Long term safety of IVIg therapy in multiple sclerosis: 10 years experience

IVIg-induced headache: prospective study of a large cohort with neurological disorders

BACKGROUND

Intravenous immune globulin (IVIg) is frequently used in some neurological diseases and is also the first-line therapy in Guillain-Barré syndrome, chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy, and multifocal motor neuropathy. We aimed to evaluate the frequency and characteristics of headaches, which is one of the most common side effects of IVIg treatment.

METHODS

Patients who received IVIg treatment for neurological diseases were prospectively enrolled in 23 centers. Firstly, the characteristics of patients with and without IVIg-induced headaches were analyzed statistically. Then, patients with IVIg-induced headaches were classified into three subgroups determined by their history: no primary headache, tension-type headache (TTH), and migraine.

RESULTS

A total of 464 patients (214 women) and 1548 IVIg infusions were enrolled between January and August 2022. The frequency of IVIg-related headaches was 27.37% (127/464). A binary logistic regression analysis performed with significant clinical features disclosed that female sex and fatigue as a side effect were statistically more common in the IVIg-induced headache group. IVIg-related headache duration was long and affected daily living activities more in patients with migraine compared to no primary headache and TTH groups (p = 0.01, respectively).

CONCLUSION

Headache is more likely to occur in female patients receiving IVIg and those who develop fatigue as a side effect during the infusion. Clinicians' awareness of IVIg-related headache characteristics, especially in patients with migraine, may increase treatment compliance.

Cost-Effectiveness of Repository Corticotropin Injection for the Treatment of Acute Exacerbations in Multiple Sclerosis

Background

Relapses are common among patients with multiple sclerosis (MS) despite treatment with disease-modifying therapies. Repository corticotropin injection (RCI, Acthar^® Gel), plasmapheresis (PMP), and intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg) are alternative therapies for MS relapse. There is a dearth of economic assessments of these therapies for the acute exacerbations of MS. This study estimated the cost-effectiveness of RCI compared to PMP or IVIg.

Methods

A Markov state-transition model compared outcomes (costs, relapses, remission, and utilities) with RCI versus PMP or IVIg for the acute exacerbations in MS. The model was developed from the United States (US) payer and societal perspectives over one to three years. Patients initiated on alternative therapies were evaluated in one-day increments for the first 30 days during treatment. The model assumes the natural history of MS after treatment in the first month, adjusting for the effect of treatment. Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) were estimated as cost per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) gained. The uncertainty in model parameters was evaluated in probabilistic sensitivity analyses.

Results

In the base case, RCI has an ICER of USD 42,078 per QALY compared to PMP over one year from the payer perspective and is dominant over two and three years; RCI is dominant compared to PMP from the societal perspective over all three years. Compared to IVIg, RCI is a dominant strategy from both payer and societal perspectives over all three years. Probabilistic sensitivity analysis supports the base case findings, suggesting that RCI may be cost-effective versus PMP and IVIg for acute exacerbations in MS.

Conclusion

RCI is a cost-effective alternative treatment for MS relapses compared to PMP and IVIg from the US payer and societal perspectives.

Factors associated with headache in intravenous immunoglobulin treatment for neurological diseases

OBJECTIVES

To identify possible risk factors influencing the incidence of intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg) treatment-related cephalalgia in neurological diseases.

MATERIALS & METHODS

Retrospective chart review of neurological patients receiving IVIg treatment between July 13, 2017, and August 14, 2017. Patients with MS receiving natalizumab in the same setting were observed as a reference group.

RESULTS

Patients with headache after IVIg infusion (n = 22 infusions) showed a reduced heart rate (by 6.0 ± 8.5 beats per minute [bpm]), but no significant difference in blood pressure. Patients without headache after IVIg infusion (n = 69 infusions) showed a higher systolic blood pressure increase and a stronger reduction in the heart rate (by 5.7 ± 8.6 bpm), compared to patients with headache after IVIg infusion. The infusion rate was significantly slower and age significantly lower in patients developing headache after IVIg infusion. Body temperature was unchanged in both groups. Binary logistic regression analysis revealed that blood pressure at baseline and age significantly influence the occurrence of cephalalgia. In reference, patients receiving natalizumab (ie, shorter infusions/smaller infusion volume), systolic blood pressure, and heart rate decreased, while body temperature increased. Here, one patient developed headache.

