Eradication of Helicobacter pylori in hemodialysis patients

Eradication Therapy for Helicobacter pylori Infection in Patients Receiving Hemodialysis: Review

Patients receiving hemodialysis (HD) often develop gastrointestinal diseases. Recently, although in general population, clinical guidelines for Helicobacter pylori have strongly recommended its eradication in patients to prevent gastric cancer, optimal eradication regimen and optimal dosage of drugs for patients receiving HD have not been established, due to possible incidence of adverse events. Some antimicrobial agents used in eradication therapy, particularly amoxicillin, can exacerbate renal dysfunction. Given the delayed pharmacokinetics of drugs in patients receiving HD compared with those in healthy individuals, drug regimen and dosage should be considered to minimize adverse effects. Although previous studies have investigated the benefits of eradication therapy for patients receiving HD, because most studies were small in terms of the number of enrolled patients, it is hard to show evidence. The numbers of eradication in HD patients have recently increased, and it is important to provide an optimal regimen. The consideration of eradication in patients undergoing HD with a reduction in the drug dose by 1/2-1/3 may prevent adverse events. Additionally, another important consideration is whether adverse events can be prevented while maintaining a similar eradication rate with reduced drug dosages. Recent meta-analysis findings indicate comparable eradication rates in patients receiving HD and healthy individuals, both with the same dosage regimen and at a reduced dosage regimen, with no significant differences (relative risk [RR] for successful eradication: 0.85 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.48-1.50]). Unlike with the same dosage regimen (RR for adverse events: 3.15 [95% CI: 1.93-5.13]), the adverse events in the dosage reduction regimen were similar to those in healthy individuals (RR: 1.26 [95% CI: 0.23-6.99]). From a pharmacological perspective, the eradication regimen in patients receiving HD should consider the dosage (1/2-1/3 dosage), dosing number (bid), dosing timing of drugs (after HD), and susceptibility to antimicrobial agents.

The Prevalence of Helicobacter Pylori Infection in Patients with Chronic Kidney Disease Undergoing Hemodialysis

The aim of this study was to analyze the prevalence of Helicobacter pylori infection and gastroduodenal lesions in Montenegrin patients with chronic kidney disease on hemodialysis. The study included 55 hemodialysis patients with dyspeptic symptoms and 50 control subjects with normal kidney function who had also dyspepsia. After dyspepsia assessment by an interview, all subjects underwent gastroduodenoscopy and histopathological analysis of biopsy specimens, taken from the corpus and antrum of the stomach. Helicobacter pylori was confirmed in 50.9% of corpus mucosa i.e. 60.6% of antrum mucosa of maintenance hemodialysis patients. There were no significantly differences in endoscopic findings of the stomach and bacterial presence between the two study groups of participants (p = 0.451), while duodenal lesions were prevalent in control subjects (p < 0.001). The atrophy of corpus mucosa was more common in hemodialysis patients (p = 0.007), especially in those who have been on hemodialysis for a longer time (p < 0.001) and had lower pH (p = 0.011). The prevalence of Helicobacter pylori infection shown an inverse relationship with dialysis duration. Contrary, a positive relationship between Helicobacter pylori and the concentration of bicarbonate was demonstrated (p = 0.031). The prevalence of Helicobacter pylori and atrophic mucosal changes in Montenegrin hemodialysis patients depends on dialysis duration and acid-base balance.

Helicobacter pylori, Endoscopic, And Histologic Features Among Kidney Transplant Candidates In Southern Iran

Background

The risks of gastrointestinal disorders and cancer are higher in chronic kidney disease (CKD) patients than the general population. There are only a few published reports on the association of helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) infection, endoscopic findings, and histology in these patients. This study was designed to address these controversial topics among kidney transplant candidates as the first study in southern Iran.

Patients and methods

In this cross-sectional study, patients undergoing renal transplantation in the largest center of southern Iran during 2016–2017 were evaluated for the frequency of H. pylori infection, endoscopic findings, and histology. Gastric endoscopic findings (normal, abnormal non-ulcerative, ulcerative) and histological findings of gastric biopsy (normal/non-significant, inflammation, premalignant lesions (PMLs), malignant lesions) were studied.

Results

In total, 293 patients underwent endoscopy for transplant work up. The mean age (SD) was 47.37 (13.14) years. The most common endoscopic finding was abnormal gastric lesions. Overall, 78.8% patients had abnormal gastric histologic findings, of which 6.1% had PMLs. There was no significant association between laboratory data of patients with H. pylori infection. Of these, 147 (50.2%) patients were positive and the others were H. Pylori negative. Positive H. pylori infection was significantly associated with gastric ulcerative lesions. Positive H. pylori infection was also strongly associated with inflammation (P<0.01), but not significantly associated with PMLs (P=0.99) in gastric histology.

