The prevalence of anti-acetylcholinesterase antibodies in autoimmune disease

Improving laboratory diagnostics in myasthenia gravis

Introduction: Myasthenia gravis (MG) is a prototypical autoimmune disease, characterized by pathogenic autoantibodies targeting structures of the neuromuscular junction. Radioimmunoprecipitation assays (RIPAs) represent the gold standard for their detection. However, new methods are emerging to complement, or overcome RIPAs, also with the perspective of eliminating the use of radioactive reagents.Areas covered: We discuss advances in laboratory methods, prompted especially by cell-based assays (CBAs), for the detection of the autoantibodies of MG diagnostics, above all those to the nicotinic acetylcholine receptor (AChR), muscle-specific kinase (MuSK), and low molecular-weight receptor-related low-density lipoprotein-4 (LRP4).Expert opinion: CBA technology makes AChRs aggregate on cell membranes, thus allowing to detect autoantibodies to clustered AChRs, with reduction of seronegative MG cases. The diagnostic relevance of RIPA/CBA-measurable LRP4 antibodies is still unclear, in Caucasian patients at least. Live CBAs for the detection of AChR, MuSK, and LRP4 antibodies might represent an alternative to RIPAs, but first require full validation. CBAs could be used as screening tests, limiting RIPAs for antibody quantification. To this end, ELISAs might be an alternative.Fixation procedures preserving enough degree of antigen conformationality could yield AChR and MuSK CBAs suitable for a wide use in clinical-chemistry laboratories.

Myasthenia Gravis: Autoantibody Specificities and Their Role in MG Management

Myasthenia gravis (MG) is the most common autoimmune disorder affecting the neuromuscular junction, characterized by skeletal muscle weakness and fatigability. It is caused by autoantibodies targeting proteins of the neuromuscular junction; ~85% of MG patients have autoantibodies against the muscle acetylcholine receptor (AChR-MG), whereas about 5% of MG patients have autoantibodies against the muscle specific kinase (MuSK-MG). In the remaining about 10% of patients no autoantibodies can be found with the classical diagnostics for AChR and MuSK antibodies (seronegative MG, SN-MG). Since serological tests are relatively easy and non-invasive for disease diagnosis, the improvement of methods for the detection of known autoantibodies or the discovery of novel autoantibody specificities to diminish SN-MG and to facilitate differential diagnosis of similar diseases, is crucial. Radioimmunoprecipitation assays (RIPA) are the staple for MG antibody detection, but over the past years, using cell-based assays (CBAs) or improved highly sensitive RIPAs, it has been possible to detect autoantibodies in previously SN-MG patients. This led to the identification of more patients with antibodies to the classical antigens AChR and MuSK and to the third MG autoantigen, the low-density lipoprotein receptor-related protein 4 (LRP4), while antibodies against other extracellular or intracellular targets, such as agrin, K_v1.4 potassium channels, collagen Q, titin, the ryanodine receptor and cortactin have been found in some MG patients. Since the autoantigen targeted determines in part the clinical manifestations, prognosis and response to treatment, serological tests are not only indispensable for initial diagnosis, but also for monitoring treatment efficacy. Importantly, knowing the autoantibody profile of MG patients could allow for more efficient personalized therapeutic approaches. Significant progress has been made over the past years toward the development of antigen-specific therapies, targeting only the specific immune cells or autoantibodies involved in the autoimmune response. In this review, we will present the progress made toward the development of novel sensitive autoantibody detection assays, the identification of new MG autoantigens, and the implications for improved antigen-specific therapeutics. These advancements increase our understanding of MG pathology and improve patient quality of life by providing faster, more accurate diagnosis and better disease management.

