Donor-specific antibodies following liver and intestinal transplantation: Clinical significance, pathogenesis and recommendations

Acute liver failure secondary to acute antibody mediated rejection after compatible liver transplant: A case report

BACKGROUND

The liver has traditionally been regarded as resistant to antibody-mediated rejection (AMR). AMR in liver transplants is a field in its infancy compared to kidney and lung transplants. In our case we present a patient with alpha-1-antitrypsin disease who underwent ABO compatible liver transplant complicated by acute liver failure (ALF) with evidence of antibody mediated rejection on allograft biopsy and elevated serum donor-specific antibodies (DSA). This case highlights the need for further investigations and heightened awareness for timely diagnosis.

CASE SUMMARY

A 56 year-old woman with alpha-1-antitrypsin disease underwent ABO compatible liver transplant from a deceased donor. The recipient MELD at the time of transplant was 28. The flow cytometric crossmatches were noted to be positive for T and B lymphocytes. The patient had an uneventful recovery postoperatively. Starting on postoperative day 5 the patient developed fevers, elevated liver function tests, distributive shock, renal failure, and hepatic encephalopathy. She went into ALF with evidence of antibody mediated rejection with portal inflammation, bile duct injury, endothelitis, and extensive centrizonal necrosis, and C4d staining on allograft biopsy and elevated DSA. Despite various interventions including plasmapheresis and immunomodulating therapy, she continued to deteriorate. She was relisted and successfully underwent liver retransplantation.

CONCLUSION

This very rare case highlights AMR as the cause of ALF following liver transplant requiring retransplantation.

Antibody-removal therapies for de novo DSA in pediatric intestinal recipients: Why, when, and how? A single-center experience

BACKGROUND

Donor-specific anti-HLA antibodies (DSA) impact negatively on the outcome of intestinal grafts. Although the use of antibody-removal therapies (ART) is becoming more frequent in the last few years, issues regarding their timing and effectiveness remain under discussion.

METHODS

In the present study, we report our experience with eight ART procedures (based on plasmapheresis, intravenous immunoglobulin, and rituximab) in eight pediatric intestinal and multivisceral transplants with de novo DSA (dnDSA).

RESULTS

ART were performed when dnDSA appeared in two contexts: (1) concomitant with rejection (acute or chronic) or (2) without rejection or any other clinical symptom. Complete DSA removal was observed in seven out of eight patients, showing an effectiveness of 88%. In the group treated for dnDSA without clinical symptoms, the success rate was 100%, with complete DSA removal and without rejection afterward. A shorter time between DSA detection and ART performance appeared as a significant factor for the success of the therapy (p = 0.0002). DSA against HLA-A and DQ alleles were the most resistant to ART, whereas anti-DR DSA were the most sensitive. In addition, the 8-year allograft survival rate in recipients undergoing ART was similar to that in those without DSA, being significantly lower in non-treated DSA-positive recipients (p = 0.013).

CONCLUSION

The results confirm the effectiveness of ART in terms of DSA removal and allograft survival and encourage its early use even in the absence of clinical symptoms.

Current Evidence on the Clinical Relevance of Donor-specific Antibodies in Paediatric Liver Transplantation

ABSTRACT

The clinical impact of donor-specific antibodies (DSA) occurring before or after liver transplantation (LT) against donor-human leucocyte antigen (HLA) on graft outcome is still unclear. We aim to present the current consensus based on recent paediatric LT case series. Compared to kidney transplantation, the liver seems to be less susceptible to antibody-mediated graft damage, which is likely due to protective Kupffer cell activity. The incidence of DSA after liver transplantation is higher in children than in adults. DSA directed against HLA class II molecules, mainly DQ, occur more often. The presence of such anti-class II DSA (DQ/DR), especially of the complement-binding IgG3 subclass, may be associated with endothelial injury, T-cell-mediated rejection (TCMR), inflammation, and fibrosis. Regular DSA-posttransplant monitoring cannot as yet be recommended in routine practice but may be useful in selected cases.

The role of endoscopy in the small intestinal transplant recipient: A review

Intestinal transplantation (ITx) is the treatment of choice for patients with intestinal failure who have developed life-threatening complications related to long-term parenteral nutrition. Patients may also undergo ITx as part of a combined liver-intestine or multivisceral transplant for a variety of indications, most commonly intestinal failure-associated liver disease or porto-mesenteric thrombosis. Endoscopy plays a critical role in the posttransplant management of these patients, most commonly in the diagnosis and management of rejection, which occurs in up to 30-40% of patients within the first-year posttransplant. With a lack of noninvasive biomarkers to identify the presence of rejection, endoscopy and biopsy remain the gold standard for its diagnosis. Endoscopic evaluation of the graft is also important in the identification of other complications post-ITx, including posttransplant lymphoproliferative disorder, graft-versus-host disease, and enteric infections. Each patient's posttransplant anatomy may be slightly different, making endoscopy sometimes technically challenging and necessitating clear and frequent communication with the surgical team in order to help identify the highest yield approach. Herein, we review the most common pathologies found endoscopically in the post-ITx patient and describe some of the unique challenges the endoscopist faces when evaluating these complex patients.

Donor-specific antibody and sensitized patients in intestinal transplantation

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

It has been well established that antibody to donor HLA pretransplant and the development of anti-human leukocyte antigen (HLA) antibodies posttransplant contribute to inferior graft survival outcomes. This article serves to review the current status of the management of pretransplant sensitized intestinal transplant candidate as well as to review posttransplant care of patients that harbor antidonor HLA antibodies.

