1
|
Riguetto CM, Barbosa EB, Atihe CC, Reis F, Alves M, Zantut-Wittmann DE. Ocular Surface Disease Related to the Inflammatory and Non-Inflammatory Phases of Thyroid Eye Disease. Clin Ophthalmol 2023; 17:3465-3475. [PMID: 38026592 PMCID: PMC10657741 DOI: 10.2147/opth.s430861] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/10/2023] [Accepted: 11/02/2023] [Indexed: 12/01/2023] Open
Abstract
Purpose This study evaluated the ocular surface disease (OSD), especially dry eye disease (DED) parameters by combining qualitative and quantitative tools, including tear matrix metalloproteinase 9 (MMP-9), in patients with Graves' disease (GD) with and without Thyroid eye disease (TED). Patients and Methods A total of 17 active TED, 16 inactive TED, 16 GD without ophthalmopathy, and 16 healthy controls were included. All patients were assessed with CAS, ophthalmometry, qualitative tear MMP-9, Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI), ocular surface staining, Schirmer test, meibography, tear meniscus height, conjunctival hyperemia, and non-invasive tear film break-up time. Patients were classified into three subtypes of DED: aqueous tear deficiency, meibomian gland dysfunction (MGD) and mixed dry eye. Results Inactive TED was shown to be an associated factor with DED (odds ratio 14, confidence interval 2.24-87.24, p=0.0047), and presented more DED than healthy controls (87.5% versus 33.3%, p=0.0113). MGD was also more prevalent among these subjects than in healthy control (62.5% versus 6.7%; p=0.0273). No significant differences were found in other ophthalmological parameters, except for more intense conjunctival redness among active TED than GD without ophthalmopathy (p=0.0214). Qualitative MMP-9 test was more frequently positive in both eyes among active TED than in other groups (p < 0.0001). Conclusion Patients with GD were symptomatic and presented a high prevalence of ocular surface changes and DED, particularly the subgroup with inactive TED. Tear MMP-9 detection was associated with active TED suggesting a relationship between ocular surface changes and the initial inflammatory phase of ophthalmopathy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cinthia Minatel Riguetto
- Endocrinology Division, Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medical Sciences, University of Campinas, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Eduardo Buzolin Barbosa
- Department of Ophthalmology and Otorhinolaryngology, Faculty of Medical Sciences, University of Campinas, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Camila Cristina Atihe
- Department of Ophthalmology and Otorhinolaryngology, Faculty of Medical Sciences, University of Campinas, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Fabiano Reis
- Department of Radiology, Faculty of Medical Sciences, University of Campinas, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Mônica Alves
- Department of Ophthalmology and Otorhinolaryngology, Faculty of Medical Sciences, University of Campinas, São Paulo, Brazil
| | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Liao X, Lai KKH, Aljufairi FMAA, Chen W, Hu Z, Wong HYM, Jia R, Wei Y, Tham CCY, Pang CP, Chong KKL. Ocular Surface Changes in Treatment-Naive Thyroid Eye Disease. J Clin Med 2023; 12:jcm12093066. [PMID: 37176507 PMCID: PMC10179143 DOI: 10.3390/jcm12093066] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/10/2023] [Revised: 04/03/2023] [Accepted: 04/20/2023] [Indexed: 05/15/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To investigate the association of meibomian gland dysfunction (MGD) and ocular surface exposure with tear film instability in untreated thyroid eye disease (TED) patients. METHODS A cross-sectional study of TED patients from September 2020 to September 2022 was conducted. Ocular surface parameters included ocular surface disease index (OSDI), tear meniscus height (TMH), non-invasive tear break-up time (NITBUT), partial blinking rate, lipid layer thickness (LLT), meibomian gland dropout (meiboscore), Schirmer's test, and corneal punctate epithelial erosions (PEE). Ocular surface exposure was assessed by the margin reflex distances of the upper and lower eyelid (MRD1 and MRD2), the amount of exophthalmos, lateral flare, and lagophthalmos. RESULTS In total, 152 eyes from 76 TED patients (64 females and 12 males, age 42.99 ± 12.28 years) and 93 eyes from 61 healthy controls (51 females and 10 males, age 43.52 ± 17.93 years) were examined. Compared with control eyes, TED eyes had higher OSDI, TMH, LLT, and PEE; shorter NITBUT; and worse meiboscore (all p < 0.05). They also had larger amounts of exophthalmos, longer MRD1, more lateral flare, and lagophthalmos. Multivariate analysis identified an association of the tear film instability with lagophthalmos (β = -1.13, 95%CI: -2.08, -0.18) and severe MGD in the lower eyelid (β = -5.01, 95%CI = -7.59, -2.43). CONCLUSIONS Dry eye in TED is mainly manifested as evaporative dry eye disease. Severe lower eyelid MGD and worse lagophthalmos were significantly associated with tear film instability in treatment-naive TED patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xulin Liao
- Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China
| | - Kenneth Ka Hei Lai
- Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China
- Department of Ophthalmology, Tung Wah Eastern Hospital, Hong Kong SAR, China
| | - Fatema Mohamed Ali Abdulla Aljufairi
- Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China
- Department of Ophthalmology, Salmaniya Medical Complex, Government Hospitals, Manama 435, Bahrain
| | - Wanxue Chen
- Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China
| | - Zhichao Hu
- Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China
| | - Hanson Yiu Man Wong
- Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China
| | - Ruofan Jia
- Department of Statistics, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China
| | - Yingying Wei
- Department of Statistics, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China
| | - Clement Chee Yung Tham
- Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China
| | - Chi Pui Pang
- Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China
| | - Kelvin Kam Lung Chong
- Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Pan Y, Chen YX, Zhang J, Lin ML, Liu GM, Xu XL, Fan XQ, Zhong Y, Li Q, Ai SM, Xu W, Tan J, Zhou HF, Xu DD, Zhang HY, Xu B, Wang S, Ma JJ, Zhang S, Gan LY, Cui JT, Li L, Xie YY, Guo X, Pan-Doh N, Zhu ZT, Lu Y, Shi YX, Xia YW, Li ZY, Liang D. Doxycycline vs Placebo at 12 Weeks in Patients With Mild Thyroid-Associated Ophthalmopathy: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Ophthalmol 2022; 140:1076-1083. [PMID: 36173609 PMCID: PMC9523551 DOI: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2022.3779] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/01/2022] [Accepted: 08/03/2022] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
Importance Mild thyroid-associated ophthalmopathy (TAO) negatively impacts quality of life, yet no clinical guidelines for its treatment are available. Existing evidence supports the use of doxycycline in treating mild TAO. Objective To evaluate the short-term (12 weeks) efficacy of doxycycline in treating mild TAO. Design, Setting, and Participants In this placebo-controlled multicenter randomized double-masked trial, 148 patients were assessed for eligibility. After exclusions (patients who were pregnant or lactating, had an allergy to tetracyclines, or had uncontrolled systematic diseases), 100 patients with mild TAO (orbital soft tissue affected mildly) at 5 centers in China were enrolled from July 2013 to December 2019 and monitored for 12 weeks. Interventions Participants were randomly assigned 1:1 to receive doxycycline (50 mg) or placebo once daily for 12 weeks. Main Outcomes and Measures The primary outcome was the rate of improvement at 12 weeks compared with baseline assessed by a composite indicator of eyelid aperture (reduction ≥2 mm), proptosis (reduction ≥2 mm), ocular motility (increase ≥8°), and Graves ophthalmopathy-specific quality-of-life (GO-QOL) scale score (increase ≥6 points). Adverse events were recorded. Results A total of 50 participants were assigned to doxycycline and 50 to placebo. The mean (SD) age was 36.7 (9.1) years; 75 participants (75.0%) were female and 100 (100.0%) were Asian. Medication compliance was checked during participant interviews and by counting excess tablets. At week 12, the improvement rate was 38.0% (19 of 50) in the doxycycline group and 16.0% (8 of 50) in the placebo group (difference, 22.0%; 95% CI, 5.0-39.0; P = .01) in the intention-to-treat population. The per-protocol sensitivity analysis showed similar results (39.6% [19 of 48] vs 16.0% [8 of 50]; difference, 23.6%; 95% CI, 6.4-40.8; P = .009). No adverse events other than 1 case of mild gastric acid regurgitation was recorded in either group. Conclusions and Relevance The results of this study indicate that oral doxycycline, 50 mg daily, resulted in greater improvement of TAO-related symptoms at 12 weeks compared with placebo in patients with mild TAO. These findings support the consideration of doxycycline for mild TAO but should be tempered by recognizing the relatively short follow-up and the size of the cohort. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02203682.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yuan Pan
- Department of Ocular Immunology, State Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology, Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Ocular Diseases, Guangzhou, China
| | - Yu-Xi Chen
- Department of Ocular Immunology, State Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology, Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Ocular Diseases, Guangzhou, China
| | - Jian Zhang
- Department of Ocular Immunology, State Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology, Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Ocular Diseases, Guangzhou, China
| | - Miao-Li Lin
- Department of Ocular Immunology, State Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology, Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Ocular Diseases, Guangzhou, China
