1
|
Abad PJB, Shah LL, Daack-Hirsch S. Family Information Management in the Context of Inherited Conditions: An Integrative Review. JOURNAL OF FAMILY NURSING 2024; 30:232-254. [PMID: 39194163 DOI: 10.1177/10748407241272196] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 08/29/2024]
Abstract
This review aimed to develop a framework to understand the process of information management in families with inherited conditions. Electronic databases were searched for relevant peer-reviewed articles. Articles were included if they were original research on families affected by any confirmed inherited condition, described how a family accesses, interprets, conveys, and/or uses information about the disease, included the recruitment of more than one family member, and used family as the unit of analysis. Data were analyzed through directed content analysis. Thirty-four articles from 27 studies were analyzed. We propose a framework for family information management consisting of the following domains: contextual influences, family information management behaviors, and family information management outcomes. This proposed framework expands the understanding of how families manage their genetic information in making health care decisions for their affected and at-risk relatives.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Peter James B Abad
- The University of Iowa, USA
- University of the Philippines Manila, Philippines
| | - Lisa L Shah
- Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Assad H, Levitin M, Petrucelli N, Manning M, Thompson HS, Chen W, Jang H, Simon MS. Uptake of screening and risk-reducing recommendations among women with hereditary breast and ovarian cancer syndrome due to pathogenic BRCA1/2 variants evaluated at a large urban comprehensive cancer center. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2024; 206:261-272. [PMID: 38605155 DOI: 10.1007/s10549-024-07283-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/05/2023] [Accepted: 02/07/2024] [Indexed: 04/13/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE Carriers of pathogenic variants in BRCA1/2 have an elevated lifetime cancer risk warranting high-risk screening and risk-reducing procedures for early detection and prevention. We report on prevention practices among women with pathogenic BRCA variants in order to document follow through with NCCN recommendations and to identify barriers to guideline-recommended care. METHODS Our cohort included women who had genetic testing through a cancer genetic clinic and completed a 54-item questionnaire to measure socio-demographics, medical history, rates of cancer screening and risk-reducing surgery, disclosure of test results, and cancer worry. Outcomes included rates of completion of risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy (RRSO), risk-reducing mastectomy (RRM), and NCCN risk-reducing and age-dependent screening guidelines (version 3.2019). Multivariable logistic regression analyses were used to evaluate potential predictors of these outcomes. RESULTS Of 129 evaluable women with pathogenic BRCA1/2 variants, 95 (74%) underwent RRSO and 77 (60%) had RRM, respectively, and 107 (83%) were considered adherent to NCCN guidelines. Women with a history of breast or ovarian cancer were more likely to have RRM (OR = 4.38; 95% CI 1.80-11.51; p = 0.002). Increasing age was associated with an increased likelihood of RRSO (OR = 1.05; 95% CI 1.01-1.09; p = 0.019) and decreased likelihood for RRM (OR = 0.95; 95% CI 0.92-0.99; p = 0.013). Women who had RRM were 3 times more likely to undergo RRSO (OR = 2.81; 95% CI 1.10-7.44; p = 0.025). Women who had genetic testing after June 2013 were less likely to have RRM than those tested before June 2013 (OR = 0.42; 95% CI 0.18-0.95; p = 0.040. None of the other measured factors were associated with rates of RRSO, RRM or follow through with NCCN recommendations. There was near universal (127/129) reported disclosure of genetic test results to family members, resulting in the discovery of a median of 1 relative with a pathogenic variant (range = 0-8). CONCLUSION An evaluation of follow up practice in a cohort of women with pathogenic variants in BRCA1/2 revealed high rates of reported completion of screening and surgical risk-reducing recommendations. Educational efforts should continue to reinforce the importance of follow-through with guideline recommended care among this high-risk group.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hadeel Assad
- Department of Oncology, Barbara Ann Karmanos Cancer Institute, Detroit, MI, USA.
| | - Maria Levitin
- Department of Oncology, Barbara Ann Karmanos Cancer Institute, Detroit, MI, USA
| | - Nancie Petrucelli
- Department of Oncology, Barbara Ann Karmanos Cancer Institute, Detroit, MI, USA
| | - Mark Manning
- Department of Psychology, Oakland University, Rochester, MI, USA
| | - Hayley S Thompson
- Department of Oncology, Barbara Ann Karmanos Cancer Institute, Detroit, MI, USA
| | - Wei Chen
- Department of Oncology, Barbara Ann Karmanos Cancer Institute, Detroit, MI, USA
| | - Hyejeong Jang
- Department of Oncology, Barbara Ann Karmanos Cancer Institute, Detroit, MI, USA
| | - Michael S Simon
- Department of Oncology, Barbara Ann Karmanos Cancer Institute, Detroit, MI, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Fukuzaki N, Kiyozumi Y, Higashigawa S, Horiuchi Y, Matsubayashi H, Nishimura S, Mori K, Notsu A, Suishu I, Ohnami S, Kusuhara M, Yamaguchi K, Doorenbos AZ, Takeda Y. A Cross-sectional Study of Regret in Cancer Patients After Sharing Test Results for Pathogenic Germline Variants of Hereditary Cancers With Relatives. Cancer Nurs 2024; 47:281-289. [PMID: 36881649 DOI: 10.1097/ncc.0000000000001224] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/09/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Research on whole genome/exome sequencing is increasing worldwide. However, challenges are emerging in relation to receiving germline pathogenic variant results and sharing them with relatives. OBJECTIVE The aim of this study was to investigate the occurrence of and reasoning related to regret among patients with cancer who shared single-gene testing results and whole exome sequencing with family members. METHODS This was a single-center, cross-sectional study. The Decision Regret Scale was administered, and descriptive questionnaires were used with 21 patients with cancer. RESULTS Eight patients were classified as having no regret, 9 patients were classified as having mild regret, and 4 patients were classified as having moderate to strong regret. Reasons patients felt that sharing was the right decision included the following: to allow relatives and children to take preventive measures, the need for both parties to be aware of and ready for the hereditary transmission of cancer, and the need to be able to discuss the situation with others. On the other hand, some patients did not think it was a good decision to share the information because of the associated anxiety. CONCLUSIONS Regret over sharing test results for pathogenic germline variants of hereditary cancers with relatives tended to be low. The main reason was that patients believed that they were able to benefit others by sharing. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE Healthcare professionals need to understand the postsharing perceptions and experiences of patients and support them throughout the sharing process.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Naomi Fukuzaki
- Author Affiliations: Department of Nursing, Shizuoka Cancer Center Hospital (Dr Fukuzaki and Ms Suishu); Division of Genetic Medicine Promotion, Shizuoka Cancer Center (Drs Kiyozumi, Horiuchi, and Matsubayashi; Ms Higashigawa; Dr Nishimura); Tokyo Metropolitan Institute of Medical Science (Dr Horiuchi); Division of Endoscopy, Shizuoka Cancer Center (Dr Matsubayashi); Division of Breast Surgery, Shizuoka Cancer Center Hospital (Dr Nishimura); Clinical Research Center, Shizuoka Cancer Center (Drs Mori and Notsu); Shizuoka Cancer Center Research Institute (Ms Ohnami and Dr Kusuhara); and Shizuoka Cancer Center (Dr Yamaguchi), Japan; Department of Biobehavioral Nursing Science, College of Nursing, University of Illinois Chicago (Dr Doorenbos); and Graduate School of Health Management, Keio University (Dr Takeda), Tokyo, Japan
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Levine R, Kahn RM, Perez L, Brewer J, Ratner S, Li X, Yeoshoua E, Frey MK. Cascade genetic testing for hereditary cancer syndromes: a review of barriers and breakthroughs. Fam Cancer 2024; 23:111-120. [PMID: 38530571 DOI: 10.1007/s10689-024-00373-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/27/2023] [Accepted: 03/09/2024] [Indexed: 03/28/2024]
Abstract
Germline genetic sequencing is now at the forefront of cancer treatment and preventative medicine. Cascade genetic testing, or the testing of at-risk relatives, is extremely promising as it offers genetic testing and potentially life-saving risk-reduction strategies to a population exponentially enriched for the risk of carrying a cancer-associated pathogenic variant. However, many relatives do not complete cascade testing due to barriers that span individual, relationship, healthcare community, and societal/policy domains. We have reviewed the published research on cascade testing. Our aim is to evaluate barriers to cascade genetic testing for hereditary cancer syndromes and explore strategies to mitigate these barriers, with the goal of promoting increased uptake of cascade genetic testing.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rachel Levine
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, HCA Florida Brandon, Brandon, FL, USA.
