HCBS Spending and Nursing Home Admissions for 1915(c) Waiver Enrollees

The association between social risks and days at home for older veterans

BACKGROUND

Many health systems are trying to support the ability of older adults to remain in their homes for as long as possible. Little is known about the relationship between patient-reported social risks and length of time spent at home. We assessed how social risks were associated with days at home for a cohort of older Veterans at high risk for hospitalization and mortality.

METHODS

A prospective cross-sectional study using a 2018 survey of 3479 high-risk Veterans aged ≥65 linked to Veterans Health Administration data. Social risks included measures of social resources (i.e., no partner present, low social support), material resources (i.e., not employed, financial strain, medication insecurity, food insecurity, and transportation barriers), and personal resources (i.e., low medical literacy and less than high school education). We estimated how social risks were associated with days at home, defined as the number of days spent outside inpatient, long-term care, observation, or emergency department settings over a 12-month period, using a negative binomial regression model.

RESULTS

Not having a partner, not being employed, experiencing transportation barriers, and low medical literacy were respectively associated with 2.57, 3.18, 3.39, and 6.14 fewer days at home (i.e., 27% more facility days, 95% confidence interval [CI] 8%-50%; 42% more facility days, 95% CI 7%-89%; 34% more facility days, 95% CI 7%-68%; and 63% more facility days, 95% CI 27%-109%). Experiencing food insecurity was associated with 2.62 more days at home (i.e., 24% fewer facility days, 95% CI 3%-59%).

CONCLUSIONS

Findings suggest that screening older Veterans at high risk of community exit for social risks (i.e., social support, material resources, and medical literacy) may help identify patients likely to benefit from home- and community-based health and social services that facilitate remaining in home settings. Future research should focus on understanding the mechanisms by which these associations occur.

Outcomes of Medicaid Rebalancing May Differ Across Enrollee Populations

Access to home- and community-based services (HCBS) may prevent or delay nursing home transitions among older adults. Medicaid's Balancing Incentive Program (BIP) (2011-2015) provided assistance for U.S. states to increase access to HCBS through infrastructure changes and spending benchmarks. We combined longitudinal data from the 2008-2019 Medicare Current Beneficiary Survey and Minimum Data Set and used survival modeling to examine the association between BIP exposure (living in a BIP-participant state vs. not) and time to long-term institutionalization (LTI, defined as a nursing home episode of 90+ days) among dual enrollees ages 65 and older. In the main effects model, BIP exposure was not associated with hazard of LTI. Interaction models showed that BIP exposure was associated with a lower hazard of LTI among Hispanic/Latinx enrollees, while the opposite was true among non-Hispanic White enrollees. Our findings suggest the outcomes of Medicaid rebalancing efforts may differ across enrollee subgroups.

Evaluating the health outcomes of aging in place: the role of medicaid aging waiver program on U.S. older adults

The Medicaid Aging Waiver program (MAW) subsidizes the cost of long-term care (LTC) at home or in communities to satisfy older people's increasing desire to age in place. The MAW program might be health improving for older people by allowing them to age at home. However, less quality and quantity of home-based care comparing to nursing home care could offset some of the potential benefits. I use policy expenditure across states over time linked with detailed health information from the Health and Retirement Study (HRS) to identify the associated effects of MAWs on health outcomes of older adults who are at risk of needing LTC and who are resources constrained to be potentially eligible for Medicaid. Overall, the findings suggest that the MAW program is beneficial to health: a $1,000 increase in MAW spending for each older person results is associated with a 1.4 percent improvement in self-reported health status, a 1.5 percent reduction in functional mobility limitations, a 1.6 percent decrease in Instrumental Activities of Daily Living (IADL) limitations, and a 1.7 percent improvement in negative psychological feelings. For older people who are most likely not eligible for MAWs, such as those who are wealthy or in good health and do not require LTC, these health-improving effects have not been observed.

"I'll fill in the gaps": perspectives of HHAs on promoting aging in place for older adults with low incomes

Older adults with low incomes experience disproportionate rates of cognitive and functional impairment and an elevated risk of nursing home admission. Home health aides (HHAs) may have insight into how to optimize aging in place for this population, yet little is known about HHAs' perspectives on this topic. We conducted 6 focus groups with 21 English-speaking and 10 Spanish-speaking HHAs in Pennsylvania and New Jersey. Transcripts were analyzed using qualitative thematic analysis, and three themes emerged. First, HHAs described the uniqueness of their role within multidisciplinary care teams. Second, HHAs shared concrete interventions they employ to help their clients improve their function at home. Third, HHAs discussed barriers they face when helping clients age in place. Our findings suggest that HHAs have important insights into improving aging in place for older adults with low incomes and that their perspectives should be incorporated into care planning and intervention delivery.

