Primary headaches in patients with temporomandibular disorders: Diagnosis and treatment of central sensitization pain

Physical therapist clinical reasoning and classification inconsistencies in headache disorders: a United States survey

Objective: The purpose of this study was to investigate the decision-making processes of physical therapists relating to evaluation and categorization of patients with headaches, including consistency with criteria proposed by the International Headache Society (IHS).Methods: A national online survey was distributed in cooperation with the Academy of Orthopaedic Physical Therapy of the American Physical Therapy Association. Three hypothetical patient case vignettes featuring headache disorders were used as assessment instruments. Additionally, data on physical therapist education, clinical experience, manual therapy training, self-efficacy, and familiarity & consistency with IHS criteria were collected. Physical therapist identification and valuation of clinical features of headache disorders were also examined in the decision-making processes.Results: Among the 384 respondents, 32.3% classified the tension-type headache case consistent with IHS criteria. The cervicogenic and migraine headache cases were classified at 54.8% and 41.7% consistent with IHS categories, respectively. Experienced clinicians and those with formal manual training categorized patient presentations with greater consistency. Clinician familiarity with IHS classification criteria was low with 73.6% collectively somewhat and not familiar, while 26.4% of physical therapists were self-described as very or moderately familiar.Discussion: Clinicians' headache categorization was significantly affected by symptom misattribution and weighting of individual examination findings. Weighting by practitioners of clinical features varied markedly with greatest emphasis being placed on detailed manual examination procedures, including passive intervertebral movements. Inconsistencies in valuation of clinical features in headache categorization suggest a need for further formal education in physical therapy educational curricula and in post-graduate education, including of IHS criteria and classification.Level of Evidence: 2a.

Juvenile Fibromyalgia and Headache Comorbidity in Children and Adolescents: A Literature Review

Juvenile fibromyalgia (JFM) is a chronic pain syndrome with onset in developmental age, characterized by widespread musculoskeletal pain associated with other neurological or nonneurological symptoms. Headache is one of the most frequent comorbid conditions with JFM, but this association is still poorly studied in the juvenile population. The literature review was conducted searching through PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science with a combination of the following free-text terms: "fibromyalgia," "juvenile fibromyalgia," "headache," "primary headache," "migraine," "children," "adolescents," and "comorbidity." The research resulted only in two specific studies regarding comorbidity JFM + Juvenile Headache (JH). From each study, we extracted data about sample features, clinical characteristics of both JFM and PH, and assessment tools. The clinical approach to JFM and JH should include a complete examination of the main causes of comorbid diseases, thus improving the therapeutic approach to the patient in developmental age.

Central sensitization in chronic pain and medically unexplained symptom research: A systematic review of definitions, operationalizations and measurement instruments

OBJECTIVE

Central sensitization (CS), a mechanism explaining the persistence of symptoms, has been the focus of many research projects. Explanations given to patients with chronic pain are often based on this mechanism. It is hypothesized that CS also plays an important role in the persistence of medically unexplained symptoms (MUS). However, definitions and operationalizations of CS vary. We conducted a systematic review of definitions, operationalizations and measurement instruments of CS.

METHODS

We searched in PubMed, EMBASE, PsycINFO, Cinahl and The Cochrane Library till September 2017 and included papers that addressed CS in relation to chronic pain and/or MUS. Two reviewers independently selected, analysed and classified information from the selected publications. We performed a thematic analysis of definitions and operationalizations. We listed the measurement instruments.

RESULTS

We included 126 publications, 79 publications concerned chronic pain, 47 publications concerned MUS. Definitions of CS consistently encompass the theme hyperexcitability of the central nervous system (CNS). Additional themes are variably present: CNS locations, nature of sensory input, reduced inhibition and activation and modulation of the NDMA receptor. Hyperalgesia and allodynia are widely mentioned as operationalizations of CS. Quantitative sensory testing (QST) and (f)MRI are the most reported measurement instruments.

CONCLUSIONS

There is consensus that hyperexcitability is the central mechanism of CS. Operationalizations are based on this mechanism and additional components. There are many measurement instruments available, whose clinical value has still to be determined. There were no systematic differences in definitions and operationalizations between the publications addressing MUS and those addressing chronic pain.

A comparative clinical and radiographic study on patients with chronic facial pain with and without temporomandibular disorder presenting to an otolaryngology clinic

Objective: Facial pain associated with temporomandibular disorder (TMD) is considered a component of Costen's syndrome. However, prior to the current study, no previous clinical and radiographic studies have addressed facial pain in patients with TMD. Methods: The study included 212 patients with chronic facial pain examined in an otolaryngology clinic. These were stratified into 132 patients with TMD and 80 patients without TMD. Clinical and radiographic findings were documented in both groups. Results: Forty-eight patients in the TMD group had normal endoscopic findings and clear CT scans and had their facial pain directly attributable to TMD. Conclusion: In patients presenting with facial pain, where nasal endoscopy reveals no abnormality, TMD should be specifically addressed, especially if CT scans of the paranasal sinuses are clear.

A associação da disfunção temporomandibular à dor orofacial e cefaleia

A articulação temporomandibular (ATM) possibilita a mastigação, deglutição e a fonética, faz parte do sistema estomatognático, e é capaz de múltiplos movimentos. A DTM (disfunção temporomandibular) representa certas condições musculares e articulares na região crânio orofacial que podem causar problemas nos músculos da mastigação e na ATM e suas estruturas associadas, sendo a cefaleia e a dor orofacial alguns dos principais sintomas relatados pelos pacientes. Objetivo: analisar a relação da DTM à dor orofacial e cefaleia através de uma revisão narrativa. Métodos: para a realização deste estudo, foram feitas buscas nas bases de dados Scielo e Pubmed, utilizando as palavras chave: Dor Orofacial, Disfunção Temporomandibular, Articulação Temporomandibular, Dor de Cabeça e Cefaleia. Conclusão: a partir dos artigos analisados na presente revisão foi possível concluir que existe relação entre dor na região orofacial e cefaleia com a DTM, porém ainda não é claro o mecanismo dessa correlação, sendo necessários mais estudos para elucidar esse quadro clínico.