1
|
Jones JO, Ince WHJ, Welsh SJ, Stewart GD. Activity of Immunotherapy Regimens on Primary Renal Tumours: A Systematic Review. KIDNEY CANCER 2022. [DOI: 10.3233/kca-220012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICPIs) are widely used in treating metastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC). Cytoreductive nephrectomy (CN) forms part of multimodality treatment in advanced disease, however there is no prospective evidence for its use in the ICPI era. Trials of neoadjuvant ICPIs in RCC are underway; understanding the anticipated effect of ICPIs on the primary tumour may help clinical decision making in both localised and advanced settings. METHODS: A systematic search (PubMed, Web of Science, clinicaltrials.gov) of English literature from 2012 to 2022 was performed according to PRISMA guidelines. 2,398 records were identified, 54 were included in the analysis. RESULTS: In the metastatic setting, response in the primary tumour (≥30% reduction in size) is seen in 33–56% of patients treated with dual ICPI or ICPI + VEGFR-TKI. Pathological complete response rates were 14% for patients undergoing CN after a period of ICPI therapy. In the neoadjuvant setting there is a single published trial of VEGFR-TKI + ICPI, 30% of patients had a≥30% reduction in size of the primary. This appears superior to single agent ICPI. Grade 3 adverse event rates are comparable to the metastatic setting. CONCLUSIONS: A period of ICPI combination therapy followed by nephrectomy may be considered for selected patients as a strategy to manage metastatic disease. In the neoadjuvant setting, it is not clear whether ICPI + VEGFR-TKI is superior to VEGFR-TKI alone. There is minimal data on whether either CN after ICPI in metastatic patients, or neoadjuvant ICPI therapy for localised disease, improves long term survival.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- James O. Jones
- University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
- Cambridge University Hospitals NHS FoundationTrust, Cambridge, UK
| | | | - Sarah J. Welsh
- University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
- Cambridge University Hospitals NHS FoundationTrust, Cambridge, UK
| | - Grant D. Stewart
- University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
- Cambridge University Hospitals NHS FoundationTrust, Cambridge, UK
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Studentova H, Zemankova A, Spisarova M, Skanderova D, Tudos Z, Melichar B, Student V. A Pathological Complete Response to the Combination of Ipilimumab and Nivolumab in a Patient with Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma. Medicina (B Aires) 2022; 58:medicina58030336. [PMID: 35334512 PMCID: PMC8951627 DOI: 10.3390/medicina58030336] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/20/2022] [Revised: 02/09/2022] [Accepted: 02/19/2022] [Indexed: 01/05/2023] Open
Abstract
Background and Objectives: Complete pathological response after ipilimumab and nivolumab combination therapy in a patient with intermediate prognosis renal cell carcinoma is an uncommon finding. Case presentation: A 60-year-old man presented with synchronous solitary metastatic bone lesion and renal cell carcinoma and achieved a complete pathological response after surgical resection of the bone lesion, followed by ipilimumab and nivolumab combination therapy and nephrectomy. The treatment was complicated by hypophysitis and oligoarthritis more than a year after the initiation of the therapy. Conclusions: Currently, the combination therapy based on immune checkpoint inhibitors represents the treatment of choice in patients with intermediate- and poor-risk prognosis metastatic renal cell carcinoma. In the present case, preoperative therapy with ipilimumab and nivolumab resulted in a complete pathological response in the renal tumor. Vigilance concerning potential immune-related side effects is warranted throughout the course of therapy and the subsequent follow-up.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hana Studentova
- Department of Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Palacky University Olomouc and University Hospital Olomouc, I.P. Pavlova 6, 77900 Olomouc, Czech Republic; (H.S.); (A.Z.); (M.S.); (B.M.)
| | - Anezka Zemankova
- Department of Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Palacky University Olomouc and University Hospital Olomouc, I.P. Pavlova 6, 77900 Olomouc, Czech Republic; (H.S.); (A.Z.); (M.S.); (B.M.)
| | - Martina Spisarova
- Department of Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Palacky University Olomouc and University Hospital Olomouc, I.P. Pavlova 6, 77900 Olomouc, Czech Republic; (H.S.); (A.Z.); (M.S.); (B.M.)
| | - Daniela Skanderova
- Department of Clinical and Molecular Pathology, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Palacky University Olomouc and University Hospital Olomouc, I.P. Pavlova 6, 77900 Olomouc, Czech Republic;
| | - Zbynek Tudos
- Department of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Palacky University Olomouc and University Hospital Olomouc, I.P. Pavlova 6, 77900 Olomouc, Czech Republic;
| | - Bohuslav Melichar
- Department of Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Palacky University Olomouc and University Hospital Olomouc, I.P. Pavlova 6, 77900 Olomouc, Czech Republic; (H.S.); (A.Z.); (M.S.); (B.M.)
| | - Vladimir Student
- Department of Urology, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Palacky University Olomouc and University Hospital Olomouc, I.P. Pavlova 6, 77900 Olomouc, Czech Republic
- Correspondence:
| |
Collapse
|