Conclusion

The present study showed that abnormal endoscopic and histologic findings as well as positive H. pylori infection were observed in a large number of kidney transplant candidates, so upper endoscopy with biopsy is an acceptable procedure for these patients. However, further studies are recommended to determine the relationship of H. pylori with abnormal endoscopic and histologic findings considering other confounding factors in kidney transplant candidates as well as the efficacy of H. pylori eradication therapy to improve these abnormal findings.

Efficacy of Reduced Dosage of Amoxicillin in an Eradication Therapy for Helicobacter pylori Infection in Patients on Hemodialysis: A Randomized Controlled Trial

BACKGROUND

An optimum Helicobacter pylori-eradication regimen for hemodialysis patients is yet to be established because of different pharmacokinetics of amoxicillin involved between hemodialysis patients and healthy subjects. We investigated to establish appropriate doses of amoxicillin for H. pylori infection eradication in hemodialysis patients.

METHODS

Of 409 hemodialysis patients screened for H. pylori infection, 37 H. pylori-positive patients were randomized to different 1-week eradication regimens: esomeprazole 20 mg twice a day (b.i.d.) and clarithromycin 200 mg b.i.d., plus amoxicillin at either 750 mg b.i.d. (group A; conventional) or 250 mg b.i.d. (group B; experimental). Sixty-three patients with normal renal function received the conventional regimen (group C). Successful eradication was confirmed by urea breath testing.

RESULTS

Eradication rates of group B (reduced amoxicillin-regimen) were 84.2% in intention-to-treat analysis and 88.9% in per-protocol analysis, which were similar with group A (77.8 and 77.8%) and group C (74.6 and 81.0%). However, the incidence of adverse events in group A was significantly higher than that in group C (22.2 vs. 5.1%, p = 0.027).

CONCLUSIONS

In H. pylori-positive hemodialysis patients, amoxicillin at 250 mg b.i.d. may be an appropriate scheme for eradication with equivalent effects to the conventional therapy and safety effects for adverse events.

First-Line Helicobacter pylori Eradication in Patients with Chronic Kidney Diseases in Taiwan

Aims

Patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) and Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) infection have a higher incidence of gastroduodenal diseases and therefore are recommended to receive eradication therapies. This study aimed to assess the efficacy of a 7-day standard triple therapy in patients with CKD (eGFR < 60 ml/min/1.73 m²) and to investigate the clinical factors influencing the success of eradication.

Methods

A total of 758 patients with H. pylori infection receiving a 7-day standard first-line triple therapy between January 1, 2013, and December 31, 2014, were recruited. Patients were divided into two groups: CKD group (N = 130) and non-CKD group (N = 628).

Results

The eradication rates attained by the CKD and non-CKD groups were 85.4% and 85.7%, respectively, in the per-protocol analysis (p = 0.933). The eradication rate in CKD stage 3 was 84.5% (82/97), in stage 4 was 88.2% (15/17), and in those who received hemodialysis was 87.5% (14/16). There were no significant differences in the various stages of CKD (p = 0.982). The adverse events were similar between the two groups (3.1% versus 4.6%, p = 0.433). Compliance between the two groups was good (100.0% versus 99.8%, p = 0.649). There was no significant clinical factor influencing the H. pylori eradication rate in the non-CKD and CKD groups.

Conclusions

This study suggests that the H. pylori eradication rate and adverse rate in patients with CKD are comparable to those of non-CKD patients.

A Comparison between Hybrid Therapy and Standard Triple Therapy for Helicobacter pylori Eradication in Patients with Uremia: A Randomized Clinical Trial

BACKGROUND

The prevalence of peptic ulcer disease in hemodialysis patients is more than the general population. They are also more prone to complications including upper gastrointestinal bleeding. The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy of 14 days hybrid regimen with 14 days triple therapy for Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori ) eradication in hemodialysis patients.

METHODS

Forty hemodialysis patients with naïve H.pylori infection were randomized to receive either hybrid regimen (pantoprazole 40 mg + amoxicillin 500 mg, both twice a day during the first 7 days, followed by pantoprazole 40 mg + amoxicillin 500 mg + clarithromycin 500 mg + tinidazole 500 mg, all twice a day, for the second 7 days, or standard triple therapy including pantoprazole 40 mg, clarithromycin 500 mg, and amoxicillin 500 mg, all twice a day for 14 days. H.pylori eradication was assessed by fecal H.pylori antigen test 8 weeks after the treatment.