Autoantibody Specificities in Myasthenia Gravis; Implications for Improved Diagnostics and Therapeutics

Myasthenia gravis (MG) is an autoimmune disease characterized by muscle weakness and fatiguability of skeletal muscles. It is an antibody-mediated disease, caused by autoantibodies targeting neuromuscular junction proteins. In the majority of patients (~85%) antibodies against the muscle acetylcholine receptor (AChR) are detected, while in 6% antibodies against the muscle-specific kinase (MuSK) are detected. In ~10% of MG patients no autoantibodies can be found with the classical diagnostics for AChR and MuSK antibodies (seronegative MG, SN-MG), making the improvement of methods for the detection of known autoantibodies or the discovery of novel antigenic targets imperative. Over the past years, using cell-based assays or improved highly sensitive immunoprecipitation assays, it has been possible to detect autoantibodies in previously SN-MG patients, including the identification of the low-density lipoprotein receptor-related protein 4 (LRP4) as a third MG autoantigen, as well as AChR and MuSK antibodies undetectable by conventional methods. Furthermore, antibodies against other extracellular or intracellular targets, such as titin, the ryanodine receptor, agrin, collagen Q, K_v1.4 potassium channels and cortactin have been found in some MG patients, which can be useful biomarkers. In addition to the improvement of diagnosis, the identification of the patients' autoantibody specificity is important for their stratification into respective subgroups, which can differ in terms of clinical manifestations, prognosis and most importantly their response to therapies. The knowledge of the autoantibody profile of MG patients would allow for a therapeutic strategy tailored to their MG subgroup. This is becoming especially relevant as there is increasing progress toward the development of antigen-specific therapies, targeting only the specific autoantibodies or immune cells involved in the autoimmune response, such as antigen-specific immunoadsorption, which have shown promising results. We will herein review the advances made by us and others toward development of more sensitive detection methods and the identification of new antibody targets in MG, and discuss their significance in MG diagnosis and therapy. Overall, the development of novel autoantibody assays is aiding in the more accurate diagnosis and classification of MG patients, supporting the development of advanced therapeutics and ultimately the improvement of disease management and patient quality of life.

Prevalence of myasthenia gravis and associated autoantibodies in paraneoplastic pemphigus and their correlations with symptoms and prognosis

BACKGROUND

Paraneoplastic pemphigus (PNP) involves multiple organs, but little is known about its neurological involvement.

OBJECTIVES

To investigate the symptoms, prognosis and profiles of associated autoantibodies in myasthenia gravis (MG), and their correlations in patients with PNP.

METHODS

Fifty-eight patients with PNP were assessed for myasthenic symptoms and laboratory evidence. Serum autoantibodies against acetylcholine receptor (AChR), acetylcholinesterase (AChE), titin, ryanodine receptor (RyR) and muscle-specific kinase (MuSK) were measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Patients with pemphigus vulgaris (PV), pemphigus foliaceus (PF), connective tissue disease (CTD) and non-PNP MG (NP-MG), and healthy donors, served as controls. These autoantibodies in PNP were also compared in the presence or absence of dyspnoea or muscle weakness. Cox regression and log-rank tests were used for survival analysis.

RESULTS

Overall 39% of patients with PNP experienced muscle weakness, and 35% were diagnosed with MG. Moreover, 35% had positive anti-AChR and 28% had anti-AChE antibodies, similarly to NP-MG (33% and 17%, respectively, P > 0·05). However, both were negative in all patients with PV, PF and CTD and healthy donors (P < 0·005). No other antibodies showed significant differences among groups. Anti-AChR and anti-AChE antibody levels were significantly increased in patients with PNP with dyspnoea, while anti-AChR, anti-titin and anti-RyR were significantly increased in patients with PNP with muscle weakness (P < 0·05). Nevertheless, levels and positive rates of these autoantibodies showed no significant differences between PNP with Castleman disease and thymoma. Although anti-AChE levels impacted survival duration (P  =  0·027, odds ratio 3·14), MG complications did not affect the overall survival percentage in PNP.

CONCLUSIONS

MG is a complication of PNP. Anti-AChR and anti-AChE antibodies are prominent in patients with PNP, especially those with dyspnoea.

Muscle autoantibodies in myasthenia gravis: beyond diagnosis?

