Morphine enhances renal cell carcinoma aggressiveness through promotes survivin level

Bidirectional effects of morphine on pancreatic cancer progression via the p38/JNK pathway

Cancer patients commonly use morphine to alleviate advanced pain. Studies have shown that morphine may influence and intervene in the malignancy of various cancers, but its role and effects on pancreatic cancer are less studied. This study aims to examine how morphine affects pancreatic cancer and its possible mechanisms. In vitro experiments were conducted using the CCK-8 experiment, colony formation experiment, EdU test, wound healing experiment, and transwell migration and invasion experiment. Tumor xenograft tests were employed to investigate the in vivo impact of morphine on pancreatic cancer. The Western blot (WB) assay was used to detect possible changes in key proteins of the related signaling pathway. Our experimental results showed that low concentrations of morphine (25 µM) promoted the progression of pancreatic cancer, while high concentrations of morphine (100 µM) inhibited its progression. Further, we demonstrated that morphine may interfere with the progression of pancreatic cancer by acting on the p38/JNK signaling pathway. Morphine may affect pancreatic cancer progression through the p38/JNK pathway in a bidirectional manner at different concentrations.

Pan-Cancer Analysis and Validation of Opioid-Related Receptors Reveals the Immunotherapeutic Value of Toll-Like Receptor 4

Introduction

The relationship between the expression of opioid-associated receptors and cancer outcomes is complex and varies among studies.

Methods

This study focused on six opioid-related receptors (OPRM1, OPRD1, OPRK1, OPRL1, OGFR, and TLR4) and their impact on cancer patient survival. Bioinformatics analysis was conducted on 33 cancer types from The Cancer Genome Atlas database to examine their expression, clinical correlations, mechanisms in the tumor microenvironment, and potential for immunotherapy. Due to significantly lower expression of OPRM1, OPRD1, and OPRK1 compared to OGFR and TLR4, the analysis concentrated on the latter two genes.

Results

OGFR was highly expressed in 16 tumor types, while TLR4 showed low expression in 13. Validation from external samples, the Gene Expression Omnibus, and the Human Protein Atlas supported these findings. The diagnostic value of these two genes was demonstrated using the Genotype-Tissue Expression database. Univariate Cox regression models and Kaplan-Meier curves confirmed OGFR's impact on prognosis in a cancer type-specific manner, while high TLR4 expression was associated with a favorable prognosis. Analysis of the tumor microenvironment using a deconvolution algorithm linked OGFR to CD8+ T cells and TLR4 to macrophages. Single-cell datasets further validated this correlation. In 25 immune checkpoint blockade treatment cohorts, TLR4 expression showed promise as an immunotherapy efficacy predictor in non-small cell lung cancer, urothelial carcinoma, and melanoma.

Conclusion

In a pan-cancer analysis of 33 tissues, OGFR was consistently highly expressed, while TLR4 had low expression. Both genes have diagnostic and prognostic significance and are linked to immune cells in the tumor microenvironment. TLR4 has potential as an immunotherapeutic response marker.

Extended Opioid Exposure Modulates the Molecular Metabolism of Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma

Opioids are commonly prescribed for extended periods of time to patients with advanced clear cell renal cell carcinoma to assist with pain management. Because extended opioid exposure has been shown to affect the vasculature and to be immunosuppressive, we investigated how it may affect the metabolism and physiology of clear cell renal cell carcinoma. RNA sequencing of a limited number of archived patients' specimens with extended opioid exposure or non-opioid exposure was performed. Immune infiltration and changes in the microenvironment were evaluated using CIBERSORT. A significant decrease in M1 macrophages and T cells CD4 memory resting immune subsets was observed in opioid-exposed tumors, whereas the changes observed in other immune cells were not statistically significant. Further RNA sequencing data analysis showed that differential expression of KEGG signaling pathways was significant between non-opioid-exposed specimens and opioid-exposed specimens, with a shift from a gene signature consistent with aerobic glycolysis to a gene signature consistent with the TCA cycle, nicotinate metabolism, and the cAMP signaling pathway. Together, these data suggest that extended opioid exposure changes the cellular metabolism and immune homeostasis of ccRCC, which might impact the response to therapy of these patients, especially if the therapy is targeting the microenvironment or metabolism of ccRCC tumors.

