Evaluation of weight-based vancomycin dosing for hospitalized hemodialysis patients

Impact of physical build on serum vancomycin concentrations of patients undergoing hemodialysis: A retrospective cohort study at an acute care hospital

INTRODUCTION

Estimating the serum vancomycin (VCM) concentrations of lean and patients with obesity is challenging. Additionally, VCM dosing for Japanese patients undergoing hemodialysis remains particularly unclear. This study aimed to determine the impact of the physical build on serum VCM concentrations of Japanese patients undergoing hemodialysis.

METHODS

This retrospective cohort study included hospitalized patients undergoing hemodialysis, who received treatment with VCM between May 1, 2019, and December 31, 2021, at Kansai Rosai Hospital, which is a 642-bed acute care hospital in Japan. Patients were divided into the following three groups based on their body mass index (BMI): lean group (≤18.5 kg/m2), normal group (18.5-25 kg/m2), and obese group (≥25 kg/m2). The VCM dose and predialysis serum VCM concentration (PVC) were compared.

RESULTS

This study included 191 patients. There were 50 patients in the lean group, 85 in the normal group, and 56 in the obese group. The median loading doses per body weight were 24.0, 22.1, and 21.2 mg/kg for the lean, normal, and obese groups, respectively. The VCM dose per body weight decreased significantly with increasing BMI. The median PVCs of the lean and normal groups were approximately 15 mg/L (not significantly different). However, the median PVC of the obese group was 18.3 mg/L, which was significantly higher (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

The VCM dose per body weight for Japanese patients undergoing hemodialysis should be adjusted based on the BMI.

Model-Informed Precision Dosing of Vancomycin in Adult Patients Undergoing Hemodialysis

Model-informed precision dosing (MIPD) maximizes the probability of successful dosing in patients undergoing hemodialysis. In these patients, area under the concentration-time curve (AUC)-guided dosing is recommended for vancomycin. However, this model is yet to be developed. The purpose of this study was to address this issue. The overall mass transfer-area coefficient (KoA) was used for the estimation of vancomycin hemodialysis clearance. A population pharmacokinetic (popPK) model was developed, resulting in a fixed-effect parameter for nonhemodialysis clearance of 0.316 liters/h. This popPK model was externally evaluated, with a resulting mean absolute error of 13.4% and mean prediction error of -0.17%. KoA-predicted hemodialysis clearance was prospectively evaluated for vancomycin (n = 10) and meropenem (n = 10), with a correlation equation being obtained (slope of 1.099, intercept of 1.642; r = 0.927, P < 0.001). An experimental evaluation using an in vitro hemodialysis circuit validated the developed model of KoA-predicted hemodialysis clearance using vancomycin, meropenem, vitamin B6, and inulin in 12 hemodialysis settings. This popPK model indicated a maximum a priori dosing for vancomycin-a loading dose of 30 mg/kg, which achieves the target AUC for 24 h after first dose with a probability of 93.0%, ensured by a predialysis concentration of >15 μg/mL. Maintenance doses of 12 mg/kg after every hemodialysis session could achieve the required exposure, with a probability of 80.6%. In conclusion, this study demonstrated that KoA-predicted hemodialysis clearance may lead to an upgrade from conventional dosing to MIPD for vancomycin in patients undergoing hemodialysis.

An updated vancomycin dosing protocol for initiating therapy in patients undergoing intermittent high-flux hemodialysis

DISCLAIMER

In an effort to expedite the publication of articles, AJHP is posting manuscripts online as soon as possible after acceptance. Accepted manuscripts have been peer-reviewed and copyedited, but are posted online before technical formatting and author proofing. These manuscripts are not the final version of record and will be replaced with the final article (formatted per AJHP style and proofed by the authors) at a later time.

PURPOSE

To design an updated vancomycin dosing protocol for initiating therapy in patients undergoing chronic intermittent high-flux hemodialysis (iHFHD) that is congruent with the revised 2020 consensus guidelines for therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM).

METHODS

Monte Carlo simulation methods were used to study vancomycin dosing for patients on iHFHD. Vancomycin regimens were constructed as intravenous infusions (for intradialytic administration) of a loading dose and maintenance doses 3 times weekly during subsequent dialysis sessions. Vancomycin plasma concentrations were simulated, and the probability of target attainment (PTA) for a 24-hour area under the time-concentration curve (AUC24) of 400 to 700 mg • h/L was determined. Standardized weight-based (ie, dose-banding) regimens were investigated, and an optimized protocol was selected based on TDM target attainment and practical considerations for use in the dialysis setting.

