1
|
Host genetics associated with gut microbiota and methane emission in cattle. Mol Biol Rep 2022; 49:8153-8161. [PMID: 35776394 DOI: 10.1007/s11033-022-07718-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/22/2022] [Accepted: 06/15/2022] [Indexed: 10/17/2022]
Abstract
In livestock sector, dairy animals alone produce 18% of the total greenhouse gas emissions globally as methane (CH4). This Enteric methane is the largest component of total carbon footprints produced by livestock production system and its reduction is today's new challenge to make livestock farming sustainable for earth's environment. The production of enteric methane in ruminants is a complex phenomena involving different host factors like host genotype, rumen microbiome, host physiology along with dietary factors. Efforts have been made to reduce methane emissions largely through nutritional interventions and dietary supplements, but permanent reductions can be obtained through genetic means by selecting and breeding of low methane emitting animals. From genome-wide association studies, many important genomic QTL regions and single nucleotide polymorphisms involved in shaping the composition of the ruminal microbiome and thus their carbon footprints have been recognised, implying that methane emission traits are quantitative traits. The major bottleneck in implementation of reduced methane emission traits in the breeding programs is wide variation at phenotypic level, lack of precise methane measurements at individual level. Overall, the heritability for CH4 production traits is moderate, and it can be used in breeding programmes to target changes in microbial composition to reduce CH4 emission in the dairy industry for far-reaching environmental benefits at the cost of a minor reduction in genetic gain in production traits.
Collapse
|
2
|
Sypniewski M, Strabel T, Pszczola M. Genetic Variability of Methane Production and Concentration Measured in the Breath of Polish Holstein-Friesian Cattle. Animals (Basel) 2021; 11:ani11113175. [PMID: 34827907 PMCID: PMC8614515 DOI: 10.3390/ani11113175] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/04/2021] [Revised: 10/29/2021] [Accepted: 11/04/2021] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
The genetic architecture of methane (CH4) production remains largely unknown. We aimed to estimate its heritability and to perform genome-wide association studies (GWAS) for the identification of candidate genes associated with two phenotypes: CH4 in parts per million/day (CH4 ppm/d) and CH4 in grams/day (CH4 g/d). We studied 483 Polish Holstein-Friesian cows kept on two commercial farms in Poland. Measurements of CH4 and carbon dioxide (CO2) concentrations exhaled by cows during milking were obtained using gas analyzers installed in the automated milking system on the farms. Genomic analyses were performed using a single-step BLUP approach. The percentage of genetic variance explained by SNPs was calculated for each SNP separately and then for the windows of neighbouring SNPs. The heritability of CH4 ppm/d ranged from 0 to 0.14, with an average of 0.085. The heritability of CH4 g/d ranged from 0.13 to 0.26, with an average of 0.22. The GWAS detected potential candidate SNPs on BTA 14 which explained ~0.9% of genetic variance for CH4 ppm/d and ~1% of genetic variance for CH4 g/d. All identified SNPs were located in the TRPS1 gene. We showed that methane traits are partially controlled by genes; however, the detected SNPs explained only a small part of genetic variation-implying that both CH4 ppm/d and CH4 g/d are highly polygenic traits.
Collapse
|
3
|
Difford GF, Díaz-Gil C, Sánchez-Moya A, Aslam ML, Horn SS, Ruyter B, Herlin M, Lopez M, Sonesson AK. Genomic and Phenotypic Agreement Defines the Use of Microwave Dielectric Spectroscopy for Recording Muscle Lipid Content in European Seabass ( Dicentrarchus labrax). Front Genet 2021; 12:671491. [PMID: 34527016 PMCID: PMC8435770 DOI: 10.3389/fgene.2021.671491] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/23/2021] [Accepted: 08/06/2021] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Recording the fillet lipid percentage in European seabass is crucial to control lipid deposition as a means toward improving production efficiency and product quality. The reference method for recording lipid content is solvent lipid extraction and is the most accurate and precise method available. However, it is costly, requires sacrificing the fish and grinding the fillet sample which limits the scope of applications, for example grading of fillets, recording live fish or selective breeding of fish with own phenotypes are all limited. We tested a rapid, cost effective and non-destructive handheld microwave dielectric spectrometer (namely the Distell fat meter) against the reference method by recording both methods on 313 European seabass (Dicentrarchus labrax). The total method agreement between the dielectric spectrometer and the reference method was assessed by Lin’s concordance correlation coefficient (CCC), which was low to moderate CCC = 0.36–0.63. We detected a significant underestimation in accuracy of lipid percentage 22–26% by the dielectric spectrometer and increased imprecision resulting in the coefficient of variation (CV) doubling for dielectric spectrometer CV = 40.7–46% as compared to the reference method 27–31%. Substantial genetic variation for fillet lipid percentage was found for both the reference method (h2 = 0.59) and dielectric spectroscopy (h2 = 0.38–0.58), demonstrating that selective breeding is a promising method for controlling fillet lipid content. Importantly, the genetic correlation (rg) between the dielectric spectrometer and the reference method was positive and close to unity (rg = 0.96), demonstrating the dielectric spectrometer captures practically all the genetic variation in the reference method. These findings form the basis of defining the scope of applications and experimental design for using dielectric spectroscopy for recording fillet lipid content in European seabass and validate its use for selective breeding.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Albert Sánchez-Moya