RESULTS

All the patients completed the study. According to both intention to treat and per-protocol analyses, H.pylori eradication rates were 100% (95% confidence interval (CI): 100) in those who received hybrid therapy and 70% (95% CI: 69.4 – 70.8) in those who were treated by standard triple therapy (p=0.02). Severe adverse effects were not reported by any patient; however, mild adverse effects were more frequent in those who received standard triple therapy (p<0.05).

CONCLUSION

Hybrid regimen could achieve ideal H.pylori eradication rates with low rates of adverse effects.

Helicobacter pylori: Effect of coexisting diseases and update on treatment regimens

The presence of concomitant diseases is an independent predictive factor for non-Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) peptic ulcers. Patients contracting concomitant diseases have an increased risk of developing ulcer disease through pathogenic mechanisms distinct from those of H. pylori infections. Factors other than H. pylori seem critical in peptic ulcer recurrence in end stage renal disease (ESRD) and cirrhotic patients. However, early H. pylori eradication is associated with a reduced risk of recurrent complicated peptic ulcers in patients with ESRD and liver cirrhosis. Resistances to triple therapy are currently detected using culture-based and molecular methods. Culture susceptibility testing before first- or second-line therapy is unadvisable. Using highly effective empiric first-line and rescue regimens can yield acceptable results. Sequential therapy has been included in a recent consensus report as a valid first-line option for eradicating H. pylori in geographic regions with high clarithromycin resistance. Two novel eradication regimens, namely concomitant and hybrid therapy, have proven more effective in patients with dual- (clarithromycin- and metronidazole-) resistant H. pylori strains. We aim to review the prevalence of and eradication therapy for H. pylori infection in patients with ESRD and cirrhosis. Moreover, we summarized the updated H. pylori eradication regimens.

A comparison between standard triple therapy and sequential therapy on eradication of Helicobacter pylori in uremic patients: A randomized clinical trial

Background:

The prevalence of peptic ulcer disease in hemodialysis dependent patients is higher than the general population. These patients are also more prone to upper gastrointestinal bleeding. The aim of this study was to compare the effects of a standard triple therapy with a sequential therapy on Helicobacter pylori eradication in azotemic and hemodialysis patients.

Materials and Methods:

Forty nine hemodialysis and azotemic patients, naïve to H. pylori treatment, were randomized into two groups to receive either standard triple therapy (pantoprazole 40 mg, amoxicillin 500 mg and clarithromycin 250 mg twice a day for 14 days) or a sequential therapy (pantoprazole 40 mg for 10 days, amoxicillin 500 mg twice a day for the first 5 days and clarithromycin 250 mg + tinidazole 500 mg twice a day just during the second 5 days). H. pylori eradication was evaluated by fecal H. pylori antigen assessment 8 weeks after the treatment.

Results:

Of 49 patients, 45 patients (21 in triple therapy group and 24 in the sequential group) completed the study. Based on intention to treat analysis, H. pylori eradication rates were 66.7% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 47.8-85.5%) in standard triple therapy group and 84% (95% CI: 69.6-98.3%) in sequential therapy group (P = 0.34). Per-protocol (PP) eradication rates were (95% CI: 76.2%. 6-89.3%) 54 and 87.5% (95% CI: 68.8-95.5%), respectively (P = 0.32).

Conclusion:

According to Maastricht III consensus report, the results of our study showed that sequential therapy might be a better choice compared with the standard triple therapy in azotemic and hemodialysis patients Iran. We propose to assess the effects of shorter-duration sequential therapy (less than 10 days) for H. pylori eradication.

Review of Helicobacter pylori infection and chronic renal failure

Chronic renal failure patients receiving hemodialysis and continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis often encounter gastrointestinal troubles over their long treatment period. Helicobacter pylori infection has close association with development of peptic ulcer, gastric cancer and gastric lymphoma, and is thought to be one of the major risk factors for gastrointestinal troubles in dialysis patients. However, it is unclear whether H. pylori infection is directly associated with progression of renal dysfunction and prognosis of chronic renal failure patients. Recent consensus shows that the prevalence of H. pylori infection in chronic renal failure patients is significantly lower than in subjects with normal renal function. In the natural history of H. pylori infection in hemodialysis patients, the prevalence of infection decreases as dialysis periods progressed, in particular within the first four years after the start of treatment. However, the chance of natural eradication becomes rare for patients receiving dialysis treatment for a long time. Moreover, chronic renal failure patients with H. pylori infection have a higher incidence of gastroduodenal diseases, and therefore, are recommended to receive eradication therapies, especially for those receiving treatment for a long time and with higher risks of complication. Intensive endoscopic check-ups for the prevention of gastrointestinal events and the discovery of peptic ulcer and neoplastic diseases at an early phase may be required.