| | - Ryan M Kahn
- Gynecology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Luiza Perez
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA
| | - Jesse Brewer
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA
| | - Samantha Ratner
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA
| | - Xuan Li
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA
| | - Effi Yeoshoua
- Gynecology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Melissa K Frey
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA
- Genetics and Personalized Cancer Prevention Program, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Mesa-Chavez F, Chavarri-Guerra Y, Aguilar-y-Mendez D, Becerril-Gaitan A, Vaca-Cartagena BF, Carrillo-Bedoya A, Santiesteban-González S, Aranda-Gutierrez A, Rodríguez-Faure A, Obregon-Leal D, Quintero-Beuló G, Rodriguez-Olivares JL, Miaja M, Weitzel JN, Villarreal-Garza C. Uptake of Risk-Reducing Measures, Cascade Testing, and Related Challenges Among Carriers of Breast Cancer-Associated Germline Pathogenic Variants in Mexico. JCO Glob Oncol 2024; 10:e2300417. [PMID: 38635940 PMCID: PMC11191870 DOI: 10.1200/go.23.00417] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/06/2023] [Revised: 12/22/2023] [Accepted: 02/20/2024] [Indexed: 04/20/2024] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Genetic cancer risk assessment (GCRA) provides pathogenic variant (PV) carriers with the invaluable opportunity to undertake timely cancer risk-reducing (RR) measures and initiate cascade testing (CT). This study describes the uptake of these strategies and the related barriers among breast cancer-associated germline PV carriers in Mexico. METHODS Carriers who were at least 6 months after disclosure of genetic test results at two GCRA referral centers were invited to answer a survey assessing sociodemographic characteristics, awareness of their carrier status and its implications, uptake of RR measures according to international guidelines by PV, CT initiation, and associated challenges. RESULTS Of the eligible carriers, 246/384 (64%) answered the survey (median age: 44 years). Most were female (88%), married/in domestic partnership (66%), and had personal breast/ovarian cancer history (61%). PVs included BRCA1/2 (75%), CHEK2 (10%), PALB2 (5%), ATM (5%), NF1 (2%), RAD51C (2%), PTEN (1%), and TP53 (1%). Most (87%) participants were aware of their carrier status. When recommended, 37% underwent RR bilateral mastectomy, 48% RR oophorectomy, 70% annual mammogram, and 20% breast magnetic resonance imaging. Challenges hindering the uptake of RR measures included financial limitations (67%), lack of recommendation by their physician (35%), and fear (24%). Nearly all (98%) claimed sharing their results with their relatives. CT was initiated in 63% of families and was associated with carriers being married/in domestic partnership (P = .04) and believing GCRA was useful (P < .001). CONCLUSION Despite the resource-constrained setting, relevant rates of RR measures and CT were observed. Targeted interventions to reduce out-of-pocket expenses and improve patient-physician communication and patients' understanding on carrier status are warranted to enhance the overall benefit of GCRA and ultimately improve the provision of patient-centered care to both carriers and their at-risk relatives.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fernanda Mesa-Chavez
- Tecnologico de Monterrey, School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Monterrey, Mexico
| | - Yanin Chavarri-Guerra
- Instituto Nacional de Ciencias Médicas y Nutrición Salvador Zubirán, Mexico City, Mexico
| | - Dione Aguilar-y-Mendez
- Breast Cancer Center, Hospital Zambrano Hellion TecSalud, Tecnologico de Monterrey, Monterrey, Mexico
| | - Andrea Becerril-Gaitan
- Breast Cancer Center, Hospital Zambrano Hellion TecSalud, Tecnologico de Monterrey, Monterrey, Mexico
| | - Bryan F. Vaca-Cartagena
- Breast Cancer Center, Hospital Zambrano Hellion TecSalud, Tecnologico de Monterrey, Monterrey, Mexico
| | | | | | | | - Andrés Rodríguez-Faure
- Instituto Nacional de Ciencias Médicas y Nutrición Salvador Zubirán, Mexico City, Mexico
| | - Daniela Obregon-Leal
- Breast Cancer Center, Hospital Zambrano Hellion TecSalud, Tecnologico de Monterrey, Monterrey, Mexico
| | | | | | - Melina Miaja
- Breast Cancer Center, Hospital Zambrano Hellion TecSalud, Tecnologico de Monterrey, Monterrey, Mexico
| | - Jeffrey N. Weitzel
- The University of Kansas Cancer Center, Kansas City, MO
- Latin American School of Oncology, Sierra Madre, CA
| | - Cynthia Villarreal-Garza
- Breast Cancer Center, Hospital Zambrano Hellion TecSalud, Tecnologico de Monterrey, Monterrey, Mexico
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Adejumo PO, Aniagwu TIG, Awolude OA, Adedokun B, Kochheiser M, Sowunmi A, Popoola A, Ojengbede O, Huo D, Olopade OI. Cancer Genetic Services in a Low- to Middle-Income Country: Cross-Sectional Survey Assessing Willingness to Undergo and Pay for Germline Genetic Testing. JCO Glob Oncol 2023; 9:e2100140. [PMID: 36854077 PMCID: PMC10166413 DOI: 10.1200/go.21.00140] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/02/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Cancer genetic testing (CGT), a pathway to personalized medicine, is also being embraced in Nigeria. However, little is known about the influence of demographics and perceptions on individuals' willingness to access and pay for CGT. This study assessed patients' willingness to undergo CGT in southwest Nigeria as a catalyst for sustainable Cancer Risk Management Program. METHODS This was a cross-sectional study using semistructured questionnaire to interview 362 patients with cancer and 10 referred first-degree relatives between July 2018 and February 2020. Participants from three Nigerian teaching hospitals-University College Hospital, Ibadan, Lagos State University Teaching Hospital, Lagos, and Lagos University Teaching Hospital, Lagos, received genetic counseling and had subsequent CGT. Primary outcomes were willingness to undergo CGT in determining cancer risk and the willingness to pay for it. Ethical approval was from appropriate ethics committees of participating hospitals. Data were analyzed with SPSS version 22. Univariate comparison of categorical variables was performed by χ2 test, multivariate analysis by logistic regression. RESULTS The participants from University College Hospital (56.2%), Lagos State University Teaching Hospital (26.3%), and Lagos University Teaching Hospital (17.5%) were mostly female (98.4%). Mean age was 48.8 years ± 11.79. Three hundred twenty-two (86.6%) patients and first-degree relatives were willing to take the test, of whom 231 (71.1%) were willing to pay for it. more than half (53.6%) of the participants were willing to pay between N10,000 and N30,000, which is less than $100 US dollars. Sociodemographic variables and willingness to test showed no association (P > .05). Education and ethnicity were found to be associated with their willingness to pay for CGT (P ≤ .05). CONCLUSION Learning clinically relevant details toward cancer prevention informs health-related decisions in patients and relatives, a motivator for willingness to pay for genetic testing in low- and middle-income countries. Increased awareness may influence outcomes of cancer risk management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Prisca O Adejumo
- Department of Nursing, College of Medicine, University of Ibadan, Nigeria
| | - Toyin I G Aniagwu
- School of Occupational Health Nursing, University College Hospital, Ibadan, Nigeria
| | - Olutosin A Awolude
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University College Hospital, Ibadan, Oyo, Nigeria
| | - Babatunde Adedokun
- Center for Clinical Cancer Genetics & Global Health, Department of Medicine, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL
| | - Makayla Kochheiser
- Center for Clinical Cancer Genetics & Global Health, Department of Medicine, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL
| | | | | | - Oladosu Ojengbede
- Center for Population and Reproductive Health, College of Medicine, University of Ibadan, Ibadan, Oyo, Nigeria
| | - Dezheng Huo
- Department of Public Health Sciences, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL
| | - Olufunmilayo I Olopade
- Center for Clinical Cancer Genetics & Global Health, Department of Medicine, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Choe L, Lau J, Fong SY, Chew E, Chow WM, Pang Y, Lim TZ, Chong CS, Chew MH, Foo FJ, Koh FHX, Wong ML, Koh GCH, Tan KK. Colorectal cancer patients advocating screening to their siblings: a randomized behavioral intervention. Gastrointest Endosc 2022; 95:519-526.e2. [PMID: 34896444 DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2021.11.042] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/15/2021] [Accepted: 11/20/2021] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS Siblings of colorectal cancer (CRC) patients are at increased risk of developing CRC, but screening rates remain low. Through a randomized behavioral intervention, this study aimed to determine whether patients can advocate screening to their siblings using a tailored educational package. METHODS CRC survivors were recruited and randomized into relaying either tailored materials (intervention group) or existing national screening guidelines (control group) to their siblings. Siblings could respond to the study team if they were interested in learning about CRC screening. Study outcomes were patient advocacy rates (number of patients who had successfully contacted at least 1 eligible sibling) between groups and the proportion of eligible siblings who responded. RESULTS Between May 2017 and March 2021, 219 CRC patients were randomized to the intervention (n = 110) and control (n = 109) groups. Patient advocacy rates were high and did not differ significantly between groups. However, only 14.3% of eligible siblings (n = 85) responded to the study team. Siblings of patients from the intervention group were more likely to respond (adjusted odds ratio, 1.8; 95% confidence interval, 1.1-3.0; P < .05). Moreover, after controlling for potential confounders, siblings aged ≥60 years were significantly less likely to respond (adjusted odds ratio, .3; 95% confidence interval, .1-.7; P < .01). CONCLUSIONS CRC patients are willing advocates of screening, and siblings contacted by patients from the intervention group were also more likely to reach out to the study team. However, overall sibling response rates were low despite advocacy, suggesting that patient-led advocacy should at best be used as an adjunct to other, multipronged CRC screening promotion modalities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lina Choe
- Saw Swee Hock School of Public Health, National University of Singapore, Singapore
| | - Jerrald Lau
- Saw Swee Hock School of Public Health, National University of Singapore, Singapore; Department of Surgery, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore
| | - Si-Ying Fong
- Department of Surgery, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore
| | - Emily Chew
- Department of Surgery, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore
| | - Wen-Min Chow
- Department of Surgery, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore
| | - Yan Pang
- Department of Surgery, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore
| | - Tian-Zhi Lim
- Division of Surgical Oncology, National University Cancer Institute, Singapore
| | - Choon-Seng Chong
- Department of Surgery, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore; Division of Surgical Oncology, National University Cancer Institute, Singapore; University Surgical Cluster, National University Health System, Singapore
| | - Min-Hoe Chew
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Division of General Surgery, Sengkang General Hospital, Singapore
| | - Fung-Joon Foo
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Division of General Surgery, Sengkang General Hospital, Singapore
| | - Frederick Hong-Xiang Koh
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Division of General Surgery, Sengkang General Hospital, Singapore
| | - Mee-Lian Wong
- Saw Swee Hock School of Public Health, National University of Singapore, Singapore; Department of Surgery, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore
| | | | - Ker-Kan Tan
- Department of Surgery, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore; Division of Surgical Oncology, National University Cancer Institute, Singapore; University Surgical Cluster, National University Health System, Singapore
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Baldry E, Redlinger-Grosse K, MacFarlane I, Walters ST, Ash E, Steinberger J, Murdy K, Cragun D, Allen-Tice C, Zierhut H. Outcomes from a pilot genetic counseling intervention using motivational interviewing and the extended parallel process model to increase cascade cholesterol screening. J Genet Couns 2021; 31:164-175. [PMID: 34260792 DOI: 10.1002/jgc4.1466] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/18/2020] [Revised: 06/01/2021] [Accepted: 06/14/2021] [Indexed: 12/26/2022]
