Long-Term Efficacy and Safety of Interferon Alpha-2a in the Treatment of Chinese Patients with Behçet's Uveitis Not Responding to Conventional Therapy

Combinations of immunomodulatory agents for prevention of uveitis relapse in patients with severe Behçet's disease already on corticosteroid therapy: a randomised, open-label, head-to-head trial

BACKGROUND

Data from head-to-head trials of immunomodulatory therapies for Behçet's disease are scarce. We aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of ciclosporin, interferon alfa-2a, and adalimumab, each combined with corticosteroids, in preventing uveitis relapse in patients with severe Behçet's disease.

METHODS

We did a randomised, open-label, assessor-masked, head-to-head trial at a large, specialised uveitis centre in Chongqing, China. Patients aged 18 years or older with severe Behçet's disease uveitis on corticosteroids and naive to anti-TNF therapy were eligible. Patients were randomly assigned in a 1:1:1 ratio to ciclosporin (2-5 mg/kg per day orally), interferon alfa-2a (3 million IU per day subcutaneously), or adalimumab (40 mg every 2 weeks subcutaneously), each combined with a tapering dose of corticosteroids with subsequent dose adjustments. The primary outcome was the annualised relapse rate of uveitis, assessed in the full analysis set (all randomly assigned patients with at least one post-baseline assessment). The non-inferiority margin of difference between the interferon alfa-2a and adalimumab groups was set to 1·0 for the primary outcome. Safety was assessed in all patients who received at least one dose of trial drugs. Individuals with lived experience of Behçet's disease uveitis were involved in the trial design and implementation. This study is registered with Chinese Clinical Trial Registry, ChiCTR2000031637. The trial is ongoing, but is closed to new participants.

FINDINGS

Between May 12, 2020, and Feb 22, 2022, a total of 270 patients (mean age 38·1 years [SD 9·8]; 213 [79%] men, 57 [21%] women; 270 [100%] east Asian ethnicity) were randomly assigned to ciclosporin, interferon alfa-2a, or adalimumab (n=90 in each group); 261 patients were included in the full analysis set. For the primary outcome, the least-squares mean was 1·84 (95% CI 1·40 to 2·44) with ciclosporin, 1·44 (1·10 to 1·89) with interferon alfa-2a, and 0·95 (0·64 to 1·40) with adalimumab. The annualised relapse rate was significantly higher in patients receiving ciclosporin than in those receiving adalimumab (least-squares mean difference 0·90 [95% CI 0·27 to 1·53]; p=0·0054 for superiority). The least-squares mean difference between interferon alfa-2a and adalimumab was 0·50 (-0·04 to 1·04), which did not meet non-inferiority criteria (p=0·034 for non-inferiority). The primary outcome did not differ substantially between interferon alfa-2a and ciclosporin (least-squares mean difference -0·40 [-1·05 to 0·25]; p=0·23 for superiority). Serious adverse events were reported in 12 (13%) of 90 patients on ciclosporin plus corticosteroids, eight (9%) of 90 patients on interferon alfa-2a plus corticosteroids, and seven (8%) of 90 patients on adalimumab plus corticosteroids. There were no treatment-related deaths.

INTERPRETATION

Adalimumab plus corticosteroids was superior to ciclosporin plus corticosteroids with respect to uveitis relapse rate in patients with severe Behçet's disease naive to anti-TNF therapy, and interferon alfa-2a plus corticosteroids was not found to be non-inferior to adalimumab plus corticosteroids or superior to ciclosporin plus corticosteroids.

FUNDING

National Natural Science Foundation of China Key Program, Major Program of Medical Science and Technology Project of Health Commission of Henan Province, Chongqing Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology, and China National Postdoctoral Program for Innovative Talents.

Interferons in vitreoretinal diseases; a review on their clinical application, and mechanism of action

PURPOSE

This review investigates the therapeutic benefits of interferons (IFNs) in vitreoretinal diseases, focusing on their regulatory roles in innate immunological reactions and angiogenesis. The study aims to categorize the clinical outcomes of IFN applications and proposes a molecular mechanism underlying their action.

METHODS

A systematic review was conducted using MEDLINE/PubMed, Web of Science, EMBASE, and Google Scholar databases to identify randomized clinical trials, case series, and case-control studies related to IFNs' impact on vitreoretinal diseases (1990-2022). The data synthesis involved an in-depth analysis of the anti-inflammatory and anti-angiogenesis effects of IFNs across various studies.