Effect of Opioid Receptor Activation and Blockage on the Progression and Response to Treatment of Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma

Recent studies suggest that opioids have a role in the progression of HNSCC mediated by mu opioid receptors (MOR), however, the effects of their activation or blockage remains unclear. Expression of MOR-1 was explored in seven HNSCC cell lines using Western blotting (WB). XTT cell proliferation and cell migration assays were performed on four selected cell lines (Cal-33, FaDu, HSC-2, and HSC-3), treated with opiate receptor agonist (morphine), antagonist (naloxone), alone and combined with cisplatin. All four selected cell lines display an increased cell proliferation and upregulation of MOR-1 when exposed to morphine. Furthermore, morphine promotes cell migration, while naloxone inhibits it. The effects on cell signaling pathways were analyzed using WB, demonstrating morphine activation of AKT and S6, key proteins in the PI3K/AKT/mTOR axis. A significant synergistic cytotoxic effect between cisplatin and naloxone in all cell lines is observed. In vivo studies of nude mice harboring HSC3 tumor treated with naloxone demonstrate a decrease in tumor volume. The synergistic cytotoxic effect between cisplatin and naloxone is observed in the in vivo studies as well. Our findings suggest that opioids may increase HNSCC cell proliferation via the activation of the PI3K/Akt/mTOR signaling pathway. Moreover, MOR blockage may chemo-sensitize HNSCC to cisplatin.

Morphine stimulates cervical cancer cells and alleviates cytotoxicity of chemotherapeutic drugs via opioid receptor-dependent and -independent mechanisms

Morphine is frequently applied in cancer patients for pain management. However, its effects on cancer are not well understood but observed to be specific to certain cancer types. We previously revealed the stimulatory properties of morphine in esophageal carcinoma. This work addressed the effects of morphine and its underlying mechanisms in cervical cancer. Proliferation, apoptosis, and migration assays were performed to examine the effects of morphine alone and its combinatory effects with chemotherapeutic drugs. Immunoblotting and biochemical analysis were performed to determine the underlying mechanisms of morphine's action. Morphine promoted proliferation in opioid receptor-dependent manner and stimulated migration in opioid receptor-independent manner. However, morphine did not affect cervical cancer cell survival. Morphine also interfered with all tested chemotherapeutic drugs (e.g., cisplatin, 5-FU, and paclitaxel) and alleviates their efficacy. Mechanistically, morphine-stimulated growth via activating EGFR-mediated signaling pathways and is opioid-receptor-dependent; morphine-stimulated migration via activating RhoA-mediated signaling pathways and this is opioid receptor-independent. Our work suggests a strong correlation of this opioid receptor on growth factor signaling to stimulate growth and opioid receptor-independent activation of RhoA and consequent migration. Our findings have the potential to guide the clinical use of morphine for patients with cervical cancer.

The µ-Opioid Receptor in Cancer and Its Role in Perineural Invasion: A Short Review and New Evidence

Cancer is a significant public health problem worldwide. While there has been a steady decrease in the cancer death rate over the last two decades, the number of survivors has increased and, thus, cancer-related sequela. Pain affects the life of patients with cancer and survivors. Prescription opioids continue as the analgesic of choice to treat moderate-to-severe cancer-related pain. There has been controversy on whether opioids impact cancer progression by acting on cancer cells or the tumor microenvironment. The μ-opioid receptor is the site of action of prescription opioids. This receptor can participate in an important mechanism of cancer spread, such as perineural invasion. In this review, current evidence on the role of the μ-opioid receptor in cancer growth is summarized and preliminary evidence about its effect on the cross-talk between sensory neurons and malignant cells is provided.

Morphine counteracts the effects of paclitaxel in triple-negative breast cancer cells

Background & objectives

Several studies have provided evidence that opioids may play a role in cancer recurrence and metastasis. Multiple research data indicate that morphine can act as a proliferative or suppressive agent on tumour cells depending on the applied concentration. Therefore, this study was aimed to investigate whether the presence of clinically relevant concentrations of morphine has any effect on the efficacy of paclitaxel, a widely used chemotherapeutic drug, on the viability and apoptosis of human triple-negative breast cancer cell line.

