Sensory retraining improves light touch threshold of the paretic hand in chronic stroke survivors: a single-subject A-B design

Exploring the contribution of case study research to the evidence base for occupational therapy: a scoping review

BACKGROUND

Case study research is generating interest to evaluate complex interventions. However, it is not clear how this is being utilized by occupational therapists or how feasible it is to contribute to the evidence base. This scoping review explores case study research within occupational therapy in terms of how it is defined, the methodological characteristics adopted, such as data collection and analysis, and the range of practice contexts in which it is applied. We consider the viability of case study research for contributing to our evidence base.

METHODS

Opinion, text and empirical studies within an occupational therapy practice context were included. A three-step extensive search following Joanna Briggs Institute methodology was conducted in June 2020 and updated in July 2021 across ten databases, websites, peer-reviewed and grey literature from 2016 onwards. Study selection was completed by two independent reviewers. A data extraction table was developed and piloted and data charted to align with research questions. Data extraction was completed by one reviewer and a 10% sample cross checked by another.

RESULTS

Eighty-eight studies were included in the review consisting of (n = 84) empirical case study and (n = 4) non-empirical papers. Case study research has been conducted globally, with a range of populations across different settings. The majority were conducted in a community setting (n = 48/84; 57%) with populations experiencing neurodevelopmental disorder (n = 32/84; 38%), stroke (n = 14/84;17%) and non-diagnosis specific (n = 13/84; 15%). Methodologies adopted quantitative (n = 42/84; 50%), mixed methods (n = 22/84; 26%) and qualitative designs (n = 20/84; 24%). However, identifying the methodology and 'case' was a challenge due to methodological inconsistencies.

CONCLUSIONS

Case study research is useful when large-scale inquiry is not appropriate; for cases of complexity, early intervention efficacy, theory testing or when small participant numbers are available. It appears a viable methodology to contribute to the evidence base for occupation and health as it has been used to evaluate interventions across a breadth of occupational therapy practice contexts. Viability could be enhanced through consistent conduct and reporting to allow pooling of case data. A conceptual model and description of case study research in occupational therapy is proposed to support this.

SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION

Open Science Framework 10.17605/OSF.IO/PCFJ6.

BCI system with lower-limb robot improves rehabilitation in spinal cord injury patients through short-term training: a pilot study

In the recent years, the increasing applications of brain-computer interface (BCI) in rehabilitation programs have enhanced the chances of functional recovery for patients with neurological disorders. We presented and validated a BCI system with a lower-limb robot for short-term training of patients with spinal cord injury (SCI). The cores of this system included: (1) electroencephalogram (EEG) features related to motor intention reported through experiments and used to drive the robot; (2) a decision tree to determine the training mode provided for patients with different degrees of injuries. Seven SCI patients (one American Spinal Injury Association Impairment Scale (AIS) A, three AIS B, and three AIS C) participated in the short-term training with this system. All patients could learn to use the system rapidly and maintained a high intensity during the training program. The strength of the lower limb key muscles of the patients was improved. Four AIS A/B patients were elevated to AIS C. The cumulative results indicate that clinical application of the BCI system with lower-limb robot is feasible and safe, and has potentially positive effects on SCI patients.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11571-022-09801-6.

Effects of Meaningful Action Observation Therapy on Occupational Performance, Upper Limb Function, and Corticospinal Excitability Poststroke: A Double-Blind Randomized Control Trial

Introduction

Action observation therapy (AOT) is a mirror neuron-based approach that has been recently used in poststroke rehabilitation. The main goal of this study was to investigate the effectiveness of AOT of occupations and tasks that are meaningful for chronic stroke patients on occupational performance, upper-extremity function, and corticospinal changes.

Method

A randomized control trial was designed to compare between experimental (n = 13) and control groups (n = 14). In both groups, the execution of meaningful tasks was practiced, but the videos of those tasks were just shown to the experiment group. Instead, patients in the control group watched nature videos as a placebo. Clinical outcomes were evaluated using the Canadian Occupational Performance Measure (COPM), Fugl-Meyer Assessment (FMA), Action Research Arm Test (ARAT), and Box-Block Test (BBT) on 3 occasions: baseline, post (at 4 weeks), and follow-up (at 8 weeks). The assessments of central motor conduction time (CMCT) for abductor policis brevis (APB) and extensor indicis (EI) were only recorded at baseline and posttreatment. Both assessors of clinical and neurophysiological outcomes were blinded to the allocation of subjects.

Result

Finally, the results of outcomes in 24 patients who completed the study were analyzed. In both groups, significant improvements after treatment were seen for most outcomes (p ≤ 0.05). These changes were persistent until follow-up. There were significant differences in COPM performance (p = 0.03) and satisfaction (p = 0.001) between the experimental and control groups. In contrast, other clinical assessments such as FMA, ARAT, and BBT did not show significant differences between the two treatments (p ≥ 0.05). The results of CMCT related to APB showed a more significant change in the experiment group compared to the control group (p = 0.022). There was no difference in change detected between the two groups for CMCT related to EI after treatments.

Conclusion

Observation and execution of meaningful activities can enhance the effects of simply practicing those activities on occupational performance/satisfaction and corticospinal excitability poststroke.

Tactile Sensation Improves Following Motor Rehabilitation for Chronic Stroke: The VIGoROUS Randomized Controlled Trial

Background. Up to 85% of people with chronic stroke experience somatosensory impairment, which contributes to poor sensorimotor control and non-use of the affected limb. Neurophysiological mechanisms suggest motor rehabilitation may improve tactile sense post-stroke, however, somatosensory recovery has rarely been reported in controlled trials. Objective. To compare the effect of four upper limb motor rehabilitation programs on the recovery of tactile sensation in adults with chronic stroke. Methods. Adults with chronic stroke and mild or moderate upper extremity hemiparesis (n = 167) were enrolled in a multi-site randomized controlled trial. Participants completed three weeks of gaming therapy, gaming therapy with additional telerehabilition, Constraint-Induced Movement therapy, or traditional rehabilitation. Here, we report the results of a secondary outcome, tactile sensation, measured with monofilaments, before and after treatment, and 6 months later. Results. A mixed-effects general linear model revealed similar positive change in tactile sensitivity regardless of the type of training. On average, participants were able to detect a stimulus that was 32% and 33% less after training and at 6-month follow-up, respectively. One-third of participants experienced recategorization of their level of somatosensory impairment (e.g., regained protective sensation) following training. Poorer tactile sensation at baseline was associated with greater change. Conclusions. About one-third of individuals with mild/moderate chronic hemiparesis experience sustained improvements in tactile sensation following motor rehabilitation, regardless of the extent of tactile input in the rehabilitation program. Potential for sensory improvement is an additional motivator for those post-stroke. Characteristics of those who improve and mechanisms of improvement are important future questions. Clinicaltrials.gov NCT02631850.