Benefit-risk balance of native vitamin D supplementation in chronic hemodialysis: what can we learn from the major clinical trials and international guidelines?

Mini review: A reevaluation of nutritional vitamin D in the treatment of chronic kidney disease

Chronic kidney disease-mineral and bone disorder is a syndrome of mineral and bone metabolism abnormalities caused by chronic kidney disease. Osteoporosis is a systemic metabolic bone disease characterized by low bone mass, disruption of bone microstructure, increased brittleness, and a higher propensity for fractures. Both of these conditions significantly affect bone metabolism and substantially increase the risk of fractures. Nutritional vitamin D is an essential trace element in the human body and an important fat-soluble vitamin. One crucial physiological role of nutritional vitamin D is to achieve mineral-bone metabolism balance by regulating calcium homeostasis. This review summarized the metabolism of vitamin in normal population and its specificity in chronic kidney disease. Over the years, the understanding and application of vitamin D in patients with chronic renal failure is changing. As people pay more attention to hypercalcemia, vascular calcification, osteoporosis, nutritional vitamin D has come into people's attention again. More and more studies are discussing how to prescribe vitamin D supplementation in hemodialysis patients.

Does Native Vitamin D Supplementation Have Pleiotropic Effects in Patients with End-Stage Kidney Disease? A Systematic Review of Randomized Trials

Vitamin D has been shown to have multiple pleiotropic effects beyond bone and mineral metabolism, with purported roles in cardiovascular disease, cancer, and host immunity. Vitamin D deficiency is common in patients with end-stage kidney disease (ESKD); however, current clinical practice has favored the use of the active hormone. Whether vitamin D deficiency should be corrected in patients with ESKD remains unclear, as few randomized trials have been conducted. In this systematic review, we summarize the current evidence examining whether vitamin D supplementation improves outcomes, beyond mineral metabolism, in patients with ESKD. Data from randomized controlled trials of adults with ESKD were obtained by searching Ovid MEDLINE, Embase, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and the Web of Science Core Collection from inception to February 2023. Twenty-three trials composed of 2489 participants were identified for inclusion. Data were synthesized by two independent reviewers and summarized in tables organized by outcome. Outcomes included measures of mortality, cardiovascular disease, inflammation, muscle strength/function, nutrition, patient well-being, and outcomes specific to ESKD including erythropoietin usage, pruritus, and dialysis access maturation. The Cochrane risk of Bias Tool (RoB 2, 2019) was used to assess study quality. Overall, our findings indicate a minimal and varied benefit of native vitamin D supplementation. From the largest studies included, we determine that vitamin D has no demonstrated effect on patient-reported measures of well-being or utilization of erythropoietin, nor does it change levels of the inflammation biomarker C-reactive protein. Included trials were heterogeneous with regards to outcomes, and the majority studied small participant populations with a relatively short follow-up. We conclude that vitamin D supplementation corrects vitamin D deficiency and is safe and well-tolerated in humans with ESKD. However, it is not clear from clinical trials conducted to date that a causal pathway exists between 25(OH)D and pleiotropic effects that is responsive to vitamin D treatment.

25-OH vitamin D threshold for optimal bone mineral density in elderly patients with chronic kidney disease

Introduction: Vitamin D deficiency is common in chronic kidney disease (CKD) and is associated with lower bone mineral density (BMD), decreased muscle strength, and increased hip fracture risk. Guidelines have suggested targeting 25-OH vitamin D (25(OH)D) levels between 20 and 30 ng/ml. However, vitamin D metabolism is altered in CKD, and threshold levels for optimal BMD are unknown. Methods: We included 1097 patients with hip fractures. CKD was defined as estimated glomerular filtration rate <60 ml/min/1.73 m (Mucsi et al., Clin. Nephrol., 2005, 64(4), 288-294) and low BMD defined as T score ≤ -2.5 at femoral neck. We assessed the association of 25(OH)D with low BMD in patients with and without CKD: using the conventional threshold 25(OH)D < 30 ng/dl, as well as a new threshold. Results: CKD was present in 479 (44%) patients. Using a threshold of 25(OH)D < 30 ng/ml, there were no significant differences in patients with CKD and low BMD when compared to the other groups. We identified 27 ng/ml as a better threshold with the Youden index. Using 25(OH)D < 27 ng/ml as a threshold, 360 of 482 patients (74.7%) with low 25(OH)D had low BMD, compared to only 185/276 (67%) of patients with adequate vitamin D, p = 0.02, which was irrespective of the presence or absence of CKD. Furthermore, patients with CKD and 25(OH)D < 27 ng/ml had a higher odds ratio of mortality upon follow-up, 1.61, 95% CI: 1.08-2.39, compared to those with CKD and 25(OH)D ≥ 27 ng/ml. Conclusion: We find that 25(OH)D < 27 ng/ml is associated with low BMD in patients with and without CKD. Further prospective studies targeting vitamin D repletion to at least 27 ng/ml and the outcome of hip fractures will be useful to validate these findings.

Cholecalciferol vs. Small Doses of Alfacalcidol vs. Placebo in Chronic Kidney Disease Patients on Hemodialysis: A Randomized Parallel Group Study

Background

The ability of extrarenal tissues to convert 25(OH)D (calcidiol) into 1,25(OH)2D (calcitriol) and dependence of the conversion on substrate levels provide the rationale for supplementing vitamin D in dialysis patients who usually have severe depletion of both: 25(OH)D and 1,25(OH)2D. The primary aim of the study was to compare effects of small doses of cholecalciferol (12,000 IU/week) with frequently used in Europe, small doses of alfacalcidol (1.5 μg/week) or placebo, given for 12 weeks, on serum 1,25(OH)₂D in hemodialysis patients with 25(OH)D deficiency. Secondary outcomes were changes in serum calcium, phosphate, 25(OH)D, parathyroid hormone (PTH), fibroblast growth factor 23 (FGF23) and sclerostin during the treatment.

Methods

This was a prospective, randomized, partly double-blind (cholecalciferol vs. placebo) study. Out of 522 patients dialyzed in 5 centers in the Mazovian Province, 93 gave informed consent and met the inclusion criteria: any vitamin D metabolites and calcimimetics naïve; no history of liver or intestinal disease; serum 25(OH)D <20 ng/ml, iPTH <1,000 –>110 pg/ml, calcium <10.2, and phosphate <6.8 mg/dl. The subjects were stratified by serum iPTH, then randomized into 3 groups according to the treatment.

Results

To our knowledge, this is the first study comparing head-to-head these drugs in the hemodialysis population. There were no significant differences between the groups at baseline. 81 patients completed the study. Cholecalciferol normalized serum 25(OH)D, with a mean rise from 12.9 ± 6.7 to 31.3 ± 10.1 ng/ml (p < 0.0001). This was accompanied by a marked increase of 1,25(OH)₂D from 13.8 ± 9.3 to 25.1 ± 14.2 pmol/l (p < 0.0001). A rise in serum 1,25(OH)₂D was also observed in alfacalcidol treated patients, however much smaller (from 13.5 ± 10.1 to 18.5 ± 11.0 pmol/l; p = 0.02). Neither cholecalciferol nor alfacalcidol treatment resulted in significant changes in serum PTH and the remaining parameters.

Conclusions

In most patients, treatment with cholecalciferol in a 12,000 IU/week dose permits safe correction of 25(OH)D deficiency and is more effective than 1.5 μg/week dose of alfacalcidol in rising serum 1,25(OH)₂D. This, together with a lack of influence on circulating iPTH the usefulness of such small alfacalcidol doses in hemodialysis patients is debatable.