Sleep deprivation sensitizes human craniofacial muscles

Neurovascular Compression-Induced Intracranial Allodynia May Be the True Nature of Migraine Headache: an Interpretative Review

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Surgical deactivation of migraine trigger sites by extracranial neurovascular decompression has produced encouraging results and challenged previous understanding of primary headaches. However, there is a lack of in-depth discussions on the pathophysiological basis of migraine surgery. This narrative review provides interpretation of relevant literature from the perspective of compressive neuropathic etiology, pathogenesis, and pathophysiology of migraine.

RECENT FINDINGS

Vasodilation, which can be asymptomatic in healthy subjects, may produce compression of cranial nerves in migraineurs at both extracranial and intracranial entrapment-prone sites. This may be predetermined by inherited and acquired anatomical factors and may include double crush-type lesions. Neurovascular compression can lead to sensitization of the trigeminal pathways and resultant cephalic hypersensitivity. While descending (central) trigeminal activation is possible, symptomatic intracranial sensitization can probably only occur in subjects who develop neurovascular entrapment of cranial nerves, which can explain why migraine does not invariably afflict everyone. Nerve compression-induced focal neuroinflammation and sensitization of any cranial nerve may neurogenically spread to other cranial nerves, which can explain the clinical complexity of migraine. Trigger dose-dependent alternating intensity of sensitization and its synchrony with cyclic central neural activities, including asymmetric nasal vasomotor oscillations, may explain the laterality and phasic nature of migraine pain. Intracranial allodynia, i.e., pain sensation upon non-painful stimulation, may better explain migraine pain than merely nociceptive mechanisms, because migraine cannot be associated with considerable intracranial structural changes and consequent painful stimuli. Understanding migraine as an intracranial allodynia could stimulate research aimed at elucidating the possible neuropathic compressive etiology of migraine and other primary headaches.

The impact of sleep disturbance on pain perception: A systematic review examining the moderating effect of sex and age

Females have increased pain sensitivity and are more vulnerable to chronic pain conditions. Sleep disturbances are comorbid with chronic pain and exacerbate pain symptoms. Different types of sleep disturbance affect pain perception distinctly, but it is not clear if these effects are equal in men and women. This systematic review investigated potential differences in how sleep disturbance affects pain in males and females. We searched EBSCO, MEDLINE, Psych INFO, Science Direct, and Web of Science from January 2001 to November 2022 and found 38 studies with 978 participants. Separate random-effects models were used to estimate the pooled effect sizes based on standardized mean differences (SMDs) of experimental sleep disturbance paradigms on various pain outcomes. Sex moderated the effect of sleep disturbance on pain facilitation (SMD = 0.13; 95%CI: 0.004 to 0.022; p=.009) and pain inhibition (SMD = 0.033; 95%CI: 0.011 to 0.054; p=.005), with increased facilitation and decreased inhibition in females, but the opposite effect in males. Further, age moderated the effects of total sleep deprivation (SMD = -0.194; 95%CI -0.328 to -0.060; p=.008) on pain sensitivity and fragmented sleep (SMD = -0.110; 95%CI: 0.148 to -0.072; p<.001) on pain threshold. While the moderating effect of sex and age on the sleep-pain relationship was small, these factors need to be considered in future sleep-pain research.

The Effects of Recovery Sleep on Experimental Pain

Recent research suggests that recovery sleep (RS) has the potential to restore pain sensitivity and modulation after hyperalgesia due to preceding sleep deprivation. However, it has not yet been systematically examined whether the restoration of these pain parameters is driven by sleep characteristics of RS. Thus, the present study assessed changes in experimental pain during RS after total sleep deprivation (TSD) to test whether RS parameters predicted the restoration of the pain system. Thirty healthy participants completed one night of habitual sleep, one night of TSD and a subsequent recovery night. At-home sleep during baseline and recovery was assessed using portable polysomnography and a questionnaire. Before and after each night pressure pain thresholds (PPTs), temporal pain summation (TSP) and conditioned pain modulation (CPM) were assessed. PPTs decreased after TSD and increased following RS, indicating a restoration of pain sensitivity after hyperalgesia. RS characteristics did not predict this restoration, suggesting other mechanisms (eg, changes in serotonergic activity) underlying the observed pain changes. TSP indicated a lack of effect of experimental sleep manipulations on excitatory processes whereas CPM lacked sufficient reliability to investigate inhibitory processes. Thus, results indicate moderate effects of sleep manipulations on pain sensitivity, but not on pain modulation. PERSPECTIVE: This article highlights the potential of recovery sleep to let pain thresholds return to normal following their decrease after a night of total sleep deprivation. In contrast, endogenous pain modulation (temporal pain summation, conditioned pain modulation) was not affected by sleep deprivation and recovery sleep.

The effects of recovery sleep on pain perception: A systematic review

Experimental studies highlight profound effects of sleep disruptions on pain, showing that sleep deprivation (SD) leads to hyperalgesic pain changes. On the other hand, given that sleep helps normalizing bodily functions, a crucial role of restorative sleep in the overnight restoration of the pain system seems likely. Thus, a systematic review of experimental studies on effects of recovery sleep (RS; subsequently to SD) on pain was performed with the aim to check whether RS resets hyperalgesic pain changes occurring due to SD. Empirical animal and human studies including SD-paradigms, RS and pain assessments were searched in three databases (PubMed, Web of Science, PsycINFO) using a predefined algorithm. 29 studies were included in this review. Most results indicated a reset of enhanced pain sensitivity and vulnerability following RS, especially when total SD was implemented and pressure pain or painful symptoms (human studies) were assessed. Further research should focus on whether and how recovery is altered in chronic pain patients, as this yields implications for pain treatment by enhancing or stabilizing RS.

Effect of sleep restriction on somatosensory sensitivity including occlusal sensation in the orofacial area

PURPOSE

To investigate the effect of sleep restriction on somatosensory sensitivity related to occlusion.

METHODS

Twelve healthy participants participated in an experimental voluntary total sleep restriction (SR) study. In a study design, they were invited to sleep as usual, normal sleep (NS) or to restrict their sleep for four nights. Following the SR night, participants were followed for 3 consecutive days including the 2 sleep nights. In NS experiment, all participants were instructed to maintain NS both nights. During all nights, actigraphy data were collected and total sleep time was estimated. On days before and after sleep conditions, all participants underwent measurements of tactile detection threshold (TDT), interocclusal detection threshold (IDT), perception of unpleasantness (POU), and the Epworth sleepiness scale (ESS).

RESULTS

As expected, total sleep time on the first night in SR experiment was significantly shorter than on the second night in SR experiment and on the first night in NS experiment (P<0.05). ESS values on Day-2 following SR experiment were significantly higher than on Day-1 and Day-3 in SR experiment and Day-2 in NS experiment (P<0.05). There were no significant differences in TDT and IDT between each day at each measurement point in both experiments. POU was significantly lower on Day-2 in SR experiment than on Day-1 and Day-3 in SR experiment and on Day-2 in NS experiment (P<0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

The present results suggest that SR affects to occlusal sensation related to POU.