Abstract
Familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) is an inherited condition resulting in increased risk of premature cardiovascular disease. This risk can be reduced with early diagnosis and treatment, but it can be challenging to identify individuals with FH. Cascade screening, the most efficient and cost-effective identification method, requires FH patients to communicate with their at-risk family and encourage them to pursue screening. Beyond FH, patients with conditions increasing disease risk to family members report barriers to the communication process such as insufficient knowledge of the condition and discomfort informing relatives. We conducted a pilot study of a genetic counseling intervention incorporating behavior-change principles from motivational interviewing (MI) and the extended parallel process model (EPPM) to help parents of children with FH overcome these barriers and improve cascade screening rates for FH. Of the 13 participants who completed the intervention and post-intervention surveys, 6 reported contacting and/or screening additional relatives. A large effect size in increasing communication and screening was observed (η2 = 0.20), with the mean percent of at-risk relatives contacted rising from 33% to 45%, and the mean percent screened rising from 32% to 42%. On average, 2.23 new relatives were contacted and 2.46 were screened, per participant, by the end of the study. Direct content analysis revealed that despite the open-ended nature of the goal-setting process, participant goals fell into two categories including those who set goals focused on communicating with and screening family members (n = 9) and those who set goals only focused on managing FH (n = 4). Overall, the communication and screening rates reported after the intervention were higher than previous observations in adult FH populations. These results suggest this EPPM/MI genetic counseling intervention could be a useful tool for increasing communication and cascade screening for FH. With further research on goal-setting techniques, the intervention could be refined and replicated to identify more individuals affected by FH or modified for use with other actionable genetic conditions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emma Baldry
- Department of Genetics, Cell Biology, and Development, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA
| | - Krista Redlinger-Grosse
- Department of Genetics, Cell Biology, and Development, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA
| | - Ian MacFarlane
- Department of Genetics, Cell Biology, and Development, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA
| | - Scott T Walters
- Health Sciences Center, University of North Texas, Fort Worth, TX, USA
| | - Erin Ash
- Sarah Lawrence College, Broxville, NY, USA
| | - Julia Steinberger
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA
| | - Kari Murdy
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA
| | - Deborah Cragun
- College of Public Health, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Carly Allen-Tice
- Department of Genetics, Cell Biology, and Development, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA
| | - Heather Zierhut
- Department of Genetics, Cell Biology, and Development, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Smit AK, Bartley N, Best MC, Napier CE, Butow P, Newson AJ, Tucker K, Ballinger ML, Thomas DM, Jacobs C, Meiser B, Goldstein D, Savard J, Juraskova I. Family communication about genomic sequencing: A qualitative study with cancer patients and relatives. PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING 2021; 104:944-952. [PMID: 33129629 DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2020.10.022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/27/2020] [Revised: 09/15/2020] [Accepted: 10/15/2020] [Indexed: 05/05/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE This study explored family communication about undertaking genomic sequencing, and intentions to communicate pertinent heritable results to family members. METHODS Semi-structured interviews were conducted with cancer patients (n = 53) and their relatives (n = 20) who underwent germline genome sequencing or molecular tumor testing. Interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed and analyzed using thematic analysis. RESULTS Key themes relevant to family communication about undertaking sequencing included: perceiving family member interest, delaying discussion until results were received, having shared capacity to understand and cope, and having open communication in the family. Intended communication subsequent to receiving results was affected by: disease severity, risk management options, degree of closeness in the family, sense of responsibility, and potential adverse impacts on family. Resource and support needs varied based on the complexity of test results, health professionals' availability, and disease severity. Unique subthemes were identified for specific subgroups. CONCLUSION Current findings support the need to assess the impact and resource needs specific to each clinical application of genomic sequencing. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS Increasingly sophisticated and complex clinical genomic sequencing warrants development of family-centered interventions and resources to facilitate preference-sensitive communication about genomic sequencing, including disseminating relevant information to family members.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amelia K Smit
- The University of Sydney, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Sydney School of Public Health, Cancer Epidemiology and Prevention Research, Sydney, Australia; The University of Sydney, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Sydney School of Public Health, Sydney Health Ethics, Sydney, Australia; The University of Sydney, Melanoma Institute Australia, Australia.
| | - Nicci Bartley
- The University of Sydney, Faculty of Science, School of Psychology, Psycho-Oncology Co-operative Research Group, Sydney, Australia
| | - Megan C Best
- The University of Sydney, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Sydney School of Public Health, Sydney Health Ethics, Sydney, Australia; The University of Sydney, Faculty of Science, School of Psychology, Psycho-Oncology Co-operative Research Group, Sydney, Australia
| | - Christine E Napier
- The Kinghorn Cancer Centre, Garvan Institute of Medical Research, Sydney, Australia
| | - Phyllis Butow
- The University of Sydney, Faculty of Science, School of Psychology, Psycho-Oncology Co-operative Research Group, Sydney, Australia
| | - Ainsley J Newson
- The University of Sydney, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Sydney School of Public Health, Sydney Health Ethics, Sydney, Australia
| | - Kathy Tucker
- Hereditary Cancer Clinic, Prince of Wales Hospital, Sydney, Australia
| | - Mandy L Ballinger
- The Kinghorn Cancer Centre, Garvan Institute of Medical Research, Sydney, Australia; St Vincent's Clinical School, University of NSW, Sydney, Australia
| | - David M Thomas
- The Kinghorn Cancer Centre, Garvan Institute of Medical Research, Sydney, Australia; St Vincent's Clinical School, University of NSW, Sydney, Australia
| | - Chris Jacobs
- University of Technology Sydney, Graduate School of Health, Sydney, Australia; Prince of Wales Clinical School, University of NSW, Sydney, Australia
| | - Bettina Meiser
- Psychosocial Research Group, Prince of Wales Clinical School, University of NSW, Sydney, Australia
| | - David Goldstein
- Prince of Wales Clinical School, University of NSW, Sydney, Australia
| | | | - Ilona Juraskova
- The University of Sydney, Faculty of Science, School of Psychology, Psycho-Oncology Co-operative Research Group, Sydney, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Haas CB, Scrol A, Jujjavarapu C, Jarvik GP, Henrikson NB. Usefulness of mobile apps for communication of genetic test results to at-risk family members in a U.S. integrated health system: a qualitative approach from user-testing. HEALTH POLICY AND TECHNOLOGY 2021; 10. [PMID: 34040952 DOI: 10.1016/j.hlpt.2021.100511] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Abstract
Objective To assess the usefulness a mobile based application to send genetic test results to at-risk family members in a U.S. integrated health system. Methods We conducted semi-structured in-person interviews with members of Kaiser Permanente Washington who had enrolled in a prospective study and received genetic test results. Participants were given the task to use the app and comment on the experience. The moderator asked participants to share perspectives on the usefulness of a mobile based app and their lived experiences of sharing their test results with family members. Results Fourteen study participants who had undergone genetic testing were interviewed. Four primary themes emerged as relevant to the use of mobile-based apps as a tool for communicating genetic test results to at-risk family members: (i) Participants felt a sense of obligation to share positive test results with relatives; (ii) Participants felt that the advantages of using email were similar to those of the app; (iii) Participants felt that younger individuals would be more comfortable with an app; and, (iv) Participants felt they could use the app independently and in their own time. Conclusion A mobile based app could be used as a tool to improve cascade screening for pathogenic/likely pathogenic test results. The benefits of such a tool are likely greatest among relatives still at the stage of family planning, as well as among family members with strained relationships. There would be minimal burden on the system to offer a mobile based app as a tool.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cameron B Haas
- Kaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute, Seattle, WA.,Department of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, University of Washington, Seattle, WA
| | - Aaron Scrol
- Kaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute, Seattle, WA
| | - Chethan Jujjavarapu
- Department of Biomedical Informatics and Medical Education, School of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - Gail P Jarvik
- Departments of Medicine (Medical Genetics) and Genome Sciences, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA
| | - Nora B Henrikson
- Kaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute, Seattle, WA
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Zimmermann BM, Fanderl J, Koné I, Rabaglio M, Bürki N, Shaw D, Elger B. Examining information-seeking behavior in genetic testing for cancer predisposition: A qualitative interview study. PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING 2021; 104:257-264. [PMID: 32988685 DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2020.09.019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/13/2020] [Revised: 06/12/2020] [Accepted: 09/04/2020] [Indexed: 06/11/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE This study aims to assess information needs and information sources and seeks to illustrate what at-risk individuals consider motivators of and barriers to information-seeking before and after genetic testing for cancer predisposition. METHODS Semi-structured interviews with people seeking genetic counseling in Switzerland were analyzed qualitatively using thematic analysis. Wilson's model of information behavior was the theoretical framework. RESULTS We identified four themes that illustrate motivators of and barriers to information-seeking: attitudes and emotions; knowledge; social environment; and demographic factors. We also elucidated information needs and collected participants' information sources. CONCLUSION This study£s empirical approach helps healthcare professionals to understand their patients' behaviors and wishes concerning information-seeking more concretely than theoretical models alone. The study also identifies information gaps, especially outside the genetic counseling setting. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS Genetic counselors and other healthcare professionals need to purposefully assist patients in finding trustworthy and accessible information. Healthcare professionals in all disciplines need to be educated about predictive genetic testing.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bettina M Zimmermann
- Institute for Biomedical Ethics, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland; Institute of History and Ethics in Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
| | - Julia Fanderl