Higher levels of state funding for Home- and Community-Based Services linked to better state performances in Long-Term Services and Supports

OBJECTIVE

To examine the relationship between the level of state funding for Home- and Community-Based Services (HCBS) and state overall and dimension-specific performances in Long-Term Services and Supports (LTSS).

DATA SOURCES AND STUDY SETTING

We employed state-level secondary data from the Medicaid LTSS Annual Expenditures Reports, the American Association of Retired Persons (AARP) State Scorecards, the U.S. Census, and Federal Reserve Economic data, spanning the timeframe of 2010-2020.

STUDY DESIGN

Overall state LTSS rankings, along with dimension-specific rankings, were modeled separately against state Medicaid spending on HCBS relative to total Medicaid spending on LTSS. All models were adjusted for state covariates, secular trend, and state fixed effects.

DATA COLLECTION/EXTRACTION METHODS

The study sample included all 50 states and the District of Columbia. However, California, Delaware, Illinois, and Virginia were excluded from FY2019 due to missing data on Medicaid HCBS expenditures.

PRINCIPAL FINDINGS

Every 10 percentage-point increase in the proportion of Medicaid LTSS spending to HCBS demonstrated 2.05 points improvement (95% confidence interval [CI]: -3.88 to 0.22, p = 0.03) in rankings for state overall LTSS system performance, 2.92 points improvement (95% CI: -4.87 to 0.98, p < 0.01) in rankings for the Choice of Setting and Provider dimension, as well as 1.73 points (95% CI: -3.14 to 0.32, p = 0.02) ranking improvement in the dimension of Effective Transitions.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study suggested promising effects of increased state funding for HCBS on LTSS performance.

Examining Satisfaction and Quality in Home- and Community-Based Service Programs in the United States: A Scoping Review

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Long-term services and supports in the United States are increasingly reliant on home- and community-based services (HCBS). Yet, little is known about the quality of HCBS. We conducted a scoping review of the peer-reviewed literature to summarize HCBS consumer, provider, and stakeholder satisfaction with services as a means of assessing quality.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

We searched PubMed, OVID-MEDLINE, and SCOPUS to identify articles published from 2000 to 2021 that reported on studies describing a U.S.-based study population. Articles were grouped into 3 categories: drivers of positive consumer satisfaction, drivers of negative consumer satisfaction, and provider and stakeholder perspectives on satisfaction.

RESULTS

Our final sample included 27 articles. Positive perceptions of quality and reported satisfaction with services were driven by consistent, reliable, and respectful care providers, and adoption of person-centered models of service delivery. Mistreatment of consumers, staff turnover, training, service interruptions, and unmet functional needs were drivers of negative consumer perceptions of quality. Support for caregivers and emphasis on training were identified by providers and stakeholders as important for providing satisfactory services.

DISCUSSION AND IMPLICATIONS

Multiple data challenges limit the ability to systematically evaluate HCBS program quality; however, studies examining single programs found that HCBS consumers are more satisfied and associate higher quality with easy-to-navigate programs and professional staff. Efforts to expand HCBS should also include requirements to systematically evaluate quality outcomes.

A Novel Framework to Address the Complexities of Housing Insecurity and Its Associated Health Outcomes and Inequities: "Give, Partner, Invest"

The association between housing insecurity and reduced access to healthcare, diminished mental and physical health, and increased mortality is well-known. This association, along with structural racism, social inequities, and lack of economic opportunities, continues to widen the gap in health outcomes and other disparities between those in higher and lower socio-economic strata in the United States and throughout the advanced economies of the world. System-wide infrastructure failures at municipal, state, and federal government levels have inadequately addressed the difficulty with housing affordability and stability and its associated impact on health outcomes and inequities. Healthcare systems are uniquely poised to help fill this gap and engage with proposed solutions. Strategies that incorporate multiple investment pathways and emphasize community-based partnerships and innovation have the potential for broad public health impacts. In this manuscript, we describe a novel framework, "Give, Partner, Invest," which was created and utilized by the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center (UPMC) Insurance Services Division (ISD) as part of the Integrated Delivery and Finance System to demonstrate the financial, policy, partnership, and workforce levers that could make substantive investments in affordable housing and community-based interventions to improve the health and well-being of our communities. Further, we address housing policy limitations and infrastructure challenges and offer potential solutions.