Myasthenia gravis is an autoimmune disorder of the neuromuscular junction. A number of molecules, including ion channels and other proteins at the neuromuscular junction, may be targeted by autoantibodies leading to abnormal neuromuscular transmission. In approximately 85% of patients, autoantibodies, directed against the postsynaptic nicotinic acetylcholine receptor can be detected in the serum and confirm the diagnosis, but in general, do not precisely predict the degree of weakness or response to therapy. Antibodies to the muscle-specific tyrosine kinase are detected in approximately 50% of generalized myasthenia gravis patients who are seronegative for anti-acetylcholine receptor antibodies, and levels of anti-muscle-specific tyrosine kinase antibodies do appear to correlate with disease severity and treatment response. Antibodies to other muscle antigens may be found in the subsets of myasthenia gravis patients, potentially providing clinically useful diagnostic information, but their utility as relevant biomarkers (measures of disease state or response to treatment) is currently unclear.

The auto-antigen repertoire in myasthenia gravis

Myasthenia Gravis (MG) is an antibody-mediated autoimmune disorder affecting the postsynaptic membrane of the neuromuscular junction (NMJ). MG is characterized by an impaired signal transmission between the motor neuron and the skeletal muscle cell, caused by auto-antibodies directed against NMJ proteins. The auto-antibodies target the nicotinic acetylcholine receptor (nAChR) in about 90% of MG patients. In approximately 5% of MG patients, the muscle specific kinase (MuSK) is the auto-antigen. In the remaining 5% of MG patients, however, antibodies against the nAChR or MuSK are not detectable (idiopathic MG, iMG). Although only the anti-nAChR and anti-MuSK auto-antibodies have been demonstrated to be pathogenic, several other antibodies recognizing self-antigens can also be found in MG patients. Various auto-antibodies associated with thymic abnormalities have been reported, as well as many non-MG-specific auto-antibodies. However, their contribution to the cause, pathology and severity of the disease is still poorly understood. Here, we comprehensively review the reported auto-antibodies in MG patients and discuss their role in the pathology of this autoimmune disease.

Investigations into the development of catalytic activity in anti-acetylcholinesterase idiotypic and anti-idiotypic antibodies

We have previously described anti-acetylcholinesterase antibodies that display acetylcholinesterase-like catalytic activity. No evidence of contaminating enzymes was found, and the antibodies are kinetically and apparently structurally distinct from both acetylcholinesterase (AChE) and butyrylcholinesterase. We have also mimicked the antibody catalytic sites in anti-anti-idiotypic (Ab3) antibodies. Independently from us, similar acetylcholinesterase-like antibodies have been raised as anti-idiotypic (Ab2) antibodies against a non-catalytic anti-acetylcholinesterase antibody, AE-2. In this paper, we describe an epitope analysis, using synthetic peptides in ELISA and competition ELISA, and a peptide array, of five catalytic anti-acetylcholinesterase antibodies (Ab1s), three catalytic Ab3s, as well as antibody AE-2 and a non-catalytic Ab2. The catalytic Ab1s and Ab3s recognized three Pro- and Gly-containing sequences ((40)PPMGPRRFL, (78)PGFEGTE, and (258)PPGGTGGNDTELVAC) on the AChE surface. As these sequences do not adjoin in the AChE structure, recognition would appear to be due to cross-reaction. This was confirmed by the observation that the sequences superimpose structurally. The non-catalytic antibodies, AE-2 and the Ab2, recognized AChE's peripheral anionic site (PAS), in particular, the sequence (70)YQYVD, which contains two of the site's residues. The crystal structure of the AChE tetramer (Bourne et al., 1999) shows direct interaction and high complementarity between the (257)CPPGGTGGNDTELVAC sequence and the PAS. Antibodies recognizing the sequence and the PAS may, in turn, be complementary; this may account for the apparent paradox of catalytic development in both Ab1s and Ab2s. The PAS binds, but does not hydrolyze, substrate. The catalytic Ab1s, therefore, recognize a site that may function as a substrate analog, and this, together with the presence of an Arg-Glu salt bridge in the epitope, suggests mechanisms whereby catalytic activity may have developed. In conclusion, the development of AChE-like catalytic activity in anti-AChE Ab1s and Ab2s appears to be the result of a combination of structural complementarity to a substrate-binding site, charge complementarity to a salt bridge, and specific structural peculiarities of the AChE molecule.