RESULTS

Our findings indicate that IFNs exhibit efficacy in treating inflammation-associated vitreoretinal disorders. However, a lack of sufficient evidence exists regarding the suitability of IFNs in angiogenesis-associated vitreoretinal diseases like choroidal neovascularization and diabetic retinopathies. The synthesis of data suggests that IFNs may not be optimal for managing advanced stages of angiogenesis-associated disorders.

CONCLUSION

While IFNs emerge as promising therapeutic candidates for inflammation-related vitreoretinal diseases, caution is warranted in their application for angiogenesis-associated disorders, especially in advanced stages. Further research is needed to elucidate the nuanced molecular pathways of IFN action, guiding their targeted use in specific vitreoretinal conditions.

Treatment with Biologic Drugs in Pediatric Behçet's Disease: A Comprehensive Analysis of the Published Data

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Behçet's disease (BD) is a variable vessel vasculitis. Biologic drugs are increasingly used in the treatment of BD. We aimed to analyze biologic drug use in the treatment of pediatric BD.

METHODS

MEDLINE/PubMed and Scopus databases were searched from the inception of these databases until 15 November 2022, according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Only reports presenting data of pediatric patients with BD (BD diagnosis < 18 years of age) treated with biologic drugs were included. The demographic features, clinical characteristics, and data on treatment were extracted from the included papers.

RESULTS

We included 87 articles including 187 pediatric patients with BD treated with biologic drugs (215 biologic treatments). Tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α inhibitors (176 treatments) were the most frequently used biologic drugs followed by interferons (21 treatments). Other reported biologic treatments were anti-interleukin-1 agents (n = 11), tocilizumab (n = 4), daclizumab (n = 2), and rituximab (n = 1). The most common indication for biologic drug use was ocular involvement (93 treatments) followed by multisystem active disease (29 treatments). Monoclonal TNF-α inhibitors, adalimumab and infliximab, were preferred over etanercept in ocular and gastrointestinal BD. The improvement rates with any TNF-α inhibitor, adalimumab, infliximab, etanercept, and interferons were 78.5%, 86.1%, 63.4%, 87.5%, and 70%; respectively. The organ-specific improvement rate with TNF-α inhibitors was 76.7% and 70% for ocular and gastrointestinal system involvement. Adverse events have been reported for TNF-α inhibitors, interferons, and rituximab. Six of these were severe [TNF-α inhibitors (n = 4); interferons (n = 2)].

CONCLUSIONS

The presented systematic literature search revealed that TNF-α inhibitors followed by interferons were the most frequently used biologic drugs in pediatric BD. Both group of biologic treatments appeared to be effective and have an acceptable safety profile in pediatric BD. However, controlled studies are required for analyzing indications for biologic treatments in pediatric BD.

Risk factors, clinical features and treatment of Behçet's disease uveitis

Behçet's disease is a systemic vasculitis frequently associated with intraocular inflammation. Recent findings identified independent clinical clusters in Behçet's disease, each involving distinct combinations of affected organs. Ocular Behçet's disease, mainly manifested as uveitis, is characterized as an independent cluster with a low likelihood of association with other system involvements, such as intestinal, cardiovascular, or central nervous system. A prevailing theory suggests that the pathogenesis of the disease is multifactorial, where a variety of genetic and infectious agents may interact with each other to cause the disease. Among sporadic cases, the human leukocyte antigen (HLA) genes, including HLA-B51, HLA-A26, HLA-B15, and HLA-B5701, have been found to be a key component conferring genetic susceptibility. Outside the HLA region, a set of susceptibility variants are identified, closely related to interleukin (IL)-23/IL-17 pathway, tumor necrosis factor (TNF) signaling, and pattern recognition receptor systems. Microbial infections, such as Streptococcus sanguinis, Mycobacterium tuberculosis, and Herpes simplex virus (HSV), are linked to play the triggering of disease in immunogenetically predisposed individuals. Clinically, due to the notable relapsing-remitting course of ocular Behçet's disease, the prevention of recurrent attack would be the primary treatment goal. Combination of corticosteroids and immunomodulatory drugs, such as anti-TNF agents, interferon, and conventional immunosuppressants (e.g. cyclosporine, azathioprine), have been the mainstream regimen for the disease. Future research may focus on comparing the effectiveness of immunomodulatory drugs and identifying the most suitable subgroups for a specific drug on the basis of the knowledge of the molecular heterogeneity of the disease.

