Are the bite force and electromyographic activity altered in muscle TMD patients with abfraction lesions?

The mouth-opening muscular performance in adults with and without temporomandibular disorders: A systematic review

Background

The mouth‐opening muscular performance in patients with temporomandibular disorders (TMDs) is unclear. Understanding the impairments of this muscle group within specific TMDs is important to develop proper management strategies.

Objective

To characterise the mouth‐opening muscular performance in adults with and without TMDs.

Methods

PubMed, EMBASE, CINAHL, Scopus, Web of Science and Cochrane databases were searched from inception to 12 November 2020. Bibliographies were searched for additional articles, including grey literature. Case‐control, cross‐sectional and interventional studies reporting mouth‐opening muscular strength and/or endurance were included. Risk of bias was assessed by the SIGN checklist for case‐control studies and by the NIH quality assessment tool for cross‐sectional studies. Results were pooled with a random‐effects model. Confidence in cumulative evidence was determined by means of the GRADE guidelines.

Results

Fourteen studies were included; most were rated as having a moderate risk of bias. Only three studies assessed patients with TMDs and the other 11 assessed healthy adults. Significant sex differences in muscular performance were found for healthy adults in the review (strength deficit for females versus males). There was a significant reduction in maximal mouth opening performance (strength and endurance) in the three studies that assessed patients with temporomandibular disorders.

Conclusion

Sex plays a significant role in maximal mouth opening strength. There is a lack of reliable data on the normal mouth‐opening strength and endurance of healthy adults as well as for patients with TMDs.

Implications

Lack of reliable TMDs patient data and comparable healthy adult data highlight future direction for research.

Is jaw muscle activity impaired in adults with persistent temporomandibular disorders? A systematic review and meta-analysis

Understanding jaw muscle activity changes in temporomandibular disorders (TMD) is crucial to guide clinical management. The nature of these changes is currently unclear. Explore changes in jaw muscle activity in TMD. Electronic databases (PubMed, EMBASE, CINAHL, Scopus, Web of Science, Cochrane) and bibliographies were searched from inception to 9 July 2020 for eligible studies, including grey literature. Case-control and interventional studies reporting time-domain and frequency-domain electromyographic measures of jaw muscle activity in TMD and control groups were included. SIGN checklist for case-control studies was used to evaluate risk of bias. Results were pooled for meta-analysis using random-effects model. Confidence in cumulative evidence was established using American Academy of Neurology guidelines. Forty-five studies were included. Most were rated moderate risk of bias. Activity of four muscles (masseter, temporalis, lateral pterygoid, suprahyoids) was assessed across six domains (resting, clenching, chewing, swallowing, concentrating, resisted mandibular movements), with partial meta-analysis scope. Masseter and temporalis activity were significantly higher at rest (P = .05, P < .0001), but lower during brief maximal clenching (P = .005, P = .04) in TMD vs controls. Insufficient data precluded meta-analysis of remaining outcomes and subgroup analysis. Confidence in cumulative evidence ranged from moderate to very low. Changes in jaw muscle activity exist in TMD, which are both task-specific and muscle-specific. It remains unclear whether jaw muscle activity changes vary between TMD subgroups. Muscle function should be considered in clinical management of TMD. Insufficient subgroup data highlight future direction for research.

Voluntary biting behavior as a functional measure of orofacial pain in mice

INTRODUCTION

Pain-related behavior secondary to masticatory function can be assessed with the rodent bite force model. A reduction of the bite force has been shown to be related to pain associated with the masseter muscle and jaw activity, while an increase in bite force suggests improvement of muscle function and less pain. To evaluate the usefulness of the bite force measure in studying long-lasting orofacial pain we analyzed biting parameters during prolonged myofascial pain induced by ligation injury of the masseter muscle tendon (TL) in mice.

METHODS

C57Bl/6 mice were habituated to bite at a pair of aluminum plates attached to a force displacement transducer. The transduced voltage signals were amplified and converted to force through calibration with a standard weight set. Voluntary biting behavior was recorded for 100 s/session and those with bite forces ≥980 mN were analyzed. Nociception was also verified with von Frey, conditioned place avoidance (CPA) tests and mouse grimace scale. Persistent orofacial pain was induced with unilateral ligation of one tendon of the masseter muscle (TL).

RESULTS

To reduce interference of random bites of smaller forces, the top 5 or 15 bite forces (BF5/15) were chosen as a measure of masticatory function and related to pain behavior. Both male and female mice exhibited similar BF5/15. For the first nascent test of all mice, mean bite force was significantly and positively correlated with the body weight. However, this correlation was less clear in the latter tests (2-8 w). TL induced a reduction of BF5/15 that peaked at 1 w and returned to the baseline within 3 w. The von Frey and CPA tests indicated that mechanical allodynia/hyperalgesia persisted at the time when the BF had returned to the pre-injury level. Infusion of pain-relieving bone marrow stromal cells improved biting behavior in both male and female mice as shown by significantly increased BF5/15, compared to vehicle-treated mice.

CONCLUSIONS

Mouse voluntary biting behavior can be reliably measured and quantified with a simplified setup. The bite force showed an inverse relationship with the level of pain after TL and was improved by pain-relieving manipulations. However, the injury-induced reduction of bite force peaked early and did not parallel with other measures of nociception in the later phase of hyperalgesia. The results suggest that multiple factors such as the level of habituation, cognitive motive, physical status, and feeding drive may affect random voluntary biting and confound the biting parameters related to maintained hyperalgesia.