- Institute for Biomedical Ethics, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Insa Koné
- Institute for Biomedical Ethics, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Manuela Rabaglio
- Department of Medical Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Nicole Bürki
- Women's Clinic and Gynecological Oncology, University Hospital Basel, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - David Shaw
- Institute for Biomedical Ethics, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland; Care and Public Health Research Institute, Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - Bernice Elger
- Institute for Biomedical Ethics, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland; Center for Legal Medicine, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Tan KK, Lim TZ, Chew E, Chow WM, Koh GCH. Colorectal cancer patients can be advocates for colorectal cancer screening for their siblings: A study on siblings' perspectives. Psychooncology 2020; 29:2028-2032. [PMID: 32715510 DOI: 10.1002/pon.5496] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/05/2020] [Revised: 07/06/2020] [Accepted: 07/22/2020] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE This study was performed to explore in-depth, the issues and barriers pertaining to colorectal cancer (CRC) screening amongst the siblings of CRC patients in view of their higher risk of developing CRC. METHODS A qualitative study of siblings of CRC patients was performed from August 2017 to October 2018. Semi-structured interviewed were performed until data saturation was achieved. The data was then thematically analysed. RESULTS A total of 36 siblings of CRC patients, with a median age of 59 (range 39-78) years old completed the interviews. All the interviews were conducted alone with the participants. Each interview lasted between 30 and 45 minutes. None of the participants has undergone screening colonoscopy prior to the interviews. After thematic analysis, five themes were identified. These include: (i) Misunderstanding their own risk of developing colorectal cancer; (ii) Misperceptions of the role of "screening" for colorectal cancer.; (iii) Misconception of the CRC screening modality for FDRs; (iv) Barriers and facilitators of undergoing screening; (v) Misperceptions of national healthcare policies. CONCLUSIONS Identifying and addressing the identified barriers for these siblings to undergo screening colonoscopy is easily attainable. A multi-pronged approach should also be adopted to address the various concerns so as to reduce the incidence of CRC amongst these higher risk individuals.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ker-Kan Tan
- Department of Surgery, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore.,Division of Colorectal Surgery, University Surgical Cluster, National University Health System, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Tian-Zhi Lim
- Division of Colorectal Surgery, University Surgical Cluster, National University Health System, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Emily Chew
- Department of Surgery, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore
| | - Wen-Min Chow
- Department of Surgery, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore
| | - Gerald Choon-Huat Koh
- Saw Swee Hock School of Public Health, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Leighton S, Forrest LE, Young MA, Delatycki MB, Lynch E. Social media usage in family communication about genetic information: 'I no longer speak with my sister but she needed to know'. J Genet Couns 2020; 30:180-190. [PMID: 32648349 DOI: 10.1002/jgc4.1307] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/05/2020] [Revised: 05/12/2020] [Accepted: 05/28/2020] [Indexed: 01/21/2023]
Abstract
The use of social media has become a ubiquitous form of communication. Little is known about whether social media is used in families to assist with the communication of genetic information. This study aimed to understand if and why individuals use social media to communicate genetic information to at-risk relatives. Individuals with either a pathogenic variant in a cancer-predisposing gene or a heterozygous pathogenic variant in an autosomal or X-linked recessive gene were surveyed about communicating genetic information to their at-risk relatives and their use of social media to assist this process. Surveys were sent to 323 individuals from a reproductive carrier screening program and 250 individuals from a familial cancer center. The 128 responses (response rate 25.2%) showed that while most participants (79.0%) did not use social media to communicate genetic information, those that did use social media (21.0%) found it to be helpful as it was easy, accessible and allowed individuals to overcome communication barriers. Genetic professionals should be aware that social media is being used by individuals to assist family communication about genetic information and should discuss this method of communication with individuals who are faced with communicating genetic information with their family.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sarah Leighton
- Department of Paediatrics, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Vic., Australia.,Tasmanian Clinical Genetics Service, Hobart, Tas., Australia
| | - Laura E Forrest
- Parkville Familial Cancer Centre, Parkville, Vic., Australia.,Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Vic., Australia
| | - Mary-Anne Young
- Kinghorn Centre for Clinical Genomics, Garvan Institute of Medical Research, Darlinghurst, NSW, Australia
| | - Martin B Delatycki
- Department of Paediatrics, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Vic., Australia.,Victorian Clinical Genetics Services, Parkville, Vic., Australia.,Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Parkville, Vic., Australia
| | - Elly Lynch
- Victorian Clinical Genetics Services, Parkville, Vic., Australia.,Melbourne Genomics Health Alliance, Parkville, Vic., Australia
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Kurian AW, Katz SJ. Emerging Opportunity of Cascade Genetic Testing for Population-Wide Cancer Prevention and Control. J Clin Oncol 2020; 38:1371-1374. [PMID: 32097078 DOI: 10.1200/jco.20.00140] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/03/2023] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Allison W Kurian
- Departments of Medicine and Epidemiology and Population Health, Stanford University, Stanford, CA
| | - Steven J Katz
- Departments of Health Management and Policy, School of Public Health, and Internal Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Conley CC, Ketcher D, Reblin M, Kasting ML, Cragun D, Kim J, Ashing KT, Knott CL, Hughes-Halbert C, Pal T, Vadaparampil ST. The big reveal: Family disclosure patterns of BRCA genetic test results among young Black women with invasive breast cancer. J Genet Couns 2020; 29:410-422. [PMID: 31912597 DOI: 10.1002/jgc4.1196] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/20/2019] [Revised: 11/04/2019] [Accepted: 11/13/2019] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
Despite higher incidence and mortality of breast cancer among younger Black women, genetic testing outcomes remain severely understudied among Blacks. Past research on disclosure of genetic testing results to family members has disproportionately focused on White, educated, high socioeconomic status women. This study addresses this gap in knowledge by assessing (a) to whom Black women disclose genetic test results and (b) if patterns of disclosure vary based on test result (e.g., BRCA1/2 positive, negative, variant of uncertain significance [VUS]). Black women (N = 149) with invasive breast cancer diagnosed age ≤50 years from 2009 to 2012 received free genetic testing through a prospective, population-based study. At 12 months post-testing, women reported with whom they shared their genetic test results. The exact test by binomial distribution was used to examine whether disclosure to female relatives was significantly greater than disclosure to male relatives, and logistic regression analyses tested for differences in disclosure to any female relative, any male relative, parents, siblings, children, and spouses by genetic test result. Most (77%) women disclosed their results to at least one family member. Disclosure to female relatives was significantly greater than disclosure to males (p < .001). Compared to those who tested negative or had a VUS, BRCA1/2-positive women were significantly less likely to disclose results to their daughters (ORBRCA positive = 0.25, 95% CI = 0.07-0.94, p = .041) by 12 months post-genetic testing. Genetic test result did not predict any other type of disclosure (all ps > 0.12). Results suggest that in Black families, one benefit of genetic testing-to inform patients and their family about cancer risk information-is not being realized. To increase breast cancer preventive care among high-risk Black women, the oncology care team should prepare Black BRCA1/2-positive women to share genetic test results with family members and, in particular, their daughters.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Claire C Conley
- Health Outcomes and Behavior Program, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Dana Ketcher
- Health Outcomes and Behavior Program, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Maija Reblin
- Health Outcomes and Behavior Program, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Monica L Kasting
- Department of Health and Kinesiology, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, USA
| | - Deborah Cragun
- College of Public Health, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Jongphil Kim
- Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Kimlin Tam Ashing
- Department of Population Sciences, City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, CA, USA
| | - Cheryl L Knott
- School of Public Health, University of Maryland, College Park, MD, USA
| | - Chanita Hughes-Halbert
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA
| | - Tuya Pal
- Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - Susan T Vadaparampil
- Health Outcomes and Behavior Program, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, USA
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Young AL, Butow PN, Tucker KM, Wakefield CE, Healey E, Williams R. Challenges and strategies proposed by genetic health professionals to assist with family communication. Eur J Hum Genet 2019; 27:1630-1638. [PMID: 31189929 PMCID: PMC6871519 DOI: 10.1038/s41431-019-0447-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/29/2019] [Revised: 05/24/2019] [Accepted: 05/31/2019] [Indexed: 11/09/2022] Open
Abstract
Hereditary genetic conditions have implications for the whole family and therefore genetic health professionals (GHPs) interact with multiple family members, sometimes individually and sometimes in aggregate. Family communication is important to ensure dissemination of genetic information to potentially affected relatives and to facilitate supportive family interactions around genetic testing and risk management decisions. Yet, little is known about how GHPs perceive and manage these interactions. A total of 73 GHPs working across Australian cancer genetic clinics participated in semi-structured focus groups or interviews to elucidate what aspects of family communication they found most challenging, the strategies they used, and whether current academic training provides sufficient guidance to address familial concerns. Patients' lack of understanding about the importance of communicating genetic information to at-risk relatives was the most common challenge reported. GHPs reported that the patients' concern for their families' emotional responses as well as wider family system challenges (e.g. estrangement) affected family communication. Common strategies during consultations included structuring appointments logistically to account for family dynamics and post-consultation use of family letters and follow-up appointments. GHPs generally felt equipped with the skills and training provided to address patient concerns, but also desired upskilling in techniques relating to systemic family issues and behavioural change. Reflective practice strategies were requested by geneticists and nurses to foster therapeutic skill usage. Additional family therapy training while on the job may be beneficial in order to meet current challenges faced in clinical practice and can be provided as further professional development.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alison L Young
- The University of Sydney, Faculty of Science, School of Psychology, Centre for Medical Psychology & Evidence-based Decision-making (CeMPED), Sydney, NSW, Australia.
- Behavioural Sciences Unit proudly supported by the Kids with Cancer Foundation, Kids Cancer Centre, Sydney Children's Hospital, Randwick, NSW, Australia.
