Addition of terlipressin to norepinephrine in septic shock and effect of renal perfusion: a pilot study

Non-adrenergic vasopressors for vasodilatory shock or perioperative vasoplegia: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

BACKGROUND

Excessive exposure to adrenergic vasopressors may be harmful. Non-adrenergic vasopressors may spare adrenergic agents and potentially improve outcomes. We aimed to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to evaluate the efficacy of non-adrenergic vasopressors in adult patients receiving vasopressor therapy for vasodilatory shock or perioperative vasoplegia.

METHODS

We searched PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library for RCTs comparing non-adrenergic vasopressors with adrenergic vasopressors alone or placebo in critically ill or perioperative patients. Each eligible study was categorized into septic shock, cardiac surgery, or non-cardiac surgery. Non-adrenergic vasopressors included vasopressin, terlipressin, selepressin, angiotensin II, methylene blue, and hydroxocobalamin. The primary outcome was mortality at longest follow-up. We conducted a random-effects meta-analysis. We registered the protocol in PROSPERO International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (CRD42024505039).

RESULTS

Among 51 eligible RCTs totaling 5715 patients, the predominant population was septic shock in 30 studies, cardiac surgery in 11 studies, and non-cardiac surgery in 10 studies. Cochrane risk-of-bias tool for randomized trials version 2 identified 17 studies as low risk of bias. In septic shock, mortality was significantly lower in the non-adrenergic group (960/2232 [43%] vs. 898/1890 [48%]; risk ratio [RR], 0.92; 95% confidence interval [95% CI], 0.86-0.97; P = 0.03; I2 = 0%), with none of the individual non-adrenergic vasopressors showing significant survival benefits. No significant mortality difference was observed in patients undergoing cardiac surgery (34/410 [8.3%] vs. 47/412 [11%]; RR, 0.82; 95% CI, 0.55-1.22; P = 0.32; I2 = 12%) or those undergoing non-cardiac surgery (9/388 [2.3%] vs. 18/383 [4.7%]; RR, 0.66; 95% CI, 0.31-1.41; P = 0.28; I2 = 0%).

CONCLUSIONS

Administration of non-adrenergic vasopressors was significantly associated with reduced mortality in patients with septic shock. However, no single agent achieved statistical significance in separate analyses. Although the pooled effects of non-adrenergic vasopressors on survival did not reach statistical significance in patients undergoing cardiac or non-cardiac surgery, the confidence intervals included the possibility of both no effect and a clinically important benefit from non-adrenergic agents. These findings justify the conduct of further RCTs comparing non-adrenergic vasopressors to usual care based on noradrenaline alone.

New ultrasound techniques for acute kidney injury diagnostics

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Acute kidney injury (AKI) is common in critical illness and associated with adverse outcomes. Imaging, specifically ultrasound, is increasingly finding a role in AKI diagnostics. This includes the assessment of arterial and venous blood flow, tissue perfusion and the condition of the renal parenchyma. This review provides an update on ultrasound techniques and their application to AKI in critical care.

RECENT FINDINGS

Advances have been made in arterial and venous Doppler, contrast enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) and shear wave elastography (SWE). Doppler and CEUS techniques offer benefit in terms of AKI diagnosis and in identifying patients at risk. In addition, through the demonstration of altered flow or impaired perfusion, these techniques provide information on the pathophysiology of AKI, offering potential for targeted intervention. Renal SWE, an emerging technique, assesses tissue stiffness potentially allowing exploration of the role of venous congestion in the pathogenesis of AKI.

SUMMARY

Ultrasound continues to demonstrate great promise in the diagnosis and management of AKI, offering a noninvasive means to diagnose perfusion deficits and assess response to treatments. Further research, with standardization of techniques, may allow multifaceted renal ultrasound assessment in the critically ill for more accurate diagnosis and tailored intervention in AKI.