RESULTS

The proposed vancomycin dosing protocol (for intradialytic administration) specifies 3 regimens: (1) a 1,500-mg loading dose and 750-mg maintenance doses for patients weighing 50 kg to 69 kg; (2) a 2,000-mg loading dose and 1,000-mg maintenance doses for patients weighing 70 kg to 89 kg; and (3) a 2,500-mg loading dose and 1,250-mg maintenance doses for patients weighing 90 kg to 110 kg. In a simulated hemodialysis population (n = 1,000), the proposed protocol delivered median (interquartile range [IQR]) loading and maintenance doses of 25.0 (23.4-26.6) mg/kg and 12.5 (11.8-13.3) mg/kg, respectively. The PTA for an AUC24 of 400 to 700 mg • h/L was 74.7% on day 1 and 70.8% on day 8, with less than 10% of values exceeding the target range.

CONCLUSION

Our proposed dosing protocol for patients undergoing iHFHD offers an updated and practical approach for initiating vancomycin therapy that can be optimized with early TDM.

Therapeutic Drug Monitoring of Antibiotic Drugs in Patients Receiving Continuous Renal Replacement Therapy or Intermittent Hemodialysis: A Critical Review

PURPOSE

Antibiotics are frequently used in patients receiving intermittent or continuous renal replacement therapy (RRT). Continuous renal replacement may alter the pharmacokinetics (PK) and the ability to achieve PK/pharmacodynamic (PD) targets. Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) could help evaluate drug exposure and guide antibiotic dosage adjustment. The present review describes recent TDM data on antibiotic exposure and PK/PD target attainment (TA) in patients receiving intermittent or continuous RRT, proposing practical guidelines for performing TDM.

METHODS

Studies on antibiotic TDM performed in patients receiving intermittent or continuous RRT published between 2000 and 2020 were searched and assessed. The authors focused on studies that reported data on PK/PD TA. TDM recommendations were based on clinically relevant PK/PD relationships and previously published guidelines.

RESULTS

In total, 2383 reports were retrieved. After excluding nonrelevant publications, 139 articles were selected. Overall, 107 studies reported PK/PD TA for 24 agents. Data were available for various intermittent and continuous RRT techniques. The study design, TDM practice, and definition of PK/PD targets were inconsistent across studies. Drug exposure and TA rates were highly variable. TDM seems to be necessary to control drug exposure in patients receiving intermittent and continuous RRT techniques, especially for antibiotics with narrow therapeutic margins and in critically ill patients. Practical recommendations can provide insights on relevant PK/PD targets, sampling, and timing of TDM for various antibiotic classes.

CONCLUSIONS

Highly variable antibiotic exposure and TA have been reported in patients receiving intermittent or continuous RRT. TDM for aminoglycosides, beta-lactams, glycopeptides, linezolid, and colistin is recommended in patients receiving RRT and suggested for daptomycin, fluoroquinolones, and tigecycline in critically ill patients on RRT.

Optimizing vancomycin dosage regimens in relation to high-flux haemodialysis

Objectives

To develop a population pharmacokinetic (PK) model for vancomycin in adults receiving high-flux haemodialysis (HFHD) in an effort to optimize vancomycin dosing in this population.

Methods

A population PK model using NONMEM was developed using retrospective data collected from 48 vancomycin courses administered to patients (n = 37) receiving HFHD. Fixed-dose [1.5 g loading dose (LD), 1 g maintenance dose (MD)], literature-adapted weight-based (WBL; 20 mg/kg LD, 10 mg/kg MD) and hospital-adapted weight-based (WBH; 25-30 mg/kg LD, 20-25 mg/kg MD) dosage regimens were then simulated using the Monte Carlo method. The PTA was an AUC24/MIC ≥400 with success being a PTA ≥90%.

Results

The data were best described using a two-compartment model. It was observed that fixed-dose and WBL dosage regimens resulted in a PTA ≤90% for most days. The WBH dosing achieved a PTA ≥90% on most days, but there were supratherapeutic concentrations with repeated dosing of vancomycin. If HFHD was delayed by 48-72 h after the LD, the PTA would fall below 90%. A dose-optimized regimen was developed: 30 mg/kg LD and 10 mg/kg MD given on HFHD days. An additional dose of 500 mg or 1 g was administered 24 h after the LD if HFHD occurred 48-72 h post-LD. This dose-optimized regimen afforded a PTA ≥90% on all days of therapy and achieved clinically acceptable pre-haemodialysis concentrations.