Lagging coverage for mental health services among children and adolescents through home and community-based Medicaid waivers

PROBLEM

Many states cover mental health home and community-based services (HCBS) for youth through 1915(c) Medicaid HCBS waivers that allow states to waive certain Medicaid eligibility criteria and define high-risk populations based on age, medical condition(s), and disability status. We sought to evaluate how States are covering children and adolescents with mental health needs through 1915(c) waivers compared to other youth waiver populations.

METHODS

Data elements were extracted from Medicaid 1915(c) approved waivers applications for all included waivers targeting any pediatric age range through October 31, 2018. Normalization criteria were developed and an aggregate overall coverage score and level of funding per person per waiver were calculated for each waiver.

FINDINGS

One hundred and forty-two waivers across 45 states were included in this analysis. Even though there was uniformity in the Medicaid applications, there was great heterogeneity in how waiver eligibility, transition plans, services covered, and wait lists were defined across group classifications. Those with mental health needs (termed serious emotional disturbance) represented 5% of waivers with the least annual funding per person per waiver.

CONCLUSIONS

We recommend greater links between public policy, infrastructure, health care providers, and a family-centered approach to extend coverage and scope of services for children and adolescents with mental health needs.

CMS Initiative to Reduce Potentially Avoidable Hospitalizations Among Long-Stay Nursing Facility Residents: Lessons Learned

Policy Points Misaligned incentives between Medicare and Medicaid may result in avoidable hospitalizations among long-stay nursing home residents. Providing nursing homes with clinical staff, such as nurse practitioners, was more effective in reducing resident hospitalizations than providing Medicare incentive payments alone.

CONTEXT

In 2012, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services implemented the Initiative to Reduce Avoidable Hospitalizations Among Nursing Facility Residents. In Phase 1 (2012 to 2016), clinical or education-based interventions (Clinical-Only) aimed to reduce hospitalizations among long-stay nursing home residents. In Phase 2 (2016 to 2020), the Initiative also included a Medicare payment incentive for treating residents with certain conditions within the nursing home. Nursing homes participating in Phase 1 continued their previous interventions and received the incentive (Clinical + Payment) and others received the incentive only (Payment-Only).

METHODS

Mixed methods were used to determine the effectiveness of the Initiative and explore facilitators of and barriers to implementation that participating nursing homes experienced. We used telephone and in-person interviews to investigate aspects of implementation and a difference-in-differences regression model framework comparing residents in participating and nonparticipating nursing homes to determine the effect of the Initiative on measures of utilization, expenditures, and quality.

FINDINGS

Three key components were necessary for successful implementation of the Initiative-staff retention and leadership stability, leadership and staff support, and provider engagement and support. Nursing homes that lacked one or more of these three components experienced greater challenges. The Clinical-Only intervention in Phase 1 was successful in reducing hospitalizations. We did not find evidence that the Clinical + Payment or Payment-Only interventions were successful in reducing hospitalizations.

CONCLUSIONS

Reducing hospitalizations among nursing home residents hinges upon the availability and support of clinical staff who can provide ongoing education to direct-care staff in the nursing home, as well as hands-on care. Use of Medicare payment incentives alone to encourage on-site treatment of residents was insufficient to reduce hospitalizations. Unless nursing homes are adequately staffed to treat residents with acute care needs, further reductions in hospitalizations will be difficult to achieve.

Trends In Medicaid Home And Community-Based Services Waivers For Older Adults

During the past several decades, state Medicaid programs have expanded the use of home and community-based services, particularly through Section 1915(c) waivers and Section 1115 demonstration waivers. We document trends from the period 1997-2020 in waivers targeting older adults, focusing on services offered. Nearly every service category saw an increase in coverage and spending, especially support for self-direction and community transition.

HCBS Service Spending and Nursing Home Placement for Patients With Alzheimer's Disease and Related Dementias: Does Race Matter?

OBJECTIVES

We examined the extent to which home and community-based services (HCBS) spending affected the likelihood of nursing home (NH) placement among black and white HCBS users with Alzheimer's disease and related dementias (ADRD).

METHODS

The study population included new HCBS users with ADRD between 2010 and 2013 (N = 1,046,200).

RESULTS

We found that a one hundred dollar increase in monthly HCBS spending was associated with a 0.3 percentage points decrease in the NH placement rate among Whites, but a 0.3 percentage points increase in the NH placement rate among Blacks. The overall NH placement rate was 68.2% and 56.7% for Whites and Blacks, respectively.

DISCUSSION

A higher HCBS spending was associated with a decreased likelihood of NH placements for Whites but not for Blacks. It is important to understand how states' HCBS expansion efforts influence Blacks and Whites with ADRD so that resources can be tailored to communities with different race-mix.