CONCLUSIONS

Intravenous immunoglobulin-associated headache is not associated with an increased blood pressure after infusion but with a reduced heart rate, a slower infusion rate, female sex and seems to be influenced by baseline systolic blood pressure and age. A reaction to immunoglobulin aggregates, stabilizers, or vasoactive mediators are possible explanations. The absence of an association with body temperature does not suggest a systemic immune response as a cause for headache.

Clinical indications for intravenous immunoglobulin utilization in a tertiary medical center: a 9-year retrospective study

BACKGROUND

Intravenous immunoglobulins (IVIG) are a biologic product originally developed to treat immunocompromised patients. In the past decades, there has been increased utilization of IVIG in autoimmune conditions. The objectives were to evaluate the clinical use of IVIG in the largest tertiary medical center in Israel and to determine top uses, estimate off-label usage, and assess consumption of this blood product.

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

We conducted an observational, retrospective study involving all patients who received IVIG from 2007 through 2015. Subjects were classified into five groups according to the indication for treatment.

RESULTS

A total of 1117 patients were identified. The mean (±SD) ages of adults and children were 55 ± 17 and 8 ± 7 years, respectively. Most common indication for treatment were immune-mediated conditions (54%), followed by secondary immunodeficiency (28%), primary immunodeficiency (10%), infections (4%), and miscellaneous (4%). The main immune-mediated conditions treated were hematologic disorders (305 patients, 27%), neurologic disorders (219 patients, 20%), and rheumatologic conditions (79 patients, 7%). Overall, a significant change in study period was observed in the number of patients (p < 0.001), consumption of IVIG (p < 0.01), and amount of IVIG administered per patient (p < 0.01). Fifty-six percent of the IVIG infusions were given for off-label Food and Drug Administration (FDA) indications.

CONCLUSION

In this study, we demonstrated that immune-mediated conditions represent the majority of indications for treatment with IVIG. We observed a 417% increase in IVIG administration (g) over time, attributed mainly to autoimmune diseases. Many indications are still off-label according to FDA recommendations.

Neurological and Neuropsychiatric Adverse Effects of Dermatologic Medications

Severe, recalcitrant dermatologic conditions often require systemic treatment. Although efficacious, these medications have been associated with wide-ranging adverse reactions. Some are reversible, predictable, and either dose-dependent or treatment length-dependent, while others are unpredictable, irreversible, and potentially fatal. This review examines the neuropsychiatric adverse effects associated with US FDA-approved medications for treatment of the following dermatologic pathologies that typically require systemic therapy: autoimmune dermatoses, acne, psoriasis, and melanoma. A search of the literature was performed, with adverse effects ranging from mild headaches and neuropathy to severe encephalopathies. The medications associated with the most serious reactions were those used to treat psoriasis, especially the older non-biologic medications such as cyclosporine A and methotrexate. Given the importance of these systemic dermatologic therapies in treating severe, recalcitrant conditions, and the wide variety of potentially serious neuropsychiatric adverse effects of these medications, neurologists, psychiatrists, dermatologists, oncologists, and primary care providers must be aware of the potential for these neuropsychiatric adverse reactions to allow for appropriate counseling, management, and medication withdrawal.

Frequency of Adverse Events Associated with Intravenous Immunoglobulin Therapy in Patients with Pemphigus or Pemphigoid

Background:

Intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) therapy is widely used in immune-mediated diseases as an immunomodulatory agent and is considered to be a safe biologic agent.

Objective:

To determine the frequency of adverse events associated with IVIG therapy in patients with pemphigus and pemphigoid.

Methods:

We retrospectively reviewed data on patients treated with IVIG for pemphigus and pemphigoid over a 10 year period. Patients had pemphigus vulgaris, pemphigus foliaceus, mucous membrane pemphigoid, or bullous pemphigoid. IVIG was given according to a published protocol at a dose of 2 g/kg administered over 3–5 days at prescribed intervals. Patient records were reviewed for information on sex, age, duration of treatment, number of cycles given, number of days each patient received IVIG, weight of each patient, IVIG dose each patient received per infusion, and early or delayed adverse effects reported by patients or observed by healthcare providers.