Effect of Continuous Infusion Therapy With Low-dose Terlipressin Combined With Norepinephrine on Hemodynamics, Inflammatory Markers, and Prognosis in Patients With Severe Septic Shock

OBJECTIVE

The present study investigated the impact of continuous infusion therapy with low-dose terlipressin (TP) combined with norepinephrine on hemodynamics, inflammatory markers, and prognosis in patients with severe septic shock.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Seventy-four patients with severe septic shock were randomly assigned to either a control group (n = 37) or an observation group (n = 37). Patients in the control group received norepinephrine alone, while those in the observation group received a continuous infusion of low-dose TP in addition to norepinephrine. To assess the effect of treatment, a set of clinical parameters was evaluated in both groups before and after treatment. These parameters included hemodynamic indicators (heart rate [HR], mean arterial pressure [MAP], central venous pressure [CVP], cardiac index [CI], and systemic vascular resistance index [SVRI]), levels of serum inflammatory markers (interleukin-8 [IL-8], tumor necrosis factor-α [TNF-α], and hypersensitivity C-reactive protein [hs-CRP]), renal function indicators (blood urea nitrogen [BUN], serum creatinine [SCr], and cystatin C [Cys-C]), serum procalcitonin (PCT), and lactate, as well as lactate clearance rate (LCR). Additionally, the acute physiology and chronic health evaluation II (APACHE II) score, 28-day mortality rate, multiple organ dysfunction syndrome (MODS) incidence rate, and adverse reaction incidence were also determined.

RESULTS

Compared to baseline values, MAP, CVP, CI, SVRI, and LCR increased in both groups after treatment, while HR, levels of IL-8, TNF-α, hs-CRP, BUN, SCr, PCT, and lactate all decreased. Additionally, APACHE II scores also decreased. Furthermore, the observation group exhibited higher MAP, CVP, CI, SVRI, and LCR, along with lower HR, levels of IL-8, TNF-α, hs-CRP, BUN, SCr, PCT, and lactate than the control group after treatment. The observation group also had lower APACHE II score, 28-day mortality rate, MODS incidence rate, and adverse reaction incidence than the control group after treatment (P < .05).

CONCLUSION

Continuous infusion therapy with low-dose TP combined with norepinephrine was effective in treating patients with severe septic shock, improving hemodynamic parameters, reducing the levels of inflammatory markers, promoting renal function recovery, and reducing the mortality rate.

Emerging concepts in the care of patients with cirrhosis and septic shock

Septic shock impacts approximately 6% of hospitalized patients with cirrhosis and is associated with high rates of morbidity and mortality. Although a number of landmark clinical trials have paved the way for incremental improvements in the diagnosis and management of septic shock in the general population, patients with cirrhosis have largely been excluded from these studies and critical knowledge gaps continue to impact the care of these individuals. In this review, we discuss nuances in the care of patients with cirrhosis and septic shock using a pathophysiology-based approach. We illustrate that septic shock may be challenging to diagnose in this population in the context of factors such as chronic hypotension, impaired lactate metabolism, and concomitant hepatic encephalopathy. Furthermore, we demonstrate that the application of routine interventions such as intravenous fluids, vasopressors, antibiotics, and steroids should be carefully considered among those with decompensated cirrhosis in light of hemodynamic, metabolic, hormonal, and immunologic disturbances. We propose that future research should include and characterize patients with cirrhosis in a systematic manner, and clinical practice guidelines may need to be refined accordingly.