Improving Prediction of Long-Term Care Utilization Through Patient-Reported Measures: Cross-Sectional Analysis of High-Need U.S. Veterans Affairs Patients

This article examines the relative merit of augmenting an electronic health record (EHR)-derived predictive model of institutional long-term care (LTC) use with patient-reported measures not commonly found in EHRs. We used survey and administrative data from 3,478 high-risk Veterans aged ≥65 in the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, comparing a model based on a Veterans Health Administration (VA) geriatrics dashboard, a model with additional EHR-derived variables, and a model that added survey-based measures (i.e., activities of daily living [ADL] limitations, social support, and finances). Model performance was assessed via Akaike information criteria, C-statistics, sensitivity, and specificity. Age, a dementia diagnosis, Nosos risk score, social support, and ADL limitations were consistent predictors of institutional LTC use. Survey-based variables significantly improved model performance. Although demographic and clinical characteristics found in many EHRs are predictive of institutional LTC, patient-reported function and partnership status improve identification of patients who may benefit from home- and community-based services.

Nursing home admissions for persons with dementia: Role of home- and community-based services

OBJECTIVE

To examine the relationship between Medicaid home- and community-based services (HCBS) generosity and the likelihood of nursing home (NH) admission for dually enrolled older adults with Alzheimer's disease and related dementias (ADRD) and their level of physical and cognitive impairment at NH admission.

DATA SOURCES

National Medicare data, Medicaid Analytic eXtract, and MDS 3.0 for CY2010-2013 were linked.

STUDY DESIGN

Eligible Medicare-Medicaid dual beneficiaries with ADRD were identified and followed for up to a year. We constructed two measures of HCBS generosity, breadth and intensity, at the county level for older duals with ADRD. Three binary outcomes were defined as follows: any NH placement during the follow-up year for all individuals in the sample, high (vs. not high) physical impairment, and high (vs. not high) cognitive impairment at the time of NH admission for those who were admitted to an NH. Logistic regressions with state-fixed effects and county random effects were estimated for these outcomes, respectively, accounting for individual- and county-level covariates.

DATA EXTRACTION METHODS

The study sample included 365,310 community-dwelling older dual beneficiaries with ADRD who were enrolled in fee-for-service Medicare and Medicaid between October 1, 2010, and December 31, 2012.

PRINCIPAL FINDINGS

Considerable variations of breadth and intensity in county-level HCBS were observed. We found that a 10-percentage-point increase in HCBS breadth was associated with a 1.4 (p < 0.01)-percentage-point reduction in the likelihood of NH admission. Among individuals with NH admission, greater HCBS breadth was associated with a higher level of physical impairment, and greater HCBS intensity was associated with a higher level of physical and cognitive impairment at NH admission.

CONCLUSIONS

Among community-dwelling duals with ADRD, Medicaid HCBS generosity was associated with a lower likelihood of NH admission and greater functional impairment at NH admission.

State Medicaid Home and Community-Based Services Policies and Health Expenditures by Payer

This study examines the relationship between two state Medicaid home and community-based services (HCBS) policies - number of beneficiaries (Participation) and use per beneficiary (Intensity) - and individual health expenditures. Data include the 2008-2013 Medicare Current Beneficiary Survey and state-level Medicaid HCBS indicators. Two-part generalized linear models are estimated for health expenditures by payer and dual-eligibility status. The likelihood and level of Medicare expenditures are significantly lower in states in the top quartile of Participation and Intensity. Findings suggest that state Medicaid HCBS policies may impact health expenditures, with potential spillover effects on Medicare spending.

Medicaid home- and community-based services and discharge from skilled nursing facilities

OBJECTIVE

To examine the association between the generosity of Medicaid home- and community-based services (HCBS) and the likelihood of community discharge among Medicare-Medicaid dually enrolled older adults who were newly admitted to skilled nursing facilities (SNFs).

DATA SOURCES

National datasets, including Medicare Master Beneficiary Summary File (MBSF), Medicare Provider and Analysis Review (MedPAR), Medicaid Analytic eXtract (MAX), minimum data set (MDS), and publicly available data at the SNF or county level, were linked.

STUDY DESIGN

We measured Medicaid HCBS generosity by its breadth and intensity and described their variation at the county level. A set of linear probability models with SNF fixed effects were estimated to characterize the association between HCBS generosity and likelihood of community discharge from SNFs. We further stratified the analyses by the type of index hospitalizations (medical vs surgical events), age group, and the Medicaid cost-sharing policy for SNF services.