| | - Phyllis N Butow
- The University of Sydney, Faculty of Science, School of Psychology, Centre for Medical Psychology & Evidence-based Decision-making (CeMPED), Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Katherine M Tucker
- Prince of Wales Clinical School, Faculty of Medicine, University of New South Wales, Randwick, NSW, Australia
- Prince of Wales Hereditary Cancer Centre, Prince of Wales Hospital, Randwick, NSW, Australia
| | - Claire E Wakefield
- Behavioural Sciences Unit proudly supported by the Kids with Cancer Foundation, Kids Cancer Centre, Sydney Children's Hospital, Randwick, NSW, Australia
- School of Women's and Children's Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Emma Healey
- Illawarra Cancer Care Centre, Wollongong Hospital, Wollongong, NSW, Australia
| | - Rachel Williams
- Prince of Wales Clinical School, Faculty of Medicine, University of New South Wales, Randwick, NSW, Australia
- Prince of Wales Hereditary Cancer Centre, Prince of Wales Hospital, Randwick, NSW, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Taylor S, Rodrigues M, Poke G, Wake S, McEwen A. Family communication following a diagnosis of myotonic dystrophy: To tell or not to tell? J Genet Couns 2019; 28:1029-1041. [PMID: 31385417 DOI: 10.1002/jgc4.1156] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/17/2019] [Revised: 07/07/2019] [Accepted: 07/08/2019] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
Family communication about genetic information enables informed medical and reproductive decision-making. The literature suggests that a significant proportion of genetically at-risk family members remain uninformed about genetic risk information as a result of non-disclosure. This study explored the experiences of New Zealand families communicating about a diagnosis of type 1 myotonic dystrophy (DM1). Eligible individuals were identified and recruited from the New Zealand (NZ) MD Prev study, a nationwide study which aimed to determine the prevalence, impact, and costs of genetic muscle disorders across the lifespan. Twelve qualitative semi-structured interviews were conducted with 17 participants. The findings demonstrate diversity among and within families, with several distinct family narratives described. Most participants reported a motivation to tell relatives about their diagnosis to promote autonomy. Women were pivotal throughout communication processes and this was often tied to the concept of maternal responsibility and a desire to promote relatives' reproductive autonomy. The diagnosis of DM1 and the subsequent family communication decisions altered relationships for many, with both positive and negative impacts described. The findings demonstrate that individuals require time to explore the impact of a diagnosis of DM1 on self, family and intimate partner relationships to anticipate unique communication challenges. Genetic counselors can use these findings to inform their approach to counseling families with DM1. Longitudinal genetic counseling may be beneficial as a way to provide individuals with life stage specific support as they communicate with their relatives about a diagnosis of DM1.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shelby Taylor
- The Department of Paediatrics, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.,Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Melbourne, Australia.,Parkville Familial Cancer Centre and Genomic Medicine, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre and The Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Miriam Rodrigues
- Neurology, Auckland District Health Board, Auckland, New Zealand.,Muscular Dystrophy Association of New Zealand, Auckland, New Zealand
| | - Gemma Poke
- Genetic Health Services, Wellington, New Zealand
| | - Samantha Wake
- The Department of Paediatrics, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.,Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Melbourne, Australia
| | | |
Collapse
|
18
|
Heuvel L, Smets E, Tintelen J, Christiaans I. How to inform relatives at risk of hereditary diseases? A mixed‐methods systematic review on patient attitudes. J Genet Couns 2019; 28:1042-1058. [DOI: 10.1002/jgc4.1143] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/09/2018] [Revised: 05/09/2019] [Accepted: 05/12/2019] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- L.M. Heuvel
- Department of Clinical Genetics Amsterdam University Medical Centres, University of Amsterdam Amsterdam The Netherlands
| | - E.M.A. Smets
- Department of Medical Psychology Amsterdam University Medical Centres, University of Amsterdam Amsterdam The Netherlands
| | - J.P. Tintelen
- Department of Genetics University Medical Centre Utrecht, University of Utrecht Utrecht The Netherlands
| | - I. Christiaans
- Department of Clinical Genetics Amsterdam University Medical Centres, University of Amsterdam Amsterdam The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Ersig AL, Werner-Lin A, Hoskins L, Young J, Loud JT, Peters J, Greene MH. Legacies and Relationships: Diverse Social Networks and BRCA1/2 Risk Management Decisions and Actions. JOURNAL OF FAMILY NURSING 2019; 25:28-53. [PMID: 30537877 PMCID: PMC6581043 DOI: 10.1177/1074840718815844] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/12/2023]
Abstract
In families with hereditary breast/ovarian cancer, complex disease histories challenge established patterns of family communication and influence decision-making for clinical surveillance, genetic testing, and risk management. An interdisciplinary team examined longitudinal interview data from women with identified BRCA1/2 mutations to assess interactions within family and social networks about risk information communication and management. We used interpretive description to identify motivation, content, and derived benefit of these interactions. Participants discussed risk information and management strategies with biological and nonbiological network members for multiple purposes: discharging responsibility for risk information dissemination, protecting important relationships, and navigating decision trajectories. Evolving interactions with loved ones balanced long-standing family communication patterns with differing personal preferences for privacy or open sharing, whereas interactions with nonbiological network members expanded participants' range of choices for sources of risk management information. Ongoing assessment of social networks may help support engagement with risk management by aligning with patient social needs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | - June Peters
- National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
20
|
Young AL, Butow PN, Rhodes P, Tucker KM, Williams R, Healey E, Wakefield CE. Talking across generations: Family communication about BRCA1
and BRCA2
genetic cancer risk. J Genet Couns 2019; 28:516-532. [DOI: 10.1002/jgc4.1055] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/18/2018] [Revised: 10/17/2018] [Accepted: 10/18/2018] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Alison Luk Young
- School of Psychology; The University of Sydney; Sydney NSW Australia
- Behavioral Sciences Unit Proudly Supported by the Kids with Cancer Foundation, Kids Cancer Centre; Sydney Children’s Hospital; Randwick Australia
| | - Phyllis N. Butow
- School of Psychology; The University of Sydney; Sydney NSW Australia
| | - Paul Rhodes
- School of Psychology; The University of Sydney; Sydney NSW Australia
| | - Katherine M. Tucker
- Prince of Wales Hereditary Cancer Centre; Prince of Wales Hospital; Randwick NSW Australia
- Prince of Wales Clinical School, Faculty of Medicine; University of New South Wales; Randwick NSW Australia
| | - Rachel Williams
- Prince of Wales Hereditary Cancer Centre; Prince of Wales Hospital; Randwick NSW Australia
- Prince of Wales Clinical School, Faculty of Medicine; University of New South Wales; Randwick NSW Australia
| | - Emma Healey
- Illawarra Cancer Care Centre, Wollongong Hospital; Wollongong NSW Australia
| | - Claire E. Wakefield
- Behavioral Sciences Unit Proudly Supported by the Kids with Cancer Foundation, Kids Cancer Centre; Sydney Children’s Hospital; Randwick Australia
- School of Women’s and Children’s Health; University of New South Wales; Sydney NSW Australia
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Dean M, Rauscher EA. Men's and Women's Approaches to Disclosure About BRCA-Related Cancer Risks and Family Planning Decision-Making. QUALITATIVE HEALTH RESEARCH 2018; 28:2155-2168. [PMID: 30051759 DOI: 10.1177/1049732318788377] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/08/2023]
Abstract
Little is known about how men and women who test positive for a BRCA gene mutation or have a strong family history of carrying a BRCA mutation manage disclosures about their BRCA-related cancer risks and family planning decision-making. By conducting interviews with 25 men and 20 women, this study investigated men's and women's approaches to disclosing their BRCA-related cancer risks and family planning decision-making. Guided by the Disclosure Decision-Making Model (DD-MM), this study demonstrates that men and women assess both information and the recipients of disclosures when making disclosure decisions. Theoretical implications for the DD-MM are discussed along with practical implications for hereditary cancer risk and family planning.
Collapse
|
22
|
Suttman A, Pilarski R, Agnese DM, Senter L. "Second-Class Status?" Insight into Communication Patterns and Common Concerns Among Men with Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer Syndrome. J Genet Couns 2018; 27:885-893. [PMID: 29404823 DOI: 10.1007/s10897-018-0214-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/20/2017] [Accepted: 01/09/2018] [Indexed: 01/06/2023]
Abstract
Hereditary breast and ovarian cancer syndrome (HBOC) is a cancer predisposition syndrome that affects both men and women, with more significant cancer risk elevations in women. Dissemination patterns regarding familial genetic risk information among females with HBOC are fairly well defined, but knowledge about how males share this information is limited. We interviewed 21 people primarily Ashkenazi Jewish men who were accrued via listserv email through Facing Our Risk of Cancer Empowered (FORCE). Interviews focused on family cancer history, experiences with cancer and genetic testing, motivations to pursue genetic testing and subsequently disclose genetic test results, information-sharing patterns, health care provider response, and participants' emotional support systems. The interviews were transcribed in their entirety, coded, and analyzed based on recurring themes. Eighteen transcripts were used for the analysis. Results were classified into five main themes. Participants (n = 8) were most concerned about cancer risk for their children and female family members, and most (n = 11) mentioned that HBOC provides them increased personal awareness, but has a negligible impact on their life overall (n = 9). Men (n = 11) were interested in a male-focused support group to discuss HBOC and gain knowledge and information. Participants (n = 9) took on active and open communication roles with family members and health care providers. The majority of participants (n = 14) discussed the need for knowledge and awareness among the health care community and general population regarding male HBOC risks. This study serves as a pilot study and provides important and novel insights into psychosocial impacts, communication patterns, encounters with health care professionals, and expressed needs of males with HBOC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexandra Suttman
- Division of Human Genetics, Department of Internal Medicine and James Comprehensive Cancer Center, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA.
- Division of Pediatrics, Department of Hematology, Oncology, and Bone Marrow Transplant, Children's Hospital Colorado, 13123 E. 16th Ave, B115, Aurora, CO, 80045, USA.