Results:

We identified 9892 infusions given to 174 patients. Headaches were the most common adverse effects; they were observed during 886 (8.9%) infusions and involved 123 (70.6%) patients. The incidence of other minor adverse effects, including fatigue, nausea, vomiting, chills, urticaria, swollen glands, hoarseness, thoracic discomfort, and palpitations, was 0.57–3.4% per infusion and 0.04–1,3% per patient. Hoarseness of voice and swelling of cervical lymph nodes have not been previously reported. Acute renal failure occurred in one patient and was the only major adverse effect observed. None of the patients required hospitalization, and there were no deaths.

Conclusions:

Adverse events associated with IVIG therapy are usually mild and self-limiting. The incidence of serious adverse events is low. Identification of risk factors and close monitoring of high-risk patients throughout the therapy are likely to decrease the occurrence of rare serious and less likely fatal adverse effects.

Intravenous immunoglobulin therapy is rarely effective as the initial treatment in West syndrome: A retrospective study of 70 patients

PURPOSE

To evaluate factors influencing the efficacy and safety of intravenous immunoglobulins (IVIG) therapy for West syndrome.

METHODS

We investigated seizure outcomes in 70 patients who received IVIG treatment for West Syndrome during the first 3months after the onset of epileptic spasms. IVIG was administered for 3 consecutive days (initial IVIG treatment) at dosages ranging from 100 to 500mg/kg/day. If spasms disappeared within 2weeks of the initial treatment, maintenance IVIG treatment was commenced. We evaluated seizure outcomes at 2weeks (initial evaluation), at 2years (long-term evaluation), and the last visit (last follow-up evaluation) after the initial IVIG treatment. We analyzed dosages of IVIG, age at onset of spasms, treatment lag, and etiologies between responders and non-responders.

RESULTS

Among the patients, 7/70 (10.0%) had cessation of spasms and resolution of hypsarrhythmia at the initial evaluation. Another 6/70 patients (8.6%) were found to have cessation of spasms at the long-term evaluations. The treatment lag in responders was shorter than that in non-responders (P<0.01). There were no significant differences between responders and non-responders in IVIG dosages, age at onset of spasms, and etiologies. Two patients had relapse of partial seizures after cessation of spasms at the last follow-up evaluation. Adverse effects occurred in 2/70 patients.

CONCLUSIONS

The efficacy of IVIG was so low that it should not be considered as first-line treatment in West syndrome. IVIG therapy has a good safety profile and we would recommend it for West syndrome cases with drug resistance, severe complications associated with profound brain damage, severe brain atrophy, and in immunocompromised patients.

Management of adverse events in the treatment of patients with immunoglobulin therapy: A review of evidence

Immunoglobulin (IG) therapy is actually used for a broad range of diseases including primary and secondary immunodeficiency disorders, and autoimmune diseases. This therapy is available for intravenous (IV) and subcutaneous (SC) administration. The efficacy of the IG therapy has been demonstrated in numerous studies and across different diseases. Generally, IG infusions are well tolerated; however some well-known adverse reactions, ranging from mild to severe, are associated with the therapy. The most common adverse reactions including headache, nausea, myalgia, fever, chills, chest discomfort, skin and anaphylactic reactions, could arise immediately during or after the infusion. Delayed events could be more severe and include migraine headaches, aseptic meningitis, haemolysis renal impairment and thrombotic events. This paper reviews all the potential adverse events related to IG therapy and establishes a comprehensive guideline for the management of these events. Moreover it resumes the opinions and clinical experience of expert endorsers on the utilization of the treatment. Published data were classified into levels of evidence and the strength of the recommendation was given for each intervention according to the GRADE system.

Intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg) for refractory and difficult-to-treat infections

Traditionally, intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg) has been used as replacement therapy for patients with primary or secondary immunoglobulin deficiencies. Increasingly, IVIg is being used (in doses higher than for replacement therapy) in certain bacterial or viral infectious diseases. A variety of modes of action have been attributed to the beneficial effects of IVIg, including its interaction with T-cell function, antigen-presenting cell maturation/presentation, combined with a general "tune down" effect on inflammatory reactions. More often, IVIg is being evaluated in clinical trials for the treatment of refractory and difficult-to-treat chronic infections. The evidence, molecular mechanisms, and rationale for the use of adjunct IVIg therapy in infectious diseases are reviewed, and its potential use in the adjunct treatment of difficult-to-treat drug-resistant tuberculosis discussed.