Methods

MDA.MB.231 cells were treated with paclitaxel in the presence or absence of morphine and examined for cell proliferation by the MTT assay. In addition, the effect of morphine on paclitaxel-induced apoptosis was investigated by flow cytometric assay and by the ratio of Bax/Bcl-2 mRNA expression levels with quantitative real-time (qRT)-PCR.

Results

Morphine significantly increased the proliferation of breast cancer cells at low concentrations (0.1-2.5 μM) but higher concentrations showed cytotoxic effect. Pre-treatment with 0.1 or 1 μM of morphine decreased the paclitaxel-induced cytotoxicity, the proportion of apoptotic cell, and the ratio of Bax/Bcl-2 mRNA expressions.

Interpretation & conclusions

Our data suggest that morphine promotes breast cancer cell viability at clinically relevant plasma concentrations and reduces the apoptotic effect of paclitaxel. This interaction may be very important in clinical settings; however, more studies are needed to explore the plausible mechanisms of interaction and to correlate such findings through in vivo animal studies as well as clinically.

The other side of the coin: Positive view on the role of opioids in cancer

Opioids have been used for medicinal purposes as an analgesic and recreational purposes as a euphorigenic throughout human history. Cancer patients are often treated with different doses of opioids concurrently with anti-cancer drugs for pain relief without exhibiting excessive adverse effects. The intersection of the biology of pain, opioid therapy, and disease progression represents the crux of the matters and is of potentially great importance in cancer care. For more than 20 years, multiple investigations have focused on the stimulatory effects of opioids on cancer cell growth, while in-depth studies on the inhibitory effects on cancer cell growth development have usually been neglected. This paper reviews the evidence regarding opioid therapies and their anti-cancer effects on various malignancies. Likewise, we have a glimpse into the molecular mechanisms necessary for pinpointing their positive or negative impacts on malignancies to raise awareness and stimulate more excellent dialogue regarding their carcinogenic/anticarcinogenic roles.

Opioids in cancer: The κ‑opioid receptor (Review)

The κ‑opioid receptor (KOR) is one of the primary receptors of opioids and serves a vital role in the regulation of pain, anesthesia, addiction and other pathological and physiological processes. KOR is associated with several types of cancer and may influence cancer progression. It has been proposed that KOR may represent a new tumor molecular marker and provide a novel basis for molecular targeted therapies for cancer. However, the association between KOR and cancer remains to be explored comprehensively. The present review introduces KOR and its association with different types of cancer. Improved understanding of KOR may facilitate development of novel antitumor therapies.

Morphine promotes tumorigenesis and cetuximab resistance via EGFR signaling activation in human colorectal cancer

Morphine, a mu-opioid receptor (MOR) agonist, has been extensively used to treat advanced cancer pain. In particular, in patients with cancer metastasis, both morphine and anticancer drugs are given simultaneously. However, evidence showed that morphine might be a risk factor in promoting the tumor's malignant potential. In this study, we report that treatment with morphine could activate MOR and lead to the promotion of proliferation, migration, and invasion in HCT116 and DLD1 colorectal cancer (CRC) cells with time-concentration dependence. Moreover, morphine can also contribute to cetuximab's drug resistance, a targeted drug widely used to treat advanced CRC by inducing the activation of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR). The cell phenotype includes proliferation, migration, invasion, and drug resistance, which may be reversed by MOR knockdown or adding nalmefene, the MOR receptor antagonist. Receptor tyrosine kinase array analysis revealed that morphine selectively induced the transactivation of EGFR. EGFR transactivation resulted in the activation of ERK1/2 and AKT. In conclusion, morphine induces the transactivation of EGFR via MOR. It activates the downstream signal pathway AKT-MTOR and RAS-MAPK, increases proliferation, migration, and invasion, and promotes resistance to EGFR inhibitors in a CRC cell line. Furthermore, we verified that EGFR inhibition by cetuximab strongly reversed the protumoral effects of morphine in vitro and in vivo. Collectively, we provide evidence that morphine-EGFR signaling might be a promising therapeutic target for CRC patients, especially for cetuximab-resistant CRC patients.

