Clonidine suppression test revisited

Clonidine suppression test for a reliable diagnosis of pheochromocytoma: When to use

OBJECTIVE

In clinical practice, false-positive results in biochemical testing for suspected pheochromocytoma/paraganglioma (PPGL) are not infrequent and may lead to unnecessary examinations. We aimed to evaluate the role of the clonidine suppression test (CST) in the era of analyses of plasma-free metanephrines for the diagnosis or exclusion of PPGL in patients with adrenal tumours and/or arterial hypertension.

DESIGN AND METHODS

This single-centre, prospective trial investigated the use of CST in 60 patients with suspected PPGL associated with out-patient elevations of plasma normetanephrine (NMN) and/or metanephrine (MN), in most cases accompanied with hypertension or an adrenal mass. Measurements of plasma catecholamines and free metanephrines were performed by liquid chromatography with electrochemical detection and tandem mass spectrometry, respectively.

RESULTS

Forty-six patients entered final analysis (n = 20 with PPGL and n = 26 with a nonfunctional adrenal mass and/or hypertension). CST reliably excluded false-positive baseline NMN results with a specificity of 100%. The sensitivity of CST improved from 85% to 94% when tumours with isolated MN increase (n = 3) were not considered. In patients with elevated baseline NMN (n = 24), CST correctly identified all patients without PPGL. Patients with falsely elevated baseline NMN results (n = 7, 26.9%) exhibited increases of baseline NMN up to 1.7-fold above the upper reference limit.

CONCLUSION

CST qualifies as a useful diagnostic tool for differential diagnosis of borderline elevated plasma-free NMN in patients with suspected PPGL. In this context, CST helps to correctly identify all false-positive NMN screening results.

Improved Diagnostic Accuracy of Clonidine Suppression Testing Using an Age-Related Cutoff for Plasma Normetanephrine

BACKGROUND

Moderately elevated plasma normetanephrine (NMN) levels are frequent among patients with suspected pheochromocytoma and paraganglioma (PPGL). Clonidine suppression testing (CST) is recommended to distinguish patients with from those without PPGL. We aimed at evaluating the diagnostic outcome of CST in patients with moderate NMN elevations.

METHODS

Data from patients participating in the PMT study (Prospective Monoamine-Producing Tumor) and the ENSAT (European Network for the Study of Adrenal Tumours) registry in 6 European reference centers were analyzed retrospectively. Eighty-nine patients with suspected PPGL and moderate NMN elevations upon screening were included. During follow-up, PPGL was confirmed in 16 and excluded in 73 cases. Plasma NMN was measured by liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry before and 180 minutes after oral clonidine. Receiver operating characteristic analysis was performed to identify optimal cutoffs.

RESULTS

If published diagnostic criteria for CST (ie, NMN ≥112 ng/L and NMN suppression <40%) were applied, a sensitivity of 88% (CI, 61%-98%) and a specificity of 97% (CI, 90%-100%) were observed. An improved cutoff for plasma NMN 180 minutes after clonidine was established at 80% of the age-related upper limit of normal, resulting in a sensitivity of 94% and a specificity of 97%. False-negative CST results occurred in 2 patients with small PPGL.

CONCLUSIONS

This study, involving one of the largest cohorts of patients with suspected PPGL and moderately elevated NMN, confirmed the diagnostic accuracy of CST. The application of an adapted cutoff further improved sensitivity.

