A Rare Complication of Idiopathic Membranous Nephropathy: Crescentic Transformation

Clinicopathological features and prognosis of primary membranous nephropathy in combination with crescent

OBJECTIVE

The incidence of primary membranous nephropathy with crescentic bodies is low, but the specificity of its clinical presentation, pathology and prognosis is of great interest. In this study, we retrospectively analyzed the clinicopathological and prognostic characteristics of patients with crescentic MN in our hospital over the past 4 years.

METHODS

Ten patients with combined crescentic primary membranous nephropathy diagnosed by renal biopsy at our hospital from 2018 to 2021 were retrospectively analysed and compared with 39 patients with PMN (simple random sample) during the same period for clinicopathological and prognostic comparisons.

RESULTS

The 10 patients had higher 24 h urine protein quantification, creatinine levels on renal biopsy, interstitial fibrosis and tubular atrophy, and interstitial inflammatory cell infiltration than the control group (P < 0.05); there were no significant differences in anti-PLA2R antibodies and PLA2R staining of renal tissue (P > 0.05); At follow-up, the poor outcome of crescentic MN treatment and the low clinical remission rate were found, with the percentage of crescentic bodies being a factor in patient prognosis (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Crescentic MN has a low prevalence and maybe a specific type of PMN; it has more severe clinical symptoms and pathology than PMN, and the crescentic proportion is strongly associated with renal prognosis. Intensive treatment is recommended for these patients.

Membranous nephropathy with crescents: a series of 19 cases

BACKGROUND

Membranous nephropathy (MN) with crescents is rare and, in the absence of lupus, usually is associated with anti-glomerular basement membrane (anti-GBM) nephritis or antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody (ANCA)-positive glomerulonephritis. Only rare cases of crescentic MN without ANCA or anti-GBM have been reported.

STUDY DESIGN

Case series.

SETTING & PARTICIPANTS

19 patients with ANCA- and anti-GBM-negative crescentic MN and no clinical evidence of systemic lupus.

OUTCOMES

Clinical features, kidney biopsy findings, laboratory results, treatment, and follow-up of patients with crescentic MN.

RESULTS

Mean age was 55 (range, 5-86) years. All patients presented with proteinuria (mean protein excretion, 11.5 [range, 3.3-29] g/d) and nearly all had hematuria; 16 of 19 (84%) patients had decreased estimated glomerular filtration rates (eGFRs; mean serum creatinine, 2.9 [range, 0.4-10] mg/dL; mean eGFR, 39.7 [range, 4 to >100] mL/min/1.73 m2). Glomeruli showed on average 25% (range, 2%-73%) involvement by crescents. All showed a membranous pattern; 7 showed mesangial and 2 showed segmental endocapillary proliferation. By immunofluorescence, all cases showed granular subepithelial immunoglobulin G (IgG) and κ and λ light chains, and all but one showed C3; 5 showed C1q or IgA. Electron microscopy revealed stages I-III MN; 38% of cases were M-type phospholipase A2 receptor (PLA2R) associated, indicating that at least some were primary MN. Follow-up clinical data were available for all patients (mean, 22 [range, 1.5-138] months). 14 patients received immunosuppressive therapy, and 2, only angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor/angiotensin receptor blocker therapy. 4 patients (21%) progressed to end-stage renal disease, at 0-9 months postbiopsy. Mean serum creatinine level of those without end-stage renal disease at follow-up was 1.7 (range, 0.5-4.1) mg/dL; mean eGFR was 53.3 (range, 16-103) mL/min/1.73 m2. 67% of patients had proteinuria with protein excretion≥1 (mean, 3.2) g/d at follow-up.

LIMITATIONS

Retrospective study.

CONCLUSIONS

Crescentic MN is a rare variant of MN that usually presents with heavy proteinuria, hematuria, and decline in GFR. The prognosis is variable and the disease may respond to therapy, but most patients develop a long-term decline in GFR.

Idiopathic membranous nephropathy: clinical and histologic prognostic features and treatment patterns over time at a tertiary referral center

BACKGROUND

Idiopathic membranous nephropathy (i-MN) is a leading cause of nephrotic syndrome in adults and results in end-stage renal disease in approximately one third of patients. There are few large, long-term US studies evaluating clinical and histologic prognostic factors in i-MN.

METHODS

We describe 132 patients with biopsy-proven i-MN who were followed for a mean period of 68 months at our tertiary referral center from 1977 to 2009, and we analyzed clinical and histologic features that predicted renal outcomes.

RESULTS

The presence of hypertension and treating physician's decision to institute immunosuppression were negative predictors of attaining complete or partial remission. Among clinical variables, impaired renal function (eGFR <60 ml/min/1.73 m(2)) at time of presentation was the only variable at presentation associated with an increased risk of reaching end-stage renal disease. The use of statins and RAAS blockers were protective. The choice of corticosteroids as the initial immunosuppressive agent by referring physicians decreased over time but even in the most recent era (2000-2008) was significant (33%).

CONCLUSION

Renal function at presentation and non-white race were the main predictors of a worse renal outcome. Corticosteroid therapy is still being adopted as first-line therapy in a significant number of patients in this era. The development of guidelines may help clarify the treatment strategies of i-MN.

Idiopathic membranous nephropathy: management strategies

Treatment of idiopathic membranous nephropathy is based on a 'symptomatic' therapy that includes ACE inhibitors or angiotensin II receptor antagonists, and on an 'aetiological' therapy aimed at modulating underlying immunological mechanisms. The role of the latter is still debated given the usually indolent course of disease; furthermore, traditional immunosuppressants would not have an impact on patient and renal survival according to a systematic review of literature. However, up to 40% of untreated patients eventually develop end-stage renal disease and remission of nephrotic syndrome protects patients from related life-threatening complications and is the strongest positive prognostic factor for long-term kidney function. Therefore, immunosuppressive therapy seems to be rational in high-risk patients with nephrotic syndrome or deteriorating renal function. This article outlines a possible role for each 'aetiological' therapy on the basis of available evidence in order to provide some practical recommendations. The first-line therapy is based on a 6-month regimen of alternating corticosteroids and an alkylating agent ('Ponticelli' regimen), whereas oral ciclosporin and intramuscular corticotrophin (adrenocorticotrophic hormone) are alternatives that provide comparable results in terms of remission of proteinuria, with a different adverse effect profile. New drugs are emerging as potential treatments, such as mycophenolate mofetil, tacrolimus, intravenous immunoglobulins and rituximab. Specific settings, such as chronic renal failure or elderly age, require a careful balance between benefits and toxicity of immunosuppression. The tailor-made use of this repertoire of drugs can provide a tool to achieve remission of proteinuria and modify the natural course of idiopathic membranous nephropathy.