The pro- and anti-cancer effects of oxycodone are associated with epithelial growth factor receptor level in cancer cells

Background: Oxycodone is an opioid medication used for the treatment of pain in cancer patients. However, little is known on the direct effects of oxycodone on cancer cells. Aim: To determine the effects and mechanisms of oxycodone in cancer cells. Materials and Methods: Proliferation, survival and migration assays were performed on multiple types of cancer cells. Epithelial growth factor receptor (EGFR)/ERK/Akt pathway and oxidative stress were investigated after oxycodone treatment. Results: Oxycodone can either stimulate growth and migration without affecting survival in MDA-468 cells or inhibit growth and survival without affecting migration in SKBR3 and Caco2 cells. In addition, oxycodone can either attenuate or stimulate efficacy of chemotherapeutic drugs in cancer, depending on the type of cancer cells and nature of action of oxycodone as single drug alone. Our mechanism studies suggest that the stimulatory and inhibitory effects of oxycodone are associated with EGFR expression levels in cancer cells. In cancer cells with high EGFR level, oxycodone activates EGFR signaling in cancer cells, leading to stimulatory effects in multiple biological activities, and this is dependent on opioid receptor. In cancer cells with low EGFR level, oxycodone induces mitochondria-mediated caspase activity and oxidative stress and damage, leading to cell death. Conclusions: Our work is the first to demonstrate systematic analysis of oxycodone’s effects and mechanism of action in cancer. The activation of EGFR signaling by oxycodone may provide a new guide in the clinical use of oxycodone, in particular for cancer patients with high EGFR levels.

Identifying Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma Coexpression Networks Associated with Opioid Signaling and Survival

While opioids constitute the major component of perioperative analgesic regimens for surgery in general, a variety of evidence points to an association between perioperative opioid exposure and longer term oncologic outcomes. The mechanistic details underlying these effects are not well understood. In this study, we focused on clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) and utilized RNA sequencing and outcome data from both The Cancer Genome Atlas, as well as a local patient cohort to identify survival-associated gene coexpression networks. We then projected drug-induced transcriptional profiles from in vitro cancer cells to predict drug effects on these networks and recurrence-free, cancer-specific, and overall survival. The opioid receptor agonist, leu-enkephalin, was predicted to have antisurvival effects in ccRCC, primarily through Th2 immune- and NRF2-dependent macrophage networks. Conversely, the antagonist, naloxone, was predicted to have prosurvival effects, primarily through angiogenesis, fatty acid metabolism, and hemopoesis pathways. Eight coexpression networks associated with survival endpoints in ccRCC were identified, and master regulators of the transition from the normal to disease state were inferred, a number of which are linked to opioid pathways. These results are the first to suggest a mechanism for opioid effects on cancer outcomes through modulation of survival-associated coexpression networks. While we focus on ccRCC, this methodology may be employed to predict opioid effects on other cancer types and to personalize analgesic regimens in patients with cancer for optimal outcomes. SIGNIFICANCE: This study suggests a possible molecular mechanism for opioid effects on cancer outcomes generally, with implications for personalization of analgesic regimens.

Morphine Stimulates Migration and Growth and Alleviates the Effects of Chemo Drugs via AMPK-Dependent Induction of Epithelial-Mesenchymal Transition in Esophageal Carcinoma Cells

The role of morphine, an opioid analgesic drug, in cancer biology has increasingly garnered attention due to its frequent usage in postoperative period for pain management in cancer patients. In this work, we demonstrated that morphine, at clinically relevant concentrations, stimulated migration and growth, and alleviated chemo drugs' efficacy in esophageal carcinoma cells. Although morphine did not affect survival, it protected esophageal carcinoma cells from chemo drugs-induced apoptosis. Mechanistical studies showed that morphine increased RhoA but not Rac1 activity. In addition, morphine activated AMP-activated protein kinase (AMPK) pathway, induced epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) via upregulating Snail and Slug levels, and increased oxidative stress in esophageal carcinoma cells. Rescue studies further demonstrated that the stimulatory effects of morphine in esophageal carcinoma cells are through activation of AMPK pathway but not RhoA or opioid receptor. In addition, morphine induced EMT in an AMPK-dependent manner whereas increased RhoA activity in an AMPK-independent manner. Our work demonstrates the protective role of morphine on esophageal carcinoma cells via AMPK activation, which may provide a new guide in clinical use of morphine for patients with esophageal carcinoma.