Shaping the Future of Behçet's Uveitis Management: A Comprehensive Review of Efficacy, Challenges, and Prospects of Biologic Therapies

Behçet's uveitis (BU), a vision-threatening manifestation of Behçet's disease, poses substantial management challenges due to its chronic, relapsing nature and potential for vision loss. This review explores the role of biologic therapies in the treatment of BU, providing a comprehensive overview of their effectiveness, drawbacks, and future possibilities. Traditionally, management has relied heavily on corticosteroids and conventional immunosuppressants. However, their long-term use is frequently associated with systemic side effects and insufficient control of ocular inflammation. Biologic therapies, particularly TNF-alpha inhibitors like infliximab and adalimumab, have emerged as effective alternatives, offering better disease control and a more favorable safety profile. We critically evaluated these agents, noting their clinical efficacy in reducing inflammatory flares and preserving visual acuity. Despite their benefits, several issues remain. Accessibility, cost, and lack of long-term safety data limit their widespread use. Additionally, individual variability in treatment response necessitates personalized therapeutic strategies. Recent research has shown promise in addressing these challenges, with the emergence of novel biologic agents and personalized medicine approaches. In summary, biologic therapies represent a paradigm shift in BU management, contributing to better patient outcomes. Yet, there are significant challenges to be overcome. As we move forward, continued research, development of novel biologic agents, and a precision medicine approach will shape the future landscape of BU treatment.

Neurological involvement by Behçet's syndrome: clinical features, diagnosis, treatment and outcome

Neurological involvement in Behçet's syndrome arises predominately through an inflammatory meningoencephalitis characterised by perivenular inflammation due to activation of Th-17 immunological pathways. The brainstem is involved in 50% of cases, the diencephalon and other areas of the brain in 30%, and the spinal cord in 10%. Movement disorders and epilepsy may occur. Psychiatric syndromes may arise with brain and brainstem involvement, and cognitive disorders relate to the brain disease, to circulating inflammatory factors, and to fatigue and despondency. Eighty per cent of cases begin with a relapsing disease course, of whom 70% have only one attack, and 30% have a progressive disease course either from onset or following an initially relapsing course. Venous thrombosis leading to intracranial hypertension and cerebral venous infarction is less common and caused by inflammation in affected veins and a circulating prothrombotic state. Arterial involvement is rare and relates to an arteritis affecting large-sized and medium-sized vessels within the brain leading to infarction, subarachnoid and parenchymal haemorrhage, aneurysm formation and arterial dissection. There is a newly recognised disorder of cerebral cortical hypoperfusion. Cranial neuropathy, peripheral neuropathy and myositis are rare. There has been significant progress in understanding the pathophysiology and treatment of the systemic disease, leading to improved outcomes, but there has been no randomised trial of treatment in the neurological disorder.

Intestinal Behcet's Disease: A Review of the Immune Mechanism and Present and Potential Biological Agents

Behcet's disease (BD) is a chronic and recurrent systemic vasculitis involving almost all organs and tissues. Intestinal BD is defined as BD with predominant gastrointestinal involvement, presenting severe complications such as massive gastrointestinal hemorrhage, perforation, and obstruction in some cases. To some extent, intestinal BD is classified as a member of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), as it has a lot in common with classical IBD including Crohn's disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC). Certainly, the underlying pathogenesis is not the same and dysregulation of immune function is believed to be one of the main pathogeneses in intestinal BD, although the etiology has not been clear up to now. Biological agents are an emerging category of pharmaceuticals for various diseases, including inflammatory diseases and cancers, in recent decades. Based on the deep understanding of the immune mechanism of intestinal BD, biological agents targeting potential pathogenic cells, cytokines and pathways are optimized options. Recently, the adoption of biological agents such as anti-tumor necrosis factor agents has allowed for the effective treatment of patients with refractory intestinal BD who show poor response to conventional medications and are faced with the risk of surgical treatment. In this review, we have tried to summarize the immune mechanism and present potential biological agents of intestinal BD.