Helicobacter pylori eradication with a 7-day low-dose triple therapy in hemodialysis patients

BACKGROUND

The optimal therapeutic regimen for Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) infection has not been established in end-stage renal disease (ESRD) patients receiving hemodialysis. We investigated the efficacy and safety of a 7-day omeprazole-based triple therapy with low doses of amoxicillin and clarithromycin (OAC) for eradication of H. pylori infection in ESRD patients receiving hemodialysis.

METHODS

Thirty-three hemodialysis patients and 55 patients with normal renal function underwent upper gastrointestinal endoscopy. For eradication of H. pylori infection, a 7-day triple therapy with low-dose OAC (omeprazole 40 mg daily, amoxicillin 500 mg daily, and clarithromycin 500 mg daily) regimen was used. Four weeks after the completion of the OAC regimen, the success of the H. pylori eradication therapy was determined by histological examination and rapid urease test.

RESULTS

The prevalence of H. pylori infection was 36.4% in hemodialysis patients and 65.5% in non-uremic patients (p = 0.0150). The mean duration of hemodialysis in H. pylori-positive and -negative patients was 56.8 ± 26.9 versus 66.4 ± 26.1 months, respectively (p = 0.3196). Eradication was successful in 83.4% of hemodialysis patients and 81.0% of non-uremic patients (p = 1.000). All patients completed the eradication therapy without any serious adverse effects.

CONCLUSION

A 7-day triple therapy with a low-dose OAC regimen was effective and safe for eradication of H. pylori infection in hemodialysis patients.

Guidelines for the management of Helicobacter pylori infection in Japan: 2009 revised edition

BACKGROUND

Over the past few years, the profile of Helicobacter pylori infection has changed in Japan. In particular, the relationship between H. pylori and gastric cancer has been demonstrated more clearly. Accordingly, the committee of the Japanese Society for Helicobacter Research has revised the guidelines for diagnosis and treatment of H. pylori infection in Japan.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Four meetings of guidelines preparation committee were held from July 2007 to December 2008. In the new guidelines, recommendations for treatment have been classified into five grades according to the Minds Recommendation Grades, while the level of evidence has been classified into six grades. The Japanese national health insurance system was not taken into consideration when preparing these guidelines.

RESULTS

Helicobacter pylori eradication therapy achieved a Grade A recommendation, being useful for the treatment of gastric or duodenal ulcer, for the treatment and prevention of H. pylori-associated diseases such as gastric cancer, and for inhibiting the spread of H. pylori infection. Levels of evidence were determined for each disease associated with H. pylori infection. For the diagnosis of H. pylori infection, measurement of H. pylori antigen in the feces was added to the tests not requiring biopsy. One week of proton-pump inhibitor-based triple therapy (including amoxicillin and metronidazole) was recommended as second-line therapy after failure of first-line eradication therapy.

CONCLUSION

The revised Japanese guidelines for H. pylori are based on scientific evidence and avoid the administrative restraints that applied to earlier versions.

[Guidelines of treatment for peptic ulcer disease in special conditions]

The pathogenesis, incidence, complication rates, response to acid suppression and Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) eradication therapy in peptic ulcer associated with chronic disease such as liver cirrhosis, chronic renal failure, diabetes mellitus, and critically ill conditions are different from those with general population, so that the management strategies also should be differentiated. The eradication of H. pylori are not so effective for preventing recurrence of peptic ulcer in liver cirrhosis patients as shown in general population, and conservative managements such as preventing deterioration of hepatic function and decrease in portal pressure are mandatory to reduce the risk of ulcer recurrence. The standard triple therapy for H. pylori eradication are as effective in chronic renal failure patients as in normal population, but the frequency of side effects of amoxicillin is higher in the patients not receiving dialysis therapy. Delay in eradication therapy until beginning of dialysis therapy or modification of eradication regimen should be considered in such cases. High prevalence of asymptomatic peptic ulcers and increased mortality in complicated peptic ulcer disease warrant regular endoscopic surveillance in diabetic patients, especially with angiopathy. The prolongation of duration of eradication therapy also should be considered in diabetic patients with angiopathic complication because of lower eradication rate with standard triple regimens as compared to normal population. Prophylactic acid suppressive therapy is highly recommended in critically ill patients with multiple risk factors. Herein, we propose evidence-based treatment guidelines for the management of peptic ulcer disease in special conditions based on literature review and experts opinion.