Positive and negative control of virus-induced interferon-A gene expression

Transcriptomic profiling of different responder types in adults after a Priorix® vaccination

Thanks to the recommendation of a combined Measles/Mumps/Rubella (MMR) vaccine, like Priorix®, these childhood diseases are less common now. This is beneficial to limit the spread of these diseases and work towards their elimination. However, the measles, mumps and rubella antibody titers show a large variability in short- and long-term immunity. The recent outbreaks worldwide of measles and mumps and previous studies, which mostly focused on only one of the three virus responses, illustrate that there is a clear need for better understanding the immune responses after vaccination. Our healthy cohort was already primed with the MMR antigens in their childhood. In this study, the adult volunteers received one Priorix® vaccine dose at day 0. First, we defined 4 different groups of responders, based on their antibody titers' evolution over 4 time points (Day 0, 21, 150 and 365). This showed a high variability within and between individuals. Second, we determined transcriptome profiles using 3'mRNA sequencing at day 0, 3 and 7. Using two analytical approaches, "one response group per time point" and "a time comparison per response group", we correlated the short-term gene expression profiles to the different response groups. In general, the list of differentially expressed genes is limited, however, most of them are clearly immune-related and upregulated at day 3 and 7, compared to the baseline day 0. Depending on the specific response group there are overlapping signatures for two of the three viruses. Antibody titers and transcriptomics data showed that an additional Priorix vaccination does not facilitate an equal immune response against the 3 viruses or among different vaccine recipients.

Differential requirement of histone acetylase and deacetylase activities for IRF5-mediated proinflammatory cytokine expression

Recent evidence indicates a new role for histone deacetylases (HDACs) in the activation of genes governing the host immune response. Virus, along with other pathogenic stimuli, triggers an antiviral defense mechanism through the induction of IFN, IFN-stimulated genes, and other proinflammatory cytokines. Many of these genes have been shown to be regulated by transcription factors of the IFN regulatory factor (IRF) family. Recent studies from IRF5 knockout mice have confirmed a critical role for IRF5 in virus-induced type I IFN expression and proinflammatory cytokines IL-6, IL-12, and TNF-α; yet, little is known of the molecular mechanism of IRF5-mediated proinflammatory cytokine expression. In this study, we show that both HDACs and histone acetyltransferases (HATs) associate with IRF5, leading to alterations in its transactivation ability. Using the HDAC inhibitor trichostatin A, we demonstrate that ISRE, IFNA, and IL6 promoters require HDAC activity for transactivation and transcription, whereas TNFα does not. Mapping the interaction of corepressor proteins (HDAC1, silencing mediator of retinoid and thyroid receptor/nuclear corepressor of retinoid receptor, and Sin3a) and HATs to IRF5 revealed distinct differences, including the dependence of IRF5 phosphorylation on HAT association resulting in IRF5 acetylation. Data presented in this study support a mechanism whereby virus triggers the dynamic conversion of an IRF5-mediated silencing complex to that of an activating complex on promoters of target genes. These data provide the first evidence, to our knowledge, of a tightly controlled transcriptional mechanism whereby IRF5 regulates proinflammatory cytokine expression in conjunction with HATs and HDACs.

Distinct Signature Type I Interferon Responses are Determined by the Infecting virus and the Target Cell

Background

Type I interferons (IFN) include multiple IFN-α subtypes which exhibit considerable amino acid identity and activate the same cell-surface receptor. The promoter regions of the IFN-α genes, however, have different transcription factor binding sites, implying differential transcriptional activation. Evolutionary conservation of multiple subtypes may have resulted from external pressures associated with the crucial nature of an IFN response, namely that different viruses that are tropic for different target tissues determine the nature and extent of an IFN response, specifically the IFN-α subtype profile.

Methods

Studies were undertaken to examine inducible IFN gene expression profiles in response to infection with single-stranded RNA viruses: Sendai virus (SeV), murine hepatitis virus (MHV-1) and coxsackie virus B3 (CVB3).

Results

In vitro, distinct signature profiles of SeV and MHV-1-inducible gene expression for IFN-α2, IFN-α4 and IFN-α5 subtypes in L2 and L929 mouse fibroblast cells, in relation to the extent and kinetics of their induction, were identified. In vivo, whereas A/J mice are highly permissive for both MHV-1 and CVB3 infections and mount a poor IFN response, C57Bl/6 mice are relatively resistant to both virus infections and mount a vigorous IFN response.

Conclusions

These data suggest that the infecting virus and the target cell type dictate the extent and signature of inducible type I IFN gene expression. The extent of IFN response to viral infection influences the subsequent biological outcome: a robust IFN response prescribes a level of resistance, whereas a poor IFN response contributes towards a permissive phenotype for infection.