| | - Robert Pilarski
- Division of Human Genetics, Department of Internal Medicine and James Comprehensive Cancer Center, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Doreen M Agnese
- Division of Human Genetics, Department of Internal Medicine and James Comprehensive Cancer Center, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Leigha Senter
- Division of Human Genetics, Department of Internal Medicine and James Comprehensive Cancer Center, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Peipins LA, Rodriguez JL, Hawkins NA, Soman A, White MC, Hodgson ME, DeRoo LA, Sandler DP. Communicating with Daughters About Familial Risk of Breast Cancer: Individual, Family, and Provider Influences on Women's Knowledge of Cancer Risk. J Womens Health (Larchmt) 2018; 27:630-639. [PMID: 29377785 DOI: 10.1089/jwh.2017.6528] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Women facing complex and uncertain situations such as cancer in their families may seek information from a variety of sources to gain knowledge about cancer risk and reduce uncertainty. We describe and assess the relative importance of information sources about familial breast cancer at the individual, family, and healthcare provider levels influencing women's reporting they had enough information to speak with daughters about breast cancer. This outcome we refer to as being informed about breast cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS Sister Study participants, a cohort of women with a family history of breast cancer, were surveyed on family cancer history, family communication, social support, and interactions with healthcare providers (n = 11,766). Adjusted percentages and 95% confidence intervals for being informed about breast cancer versus not being informed were computed for individual-, family-, and provider-level characteristics in three steps using multivariate logistic regression models. RESULTS We found 65% of women reported being informed about breast cancer while 35% did not. Having a trusted person with whom to discuss cancer concerns, having a lower versus higher perceived risk of breast cancer, having undergone genetic counseling, and being satisfied with physician discussions about breast cancer in their families were predictors of being informed about breast cancer. CONCLUSIONS Although acquiring objective risk information, such as through genetic counseling, may contribute to a basic level of understanding, communication with providers and within other trusted relationships appears to be an essential component in women's reporting they had all the information they need to talk with their daughters about breast cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lucy A Peipins
- 1 Epidemiology and Applied Research Branch, Division of Cancer Prevention and Control, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention , Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Juan L Rodriguez
- 1 Epidemiology and Applied Research Branch, Division of Cancer Prevention and Control, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention , Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Nikki A Hawkins
- 2 National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Disease Promotion, Division of Heart Disease and Stroke Prevention, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention , Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Ashwini Soman
- 3 Northrop Grumman Corporation , Information Systems, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Mary C White
- 1 Epidemiology and Applied Research Branch, Division of Cancer Prevention and Control, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention , Atlanta, Georgia
| | | | - Lisa A DeRoo
- 5 Department of Global Public Health and Primary Care, University of Bergen , Bergen, Norway
| | - Dale P Sandler
- 6 Epidemiology Branch, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences , Durham, North Carolina
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Daly MB, Montgomery S, Bingler R, Ruth K. Communicating genetic test results within the family: Is it lost in translation? A survey of relatives in the randomized six-step study. Fam Cancer 2017; 15:697-706. [PMID: 26897130 PMCID: PMC5010833 DOI: 10.1007/s10689-016-9889-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 73] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/10/2023]
Abstract
Genetic testing for cancer susceptibility genes is increasingly being integrated into medical care. Test results help inform risks of the individual being tested as well as family members who could benefit from knowing the results. The responsibility for informing relatives of genetic test results falls on the proband, the first family member being tested. However, there are several challenges associated with sharing genetic test results within families including incomplete understanding of test results, emotional distance among family members, and poor communication skills. In this paper we describe the communication process between probands randomized to receive BRCA1/2 genetic test results in an enhanced versus a standard of care counseling session, and their first degree relatives with whom they shared results. We contacted 561 first degree relatives of probands who had undergone BRCA1/2 genetic testing to measure their level of understanding of the test results, their difficulty and distress upon hearing the results, the impact of the test results on their risk perception, and their intention to pursue genetic counseling/testing. 82.1 % of relatives correctly reported the test results of their proband. Distress upon hearing the test result was highest for those relatives whose proband received informative test results. Relatives reported a decrease in cancer risk perception after hearing the test results, regardless of the type of result. Intention to pursue counseling/testing was low, even among those relatives whose proband received informative test results. Male relatives were less likely to be informed of test results and more likely to forget hearing them. These results suggest ways to improve the communication process within families.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mary B Daly
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Timothy R. Talbot Jr. Chair for Cancer Research, Fox Chase Cancer Center, 333 Cottman Avenue, Philadelphia, PA, 19111, USA.
| | - Susan Montgomery
- Risk Assessment Program, Department of Clinical Genetics, Fox Chase Cancer Center, 333 Cottman Avenue, Philadelphia, PA, 19111, USA
| | - Ruth Bingler
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Fox Chase Cancer Center, 333 Cottman Avenue, Philadelphia, PA, 19111, USA
| | - Karen Ruth
- Department of Biostatistics, Fox Chase Cancer Center, 333 Cottman Avenue, Philadelphia, PA, 19111, USA
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Karakasis K, Burnier JV, Bowering V, Oza AM, Lheureux S. Ovarian Cancer and BRCA1/2 Testing: Opportunities to Improve Clinical Care and Disease Prevention. Front Oncol 2016; 6:119. [PMID: 27242959 PMCID: PMC4862980 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2016.00119] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/26/2016] [Accepted: 04/28/2016] [Indexed: 01/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Without prevention or screening options available, ovarian cancer is the most lethal malignancy of the female reproductive tract. High-grade serous ovarian cancer (HGSOC) is the most common histologic subtype, and the role of germline BRCA1/2 mutation in predisposition and prognosis is established. Given the targeted treatment opportunities with PARP inhibitors, a predictive role for BRCA1/2 mutation has emerged. Despite recommendations to provide BRCA1/2 testing to all women with histologically confirmed HGSOC, uniform implementation remains challenging. The opportunity to review and revise genetic screening and testing practices will identify opportunities, where universal adoption of BRCA1/2 mutation testing will impact and improve treatment of women with ovarian cancer. Improving education and awareness of genetic testing for women with cancer, as well as the broader general community, will help focus much-needed attention on opportunities to advance prevention and screening programs in ovarian cancer. This is imperative not only for women with cancer and those at risk of developing cancer but also for their first-degree relatives. In addition, BRCA1/2 testing may have direct implications for patients with other types of cancers, many of which are now being found to have BRCA1/2 involvement.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Katherine Karakasis
- Drug Development Program, Division of Medical Oncology and Hematology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Julia V. Burnier
- Drug Development Program, Division of Medical Oncology and Hematology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Valerie Bowering
- Drug Development Program, Division of Medical Oncology and Hematology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Amit M. Oza
- Drug Development Program, Division of Medical Oncology and Hematology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Stephanie Lheureux
- Drug Development Program, Division of Medical Oncology and Hematology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
de Geus E, Aalfs CM, Menko FH, Sijmons RH, Verdam MGE, de Haes HCJM, Smets EMA. Development of the Informing Relatives Inventory (IRI): Assessing Index Patients' Knowledge, Motivation and Self-Efficacy Regarding the Disclosure of Hereditary Cancer Risk Information to Relatives. Int J Behav Med 2016; 22:551-60. [PMID: 25515913 DOI: 10.1007/s12529-014-9455-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Despite the use of genetic services, counselees do not always share hereditary cancer information with at-risk relatives. Reasons for not informing relatives may be categorized as a lack of: knowledge, motivation, and/or self-efficacy. PURPOSE This study aims to develop and test the psychometric properties of the Informing Relatives Inventory, a battery of instruments that intend to measure counselees' knowledge, motivation, and self-efficacy regarding the disclosure of hereditary cancer risk information to at-risk relatives. METHOD Guided by the proposed conceptual framework, existing instruments were selected and new instruments were developed. We tested the instruments' acceptability, dimensionality, reliability, and criterion-related validity in consecutive index patients visiting the Clinical Genetics department with questions regarding hereditary breast and/or ovarian cancer or colon cancer. RESULTS Data of 211 index patients were included (response rate = 62%). The Informing Relatives Inventory (IRI) assesses three barriers in disclosure representing seven domains. Instruments assessing index patients' (positive) motivation and self-efficacy were acceptable and reliable and suggested good criterion-related validity. Psychometric properties of instruments assessing index patients knowledge were disputable. These items were moderately accepted by index patients and the criterion-related validity was weaker. CONCLUSION This study presents a first conceptual framework and associated inventory (IRI) that improves insight into index patients' barriers regarding the disclosure of genetic cancer information to at-risk relatives. Instruments assessing (positive) motivation and self-efficacy proved to be reliable measurements. Measuring index patients knowledge appeared to be more challenging. Further research is necessary to ensure IRI's dimensionality and sensitivity to change.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eveline de Geus
- Department of Medical Psychology, Academic Medical Centre, University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, 1105 AZ, Amsterdam, The Netherlands,
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
27
|
Ummel D, Achille M. Transplant Trajectory and Relational Experience Within Living Kidney Dyads. QUALITATIVE HEALTH RESEARCH 2016; 26:194-203. [PMID: 25700284 DOI: 10.1177/1049732315570128] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/14/2023]
Abstract
Living kidney donation is considered common practice across most Westernized countries. While extensive research has documented the experience of living donors, few studies have addressed the perspective of recipients, and even fewer have examined the experience of donor and recipient as an interactive dyad. In this study, our aim was to examine the reciprocal influence between donors and recipients across the transplantation process. We recruited a homogeneous sample of 10 donors and recipients, who were interviewed individually. Data were analyzed using interpretative phenomenological analysis. The presentation of results follows the stages of the transplantation process: the disease experience, the experience of offering and accepting a kidney, the screening period, the surgery, and the post-transplantation period. Results are discussed within the framework of Mauss's gift exchange theory, social roles, and altruism. This comprehensive description of the dyadic experience provides a way to frame and understand psychosocial aspects and relational implications of living renal transplantation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Deborah Ummel
- Department of psychology, Université de Montréal, Montréal, Québec, Canada
| | - Marie Achille
- Department of psychology, Université de Montréal, Montréal, Québec, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Baars JE, Ausems MGEM, van Riel E, Kars MC, Bleiker EMA. Communication Between Breast Cancer Patients Who Received Inconclusive Genetic Test Results and Their Daughters and Sisters Years After Testing. J Genet Couns 2015; 25:461-71. [PMID: 26446011 DOI: 10.1007/s10897-015-9889-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/22/2014] [Accepted: 09/16/2015] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
Inconclusive genetic test results including screening recommendations for the breast cancer patients and their first-degree relatives are the most common outcomes of BRCA 1/2 testing. Patients themselves should communicate these results to their relatives. Our aim was to explore communication of breast cancer genetic counseling results with daughters and sisters over a long period of time. Breast cancer patients, who had received an inconclusive DNA test result 7-14 years earlier, completed a self-report questionnaire. Additionally, in-depth interviews were conducted and analysed thematically. Of the 93 respondents, 85 (91 %) considered themselves responsible for communicating genetic test results to relatives. In-depth interviews (n = 14) showed, that counselees wanted 'to hand over' their responsibilities to communicate the test results and screening recommendations to their sisters. Although most patients had informed their daughters and sisters about the genetic test results, usually little is spoken about genetic test results and screening recommendations once the duty of informing is completed. We recommend that, similar to the procedure for BRCA1/2-mutation carriers, a separate letter for first-degree relatives of patients with an inconclusive test result should be provided. In this way information about risks and screening recommendations can be verified by family members years after genetic testing has been completed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jessica E Baars
- Department of Medical Genetics, Division of Biomedical Genetics, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
- Division of Psychosocial Research and Epidemiology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066 CX, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Margreet G E M Ausems
- Department of Medical Genetics, Division of Biomedical Genetics, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Els van Riel
- Department of Medical Genetics, Division of Biomedical Genetics, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Marijke C Kars
- Department of Medical Humanities, Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Eveline M A Bleiker
- Division of Psychosocial Research and Epidemiology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066 CX, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
- Family Cancer Clinic, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Patients’ Attitudes Towards Disclosure of Genetic Test Results to Family Members: The Impact of Patients’ Sociodemographic Background and Counseling Experience. J Genet Couns 2015; 25:314-24. [DOI: 10.1007/s10897-015-9873-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/20/2014] [Accepted: 08/06/2015] [Indexed: 10/23/2022]
|
30
|
Taber JM, Chang CQ, Lam TK, Gillanders EM, Hamilton JG, Schully SD. Prevalence and correlates of receiving and sharing high-penetrance cancer genetic test results: findings from the Health Information National Trends Survey. Public Health Genomics 2015; 18:67-77. [PMID: 25427996 DOI: 10.1159/000368745] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/01/2014] [Accepted: 09/30/2014] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND/AIMS The aim of this study was to explore the prevalence and correlates of receiving and sharing high-penetrance cancer genetic test results. METHODS Participants completed the population-based, cross-sectional 2013 Health Information National Trends Survey. We examined sociodemographic characteristics of participants reporting having had BRCA1/2 or Lynch syndrome genetic testing, and sociodemographic and psychosocial correlates of sharing test results with health professionals and family members. RESULTS Participants who underwent BRCA1/2 or Lynch syndrome genetic testing (n = 77; 2.42% of respondents) were more likely to be female and to have a family or personal history of cancer than those not undergoing testing. Approximately three-quarters of participants shared results with health professionals and three-quarters with their family; only 4% did not share results with anyone. Participants who shared results with health professionals reported greater optimism, self-efficacy for health management, and trust in information from their doctors. Participants who shared results with their family were more likely to be female and to have a personal history of cancer, and had greater self-efficacy for health management, perceived less ambiguity in cancer prevention recommendations, and lower cancer prevention fatalism. CONCLUSIONS We identified several novel psychosocial correlates of sharing genetic information. Health professionals may use this information to identify patients less likely to share information with at-risk family members.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jennifer M Taber
- Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, 9609 Medical Center Drive, Room 3E642, Bethesda, MD 20892-9761 (USA). Jennifer.taber @ nih.gov
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
31
|
[Informing the family: emotions and attitudes of oncogenetic counselees for familial breast/ovarian and/or colon cancer risk]. Bull Cancer 2015; 102:162-73. [PMID: 25636360 DOI: 10.1016/j.bulcan.2014.09.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/05/2014] [Accepted: 09/03/2014] [Indexed: 11/21/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Transmission of oncogenetic information (TOI) by probands to their families is of major importance to organize medical prevention in his family. Little is known about the difficulties that the proband faces when he tries to endorse his "duty to warn". METHODS To characterize the barriers to TOI, a survey was performed, previously to the bioethic law of 2011, on a representative sample of 337 counselees seen in the last 10 years at the Centre Jean-Perrin Oncogenetics Department. A questionnaire comprising 97 items was prepared by experts and validated by a group of patients and health professionals. Nineteen Lickert-scale questions specially concerned TOI. RESULTS Analysis found two dimensions, one of emotions and one concerning communication attitudes. Both dimensions were negatively correlated (r=-0.34, P<10(-7)): high emotional levels limited communication attitudes. The probands' history of cancer was the main factor impacting TOI. TOI was more difficult for cancer patients than for healthy counselees (P=0.025). Delay since consultation and type of cancer risk had no bearing on TOI. CONCLUSION Cancer and its treatments seem to deeply affect patient's relatives and limit his capacity to involve his family into the oncogenetic inquiry. Measures are suggested to help ex-patients improve TOI.