Renal Microcirculation Injury as the Main Cause of Ischemic Acute Kidney Injury Development

Acute kidney injury (AKI) can result from multiple factors. The main cause is reduced renal perfusion. Kidneys are susceptible to ischemia due to the anatomy of microcirculation that wraps around the renal tubules-peritubular capillary (PTC) network. Cortical and medullary superficial tubules have a large share in transport and require the supply of oxygen for ATP production, while it is the cortex that receives almost 100% of the blood flowing through the kidneys and the medulla only accounts for 5-10% of it. This difference makes the tubules present in the superficial layer of the medulla very susceptible to ischemia. Impaired blood flow causes damage to the endothelium, with an increase in its prothrombotic and pro-adhesive properties. This causes congestion in the microcirculation of the renal medulla. The next stage is the migration of pericytes with the disintegration of these vessels. The phenomenon of destruction of small vessels is called peritubular rarefaction, attributed as the main cause of further irreversible changes in the damaged kidney leading to the development of chronic kidney disease. In this article, we will present the characteristic structure of renal microcirculation, its regulation, and the mechanism of damage in acute ischemia, and we will try to find methods of prevention with particular emphasis on the inhibition of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system.

Norepinephrine May Exacerbate Septic Acute Kidney Injury: A Narrative Review

Sepsis, the most serious complication of infection, occurs when a cascade of potentially life-threatening inflammatory responses is triggered. Potentially life-threatening septic shock is a complication of sepsis that occurs when hemodynamic instability occurs. Septic shock may cause organ failure, most commonly involving the kidneys. The pathophysiology and hemodynamic mechanisms of acute kidney injury in the case of sepsis or septic shock remain to be elucidated, but previous studies have suggested multiple possible mechanisms or the interplay of multiple mechanisms. Norepinephrine is used as the first-line vasopressor in the management of septic shock. Studies have reported different hemodynamic effects of norepinephrine on renal circulation, with some suggesting that it could possibly exacerbate acute kidney injury caused by septic shock. This narrative review briefly covers the updates on sepsis and septic shock regarding definitions, statistics, diagnosis, and management, with an explanation of the putative pathophysiological mechanisms and hemodynamic changes, as well as updated evidence. Sepsis-associated acute kidney injury remains a major burden on the healthcare system. This review aims to improve the real-world clinical understanding of the possible adverse outcomes of norepinephrine use in sepsis-associated acute kidney injury.

Comprehensive Management of Blood Pressure in Patients with Septic AKI

Acute kidney injury (AKI) is one of the serious complications of sepsis in clinical practice, and is an important cause of prolonged hospitalization, death, increased medical costs, and a huge medical burden to society. The pathogenesis of AKI associated with sepsis is relatively complex and includes hemodynamic abnormalities due to inflammatory response, oxidative stress, and shock, which subsequently cause a decrease in renal perfusion pressure and eventually lead to ischemia and hypoxia in renal tissue. Active clinical correction of hypotension can effectively improve renal microcirculatory disorders and promote the recovery of renal function. Furthermore, it has been found that in patients with a previous history of hypertension, small changes in blood pressure may be even more deleterious for kidney function. Therefore, the management of blood pressure in patients with sepsis-related AKI will directly affect the short-term and long-term renal function prognosis. This review summarizes the pathophysiological mechanisms of microcirculatory disorders affecting renal function, fluid management, vasopressor, the clinical blood pressure target, and kidney replacement therapy to provide a reference for the clinical management of sepsis-related AKI, thereby promoting the recovery of renal function for the purpose of improving patient prognosis.

Multimodal strategy to counteract vasodilation in septic shock

Early initiation of a multimodal treatment strategy in the management of vasopressors during septic shock has been advocated to reduce delays in restoring adequate organ perfusion and to mitigate side effects associated with the administration of high-dose catecholamines. We provide a review that summarises the pathophysiology of vasodilation, the physiologic response to the vascular response, and the different drugs used in this situation, focusing on the need to combine early different vasopressors. Fluid loading being insufficient for counteracting vasoplegia, norepinephrine is usually the first-line vasopressor used to restore hemodynamics. Norepinephrine sparing is discussed in further detail through the concomitant use of adrenergic, vasopressinergic, and renin-angiotensin systems and the optimisation of endothelial reactivity with methylene blue. A blueprint for the construction of new studies is outlined to address the question of vasopressor selection and timing in septic shock.