 80 patients with mild-moderate LV hypertrophy treated with telmisartan. Patients were followed over a period of 12 months from the start of telmisartan treatment. LA size was measured during systole from the parasternal long-axis view from M-mode. Atrial function was assessed by Doppler-echocardiography and the following parameters were measured: transmitral peak A velocity, atrial filling fraction, atrial ejection force (AEF), peak E velocity, deceleration time and isovolumic relaxation time, LA maximal and minimal volume, and LV cardiac mass index (LVMI).

RESULTS

All patients had an increased LVMI and decrease during follow-up. LA dimensions were greater at baseline and reduced after 1 year of treatment. LA volume indexes maximal volume, minimal volume and P volume were reduced compared with baseline value (maximal volume from 35+/-5 to 32+/-5, p<0.05; minimal volumes from 14+/-2 to 10+/-4, p<0.05). AEF, a parameter of atrial systolic function, increased from 12+/-3 to 15+/-2.4 (p<0.01). The reduction of LA volumes correlate with reduction of LVMI (LA maximal volume and LVMI r = 0.45; p<0.01; LA minimal volume and LVMI r = 0.34; p<0.05). A positive correlation was also found between LV mass index and P volume (r = 0.41; p<0.01), LV mass index and LA active emptying volume (r = 0.39; p<0.01), and LV mass index and LA total emptying volume (r = 0.38; p<0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

The present study suggests that regression of LV hypertrophy due to telmisartan is associated with reduction of LA volumes that expresses variation of LV end-diastolic pressure. The reduction of LV end-diastolic pressure is associated with an increase in diastolic filling and with a significant reduction of active and passive emptying contribution of left atrium to LV stroke volume.

WITHDRAWN: Left atrial function and arterial hypertension

Left atrial enlargement is frequently observed in many cardiac diseases. One of the main determinants of left atrial size is ventricular diastolic function. It has recently been suggested that left atrial volume might be the morphophysiologic expression of long-term modifications induced by diastolic function. Furthermore, left ventricular remodelling, such as it happens in hypertensive patients, is another important determinant of atrial volume. All the volumetric modifications of the left atrium, during cardiac cycle, are involved in hypertensive damage. Therefore, left atrial function impairment represents the result of morphological and haemodynamic alterations observed in hypertension. Actually, many techniques, invasive and non-invasive, are available with the purpose to investigate the real atrial dimensions and provide a suitable assessment of atrial function. Recently, it has been demonstrated that the degree of left atrial enlargement is associated with adverse prognosis in different clinical setting. The predictive value of left atrial volume seems to be independent of left ventricular systolic and diastolic function, but the use of left atrial volume for risk stratification is yet an evolving science: more data are required with respect to the natural history of left atrial remodelling in disease, the degree of left atrial modifiability with therapy and whether regression of left atrial size translates into improved cardiovascular outcome.Journal of Human Hypertension advance online publication, 14 August 2008; doi:10.1038/jhh.2008.96.

Correlates of left atrial size in hypertensive patients with left ventricular hypertrophy: the Losartan Intervention For Endpoint Reduction in Hypertension (LIFE) Study

Left ventricular hypertrophy has been suggested to mediate the relation between hypertension and left atrial enlargement, with associated risks of atrial fibrillation and stroke. However, less is known about correlates of left atrial size in hypertensive patients with left ventricular hypertrophy. We assessed left atrial size by echocardiography in 941 hypertensive patients, age 55 to 80 (mean, 66) years, with electrocardiographic left ventricular hypertrophy at baseline in the Losartan Intervention For Endpoint reduction in hypertension study. Enlarged left atrial diameter (women, >3.8 cm; men, >4.2 cm) was present in 56% of women and 38% of men (P<0.01). Compared with the 512 patients with normal left atrial size, the 429 patients with enlarged left atrium more often had mitral regurgitation, atrial fibrillation, and echocardiographic left ventricular hypertrophy. They also had higher age, systolic blood pressure, pulse pressure, weight, body mass index, left ventricular internal chamber dimension, stroke volume, and mass and lower relative wall thickness and ejection fraction (all, P<0.05). In logistic regression analysis, left atrial enlargement was related to left ventricular hypertrophy and eccentric geometry; greater body mass index, systolic blood pressure, and age; female gender; mitral regurgitation; and atrial fibrillation (all, P<0.05). Thus, left atrial size in hypertensive patients with electrocardiographic left ventricular hypertrophy is influenced by gender, age, obesity, systolic blood pressure, and left ventricular geometry independently of left ventricular mass and presence of mitral regurgitation or atrial fibrillation.

Association between salt sensitivity and target organ damage in essential hypertension

Cardiovascular events occur more frequently in sodium-sensitive patients with essential hypertension; recently, sodium sensitivity was shown to be a cardiovascular risk factor independently of other classic factors such as blood pressure and cigarette smoking This study examined the relationship between salt sensitivity status and target organ damage in hypertensive patients. Ninety-six patients (35 men, 61 women) with moderate essential hypertension were studied for salt sensitivity status and the presence of target organ damage, including hypertensive retinopathy, serum creatinine, creatinine clearance, and urinary albumin excretion (UAE). Four different patterns of left ventricular anatomic adaptation were identified by categorizing patients according to the values of left ventricular mass index and relative wall thickness by the means of echocardiography. Forty-five (47%) patients were shown to be salt-sensitive, in contrast to 51 (53%) salt-resistant subjects. Serum creatinine and UAE were significantly higher in the group of salt-sensitive hypertensives (P < .05 and P < .001, respectively). Left ventricular mass index (LVMI), relative wall thickness (RWT), and left atrial index (LAI) were all significantly higher in the group of salt-sensitive hypertensive patients. Concentric hypertrophy was significantly more prevalent in the salt-sensitive group (37.8% v 11.8%; P < .01). The prevalence of hypertensive retinopathy in the salt-sensitive group was 84.4%, in contrast to 59.6% in the salt-resistant group (P < .01). Multivariate regression analysis revealed salt sensitivity as a significant predictor of LVMI, RWT, and UAE, independently of age, body mass index, and mean blood pressure. In conclusion, salt-sensitive hypertensive patients are more prone to develop severe hypertensive target organ damage that may enhance their risk of renal and cardiovascular morbidity.