Collapse
|
32
|
Abstract
The public expects nurse practitioners (NPs) to be informed about scientific advances and adjust practice as disease screening and management evolves with new research findings. No discipline has evolved more quickly than genomics. This article describes six areas in genomics in which NPs should be competent, concluding with three case studies.
Collapse
|
33
|
Gustafson SL, Raymond VM, Marvin ML, Else T, Koeppe E, Stoffel EM, Everett JN. Outcomes of genetic evaluation for hereditary cancer syndromes in unaffected individuals. Fam Cancer 2014; 14:167-74. [DOI: 10.1007/s10689-014-9756-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
|
34
|
Accuracy of recall of information about a cancer-predisposing BRCA1/2 gene mutation among patients and relatives. Eur J Hum Genet 2014; 23:147-51. [PMID: 24848747 DOI: 10.1038/ejhg.2014.84] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/11/2013] [Revised: 03/11/2014] [Accepted: 03/18/2014] [Indexed: 11/09/2022] Open
Abstract
This observational study aimed to (i) compare the accuracy of information recalled by patients and relatives following genetic counselling about a newly identified BRCA1/2 mutation, (ii) identify differences in accuracy of information about genetics and hereditary cancer and (iii) investigate whether accuracy among relatives improved when information was provided directly by genetics health professionals. Semistructured interviews following results from consultations with 10 breast/ovarian cancer patients and 22 relatives were audio-recorded and transcribed. Information provided by the genetics health professional was tracked through the families and coded for accuracy. Accuracy was analysed using the Wilcoxon Signed-Ranks test. Sources of information were tested using Spearman's rank-order correlation coefficient. Fifty-three percent of the information recalled by patients was accurate. Accuracy of recall among relatives was significantly lower than that among patients (P=0.017). Both groups recalled a lower proportion of information about hereditary cancer than about genetics (P=0.005). Relatives who learnt the information from the patient alone recalled significantly less accurate information than those informed directly by genetics health professionals (P=0.001). Following genetic counselling about a BRCA1/2 mutation, accuracy of recall was low among patients and relatives, particularly about hereditary cancer. Multiple sources of information, including direct contact with genetics health professionals, may improve the accuracy of information among relatives.
Collapse
|
35
|
Hodgson JM, Metcalfe SA, Aitken M, Donath SM, Gaff CL, Winship IM, Delatycki MB, Skene LLC, McClaren BJ, Paul JL, Halliday JL. Improving family communication after a new genetic diagnosis: a randomised controlled trial of a genetic counselling intervention. BMC MEDICAL GENETICS 2014; 15:33. [PMID: 24628824 PMCID: PMC3995589 DOI: 10.1186/1471-2350-15-33] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/14/2014] [Accepted: 03/04/2014] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Genetic information given to an individual newly diagnosed with a genetic condition is likely to have important health implications for other family members. The task of communicating with these relatives commonly falls to the newly diagnosed person. Talking to relatives about genetic information can be challenging and is influenced by many factors including family dynamics. Research shows that many relatives remain unaware of relevant genetic information and the possible impact on their own health. This study aims to evaluate whether a specific genetic counselling intervention for people newly diagnosed with a genetic condition, implemented over the telephone on a number of occasions, could increase the number of at-risk relatives who make contact with genetics services after a new genetic diagnosis within a family. METHODS This is a prospective, multi-centre randomised controlled trial being conducted at genetics clinics at five public hospitals in Victoria, Australia. A complex genetic counselling intervention has been developed specifically for this trial. Probands (the first person in a family to present with a diagnosis of a genetic condition) are being recruited and randomised into one of two arms - the telephone genetic counselling intervention arm and the control arm receiving usual care. The number of at-risk relatives for each proband will be estimated from a family pedigree collected at the time of diagnosis. The primary outcome will be measured by comparing the proportion of at-risk relatives in each arm of the trial who make subsequent contact with genetics services. DISCUSSION This study, the first randomised controlled trial of a complex genetic counselling intervention to enhance family communication, will provide evidence about how best to assist probands to communicate important new genetic information to their at-risk relatives. This will inform genetic counselling practice in the context of future genomic testing. TRIAL REGISTRATION Australia and New Zealand Clinical Trials Register (ANZCTR): ANZCTRN12608000642381.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jan M Hodgson
- Department of Paediatrics, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
- Murdoch Childrens Research Institute, MCRI, 5th Floor Royal Childrens Hospital, Melbourne 3052, Australia
| | - Sylvia A Metcalfe
- Department of Paediatrics, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
- Murdoch Childrens Research Institute, MCRI, 5th Floor Royal Childrens Hospital, Melbourne 3052, Australia
| | - MaryAnne Aitken
- Department of Paediatrics, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
- Murdoch Childrens Research Institute, MCRI, 5th Floor Royal Childrens Hospital, Melbourne 3052, Australia
| | - Susan M Donath
- Department of Paediatrics, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
- Murdoch Childrens Research Institute, MCRI, 5th Floor Royal Childrens Hospital, Melbourne 3052, Australia
| | - Clara L Gaff
- Murdoch Childrens Research Institute, MCRI, 5th Floor Royal Childrens Hospital, Melbourne 3052, Australia
- Walter and Eliza Hall Institute, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Ingrid M Winship
- Genetic Medicine, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, Australia
- Department of Medicine, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Martin B Delatycki
- Bruce LeFroy Centre for Genetic Health Research, MCRI, Melbourne, Australia
- Department of Genetics, Austin Health, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Loane LC Skene
- Melbourne Law School, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Belinda J McClaren
- Murdoch Childrens Research Institute, MCRI, 5th Floor Royal Childrens Hospital, Melbourne 3052, Australia
| | - Jean L Paul
- Department of Paediatrics, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
- Murdoch Childrens Research Institute, MCRI, 5th Floor Royal Childrens Hospital, Melbourne 3052, Australia
| | - Jane L Halliday
- Department of Paediatrics, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
- Murdoch Childrens Research Institute, MCRI, 5th Floor Royal Childrens Hospital, Melbourne 3052, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Abstract
In the care of patients with Lynch Syndrome (LS), a range of psychosocial issues are encountered, which significantly affect patient outcomes. A brief historical background of 'psycho-onco-genetics' (the domain where psychology, oncology and genetics meet) in relation to LS is presented, followed by an overview of important psychosocial issues identified in the past 20 years. The identification of mismatch repair genes in 1993-1994 made possible genetic counseling and testing for patients who had cancer and for potentially high-risk relatives without cancer. At that time, concerns were raised about the potentially negative psychosocial impact of predictive genetic testing. Since 1993, a large number of studies have been conducted to investigate the possible psychosocial benefits and limitations of such testing. This article presents an overview of: the uptake of and motivations for genetic testing, its psychosocial impact (e.g. psychological adaptation, impact on risk perception and self-concept, and concerns about, and experiences of, genetic discrimination), psychological screening instruments, adherence to and decision-making about preventive strategies, family communication, lifestyle changes, reproductive technology utilization, and professional psychosocial support needs of members of families with LS. Finally, challenges for the future are discussed, including population screening and genomic testing.