Intraoperative opioids are associated with improved recurrence-free survival in triple-negative breast cancer

BACKGROUND

Opioid-induced immunomodulation may be of particular importance in triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) where an immune response is associated with improved outcome and response to immunotherapy. We evaluated the association between intraoperative opioids and oncological outcomes and explored patterns of opioid receptor expression in TNBC.

METHODS

Consecutive patients with stage I-III primary TNBC were identified from a prospectively maintained database. Opioid receptor expression patterns in the tumour microenvironment were analysed using publicly available bulk and single-cell RNA-seq data.

RESULTS

A total of 1143 TNBC cases were retrospectively analysed. In multivariable analysis, higher intraoperative opioid dose was associated with favourable recurrence-free survival, hazard ratio 0.93 (95% confidence interval 0.88-0.99) per 10 oral morphine milligram equivalents increase (P=0.028), but was not significantly associated with overall survival, hazard ratio 0.96 (95% confidence interval 0.89-1.02) per 10 morphine milligram equivalents increase (P=0.2). Bulk RNA-seq analysis of opioid receptors showed that OPRM1 was nearly non-expressed. Compared with normal breast tissue OGFR, OPRK1, and OPRD1 were upregulated, while TLR4 was downregulated. At a single-cell level, OPRM1 and OPRD1 were not detectable; OPRK1 was expressed mainly on tumour cells, whereas OGFR and TLR4 were more highly expressed on immune cells.

CONCLUSIONS

We found a protective effect of intraoperative opioids on recurrence-free survival in TNBC. Opioid receptor expression was consistent with a net protective effect of opioid agonism, with protumour receptors either not expressed or downregulated, and antitumour receptors upregulated. In this era of personalised medicine, efforts to differentiate the effects of opioids across breast cancer subtypes (and ultimately individual patients) should continue.

Oxycodone stimulates normal and malignant hematopoietic progenitors via opioid-receptor-independent-β-catenin activation

Oxycodone is a common type of opioid used for the treatment of moderate to severe pain. Besides its analgesic effects on neuron cells, the effects of oxycodone on other cell types are yet to be elucidated. We previously demonstrated that oxycodone displayed both pro- and anti-cancer effects on bulk cancer cells. This work further investigated the effects of oxycodone on normal and malignant hematopoietic stem cells. Using hematopoietic CD34⁺ cells isolated from normal bone marrow (NBM) or patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML), we showed that oxycodone activates hematopoietic cells regardless of cell development stage and malignant status. Oxycodone dose-dependently increases colony formation and self-renewal capacity of NBM and AML stem/progenitor cells, and promotes proliferation of AML bulk cells. NBM stem/progenitor cells are more sensitive to oxycodone than AML counterparts. In addition, oxycodone alleviates chemotherapy drug-induced toxicity in AML stem/progenitor cells. Mechanism studies demonstrate that oxycodone acts on hematopoietic cells in an opioid-receptor-independent manner. Oxycodone did not affect epithelial growth factor receptor (EGFR) signaling neither but stimulated Wnt/β-catenin signaling. Rescue studies via depleting β-catenin using genetic and pharmacological approaches confirmed that β-catenin was required for the activation of hematopoietic cells induced by oxycodone. Our work demonstrates 1) the protective role of oxycodone in malignant hematopoietic cells from chemotherapy; 2) stimulatory effects of oxycodone in normal hematopoietic stem cells; and 3) ability of oxycodone in Wnt signaling activation.