Conclusions

Current vancomycin dosage regimens used clinically do not achieve a PTA ≥90% for most days of therapy for people receiving HFHD. A dose-optimized regimen was developed, which could be implemented in clinical practice.

Validation of a Weight Threshold-Based Vancomycin Dosing Protocol for Patients Undergoing Intermittent Hemodialysis

BACKGROUND

Patients receiving intermittent hemodialysis (IHD) are at high risk of acquiring gram-positive infections, which are often treated with IV vancomycin. Despite frequent use of vancomycin in the IHD setting, there is variability in dosing and monitoring practices among clinicians at the study institution. There is also a paucity of evidence regarding optimal vancomycin dosing to achieve target pre-IHD serum concentration.

OBJECTIVES

The primary objective was to compare the percentage of treatment courses with a serum vancomycin concentration between 15 and 20 mg/L, measured before the third IHD session, before and after implementation of a weight threshold-based dosing protocol. The secondary objectives were to compare the percentage of treatment courses with a pre-third IHD vancomycin concentration between 10 and 22 mg/L and the number of vancomycin measurements per treatment day, before and after protocol implementation.

METHODS

This quasi-experimental, single-centre study included inpatients and outpatients who underwent IHD and received at least 2 IV doses of vancomycin, with vancomycin being measured in an appropriately drawn sample before the third IHD session. Before protocol implementation, vancomycin dosing was at the clinician's discretion (usual care). After protocol implementation, each patient received a loading dose of 1000, 1500, or 2000 mg and a maintenance dose of 500, 750, or 1000 mg, depending on body weight.

RESULTS

The percentage of treatment courses with a pre-third IHD vancomycin concentration between 15 and 20 mg/L was greater after implementation of the protocol than with usual care, but the difference was nonsignificant (44% [8/18] versus 20% [3/15], p = 0.27). However, the percentage of treatment courses with a pre-third IHD vancomycin concentration between 10 and 22 mg/L was significantly higher after protocol implementation (94% [17/18] versus 53% [8/15], p = 0.012). There was no difference in the median number of vancomycin measurements per treatment day before and after protocol implementation (0.133 versus 0.125, p = 0.99).

CONCLUSIONS

At the study institution, the likelihood of achieving recommended vancomycin concentration increased (relative to previous practice) after implementation of a simplified vancomycin dosing protocol for patients undergoing IHD.

Vancomycin dosing in chronic high-flux haemodialysis: a systematic review

The aim of this study was to systematically evaluate whether non-weight-based dosing (non-WBD) or weight-based dosing (WBD) of vancomycin leads to a higher proportion of patients achieving the pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic target. Studies from January 1985 to February 2017 were identified through Cochrane, MEDLINE and Embase databases. Those conducted in adults with end-stage renal disease receiving high-flux haemodialysis (HD) and intravenous vancomycin were included. The primary outcome was the proportion of patients with a pre-HD vancomycin concentration of 15-20 mg/L and/or an area under the concentration-time curve/minimum inhibitory concentration (AUC/MIC) ratio ≥400. Of the 3948 studies screened, 5 met the inclusion criteria. The proportion of patients with pre-HD concentrations between 15-20 mg/L were 35% (non-WBD) and 13% (WBD) post-loading dose. During maintenance dosing, the proportion of patients with pre-HD concentrations between 15-20 mg/L were 37% (non-WBD) and 50-67% (WBD). The proportion of pre-HD concentrations <15 mg/L was greater in the non-WBD group post-loading dose but was similar between the non-WBD and WBD group during maintenance dosing. One study reported that all patients had an AUC/MIC ≥ 400 for micro-organisms with an MIC ≤ 1 mg/L for weight-based maintenance dosing. The limited data suggest that WBD may be preferential as there was a smaller proportion of pre-HD concentrations falling below 15 mg/L. However, larger well-designed studies of higher quality are required to provide guidance for vancomycin dosing in the high-flux HD setting. Future research should focus on reporting AUC/MIC ratios and exploring clinical outcomes in this patient population.