Collapse
|
37
|
Pal T, Vadaparampil ST. Genetic risk assessments in individuals at high risk for inherited breast cancer in the breast oncology care setting. Cancer Control 2013; 19:255-66. [PMID: 23037493 DOI: 10.1177/107327481201900402] [Citation(s) in RCA: 32] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND It has become increasingly common to consider BRCA mutation status when determining optimal cancer risk management and treatment options in order to improve patient outcomes. Knowledge about the risk for hereditary cancer at or as close as possible to the time of diagnosis allows patients access to the most risk reduction options available. METHODS This paper illustrates the role of genetic risk assessment for hereditary breast cancer, using hereditary breast and ovarian cancer (HBOC) syndrome as a model due to germline mutations in the BRCA1 and BRCA2. Specifically, the value of genetic counseling and testing for HBOC across the cancer prevention and control continuum is outlined as it pertains to breast cancer. RESULTS In recognition of the importance of risk assessment for hereditary breast cancer, leading health professional organizations have developed specific guidelines and recommendations to providers for identification of women at increased risk for carrying a BRCA mutation. CONCLUSIONS Institutional efforts specific to genetic counseling and testing have resulted in the implementation of a model driven by physician recommendation as a referral system for high-risk breast cancer patients. Establishing an infrastructure to support research, education, and outreach initiatives focused on BRCA genetic counseling and testing will provide information that can improve the delivery of cancer genetics services.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tuya Pal
- Population Sciences Department of Cancer Epidemiology, Moffitt Cancer Center & Research Institute, Tampa, FL 33612, USA.
| | | |
Collapse
|
38
|
Wiens ME, Wilson BJ, Honeywell C, Etchegary H. A family genetic risk communication framework: guiding tool development in genetics health services. J Community Genet 2013; 4:233-42. [PMID: 23319393 PMCID: PMC3666832 DOI: 10.1007/s12687-012-0134-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 34] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/15/2012] [Accepted: 12/20/2012] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Family communication of genetic risk information is a complex process. Currently, there are no evidence-based interventions to help genetics professionals facilitate the process of disclosure within families. This study was designed to create a framework to assist in the development of tools to support patients in communicating genetic risk information to family members. A systematic review identified the factors relevant in communicating genetic risk information in families. A guiding theory for the proposed framework was selected and populated with the factors identified from the review. The review identified 112 factors of relevance. The theory of planned behaviour was selected to guide framework development, organising the framework in terms of the patient's attitudes about disclosure, perceived pressure to disclose and perceived control over disclosure. Attitudes about disclosure are influenced by a desire to protect oneself or family members, and the patient's perceptions of relevance of the information for family members, responsibility to disclose, family members' rights to information and the usefulness of communicating. Perceived pressure to disclose information is shaped by genetic professionals, family members and society. Perceived control over disclosure is affected by family relationships/dynamics, personal communication skills, the ability of the patient and family to understand the information and coping skills of the patient and family member. The family genetic risk communication framework presents a concise synthesis of the evidence on family communication of genetic information; it may be useful in creating and evaluating tools to help genetic counsellors and patients with communication issues.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Miriam E Wiens
- CF Health Services Group Headquarters, Department of National Defence, 1745 Alta Vista Drive, Ottawa, ON, Canada, K1A 0K6,
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
39
|
Lapointe J, Dorval M, Noguès C, Fabre R, Julian-Reynier C. Is the psychological impact of genetic testing moderated by support and sharing of test results to family and friends? Fam Cancer 2013; 12:601-10. [DOI: 10.1007/s10689-013-9621-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/10/2023]
|
40
|
Patenaude AF, Tung N, Ryan PD, Ellisen LW, Hewitt L, Schneider KA, Tercyak KP, Aldridge J, Garber JE. Young adult daughters of BRCA1/2 positive mothers: what do they know about hereditary cancer and how much do they worry? Psychooncology 2013; 22:2024-31. [PMID: 23417902 DOI: 10.1002/pon.3257] [Citation(s) in RCA: 41] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/01/2012] [Revised: 01/07/2013] [Accepted: 01/14/2013] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The objectives of this study are to determine (i) what daughters, ages 18-24 years, of BRCA1/2 mutation carriers understand about their 50% chance of carrying a BRCA1/2 mutation and about risk reduction or management options for mutation carriers, (ii) the extent and nature of daughters' cancer-related distress, and (iii) the effects of knowing mother's mutation status on daughters' future plans. METHODS A total of 40 daughters, currently aged 18-24 years, of mothers who tested positive for a mutation in BRCA1/2 were invited by mail to participate (with contact information supplied by their mothers). Daughters participated in a qualitative telephone interview about the impact of learning their mother's mutation status on their understanding of their own cancer risks and their cancer-related distress, and their knowledge of screening strategies, risk-reducing surgery, current health status, and future plans. Participants also completed study-specific demographic and family history questionnaires, the Brief Symptom Inventory-18, Impact of Event Scale (with hereditary predisposition to breast/ovarian cancer as the event), and the Breast Cancer Genetic Counseling Knowledge Questionnaire. RESULTS Daughters' genetic knowledge is suboptimal; gaps and misconceptions were common. Over 1/3 of the daughters reported high cancer-related distress, despite normal levels of general distress. Disclosed genetic information raised future concerns, especially regarding childbearing. CONCLUSION Targeted professional attention to this high-risk cohort of young women is critical to inform the next generation of daughters of BRCA1/2 mutation carriers and encourage recommended screening by age 25 years. Improved uptake of screening and risk reduction options could improve survival, and psychoeducation could reduce cancer-related distress.
Collapse
|
41
|
Bellcross CA, Leadbetter S, Alford SH, Peipins LA. Prevalence and healthcare actions of women in a large health system with a family history meeting the 2005 USPSTF recommendation for BRCA genetic counseling referral. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2013; 22:728-35. [PMID: 23371291 DOI: 10.1158/1055-9965.epi-12-1280] [Citation(s) in RCA: 50] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND In 2005, the United States Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) released guidelines which outlined specific family history patterns associated with an increased risk for BRCA1/2 mutations, and recommended at-risk individuals be referred for genetic counseling and evaluation for BRCA testing. The purpose of this study was to assess the prevalence of individuals with a USPSTF increased-risk family history pattern, the frequency with which specific patterns were met, and resulting healthcare actions among women from the Henry Ford Health System. METHODS As part of a study evaluating ovarian cancer risk perception and screening, 2,524 randomly selected participants completed a detailed interview (response rate 76%) from an initial eligible cohort of 16,720 women. RESULTS Approximately 6% of participants had a family history fulfilling one or more of the USPSTF patterns. Although 90% of these women had shared their family history with their provider, less than 20% had been referred for genetic counseling and only 8% had undergone genetic testing. Caucasian women with higher income and education levels were more likely to receive referrals. Among the 95 participants in the total study cohort who reported BRCA testing, 78% did not have a family history that met one of the USPSTF patterns. CONCLUSIONS These results suggest a higher prevalence of women with an increased-risk family history than originally predicted by the USPSTF, and lack of provider recognition and referral for genetic services. IMPACT Improvements in healthcare infrastructure and clinician education will be required to realize population level benefits from BRCA genetic counseling and testing.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cecelia A Bellcross
- Emory University School of Medicine, Department of Human Genetics, Whitehead Building, Suite 301, 615 Michael Street, Atlanta, GA 30322, USA.
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
42
|
Family Communication Following BRCA1/2 Genetic Testing: A Close Look at the Process. J Genet Couns 2012; 22:323-35. [DOI: 10.1007/s10897-012-9559-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/12/2012] [Accepted: 11/29/2012] [Indexed: 10/27/2022]
|
43
|
Lapointe J, Côté C, Bouchard K, Godard B, Simard J, Dorval M. Life events may contribute to family communication about cancer risk following BRCA1/2 testing. J Genet Couns 2012; 22:249-57. [PMID: 22892900 DOI: 10.1007/s10897-012-9531-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/23/2011] [Accepted: 07/19/2012] [Indexed: 02/01/2023]
Abstract
We assessed whether certain life events contributed to the communication about cancer risk within families who have undergone BRCA1/2 testing. We also explored what type of resources participants would have valued to help in supporting family communication about genetic information. Two hundred and forty-six individuals (218 women, 28 men) who received a BRCA1/2 genetic test result 3 to 10 years earlier (mean of 6.4 years) participated in a telephone interview. Participants were asked about the occurrence of a number of life events (cancer diagnosis, death, uptake of prophylactic surgery, and providing care to a family member with cancer) in their family since their BRCA1/2 test result disclosure and, for each occurrence, whether it fostered family communication about cancer risk. A total of 182 participants (74 %) reported that they or one of their relatives received a cancer diagnosis, 176 (72 %) reported that someone died in their family, and 73 (30 %) stated that they or one of their relatives undertook a prophylactic surgery. During this period, 109 participants (44 %) also provided care for a family member who had cancer. Among participants who reported these life events, family communication was fostered by these events in proportions varying from 50 % (death) to 69 % (cancer diagnosis). Our results indicate that life events may contribute to family communication about cancer risk. Further research is needed to determine whether these events provide a "window of opportunity" to reach family members, address their needs and concerns about cancer, update family cancer history, and introduce genetic counseling and risk assessment.
Collapse
|
44
|
Do Breast Cancer Patients Tested in the Oncology Care Setting Share BRCA Mutation Results with Family Members and Health Care Providers? J Cancer Epidemiol 2012; 2012:498062. [PMID: 22848222 PMCID: PMC3403073 DOI: 10.1155/2012/498062] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/02/2012] [Accepted: 05/25/2012] [Indexed: 01/05/2023] Open
Abstract
BRCA genetic test results provide important information to manage cancer risk for patients and their families. Little is known on the communication of genetic test results by mutation status with family members and physicians in the oncology care setting. As part of a longitudinal study evaluating the impact of genetic counseling and testing among recently diagnosed breast cancer patients, we collected patients' self-reported patterns of disclosure. Descriptive statistics characterized the sample and determined the prevalence of disclosure of BRCA test results to family members and physicians. Of 100 patients who completed the baseline and the 6-month followup survey, 77 reported pursuing testing. The majority shared test results with female first-degree relatives; fewer did with males. Participants were more likely to share results with oncologists compared to surgeons, primary care physicians, or other specialty physicians. These findings suggest that while breast cancer patients may communicate results to at-risk female family members and their medical oncologist, they may need education and support to facilitate communication to other first-degree relatives and providers.
Collapse
|