Interferon-α2a induces CD4+ T cell apoptosis and suppresses Th1/Th17 responses via upregulating IRF1-mediated PDL1 expression in dendritic cells from Behcet's uveitis

Recombinant interferon-α2a (IFNα2a) has been widely used in the treatment of Behcet's uveitis (BU). However, the mechanism underlying its effects remains poorly understood. In this study, we investigated its effect on dendritic cells (DCs) and CD4⁺ T cells, which are essential for the development of BU. Our results showed that the expression of PDL1 and IRF1 was significantly decreased in DCs from active BU patients, and IFNα2a could significantly upregulate PDL1 expression in an IRF1-dependent manner. IFNα2a-treated DCs induced CD4⁺ T cells apoptosis and inhibited the Th1/Th17 immune response in association with reduced secretion of IFN-γ and IL-17. We also found that IFNα2a promoted Th1 cell differentiation and IL-10 secretion by CD4⁺ T cells. Finally, a comparison of patients before and after IFNα2a therapy revealed that the frequencies of Th1/Th17 cells significantly decreased in association with remission of uveitis after IFNα2a therapy. Collectively, these results show that IFNα2a could exert its effects by modulating the function of DCs and CD4⁺ T cells in BU.

Effectiveness and safety of low-dose interferon alpha-2a treatment in Behçet’s Syndrome with refractory vascular or neurological involvement: a case series

Objective:

The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of low-dose interferon alpha-2a (IFNα2a) in Behçet’s syndrome (BS) patients with refractory vascular/cardiac or neurological involvement.

Methods:

In this retrospective cohort study, we consecutively included 25 BS patients with refractory vascular/cardiac ( n = 16) or neurological involvement ( n = 9) who received IFNα2a treatment in our center between June 2018 and September 2021. The low-dose IFNα2a (3 million IU, every other day) was used as an add-on treatment with the continuation of glucocorticoids (GCs) and immunosuppressants.

Results:

In total, 25 patients (20 males, 5 females) with a mean age of 31.92 ± 9.25 years were included. IFNα2a was administered for BS patients with refractory vascular/cardiac involvement ( n = 16) and neurological involvement ( n = 9). Before the initiation of IFNα2a, patients had insufficient response or intolerance to conventional therapies. After a median follow-up of 23 [interquartile range (IQR), 11–30] months, all patients achieved clinical improvement. The Behçet’s disease Current Activity Form (BDCAF) score improved significantly (5 versus 0, median, p < 0.0001). BS Overall Damage Index (BODI) and vasculitis damage index (VDI) remain stable ( p > 0.05). Decrease in erythrocyte sedimentation rate [ESR; 24 (IQR, 12–43.5) versus 5 (IQR, 2.75–10.5) mm/h, p = 0.0001] and C-reactive protein [CRP; 6.64 (IQR, 3.67–19.82) versus 1.24 (IQR, 0.24–3.12) mg/liter, p < 0.005] was achieved effectively. The median GCs dosage tapered from 26.25 (IQR, 11.88–41.25) to 10.00 (IQR, 7.50–10.63) mg/d, p < 0.0001. Immunosuppressants were also reduced in number ( p < 0.005). No serious adverse events were observed during follow-up.

Conclusion:

Our study suggests that low-dose IFNα2a, combined with GCs and immunosuppressants, is well-tolerated and effective for BS patients with refractory vascular/cardiac or neurological involvement and has a steroid- and immunosuppressant-sparing effect.

Comparison of the Safety and Efficacy of Interferon Alpha-2a and Cyclosporine-A When Combined With Glucocorticoid in the Treatment of Refractory Behçet's Uveitis: A Randomized Controlled Prospective Study

Purpose: To evaluate and compare the efficacy and safety of interferon alpha-2a (IFN-α2a) and cyclosporine-A (CsA) in patients with refractory Behçet’s uveitis (BU).

Methods: In this 12-month randomized, controlled, prospective trial, 26 participants (44 eyes) completed the study. Patients were randomly allocated to the IFN-α2a or CsA groups. All patients in both groups received a standardized prednisone burst and tapering schedule as per protocol. The primary outcome measures were response rate, complete remission rate, and tolerance rate. The secondary outcome measures included time to achieve complete remission, the logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR) of best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), and Behçet’s disease ocular attack score 24 (BOS24). T-tests and non-parametric tests were used to compare quantitative variables, and chi-square tests were performed to compare qualitative variables.