DATA EXTRACTION METHODS

The final analytical sample included 224 229 community-dwelling dually enrolled older duals who were newly admitted to SNFs after an acute inpatient event between October 1, 2010, and September 30, 2013.

PRINCIPAL FINDINGS

We observed substantial cross-sectional and over-time variations in HCBS breadth and intensity. Regression results indicate that on average, a 10 percentage-point increase in HCBS breadth was associated with a 0.7 percentage-point increase (P < 0.01) in the likelihood of community discharge. Such relationship could be modified by individual factors and state policies: significant effects of HCBS breadth were detected among medical patients (0.7 percentage-point, P < 0.05), individuals aged older than 85 (1.5 percentage-point, P < 0.01), and states with and without lesser-of policies (0.5 and 2.3 percentage-point, respectively, P < 0.05). No significant relationship between HCBS intensity and community discharge was detected.

CONCLUSIONS

Higher Medicaid HCBS breadth but not intensity was associated with a greater likelihood of community discharge, and such relationship could be modified by individual factors and state policies.

Age Differences in Determinants of Self-Rated Health among Recipients of Publicly Funded Home-and-Community-Based Services

This research examined determinants of self-rated health (SRH) of publicly funded home-and-community-based services (HCBS) recipients and tested if the effects of determinants differ between older recipients and younger recipients with disabilities. Using Minnesota's data of 2015-2016 National Core Indicators - Aging and Disabilities survey (n = 3,426), this study revealed that functional status and community inclusion had both direct and indirect effects on SRH, with negative mood as a mediator. Community inclusion had a more pronounced effect on SRH in younger recipients than in older recipients. HCBS should address psychosocial needs and be tailored for recipients of different age groups.

Publicly Funded Home and Community-Based Care for Children With Medical Complexity: Protocol for the Analysis of Medicaid Waiver Applications

Background

Children with medical complexity are a group of children with multiple chronic conditions and functional limitations that represent the highest health care utilization and often require a substantial number of home and community-based services (HCBS). In many states, HCBS are offered to target populations through 1915(c) Medicaid waivers. To date, no standard methods or approaches have been established to evaluate or compare 1915(c) waivers across states in the United States for children.

Objective

The purpose of this analysis was to develop a systematic and reproducible approach to evaluate 1915(c) Medicaid waivers for overall coverage of children with medical complexity.

Methods

Data elements were extracted from Medicaid 1915(c) approved waiver applications for all included waivers targeting any pediatric age range through October 31, 2018. Normalization criteria were established, and an aggregate overall coverage score was calculated for each waiver.

Results

Data extraction occurred in two phases: (1) waivers that were considered nonexpired through December 31, 2017, and (2) the final sample that included nonexpired waivers through October 31, 2018. A total of 142 waivers across 45 states in the United States were included in this analysis. We found that the existing adult HCBS taxonomy may not always be applicable for child and family-based service provision. Although there was uniformity in the Medicaid applications, there was high heterogeneity in how waiver eligibility, transition plans, and wait lists were defined. Study analysis was completed in January 2019, and after analyzing each individual waiver, results were aggregated at the level of the state and for each diagnostic subgroup. The published results are forthcoming.

Conclusions

To our knowledge, this is the first study to systematically evaluate 1915(c) Medicaid waivers targeting children with medical complexity that can be replicated without the threat of missing data.

International Registered Report Identifier (IRRID)

RR1-10.2196/13062

Predictors of Nursing Facility Entry by Medicaid-Only Older Adults and Persons With Disabilities in California

Nearly one-third of adult Medicaid beneficiaries who receive long-term services and supports (LTSS) consist of older adults and persons with disabilities who are not eligible for Medicare. Beneficiaries, advocates, and policymakers have all sought to shift LTSS to home and community settings as an alternative to institutional care. We conducted a retrospective cohort study of Medicaid-only adults in California with new use of LTSS in 2006-2007 (N = 31 849) to identify unique predictors of entering nursing facilities versus receiving Medicaid home and community-based services (HCBS). Among new users, 18.3% entered into nursing facilities, whereas 81.7% initiated HCBS. In addition to chronic conditions, functional and cognitive limitations, substance abuse disorders (odds ratio [OR] 1.35; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.23, 1.48), and homelessness (OR: 4.35, 9% CI: 3.72, 5.08) were associated with higher odds of nursing facility entry. For older adults and persons with disabilities covered by Medicaid only, integration with housing and behavioral health services may be key to enabling beneficiaries to receive LTSS in noninstitutional settings.