The future of autoimmunity

There have been enormous strides in our understanding of autoimmunity. These strides have come under the umbrellas of epidemiology, immunological phenotype and function, disease definitions and classification and especially new therapeutic reagents. However, while these advances have been herculean, there remains enormous voids. Some of these voids include genetic susceptibility and the interaction of genes and environment. The voids include induction of tolerance in preclinical disease and definitions of host susceptibility and responses to the expensive biologic agents. The voids include the so-called clustering of human autoimmune diseases and the issues of whether the incidence is rising in our western society. Other voids include the relationships between microbiology, vaccination, gut flora, overzealous use of antibiotics, and the role of nanoparticles and environmental pollution in either the induction or the natural history of disease. One cannot even begin to address even a fraction of these issues. However, in this special issue, we are attempting to discuss clinical issues in autoimmunity that are not usually found in generic reviews. The goal is to bring to the readership provocative articles that ultimately will lead to improvement in patient care.

Experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis (EAE) as a model for multiple sclerosis (MS)

Experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis (EAE) is the most commonly used experimental model for the human inflammatory demyelinating disease, multiple sclerosis (MS). EAE is a complex condition in which the interaction between a variety of immunopathological and neuropathological mechanisms leads to an approximation of the key pathological features of MS: inflammation, demyelination, axonal loss and gliosis. The counter-regulatory mechanisms of resolution of inflammation and remyelination also occur in EAE, which, therefore can also serve as a model for these processes. Moreover, EAE is often used as a model of cell-mediated organ-specific autoimmune conditions in general. EAE has a complex neuropharmacology, and many of the drugs that are in current or imminent use in MS have been developed, tested or validated on the basis of EAE studies. There is great heterogeneity in the susceptibility to the induction, the method of induction and the response to various immunological or neuropharmacological interventions, many of which are reviewed here. This makes EAE a very versatile system to use in translational neuro- and immunopharmacology, but the model needs to be tailored to the scientific question being asked. While creating difficulties and underscoring the inherent weaknesses of this model of MS in straightforward translation from EAE to the human disease, this variability also creates an opportunity to explore multiple facets of the immune and neural mechanisms of immune-mediated neuroinflammation and demyelination as well as intrinsic protective mechanisms. This allows the eventual development and preclinical testing of a wide range of potential therapeutic interventions.

Safety of intravenous immunoglobulin treatment

IMPORTANCE OF THE FIELD

Intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg) is a biologic pharmaceutical that is widely used to treat immunodeficiency conditions and a variety of autoimmune conditions. It is under-recognized that IVIg can be associated with severe complications including death.

AREAS COVERED IN THIS REVIEW

This review will address common mild side effects and extensively discuss the uncommon but serious complications of IVIg. Mild constitutional reactions include headache, fever and rash and severe complications include anaphylaxis, acute renal failure, stroke and myocardial infarction. IVIg has been used to treat autoimmune illnesses for ~30 years and the literature since then is reviewed with special attention to reports in the last 10 years that detail the serious adverse events.

WHAT THE READER WILL GAIN

The reader will understand that mild side effects are common and that these can be ameliorated with pre-treatment medications. They will also become familiar with the risk factors for serious complications so that careful patient and IVIg product selection will result in fewer poor outcomes.

TAKE HOME MESSAGE

IVIg is quite safe across age groups although serious adverse reactions occur particularly in elderly individuals with multiple cardiovascular risk factors and those with preexisting renal failure.