The association between systolic blood pressure reduction during clonidine suppression testing and the decrease in plasma catecholamines and metanephrines

Borderline isolated norepinephrine (NE) and normetanephrine (NMT) elevation is common among patients with suspected pheochromocytoma and paraganglioma (PPGL). The clonidine suppression test (CST) may help establish the etiology in these cases. Prolonged laboratory processing and/or paucity of reliable biochemical assays may limit the utility of CST. The aim of this study was to evaluate whether blood pressure (BP) reduction during CST is associated with alterations in plasma NMT/NE, thereby potentially providing an immediate indication of CST results. In this cross-sectional study, the authors included all consecutive patients with suspected PPGL who underwent CST from January 1, 2014, to December 31, 2019. Linear regression models were conducted to evaluate the association between BP reduction and decrease in plasma NMT/NE. The final analysis included 36 patients (17 males). The decrease in systolic BP (SBP) 90 minutes postclonidine was associated with a decrease in plasma NMT (R = 0.668, P = .025) and NE (R = 0.562, P = .005). A 40% decrease in NMT and NE correlated with a 9.74% and 7.16% decrease in SBP, respectively. Subgroup analyses demonstrated that the association between SBP reduction and the decrease in plasma NMT (R = 0.764, P = .046) and NE (R = 0.714, P = .003) strengthens among patients with hypertension and among those with diabetes mellitus (R = 0.974, P = .026 for NMT). In conclusion, SBP reduction during CST is associated with plasma NMT and NE decrease. Therefore, the decrease in SBP 90 minutes postclonidine may serve as an immediate complementary clinical tool for PPGL diagnosis.

Pseudopheochromocytoma

Pseudopheochromocytoma manifests as severe, symptomatic paroxysmal hypertension without significant elevation in catecholamine and metanephrine levels and lack of evidence of tumor in the adrenal gland. The clinical manifestations are similar but not identical to those in excess circulating catecholamines. The underlying symptomatic mechanism includes augmented cardiovascular responsiveness to catecholamines alongside heightened sympathetic nervous stimulation. The psychological characteristics are probably attributed to the component of repressed emotions related to a past traumatic episode or repressive coping style. Successful management can be achieved by strong collaboration between a hypertension specialist and a psychiatrist or psychologist with expertise in cognitive-behavioral panic management.

Discriminating pheochromocytomas from other adrenal lesions: the dilemma of elevated catecholamines

BACKGROUND

Screening tests for pheochromocytoma involve measuring levels of catecholamines in the urine or plasma, which have significant false-positive rates. We reviewed patients with adrenal masses and elevated levels of catecholamines to determine the value of different preoperative tests in diagnosing pheochromocytomas.

METHODS

A retrospective chart review identified patients who underwent adrenalectomy between 1997 and 2011 with elevation of urine or serum catecholamines. A database of clinicopathologic factors was created including preoperative urine and plasma metanephrines, normetanephrines, vanillylmandelic acid, and fractionated catecholamines, and tumor dimensions on imaging and pathology.

RESULTS

A total of 70 patients underwent adrenalectomy because of presence of an adrenal mass and elevation of catecholamines or normetanephrines or metanephrines. Of these, 46 had pathologically confirmed pheochromocytomas. To improve our ability to discriminate between pheochromocytoma and other pathology, we examined different combinations of clinicopathologic factors and catecholamine levels and found the best test was a scoring system. Points are awarded for a hierarchy of elevated normetanephrine, norepinephrine, metanephrines, with additional points received for age <50 and size on imaging >3.3 cm. A score of 2 is suggestive of pheochromocytoma, with a positive predictive value of 86-87%, while a score of 4 is diagnostic with positive predictive value of 100%.

CONCLUSION

We found that urine/serum normetanephrine levels were the most valuable screening tool; however, a score examining the size of adrenal mass on preoperative CT, age, and either plasma or urine norepinephrine, metanephrine, and normetanephrine values leads to a higher positive predictive value, making this scoring system superior to individual lab tests.