Fentanyl stimulates tumor angiogenesis via activating multiple pro-angiogenic signaling pathways

Angiogenesis plays a vital role in tumor progression and metastasis. To better understand the role of anesthesia in tumor biology, we previously reported that bupivacaine displayed the inhibitory effects in endothelial cells. In this work, we demonstrated that fentanyl, an opioid medication commonly used in cancer patients, stimulated tumor angiogenesis. We found that fentanyl at nanomolar concentrations significantly stimulated capillary network formation of human lung tumor-associated endothelial cell (HLT-EC) in a similar manner as vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), and furthermore that the stimulatory effect of fentanyl was mainly involved in early stage of HLT-EC vascular structure assembly. Particularly, fentanyl significantly increased HLT-EC growth and migration. Fentanyl also protected HLT-EC from apoptosis induced by growth factor withdrawal. In contrast, the same concentrations of fentanyl did not affect human lung cancer cell growth and survival. Fentanyl stimulated migration of some but not all tested human lung cancer cells. Mechanism analysis suggested that fentanyl activates multiple pro-angiogenic signaling pathways, including VEGFR2/FAK/PI3K/Akt and small GTPases. Our work systematically demonstrates that fentanyl stimulates tumor angiogenesis via activating multiple pro-angiogenic signaling pathways. Our findings highlight the potential adverse effect of fentanyl in cancer patients.

Effects of Anesthesia on Postoperative Recurrence and Metastasis of Malignant Tumors

It is difficult to control the recurrence and metastasis of malignant tumors; furthermore, anesthesia is considered one of the main influencing factors. There has been increasing clinical attention on the effects of anesthetic drugs and methods on postoperative tumor growth and metastasis. We reviewed the effects of anesthesia on tumor recurrence and metastasis; specifically, the effects of anesthetic agents, anesthesia methods, and related factors during the perioperative period on the tumor growth and metastasis were analyzed. This study can provide reference standards for rational anesthesia formulations and cancer-related pain analgesia protocols for surgical procedures in patients with malignant tumors. Moreover, it contributes toward an experimental basis for the improvement and development of novel anesthetic agents and methods.

Opioid-free spine surgery: a prospective study of 244 consecutive cases by a single surgeon

BACKGROUND CONTEXT

There have been no reported efforts to eliminate opioid use for elective spine surgery, despite its well-known drawbacks.

PURPOSE

We sought to test the hypothesis that opioid-free elective spine surgery, including lumbar fusions, can be performed with satisfactory pain control.

STUDY DESIGN/ SETTING

This study analyzes prospectively collected data from a single surgeon's patients who were enrolled into an institutional spine registry.

PATIENT SAMPLE

We enrolled every consecutive surgical patient of author RAB between January 1, 2018 and July 13, 2019.

OUTCOME MEASURES

The postsurgical opioid use, pain scores, emergency room visits, and readmissions were tracked.

METHODS

We developed a comprehensive program for opioid-free pain control after elective spine surgery. In the initial stage, opioids were given "PRN" only, while in the second stage, they were avoided altogether. Student's t tests were performed to compare pain scores, and regression analyses were performed to understand drivers of opioid use and pain.

RESULTS

Two hundred forty-four patients were studied, a third of whom underwent lumbar fusions. In the initial stage, 47% of patients took no opioids from recovery room departure until 1-month follow-up. During the second stage, 88% of patients took no opioids during that period. Pain scores were satisfactory, and there was no association between postoperative opioid use and either procedural invasiveness or pain scores. However, preoperative opioid use was associated with a nearly fivefold increased risk of postoperative use. Ninety-three percent of lumbar fusion patients who were opioid-free before surgery did not take a single opioid in the postoperative period.

CONCLUSION

Opioid-free elective spine surgery, including lumbar fusions, is feasible and effective. We suggest that opioid-free spine surgery be offered to patients who are opioid-naïve or who can be weaned off before the operation.

Endogenous opiates and behavior: 2017

This paper is the fortieth consecutive installment of the annual anthological review of research concerning the endogenous opioid system, summarizing articles published during 2017 that studied the behavioral effects of molecular, pharmacological and genetic manipulation of opioid peptides and receptors as well as effects of opioid/opiate agonists and antagonists. The review is subdivided into the following specific topics: molecular-biochemical effects and neurochemical localization studies of endogenous opioids and their receptors (1), the roles of these opioid peptides and receptors in pain and analgesia in animals (2) and humans (3), opioid-sensitive and opioid-insensitive effects of nonopioid analgesics (4), opioid peptide and receptor involvement in tolerance and dependence (5), stress and social status (6), learning and memory (7), eating and drinking (8), drug abuse and alcohol (9), sexual activity and hormones, pregnancy, development and endocrinology (10), mental illness and mood (11), seizures and neurologic disorders (12), electrical-related activity and neurophysiology (13), general activity and locomotion (14), gastrointestinal, renal and hepatic functions (15), cardiovascular responses (16), respiration and thermoregulation (17), and immunological responses (18).