Intravenous immunoglobulin-based immunotherapy: an arsenal of possibilities for patients and science

The use of intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) concentrated from pooled healthy donors' plasma has gained increasing popularity. IVIG therapy has become important as a replacement therapy in primary and acquired humoral immunodeficiencies, and it has been extended to autoimmune, neurodegenerative and inflammatory conditions and transplantation therapy. Recurrent pregnancy failure and cancer are rather new platforms, where IVIG has shown its beneficial effects. This manuscript is focused on these two off-labelled usages. The immunomodulatory mechanisms of IVIG therapy appear as a coordinated orchestration of different functions, resulting in a synergistic effect. Treatment monitoring and detailed molecular analyses reveal how such treatments may interfere with disease pathogenesis. These finding may foster the development of novel therapeutic and/or preventive strategies. Studying this field with bidirectional bench-to-bedside and bedside-to-bench approaches fit well into 'the two-way road' paradigm of translational medicine.

Relevant criteria for selecting an intravenous immunoglobulin preparation for clinical use

Over the past several decades, the use of intravenous human normal immunoglobulin (IVIg) products in a diverse range of immunodeficiency, inflammatory and infectious disorders has increased significantly. Newer manufacturing processes have increased the yield of intact IVIg molecules and have also improved the tolerability and safety of these products, including reducing the transmission risk of blood-borne diseases. While there are no appreciable differences between the numerous commercially available IVIg products in terms of efficacy, different manufacturing processes and the final composition of IVIg products have resulted in different safety and tolerability profiles. The tolerability profile of different IVIg products may be idiosyncratic for individual patients and may not be predictable, based on product characteristics. Consequently, patients receiving an IVIg product should be carefully monitored at initial exposure, and switching of products should be avoided. To achieve the best outcomes in patients requiring IVIg therapy, treatment should be tailored to the patient's needs. The risk/benefit profile of an IVIg in relation to patient risk factors and the underlying immune deficiency, or autoimmune or inflammatory disorder should be considered when deciding on the most appropriate therapy.

Current management of pain associated with multiple sclerosis

While pain is a common problem in patients with multiple sclerosis (MS), it is not frequently mentioned by patients and a more direct approach is required in order to obtain information about pain from patients. Many patients with MS experience more than one pain syndrome; combinations of dysaesthesia, headaches and/or back or muscle and joint pain are frequent. For each pain syndrome a clear diagnosis and therapeutic concept needs to be established. Pain in MS can be classified into four diagnostically and therapeutically relevant categories: (i) neuropathic pain due to MS (pain directly related to MS); (ii) pain indirectly related to MS; (iii) MS treatment-related pain; and (iv) pain unrelated to MS. Painful paroxysmal symptoms such as trigeminal neuralgia (TN), or painful tonic spasms are treated with antiepileptics as first choice, e.g. carbamazepine, oxcarbazepine, lamotrigine, gabapentin, pregabalin, etc. Painful 'burning' dysaesthesias, the most frequent chronic pain syndrome, are treated with TCAs such as amitriptyline, or antiepileptics such as gabapentin, pregabalin, lamotrigine, etc. Combinations of drugs with different modes of action can be particularly useful for reducing adverse effects. While escalation therapy may require opioids, there are encouraging results from studies regarding cannabinoids, but their future role in the treatment of MS-related pain has still to be determined. Pain related to spasticity often improves with adequate physiotherapy. Drug treatment includes antispastic agents such as baclofen or tizanidine and in patients with phasic spasticity, gabapentin or levetiracetam are administered. In patients with severe spasticity, botulinum toxin injections or intrathecal baclofen merit consideration. While physiotherapy may ameliorate malposition-induced joint and muscle pain, additional drug treatment with paracetamol (acetaminophen) or NSAIDs may be useful. Moreover, painful pressure lesions should be avoided by using optimally adjusted aids. Treatment-related pain associated with MS can occur with subcutaneous injections of interferon-beta or glatiramer acetate, and may be reduced by optimizing the injection technique and by local cooling. Systemic (particularly 'flu-like') adverse effects of interferons, e.g. myalgias, can be reduced by administering paracetamol, ibuprofen or naproxen. A potential increase in the frequency of pre-existing headaches after starting treatment with interferons may require optimization of headache attack therapy or even prophylactic treatment. Pain unrelated to MS, such as back pain or headache, is common in patients with MS and may deteriorate as a result of the disease. In summary, a careful analysis of each pain syndrome will allow the design of the appropriate treatment plan using various medical and nonmedical options (multimodal therapy), and will thus help to improve the quality of life (QOL) of the patients.