Evaluation of the clonidine suppression test in the diagnosis of phaeochromocytoma

The aim of this study is to review the experience of the clonidine suppression test in a regional endocrine centre and to compare the diagnostic sensitivity and specificity using various previous published criteria. The design used is retrospective study. The subjects include 56 patients in whom clonidine suppression tests had been performed from 1995 to 2000: 15 with phaeochromocytoma and 41 patients in whom the diagnosis was excluded using a combination of biochemical testing, abdominal computed tomography scanning and clinical follow-up. Plasma catecholamines were measured by high pressure liquid chromatography on basal samples and at hourly intervals for 3 h after the administration of clonidine 300 μg orally and the following diagnostic criteria were applied: plasma noradrenaline+adrenaline>2.96 nmol l(-1) at 3 h post-clonidine or a baseline plasma adrenaline plus noradrenaline>11.82 nmol l(-1); plasma noradrenaline>2.96 nmol l(-1) at 3 h post-clonidine and plasma noradrenaline>2.96 nmol l(-1) and <50% fall in noradrenaline at 3 h post-clonidine. The results obtained is that mean plasma noradrenaline plus adrenaline fell across the test in 40/41 patients in the non-phaeochromocytoma patients and was lowest at 3 h (basal 2.28 ± 0.14 vs 1.36 ± 0.11 nmol l(-1), P<0.001). In the phaeochromocytoma group, clonidine had a variable effect on adrenaline plus noradrenaline levels with increases in 7/15. Using an abnormal result as a 3 h level of noradrenaline plus adrenaline>2.96 mmol l(-1) gave a sensitivity of 93% and specificity of 95%. When a 3 h noradrenaline>2.96 mmol l(-1) was used, sensitivity was 87% and specificity 95%. Using the former criteria, noradrenaline plus adrenaline>2.96 mmol l(-1), 1/15 in the phaeochromocytoma group had a normal result after clonidine suppression testing. Two of 41 in the non-phaeochromocytoma group had a false-positive result. Under carefully controlled conditions, the clonidine suppression test is well tolerated, safe and accurate for use in the investigation of patients with suspected phaeochromocytoma.

Diagnosis and treatment of pheochromocytoma in an academic hospital from 1997 to 2007

BACKGROUND

The diagnosis and treatment of pheochromocytoma pose a challenge to physicians. Several trends in the presentation, diagnosis, and surgical treatment of pheochromocytoma have emerged in the last 10 years. The diagnostic accuracy and consequences of misdiagnosis of pheochromocytoma are not well known. We aimed to systemically study the diagnostic accuracy and treatment outcomes of pheochromocytoma and to reveal the causes and consequences of misdiagnosis (including both overdiagnosis and underdiagnosis).

METHODS

We reviewed the electronic and paper charts of 49 patients who underwent adrenalectomy or adrenal biopsy with either preoperative or pathologic diagnosis of pheochromocytoma in a large academic hospital from 1997 to 2007. Three groups of patients (overdiagnosed, correctly diagnosed, and underdiagnosed) were compared on clinical courses, biochemical tests, imaging studies, and surgical outcomes.

RESULTS

Pheochromocytoma was overdiagnosed in 9 patients, correctly diagnosed in 30 patients, and underdiagnosed in 10 patients. The overdiagnosis rate was 23% (9/39), and the underdiagnosis rate was 25% (10/40). The 3 distinct groups of patients exhibited significant differences in clinical presentation, biochemical tests, and imaging characteristics. The most common causes of overdiagnosis were misinterpretation of borderline biochemical test results and overzealous imaging. Overdiagnosis subjected patients to unnecessary adrenalectomy and its complications. The most common cause of underdiagnosis was failure to consider and test for pheochromocytoma. Underdiagnosis resulted in dangerous adrenal biopsy or adrenalectomy with hypertensive crisis and nearly doubled the length of stay in hospital. Surgical resection of correctly diagnosed pheochromocytoma was largely effective and safe, but intraoperative and postoperative complications occurred in some patients.

CONCLUSION

We conclude that misdiagnosis of pheochromocytoma is not uncommon and causes serious adverse effects. Correct interpretation of biochemical tests and imaging is crucial to a correct diagnosis, and pheochromocytoma should always be included in the differential diagnosis of any adrenal mass. Our data suggest that physician education is needed to improve the diagnosis and treatment of pheochromocytoma.