Morphine contributed to the deterioration of cancer via miR-543/MARCKS/FcγR-mediated phagocytosis pathway

OBJECTIVES

It has been confirmed that morphine was detrimental to patients with cancers. Hence, we aimed to reveal a certain mechanism of morphine in cancer development.

METHODS

Microarray and GSEA analysis were utilized to seek for differently expressed genes and pathway.

KEY FINDINGS

Bioinformatics analysis identified that downregulation of MARCKS and upregulation of miR-543 in samples treated with morphine. FcγR-mediated phagocytosis pathway was illustrated to be upregulated in the control. PANC-1 and DU145 cell viability was increased but apoptosis was declined as morphine concentration went up from 10^-8 to 10^-6  mol/l. On the other curve, the viability was reduced and apoptosis was elevated from 10^-6 to 10^-5  mol/l. The expression of miR-543 ran the same trend as cell viability. Assays in vivo and in vitro validated that miR-543 facilitated cell viability, tumour growth, levels of CA199 and PSA, whereas inhibited apoptosis. MARCKS could target and inhibit miR-543 expression, which exhibited an opposite effect on cancer progression. MiR-543 blocked but MARCKS activated FcγR-mediated phagocytosis pathway.

CONCLUSIONS

Morphine at 10^-6  mol/l could benefit miR-543 expression to inhibit MARCKS expression, consequently, blocking FcγR-mediated phagocytosis pathway, which contributed to the cancer progression in vitro and in vivo.

The dual effect of morphine on tumor development

Morphine is a classic opioid drug used for reducing pain and is commonly prescribed as an effective drug to control cancer pain. Morphine has a direct role in the central nervous system to relieve pain, but because of its peripheral functions, morphine also has some side effects, such as nausea, constipation, and addiction (Gupta et al. in Sci World J 2015:10, 2015). In addition to its analgesic effect, the role of morphine in tumor development is an important question that has been investigated for many years with conflicting results. Numerous studies suggest that morphine has a role in both promoting and inhibiting tumor growth. In this extensive review, we attempt to comprehensively understand the effects of morphine and summarize both its positive and negative influences on various aspects of tumors, including tumor growth, angiogenesis, metastasis, inflammation, and immunomodulation.

Morphine as a suspect of aiding the propagation of cancer cells

Controlling pain in cancer patients is important for several reasons including patient quality of life (QOL). In moderate-to-severe cancer-pain management, opioid analgesics are indispensable. Among these, morphine is the most representative. Unfortunately, many studies have shown that morphine is potentially associated with cancer growth, recurrence, and metastasis. Specifically, in animal as well as in vivo and in vitro studies, morphine has been demonstrated to have possibly positive effects on cancer progression. However, those effects have not yet been confirmed as entirely harmful, for several reasons: the results of animal and laboratory research have not been subjected to clinical trials; there are as yet no well-designed clinical studies, and indeed, some studies have shown that morphine can have negative, suppression effects on tumor growth. This review paper will present some of the data on the potentially positive relationships between morphine and cancer. It should not be forgotten, though, that such relationships remain controversial, and that pain itself promotes cancer progression.

The Effects of Anesthetics on Recurrence and Metastasis of Cancer, and Clinical Implications

Surgical resection of the primary tumor may enhance the metastasis and recurrence of cancer. The reaction of patients to surgery includes changes of the immune system, the inflammatory system and the neuroendocrine system. In the perioperative period, anesthetics are used both for anesthesia and analgesia. There are several studies showing that the progression of cancer can be influenced by many kinds of anesthetics, although most of these studies are preclinical and thus have not yet influenced clinical recommendations. This review summarizes recent studies regarding the effects of anesthetics on metastasis and recurrence of cancer.