Results: The response and complete remission rates were 85.7% (12/14 patients) and 50.0% (7/14 patients) in the IFN-α2a group, compared with 66.7% (8/12 patients) and 25.0% (3/12 patients) in the CsA group, respectively (p > 0.05). Complete remission was achieved at 3.3 and 7.0 months after initiation of IFN-α2a and CsA (p = 0.023). LogMAR BCVA significantly improved 1 month after IFN-α2a initiation (23 eyes) (p = 0.002), and this beneficial effect remained statistically significant during the entire follow-up period (p < 0.05); however, this improvement was not observed in the CsA group (21 eyes). At the endpoint, LogMAR BCVA in the IFN-α2a group was significantly better (0.22 vs. 0.31, p = 0.031) with a higher improvement rate (60.9 vs. 47.6%, p > 0.05). Moreover, compared to the CsA group, more eyes in the IFN-α2a group had a lower BOS24 score (87.0 vs. 57.1%, p = 0.042). None of the patients had any side effects that influenced the medication adherence.

Conclusion: Compared to CsA plus corticosteroid, IFN-α2a plus corticosteroid appears to induce a better treatment response, a significantly greater improvement in visual acuity, and more stable remission of intraocular inflammation in a 12-month study period.

Vasculitis: From Target Molecules to Novel Therapeutic Approaches

Systemic vasculitis is a group of diverse diseases characterized by immune-mediated inflammation of blood vessels. Current treatments for vasculitis, such as glucocorticoids and alkylating agents, are associated with significant side effects. In addition, the management of both small and large vessel vasculitis is challenging due to a lack of robust markers of disease activity. Recent research has advanced our understanding of the pathogenesis of both small and large vessel vasculitis, and this has led to the development of novel biologic therapies capable of targeting key cytokine and cellular effectors of the inflammatory cascade. It is anticipated that these novel treatments will lead to more effective and less toxic treatment regimens for patients with systemic vasculitis.

Vasculitis damage index in Behçet's disease

BACKGROUND

Vasculitis damage index (VDI) is a validated damage index for systemic vasculitis, and as Behçet's disease is considered one of systemic vascular disease we aimed to study the relationship of the vasculitis damage index to clinical manifestations and comorbidity in patients with Behçet's disease (BD) to determine if VDI could be used to assess damage in patients with BD.

METHODS

A total of 109 patients with BD were recruited from the Rheumatology Department (outpatient and inpatient clinic), Cairo University Hospitals. All patients were subjected to full history taking, clinical examination, and routine laboratory investigations. Disease activity was assessed by the BD current activity form, and the VDI was calculated in all patients. The relationship of the VDI to the disease clinical manifestations was studied. Mann-Whitney and Kruskal Wallis tests were used to estimate differences in quantitative variables. Spearman correlation test was used to test for correlation between quantitative variables.

RESULTS

In the current study, the VDI ranged from 1 to 10, with a mean of 3.5 ± 1.8. It was significantly associated with total thrombosis (P = 0.022); total neurological manifestations (P = 0.000), especially stroke and cranial nerve affection; uveitis (P = 0.005); avascular necrosis (AVN) (P = 0.015); osteoporosis (P = 0.01); impaired vision (P < 0.0001); cataract (P < 0.0001); and diabetes (P = 0.012). Generally, immunosuppressive treatment was significantly associated with VDI (P = 0.039), especially cyclophosphamide (P < 0.0001), biological agent (P = 0.008), chlorambucil (P = 0.003), and anticoagulant (P = 0.02). VDI was also significantly correlated with age (P = 0.033), disease duration (P = 0.029), and duration of eye involvement (P = 0.003).

CONCLUSION

VDI is significantly associated with most disease parameters of BD, except for parameters such as mucocutaneous manifestations and uncomplicated venous thrombosis; however, further studies may be needed to establish BD-specific damage index.

The current status of biological treatment for uveitis

INTRODUCTION

Noninfectious uveitis represents one of the leading causes of blindness in developed Countries, compromising patients' quality of life and social functioning. The main treatment goals are the control of ocular inflammation, to avert and treat sight-threatening complications, thus preserving and/or restoring visual function.