A repetitive region of gammaherpesvirus genomic DNA is a ligand for induction of type I interferon

Innate immune responses against viral infection, especially the induction of type I interferon, are critical for limiting the replication of the virus. Although it has been shown that DNA can induce type I interferon, to date no natural DNA ligand of a virus that induces type I interferon has been described. Here we screened the genome of murine gammaherpesvirus 68 with mutations at various genomic locations to map the region of DNA that induces type I interferon. A repetitive region termed the 100-base-pair repeat region is a ligand that is both necessary and sufficient for the viral genomic DNA to induce type I interferon. A region colinear with this ligand in the genome of Kaposi's sarcoma-associated herpesvirus also induces type I interferon. We have thus defined a repetitive region of the genomes of gammaherpesviruses as the first natural DNA virus ligand that induces type I interferon.

Binding of YY1 to the proximal region of the murine beta interferon promoter is essential to allow CBP recruitment and K8H4/K14H3 acetylation on the promoter region after virus infection

Virus-induced activation of the beta interferon (IFN-beta) gene requires orderly recruitment of chromatin-remodeling complexes and time-regulated acetylation of histone residues K8H4 and K14H3 on the promoter region. We have previously shown that transcription factor Yin Yang 1 (YY1) binds the murine IFN-beta promoter at two sites (-122 and -90) regulating promoter transcriptional capacity with a dual activator/repressor role. In this work we demonstrate that both YY1 -122 and -90 sites are required for CBP recruitment and K8H4/K14H3 acetylation to take place on the IFN-beta promoter region after virus infection. A single point mutation introduced at either one of these two sites inhibiting YY1 binding completely disrupted CBP recruitment and K8H4/K14H3 acetylation independently of HMGI or IRF3 binding to the promoter. We have previously demonstrated that YY1 represses the transcriptional capacity of the IFN-beta promoter through its -90 site via histone deacetylation. Here we demonstrate that, in vivo, the binding of YY1 to the -90 site is constant all through virus infection whereas the binding of YY1 to the -122 site is activated after infection. We discuss here the capacity of YY1 to either repress (through histone deacetylase recruitment) or activate (through CBP recruitment) IFN-beta gene expression according to the occupancy of either only its -90 site or both its -122 and -90 sites.

The POU transcription factor Oct-1 represses virus-induced interferon A gene expression

Alpha interferon (IFN-alpha) and IFN-beta are able to interfere with viral infection. They exert a vast array of biologic functions, including growth arrest, cell differentiation, and immune system regulation. This regulation extends from innate immunity to cellular and humoral adaptive immune responses. A strict control of expression is needed to prevent detrimental effects of unregulated IFN. Multiple IFN-A subtypes are coordinately induced in human and mouse cells infected by virus and exhibit differences in expression of their individual mRNAs. We demonstrated that the weakly expressed IFN-A11 gene is negatively regulated after viral infection, due to a distal negative regulatory element, binding homeoprotein pituitary homeobox 1 (Pitx1). Here we show that the POU protein Oct-1 binds in vitro and in vivo to the IFN-A11 promoter and represses IFN-A expression upon interferon regulatory factor overexpression. Furthermore, we show that Oct-1-deficient MEFs exhibit increased in vivo IFN-A gene expression and increased antiviral activity. Finally, the IFN-A expression pattern is modified in Oct-1-deficient MEFs. The broad representation of effective and potent octamer-like sequences within IFN-A promoters suggests an important role for Oct-1 in IFN-A regulation.

Modulation of human herpesvirus 8/Kaposi's sarcoma-associated herpesvirus replication and transcription activator transactivation by interferon regulatory factor 7

Human herpesvirus 8 (HHV-8)/Kaposi's sarcoma-associated herpesvirus infection goes through lytic and latent phases that are regulated by viral gene products, but very little is known about the involvement of host proteins. The replication and transcription activator (RTA) is a viral protein sufficient to initiate lytic replication by activating downstream genes, including the viral early gene open reading frame 57 (ORF 57), which codes for a posttranscriptional activator. In this study, we demonstrate that cellular interferon regulatory factor 7 (IRF-7) negatively regulates this process by competing with RTA for binding to the RTA response element in the ORF 57 promoter to down-regulate RTA-induced gene expression. We also show that alpha interferon represses RTA-mediated transactivation and that repression involves IRF-7. Our study indicates that upon HHV-8 infection, the host responds by suppression of lytic gene expression through binding of IRF-7 to the lytic viral gene promoter. These findings suggest that HHV-8 has developed a novel mechanism to induce but then subvert the innate antiviral response, specifically the interferon-signaling pathway, to regulate RTA activity and ultimately the viral latent/lytic replicative cycle.