Endocrine causes of secondary hypertension

Secondary hypertension is common in clinical practice if a broad definition is applied. Various patterns of hypertension exist in the patient with an endocrine source of their disease, including new-onset hypertension in a previously normotensive individual, a loss of blood pressure control in a patient with previously well-controlled blood pressure, and/or labile blood pressure in the setting of either of these 2 patterns. A thorough history and physical exam, which can rule out concomitant medications, alcohol intake, and over-the-counter medication use, is an important prerequisite to the workup for endocrine causes of hypertension. Endocrine forms of secondary hypertension, such as pheochromocytoma and Cushing's disease, are extremely uncommon. Conversely, primary aldosteronism now occurs with sufficient frequency so as to be considered "top of the list" for secondary endocrine causes in otherwise difficult-to-treat or resistant hypertension. Primary aldosteronism can be insidious in its presentation since a supposed hallmark finding, hypokalemia, may be variable in its presentation. It is important to identify secondary causes of hypertension that are endocrine in nature because surgical intervention may result in correction or substantial improvement of the hypertension.

Sensitivity and positive predictive value of CT, MRI and 123I-MIBG scintigraphy in localizing pheochromocytomas: A prospective study

AIM

To establish a standardized non-invasive imaging protocol for patients with pheochromocytoma undergoing surgery.

METHODS

A series of 32 consecutive patients (16 men, 16 women; median age 43 years, range 15-71 years) with biochemically confirmed pheochromocytoma underwent computed tomography (CT) scanning, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and meta-[I]iodobenzylguanidine (MIBG) whole-body scintigraphy prior to adrenalectomy or excision of extra-adrenal tumour (paraganglioma).

RESULTS

At final pathology no malignant pheochromocytomas were found. The tumour was right-sided in 16 (50%) patients, left-sided in 13 (41%), extra-adrenal (sympathetic ganglia, upper abdomen) in two (6%) and bilateral in one (3%) patient. Overall, the median greatest diameter (size) of the tumour was 35 mm (range, 15-90 mm). The sensitivity of CT, MRI and MIBG scintigraphy was 90%, 93% and 91%, and the specificity was 93%, 93% and 100%, respectively. The three patients with false negative scintigraphy had an intra-adrenal tumour, ranging from 20 to 50 mm in size. The presence of necrosis within the mass might justify the lack of significant uptake of radiopharmaceutical in two patients, and the small size (15 mm) of the mass in the other. There were two false positive results with both CT and MRI, and no false positive MIBG scintigraphy, which had the highest (100%) positive predictive value. The combination of MRI+MIBG scintigraphy reached 100% sensitivity and positive predictive value.

CONCLUSION

Our data suggest that this imaging protocol should be used in all patients with biochemically confirmed pheochromocytoma.

Pheochromocytoma. Special considerations in children

Pheochromocytoma is a rare but important tumor in children. Appropriate evaluation and management are essential for a favorable outcome. Pheochromocytomas are more often multifocal and extra-adrenal in children when compared with adults. This pattern makes the diagnosis, localization, and surgical management more challenging. Nonetheless, the standard biochemical evaluation is usually diagnostic, and MR imaging is currently the best tool for tumor localization. The possibility of a familial syndrome must always be considered and should always be thoroughly evaluated when children present with a pheochromocytoma. Conversely, children with a familial syndrome should undergo annual screening for pheochromocytoma from a young age. Given the greater likelihood of a metachronous recurrence in children, consideration should be given to adrenal-sparing surgery in selected patients. When managed appropriately, the outlook for pheochromocytoma in children is excellent. Unfortunately, the uncommon malignant tumors are still difficult to treat. Perhaps the unique genetic characteristics of pheochromocytoma will ultimately be exploited in the management of the aggressive forms of this disease.