Inhibition of HIV-1 transmission in trans from dendritic cells to CD4+ T lymphocytes by natural antibodies to the CRD domain of DC-SIGN purified from breast milk and intravenous immunoglobulins

The present study demonstrates that human breast milk and normal human polyclonal immunoglobulins purified from plasma [intravenous immunoglobulins (IVIg)] contain functional natural immunoglobulin A (IgA) and IgG antibodies directed against the carbohydrate recognition domain (CRD) domain of the dendritic cell-specific intercellular adhesion molecule-3-grabbing non-integrin (DC-SIGN) molecule, which is involved in the binding of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-1 to dendritic cells (DCs). Antibodies to DC-SIGN CRD were affinity-purified on a matrix to which a synthetic peptide corresponding to the N-terminal CRD domain (amino-acid 342-amino-acid 371) had been coupled. The affinity-purified antibodies bound to the DC-SIGN peptide and to the native DC-SIGN molecule expressed by HeLa DC-SIGN+ cells and immature monocyte-derived dendritic cells (iMDDCs), in a specific and dose-dependent manner. At an optimal dose of 200 microg/ml, natural antibodies to DC-SIGN CRD peptide purified from breast milk and IVIg stained 25 and 20% of HeLa DC-SIGN+ cells and 32 and 12% of iMDDCs, respectively. Anti-DC-SIGN CRD peptide antibodies inhibited the attachment of virus to HeLa DC-SIGN by up to 78% and the attachment to iMDDCs by only 20%. Both breast milk- and IVIg-derived natural antibodies to the CRD peptide inhibited 60% of the transmission in trans of HIV-1(JRCSF), an R5-tropic strain, from iMDDCs to CD4+ T lymphocytes. Taken together, these observations suggest that the attachment of HIV to DCs and transmission in trans to autologous CD4+ T lymphocytes occur through two independent mechanisms. Our data support a role of natural antibodies to DC-SIGN in the modulation of postnatal HIV transmission through breast-feeding and in the natural host defence against HIV-1 in infected individuals.

Variations in serum hemoglobin, albumin, and electrolytes in patients receiving intravenous immunoglobulin therapy: a real clinical threat?

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg) is a solution of globulins containing antibodies derived from pooled human plasma of donors and used in the treatment of a number of immune deficiencies and autoimmune diseases. However, several investigators have reported biochemical alterations with use of IVIg. The objective of this study was to evaluate the effects of IVIg therapy on selected biochemical and hematologic parameters in patients with autoimmune mucocutaneous blistering diseases (AMBDs).

METHODS

In this preliminary clinical study, ten patients with AMBDs (seven with pemphigus vulgaris and three with mucous membrane pemphigoid) received 133 cycles of IVIg for a total of 399 infusions. We evaluated the effects of IVIg therapy on serum hemoglobin (Hb), albumin, and electrolyte levels, including sodium (Na+), potassium (K+), chloride (Cl-) and calcium (Ca2+). Values of these parameters were measured 24 hours before, during, and 24 hours and 4 weeks after the 3-day infusion period.

RESULTS

The observed variations in serum electrolyte levels were physiologically and clinically negligible. Furthermore, 24 hours after the last infusion, mean electrolyte values had spontaneously returned to normal levels without the need for additional supplementation: Na+ 137.59+/-1.42 mmol/L (p=0.6091 vs baseline); K+ 3.97+/-0.5 mmol/L (p=0.2689); Cl- 103.4+/-2.69 mmol/L (p=0.0388); and Ca2+ 9.07+/-0.44 mg/dL (p=0.5332). Conversely, significant variations in mean Hb and albumin levels were observed. When measured 24 hours after the last infusion, mild/moderate decreases in Hb (11.62+/-2.12 g/dL; p=0.009 vs baseline) and/or albumin (mean 3.14+/-0.24 g/dL; p=0.0016 vs baseline) were evident. Such changes may, albeit very rarely, be of sufficient clinical significance in individual patients as to necessitate additional treatment.

CONCLUSION

In patients receiving intravenous IVIg for AMBDs, electrolyte values should be monitored but do not represent a real clinical threat. Hemoglobin and albumin values may be altered sufficiently to require additional treatment but this is a very rare occurrence. These findings confirm and extend previous reports of the safety of IVIg therapy.