RECENT FINDINGS

The intestinal transplant candidate oftentimes presents for transplant listing with high levels of anti-HLA antibodies that necessitate a careful preoperative strategy to avoid a donor-recipient pair that would result in a positive crossmatch. In the end, donor intestine offer acceptance is based on a balance between recipient clinical needs and allowable immunologic risk tolerance. The use of virtual crossmatching (VXM) enables the transplant center to effectively gauge the immunologic risk of each potential donor-recipient pair far in advance of allocating resources toward pursuing a donor organ. In those candidates with high levels of preformed donor anti-HLA antibodies, desensitization with a novel technique of donor splenic perfusion has been described as well as a single-center experience with a conventional desensitizing protocol. Posttransplant, with the use of a denovo donor-specific antibody (dnDSA) monitoring and treatment protocol, the well known deleterious effects of dnDSA can potentially be ameliorated, thus improving outcome. Efforts to establish a formal histologic criteria for antibody-mediated rejection (ABMR) in the intestinal graft continues to evolve with recent findings describing the relationship between DSA and histopathologic findings.

SUMMARY

Techniques such as the use of VXM, novel desensitization methods and protocols, monitoring and eradicating dnDSA, along with establishing new criteria for ABMR have all contributed to improving the outcomes in transplanting the immunologically challenging intestine.

Graft assessment for acute rejection after intestinal transplantation: current status and future perspective

Intestinal transplantation has since its inception evolved as a lifesaving treatment option for patients with irreversible intestinal failure who can no longer be sustained on parenteral nutrition. Improvement in short-term survival after transplantation has also justified the expansion of treatment indications. Unfortunately, success is somewhat limited by a plateau observed in long-term survival. The reason for this sub-optimal long-term result experienced in this cohort may in part be attributed to the intestinal graft with the lymphoid content it carries inflicting the host with multiple complications where acute cellular rejection is one of the most common causes for graft loss. Graft monitoring is for this reason of paramount importance and detection of rejection at an early stage essential to enable early instigation of treatment and successful reversal of the pathology. Due to the challenges in diagnosing acute rejection with a noninvasive marker we are still limited to a surveillance protocol using endoscopy and biopsies for the diagnosis of rejection. The purpose of our paper is to review the adequacy of different methods in monitoring the graft for acute rejection using biomarkers, endoscopy and imaging. In conclusion, the evidence base continues to support the use of histology for the diagnosis of acute rejection. The role of biomarkers are still debatable, although markers such as calprotectin might be beneficial in excluding an ongoing process.

De novo HLA Class II antibodies are associated with the development of chronic but not acute antibody-mediated rejection after liver transplantation - a retrospective study

Donor-specific antibodies (DSA) cause antibody-mediated rejection (AMR); however, their pathogenic role has not yet been adequately investigated after liver transplantation. The aim of our study was to analyse the clinical significance of DSA and complement-binding DSA for the prediction of AMR after liver transplantation. Our cohort included 120 liver recipients with assessed protocol biopsies one year post-transplant. All patients had defined HLA-specific and complement-binding (C1q + and C3d+) antibodies before and in regular intervals after transplantation. The incidence of DSA was evaluated in relation with clinical and histopathological data in the liver allografts. A higher occurrence of acute AMR was observed in recipients with preformed complement-binding DSA to HLA Class I antigens. Patients who developed chronic AMR had more frequently de novo-produced antibodies against HLA Class II antigens (P = 0.0002). A correlation was also found between de novo-formed C1q + and C3d+-binding antibodies to HLA Class II antigens and the development of chronic AMR (P = 0.043). Our study implies that preformed complement-binding DSA to HLA Class I antigens are related to increased risk of acute antibody-mediated rejection, while chronic AMR is more frequent in patients with de novo-produced antibodies to HLA Class II antigens after liver transplantation.

The Human Immune Response to Cadaveric and Living Donor Liver Allografts

The liver is an important contributor to the human immune system and it plays a pivotal role in the creation of both immunoreactive and tolerogenic conditions. Liver transplantation provides the best chance of survival for both children and adults with liver failure or cancer. With current demand exceeding the number of transplantable livers from donors following brain death, improved knowledge, technical advances and the desire to prevent avoidable deaths has led to the transplantation of organs from living, ABO incompatible (ABOi), cardiac death donors and machine based organ preservation with acceptable results. The liver graft is the most well-tolerated, from an immunological perspective, of all solid organ transplants. Evidence suggests successful cessation of immunosuppression is possible in ~20–40% of liver transplant recipients without immune mediated graft injury, a state known as “operational tolerance.” An immunosuppression free future following liver transplantation is an ambitious but perhaps not unachievable goal. The initial immune response following transplantation is a sterile inflammatory process mediated by the innate system and the mechanisms relate to the preservation-reperfusion process. The severity of this injury is influenced by graft factors and can have significant consequences. There are minimal experimental studies that delineate the differences in the adaptive immune response to the various forms of liver allograft. Apart from ABOi transplants, antibody mediated hyperacute rejection is rare following liver transplant. T-cell mediated rejection is common following liver transplantation and its incidence does not differ between living or deceased donor grafts. Transplantation in the first year of life results in a higher rate of operational tolerance, possibly due to a bias toward Th2 cytokines (IL4, IL10) during this period. This review further describes the current understanding of the immunological response toward liver allografts and highlight the areas of this topic yet to be fully understood.