- C-MER Dennis Lam Eye Hospital, Shenzhen, China
| | - Guang-Ming Liu
- Department of Ocular Immunology, State Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology, Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Ocular Diseases, Guangzhou, China
- Department of Ophthalmology, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Changzhou, China
| | - Xue-Liang Xu
- Eye Center of Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China
- Department of Ophthalmology, Xiangya Changde Hospital, Changde, China
- Hunan Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology, Changsha, China
- National Clinical Research Center for Geriatric Disorders, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China
| | - Xian-Qun Fan
- Department of Ophthalmology, Ninth People’s Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Yong Zhong
- Department of Ophthalmology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Qing Li
- Department of Ophthalmology, Fujian Provincial Hospital, Fuzhou, China
| | - Si-Ming Ai
- Department of Ocular Immunology, State Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology, Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Ocular Diseases, Guangzhou, China
| | - Wen Xu
- Department of Endocrinology, Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Jia Tan
- Eye Center of Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China
- Hunan Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology, Changsha, China
- National Clinical Research Center for Geriatric Disorders, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China
| | - Hui-Fang Zhou
- Department of Ophthalmology, Ninth People’s Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Dong-Dong Xu
- Department of Ophthalmology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Hui-Ying Zhang
- Department of Ophthalmology, Fujian Provincial Hospital, Fuzhou, China
| | - Bei Xu
- Eye Center of Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China
- Hunan Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology, Changsha, China
- National Clinical Research Center for Geriatric Disorders, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China
| | - Sha Wang
- Eye Center of Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China
- Hunan Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology, Changsha, China
- National Clinical Research Center for Geriatric Disorders, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China
| | - Jun-Jie Ma
- Eye Center of Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China
- Hunan Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology, Changsha, China
- National Clinical Research Center for Geriatric Disorders, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China
- Department of Ophthalmology, Huzhou Central Hospital, Huzhou, China
| | - Shuo Zhang
- Department of Ophthalmology, Ninth People’s Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Lin-Yang Gan
- Department of Ophthalmology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Jian-Tao Cui
- Department of Ophthalmology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Beijing, China
- Beijing Tongren Eye Center, Beijing Tongren Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| | - Li Li
- Department of Ophthalmology, Fujian Provincial Hospital, Fuzhou, China
| | - Yan-Yan Xie
- Department of Ocular Immunology, State Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology, Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Ocular Diseases, Guangzhou, China
| | - Xinxing Guo
- Wilmer Eye Institute, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
- Dana Center of Preventive Ophthalmology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Nathan Pan-Doh
- Wilmer Eye Institute, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Zhuo-Ting Zhu
- Department of Ocular Immunology, State Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology, Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Ocular Diseases, Guangzhou, China
| | - Yao Lu
- Department of Ocular Immunology, State Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology, Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Ocular Diseases, Guangzhou, China
| | - Yu-Xun Shi
- Department of Ocular Immunology, State Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology, Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Ocular Diseases, Guangzhou, China
| | - Yi-Wen Xia
- Department of Ocular Immunology, State Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology, Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Ocular Diseases, Guangzhou, China
| | - Zuo-Yi Li
- Department of Ocular Immunology, State Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology, Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Ocular Diseases, Guangzhou, China
| | - Dan Liang
- Department of Ocular Immunology, State Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology, Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Ocular Diseases, Guangzhou, China
| |
Collapse
|