Long-Term Outcome of Intravitreal Bevacizumab Followed by Ahmed Valve Implantation in the Management of Neovascular Glaucoma

Long-term results of Ahmed glaucoma valve implantation with/without intravitreal anti-VEGF injection in neovascular glaucoma patients

PURPOSE

This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of Ahmed glaucoma valve (AGV) implantation with or without anti-VEGF injections in neovascular glaucoma patients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This single-center retrospective study assessed NVG patients who underwent AGV implantation with or without anti-VEGF injections. Demographic and clinical data, including ocular findings, intraocular pressure (IOP), visual acuity, and glaucoma medication count, were recorded preoperatively and postoperatively at one day, one month, and one year. The study included 35 patients. Group 1 consisted of 23 patients who received anti-VEGF injections before AGV surgery. Group 2, with 12 patients, had no anti-VEGF injections prior to surgery. Successful surgery was defined as IOP values between 6 and 21mmHg. The primary outcome was a 30% or more reduction in IOP.

RESULTS

The groups displayed no significant difference in their demographic or clinical profiles (P>0.05). The visual acuity before and one year after surgery did not differ significantly between the groups. However, IOP values significantly decreased by the end of the one-year follow-up for both groups. No significant differences were found between the groups regarding visual acuity, IOP, or the number of medications during the one-year follow-up (P>0.05). Success rates were 95.7% for Group 1 and 91.7% for Group 2. No significant difference in complications between the groups was observed (P>0.05).

CONCLUSION

Anti-VEGF injections prior to AGV implantation did not significantly impact visual acuity, IOP values, or medication count during the one-year follow-up.

Gonioscopy-assisted transluminal trabeculotomy in neovascular glaucoma: Salvaging the conventional outflow pathway

Purpose

To report a case of acute neovascular glaucoma with partial synechial angle closure secondary to central retinal vein occlusion that underwent gonioscopy-assisted transluminal trabeculotomy as well as near-monthly anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) injections and panretinal photocoagulation (PRP) treatments.

Observations

Nine months after GATT, the patient had achieved intraocular pressure control on no medications. However, she was lost to follow up for 4 months and received no anti-VEGF or PRP during that time; she re-presented with acute NVG and complete synechial closure, and ultimately underwent aqueous shunt implantation.

Conclusions and Importance

To our knowledge, this is the first reported attempt of an ab interno angle surgery to successfully restore aqueous outflow through the conventional outflow pathway in an eye with acute NVG and partial synechial angle closure. We posit that this can be an effective approach to achieve IOP control in NVG with at least partially open angles, as long as sufficient anti-neovascular treatments are administered until the underlying neovascular drive achieves quiescence.

A Long-term Clinical Study to Evaluate AGV with Concurrent Intravitreal Ranibizumab vs Primary AGV Implantation in Cases of Refractory Neovascular Glaucoma

Purpose

Methods

Results

Conclusion

How to cite this article

Ahmed glaucoma valve implantation with and without subconjunctival bevacizumab in refractory glaucoma

PURPOSE

To evaluate the effects of subconjunctival bevacizumab injection on intraocular pressure (IOP), hypertensive phase, and failure and success rates of Ahmed Glaucoma Valve (AGV) implantation.

METHODS

A total of 63 eyes of 63 patients (30 cases in control and 33 cases in bevacizumab group) were included in this randomized masked prospective clinical trial. Pre- and postoperative BCVA, IOP, number of medications, complications and success rates were compared between AGV + bevacizumab and AGV alone group.

RESULTS

Both groups showed statistically significant reductions in IOP in all their follow-up visits (P < 0.05). The mean IOP was lower in the AGV + Bevacizumab group than AGV group in all follow-up visits. However, the difference was only significant at the 3rd month (17.3 ± 6.2 vs. 20.7 ± 4.6, p = 0.04). The number of medications was not differed significantly between the two groups at their last visit (p value = 0.84) Complete success rate was higher in AGV + Bevacizumab. However, the difference was not significant (p = 0.73). The qualified and overall success rate, failure rate and the need for second tube were not statistically different between the two groups. The hypertensive phase was not statistically significant between the 2 groups (33.3% in AGV + Bevacizumab group and 50% in AGV group, p = 0.06) CONCLUSION: Adjunctive use of Bevacizumab during AGV implantation is beneficial in controlling hypertensive phase and IOP control and may lead to higher success rates and lower failure rates after AGV implantation. However, whether it's clearly beneficial or its exact role remains to be investigated.

Ahmed glaucoma valve implantation versus suprachoroidal silicone tube implantation following the injection of bevacizumab into the anterior chamber in patients with neovascular glaucoma

PURPOSE

This study compared the efficacy and safety of Ahmed glaucoma valve (AGV) implantation versus suprachoroidal silicone tube (SST) implantation after the injection of bevacizumab into the anterior chamber in patients with neovascular glaucoma.

METHODS

Patients were randomly assigned to undergo AGV or SST implantation. Bevacizumab was injected into the anterior chamber at a dosage of 1.25 mg/0.1 mL, 1 week before surgery. Intraocular pressure (IOP) control, complication, and success rates were compared between the groups. Success was defined as a final IOP > 5 mmHg, < 22 mmHg with or without any antiglaucoma drug.

RESULTS

A total of 23 patients were enrolled in the study, including 13 (56.5%) in the AGV group (group 1) and 10 (43.5%) in the SST group (group 2). The mean baseline IOP was 42.0 ± 9.1 mmHg in group 1 and 39.5 ± 10 mmHg in group 2 (p > 0.05). The mean IOP was 16.9 ± 7.0 mmHg in group 1 and 12.5 ± 6.7 mmHg in group 2 on the first day after surgery. After a mean follow-up period of 19.4 ± 5.2 months, success was achieved in 12 (92.3%) patients in group 1 and in 1 (10%) patient in group 2. There was a statistically significant difference in terms of the success rate between groups (p < 0.05). Complications included hyphema in three (23%) patients, obstruction of the AGV tube by iris tissue in one (7.7%) patient, and tube exposure in one patient (7.7%) in group 1. Suprachoroidal silicone tube dislocation to the anterior chamber was observed in one (10%) patient in group 2.

CONCLUSION

AGV implantation after the injection of bevacizumab into the anterior chamber had a higher success rate than SST implantation. Complications were seen more frequently in the AGV group.