- Department of Cell Biology, Physiology, and Immunology, Faculty of Biology, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
de Haas Y, Veerkamp RF, de Jong G, Aldridge MN. Selective breeding as a mitigation tool for methane emissions from dairy cattle. Animal 2021; 15 Suppl 1:100294. [PMID: 34246599 DOI: 10.1016/j.animal.2021.100294] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/29/2020] [Revised: 01/21/2021] [Accepted: 01/25/2021] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
The global livestock sector, particularly ruminants, contributes substantially to the total anthropogenic greenhouse gases. Management and dietary solutions to reduce enteric methane (CH4) emissions are extensively researched. Animal breeding that exploits natural variation in CH4 emissions is an additional mitigation solution that is cost-effective, permanent, and cumulative. We quantified the effect of including CH4 production in the Dutch breeding goal using selection index theory. The current Dutch national index contains 15 traits, related to milk yield, longevity, health, fertility, conformation and feed efficiency. From the literature, we obtained a heritability of 0.21 for enteric CH4 production, and genetic correlations of 0.4 with milk lactose, protein, fat and DM intake. Correlations between enteric CH4 production and other traits in the breeding goal were set to zero. When including CH4 production in the current breeding goal with a zero economic value, CH4 production increases each year by 1.5 g/d as a correlated response. When extrapolating this, the average daily CH4 production of 392 g/d in 2018 will increase to 442 g/d in 2050 (+13%). However, expressing the CH4 production as CH4 intensity in the same period shows a reduction of 13%. By putting economic weight on CH4 production in the breeding goal, selective breeding can reduce the CH4 intensity even by 24% in 2050. This shows that breeding is a valuable contribution to the whole set of mitigation strategies that could be applied in order to achieve the goals for 2050 set by the EU. If the decision is made to implement animal breeding strategies to reduce enteric CH4 production, and to achieve the expected breeding impact, there needs to be a sufficient reliability of prediction. The only way to achieve that is to have enough animals phenotyped and genotyped. The power calculations offer insights into the difficulties that will be faced in trying to record enough data. Recording CH4 data on 100 farms (with on average 150 cows each) for at least 2 years is required to achieve the desired reliability of 0.40 for the genomic prediction.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Y de Haas
- Animal Breeding and Genomics, Wageningen University & Research, 6700 AH Wageningen, the Netherlands.
| | - R F Veerkamp
- Animal Breeding and Genomics, Wageningen University & Research, 6700 AH Wageningen, the Netherlands
| | - G de Jong
- CRV, 6800 AL Arnhem, the Netherlands
| | - M N Aldridge
- Animal Breeding and Genomics, Wageningen University & Research, 6700 AH Wageningen, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Jonker A, Hickey S, Boma P, Woyimo Woju C, Sandoval E, MacLean S, García Rendón Calzada M, Yu W, Lewis S, Janssen PH, McEwan JC, Rowe S. Individual-level correlations of rumen volatile fatty acids with enteric methane emissions for ranking methane yield in sheep fed fresh pasture. ANIMAL PRODUCTION SCIENCE 2021. [DOI: 10.1071/an20128] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
Context
Total ruminal volatile fatty acids (VFA) or acetate concentrations were previously found to be moderate correlated proxies to select sheep that are genetically low methane (CH4) emitters. However, this was based on trials, with sheep fed lucerne pellets at a fixed feeding level, which is different from pastoral farming conditions in New Zealand, where the correlated proxy would be applied.
Aim
To determine repeatability and individual-level correlation of rumen VFAs with CH4 emissions in sheep fed ad libitum cut pasture in three and four repeated periods in Experiments 1 and 2 respectively. Sheep in Experiment 1 were also fed lucerne pellets at 2.0 × maintenance-energy requirements in two periods.
Methods
Methane emissions were measured from 96 and 72 animals, in Experiments 1 and 2 respectively, in respiration chambers and rumen samples were collected via oral stomach tubing before morning feeding. Repeatability estimates between periods within feed and experiment serve as an upper threshold for the estimate of heritability and ri estimates are a proxy for genetic correlation.
