Prognostic implications of predialysis patients' symptoms in peritoneal dialysis patients

Experiences of Muslim patients living with peritoneal dialysis: A qualitative study in Southern Thailand

Background

Living with peritoneal dialysis affects the patient's life. The experiences of peritoneal dialysis patients, especially Muslim patients, are incomprehensible. There is a need to explore this area further to foster nursing practice improvement through enhanced understanding.

Objective

The purpose of this study was to understand the experiences of Muslim patients who are undergoing peritoneal dialysis.

Methods

A qualitative descriptive design was employed to gain a deeper understanding of the experiences of Muslim patients undergoing peritoneal dialysis in a peritoneal dialysis unit in Southern Thailand. Participants were initially recruited through purposive sampling and then selected based on the inclusion criteria. Data saturation was reached from October 2019 to January 2020. Ten Muslim patients who had been receiving peritoneal dialysis for a minimum of one month participated in personalized, in-depth, face-to-face interviews, which were supplemented by field notes. Inductive content analysis was performed using open coding, categories, and abstractions.

Results

The experiences of Muslim patients undergoing peritoneal dialysis were grouped into two main categories: 1) Overwhelmed by change and 2) Learned to survive.

Conclusion

Peritoneal dialysis has a significant impact on Muslim patients, especially during the first months of treatment. Recognizing religious teachings and strengthening religious commitment through participation in religious practices are central to living on peritoneal dialysis. The findings offer a more profound insight into the experiences of Muslim patients receiving peritoneal dialysis. These results can be foundational knowledge for establishing and improving culturally appropriate nursing practices for Muslim patients.

Peritoneal dialysis discontinuation: to the root of the problem

As the global burden of chronic kidney disease continues to increase, the use of peritoneal dialysis is often advocated as the preferred initial dialysis modality. Observational studies suggest a survival advantage for peritoneal dialysis over hemodialysis for the initial 2-3 years of dialysis. Peritoneal dialysis has been associated with better graft survival after kidney transplantation and has a reduced cost burden compared to hemodialysis. However, several medical and non-medical reasons may limit access to peritoneal dialysis, and less than 20% of patients with end-stage kidney disease are treated with peritoneal dialysis worldwide. In this narrative review, we sought to summarize the recent medical literature on risk factors for peritoneal dialysis discontinuation, distinguishing the early and the late phase after peritoneal dialysis initiation. Although the definition of clinically relevant outcomes varies among studies, we observed that center size, older age, and the presence of many comorbidities are risk factors associated with peritoneal dialysis discontinuation, regardless of the phase after peritoneal dialysis initiation. On the contrary, poor technique training and late referral to nephrology care, as opposed to the need for a caregiver, patient burnout and frequent hospitalizations, are related to early and late peritoneal dialysis drop-out, respectively. The aim of the review is to provide an overview of the most relevant parameters to be considered when advising patients in the selection of the most appropriate dialysis modality and in the clinical management of peritoneal dialysis patients. In addition, we wish to provide the readers with a critical appraisal of current literature and a call for a consensus on the definition of clinically relevant outcomes in peritoneal dialysis to better address patients' needs.

Health-Related Quality of Life Sleep Score Predicts Transfer to Hemodialysis among Patients on Peritoneal Dialysis

Despite the superiority of peritoneal dialysis (PD) over hemodialysis (HD) regarding health-related quality of life (HRQOL), the specific HRQOL domain(s) that predict unplanned HD transfer remains uncertain. In this cohort study, we assessed the HRQOL of 50 outpatients undergoing PD using the Japanese version 1.3 Kidney Disease Quality of Life-Short Form from March 2017 to March 2018 and prospectively analyzed the association of each HRQOL component with HD transfer until June 2021. During the follow-up (41.5 (13.0–50.1) months), 21 patients were transferred to HD. In a multivariate Cox proportional hazards model adjusted for age, sex, PD vintage, urine output, Charlson comorbidity index, and incremental shuttle walking test, a higher sleep score was significantly associated with lower HD transfer rates (HR 0.70 per 10, p = 0.01). An adjusted subdistribution hazard model where elected transition to HD, death, and transplantation were considered competing events of unintended HD transfer that showed sleep score as an exclusive predictor of HD transfer (HR 0.70 per 10, p = 0.002). Our results suggest that sleep score among the HRQOL subscales is instrumental in predicting HD transfer in patients undergoing PD.

Kidney Supportive Care in Peritoneal Dialysis: Developing a Person-Centered Kidney Disease Care Plan

Individuals receiving peritoneal dialysis (PD)—similar to those receiving hemodialysis —may experience high mortality coupled with a high symptom burden and reduced health-related quality of life. In this context, a discussion of the risks, benefits, and tradeoffs of PD and/or other kidney treatment modalities should be explored based on individual goals and preferences. Through these principles, kidney supportive care provides a person-centered approach to kidney disease care throughout the spectrum of kidney failure and earlier stages of chronic kidney disease. Kidney supportive care is offered in conjunction with life-prolonging therapies, including dialysis and kidney transplants, and is increasingly recognized as an integral part of advancing the care of PD patients. Using “My Kidney Care Roadmap” for shared decision making, kidney supportive care guides patients undergoing PD and their clinicians to (1) elicit patient goals, values, and priorities; (2) convey medical prognosis and suitable treatment options; and (3) ask “Which of these kidney treatment options will best help me achieve my goals and priorities?” to inform both current and future decisions, including choice of dialysis modalities, time-limited trials, and/or nondialysis management. Recognizing that patient priorities and choices may evolve, this framework ultimately allows patients to continually reassess their PD care to better achieve goal-directed dialysis.