Key results
Methane (g/day) production and yield (g/kg dry-matter intake) were low to moderately repeatable traits on pasture across periods (0.58 and 0.39 for CH4 production and 0.43 and 0.32 for yield in Experiments 1 and 2 respectively). On pasture, repeatability was generally greater for VFA proportions (0.13–0.32) than for VFA concentrations (0.02–0.24), while the opposite was the case on lucerne pellets. Rumen propionate as a proportion of total VFA had strong negative ri (−0.82 and −0.87) and acetate:propionate ratio (A:P; 0.82 and 0.78) and (acetate + butyrate):(propionate + valerate) ratio (AB:PV; 0.84 and 0.82) had a strong positive ri with CH4 yield in sheep fed cut pasture, while the ri of total ruminal VFA (−0.13 and 0.35) and acetate (−0.08 and 0.38) concentrations with CH4 yield were only moderate and non-significant.
Conclusion
The VFA traits propionate proportion and A:P and AB:PV ratios had strong individual-level correlations with CH4 yield in sheep fed pasture ad libitum, suggesting that they would be useful correlated proxies to rank sheep CH4 yields.
Collapse
|
6
|
Garnsworthy PC, Difford GF, Bell MJ, Bayat AR, Huhtanen P, Kuhla B, Lassen J, Peiren N, Pszczola M, Sorg D, Visker MHPW, Yan T. Comparison of Methods to Measure Methane for Use in Genetic Evaluation of Dairy Cattle. Animals (Basel) 2019; 9:E837. [PMID: 31640130 PMCID: PMC6826463 DOI: 10.3390/ani9100837] [Citation(s) in RCA: 45] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/30/2019] [Revised: 10/11/2019] [Accepted: 10/15/2019] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Partners in Expert Working Group WG2 of the COST Action METHAGENE have used several methods for measuring methane output by individual dairy cattle under various environmental conditions. Methods included respiration chambers, the sulphur hexafluoride (SF6) tracer technique, breath sampling during milking or feeding, the GreenFeed system, and the laser methane detector. The aim of the current study was to review and compare the suitability of methods for large-scale measurements of methane output by individual animals, which may be combined with other databases for genetic evaluations. Accuracy, precision and correlation between methods were assessed. Accuracy and precision are important, but data from different sources can be weighted or adjusted when combined if they are suitably correlated with the 'true' value. All methods showed high correlations with respiration chambers. Comparisons among alternative methods generally had lower correlations than comparisons with respiration chambers, despite higher numbers of animals and in most cases simultaneous repeated measures per cow per method. Lower correlations could be due to increased variability and imprecision of alternative methods, or maybe different aspects of methane emission are captured using different methods. Results confirm that there is sufficient correlation between methods for measurements from all methods to be combined for international genetic studies and provide a much-needed framework for comparing genetic correlations between methods should these become available.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Philip C Garnsworthy
- School of Biosciences, University of Nottingham, Sutton Bonington Campus, Loughborough LE12 5RD, UK.
| | - Gareth F Difford
- Department of Molecular Biology and Genetics-Center for Quantitative Genetics and Genomics, Aarhus University, Blichers Allé 20, 8830 Tjele, Denmark.
- Animal Breeding and Genomics, Wageningen University & Research, P.O. Box 338, 6700 AH Wageningen, The Netherlands.
| | - Matthew J Bell
- School of Biosciences, University of Nottingham, Sutton Bonington Campus, Loughborough LE12 5RD, UK.
| | - Ali R Bayat
- Milk Production, Production Systems, Natural Resources Institute Finland (Luke), FI 31600 Jokioinen, Finland.
| | - Pekka Huhtanen
- Department of Agricultural Research for Northern Sweden, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, SE-901 83 Umeå, Sweden.
| | - Björn Kuhla
- Institute of Nutritional Physiology "Oskar Kellner", Leibniz Institute for Farm Animal Biology (FBN), Wilhelm-Stahl-Allee 2, 18196 Dummerstorf, Germany.
| | - Jan Lassen
- Department of Molecular Biology and Genetics-Center for Quantitative Genetics and Genomics, Aarhus University, Blichers Allé 20, 8830 Tjele, Denmark.
| | - Nico Peiren
- Flanders Research Institute for Agriculture, Fisheries and Food, Animal Sciences Unit, Scheldeweg 68, 9090 Melle, Belgium.
| | - Marcin Pszczola
- Department of Genetics and Animal Breeding, Poznan University of Life Sciences, Wolynska 33, 60-637 Poznan, Poland.
| | - Diana Sorg
- Institute of Agricultural and Nutritional Sciences, Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg, Animal Breeding, Theodor-Lieser-Str. 11, 06120 Halle, Germany.
- German Environment Agency (Umweltbundesamt), Wörlitzer Platz 1, 06844 Dessau-Roßlau, Germany.
| | - Marleen H P W Visker
- Animal Breeding and Genomics, Wageningen University & Research, P.O. Box 338, 6700 AH Wageningen, The Netherlands.
| | - Tianhai Yan
- Agri-Food and Biosciences Institute, Hillsborough, Co. Down BT26 6DR, UK.
| |
Collapse
|