AREAS COVERED

This manuscript deals with systemic therapy with biologic drugs for noninfectious uveitis. An extensive literature search in the MEDLINE database (via PubMed) has been performed up to June 2020. The major classes of biologic molecules employed in ocular inflammatory diseases have been reviewed, focusing on TNF inhibitors, IL-1, IL-6, IL-17, IL-23 inhibitors, interferons, rituximab, and abatacept efficacy and safety. An overview of most recent developments in the field has been provided as well, with reference to the experience with JAK inhibitors and with biosimilar drugs.

EXPERT OPINION

The development of the concept of targeted therapy and the subsequent introduction of biologic molecules in clinical practice have revolutionized the prognosis of uveitis. The target of a rapid and sustained steroid-free remission of ocular inflammation should be pursued for all patients early in the disease course, in order to have a better chance to improve the final visual outcome.

Activation of the interleukin-23/interleukin-17 signalling pathway in autoinflammatory and autoimmune uveitis

Uveitis is a group of diseases characterized by intraocular inflammation, of which some are driven by autoinflammatory or autoimmune responses, such as Vogt-Koyanagi-Harada disease, Behçet's disease, uveitis associated with spondyloarthritis, ocular sarcoidosis, sympathetic ophthalmia and birdshot chorioretinopathy. These entities have various clinical forms, but genetic and biomarker data suggest that they share a common molecular basis, activation of the Interleukin (IL)-23/IL-17 pathway. Multiple factors including genetic predisposition, various cytokine imbalances, infectious agents and gut alterations are found to trigger an aberrant response of this pathway. The enhanced activity of the IL-23/IL-17 pathway is committed to the expansion and pathogenicity of Th17 cells. Evidence from animal models demonstrates that the development of pathogenic Th17 cells is responsible for the induction of experimental autoimmune uveitis. Further findings indicate that retinal pigment epithelium (RPE) cells may be a target of IL-17. IL-17 triggers downstream inflammatory cascades and causes dysfunction of RPE cells, which may affect retinal barrier function and thereby promote intraocular inflammation. Currently, several emerging drugs blocking the IL-23/IL-17 pathway have been assessed for the treatment of uveitis in pilot studies. The purpose of this is to summarize updated biological knowledge and preliminary clinical data, providing the rationale for further development and evaluation of novel drugs targeting the IL-23/IL-17 pathway in autoinflammatory and autoimmune uveitis. Future studies may focus on translational medicine targeting the IL-23/IL-17 pathway for the improvement of diagnosis and treatment of uveitis. In conclusion, activation of the IL-23/IL-17 pathway is a critical biological event and can be an important target for the treatment of autoinflammatory and autoimmune uveitis.

Interferon Alpha-2b Eye Drops Prevent Recurrence of Pterygium After the Bare Sclera Technique: A Single-Center, Sequential, and Controlled Study

To investigate the efficacy and safety of interferon (IFN) alpha-2b eye drops in preventing pterygium recurrence after the bare sclera technique.

Effectiveness and safety of interferon α2a as an add-on treatment for refractory Behçet's uveitis

Objective:

The objective of this study was to investigate the effectiveness and safety of interferon (IFN) α2a as an add-on treatment for refractory Behçet’s uveitis (BU).

Methods:

In this retrospective cohort study, 30 refractory BU patients who received IFNα2a treatment in Peking Union Medical College Hospital between February 2015 and June 2018 were consecutively included. IFNα2a was used mainly as an add-on treatment for BU patients who underwent relapse under corticosteroids and conventional immunosuppressive agents. The primary outcome was treatment success rate before and after initiation of IFNα2a. Changes in ocular relapse rates, disease activity, corticosteroid- and immunosuppressant-sparing effects, as well as side effects were secondary outcomes.

Results:

A total of 30 patients (27 males and 3 females) with a mean age of 30.5 ± 8.7 years were included. Twenty-one patients (70%) were treated with at least 2 immunosuppressive agents before the initiation of IFNα2a. Treatment success was achieved in 26 patients (86.7%), and the median uveitis relapse rate decreased from 7.3 (range 2–12) to 0 (range 0–6) per patient-year (p = 0.000002) during a mean follow-up of 21.7 ± 7.5 months, corticosteroids were lowered in 25 cases (83.3%) and completely withdrawn in four (13.3%). In addition, immunosuppressive agents were reduced in number and dosage in 22 (73.3%) and 29 patients (96.7%), respectively, and were completely withdrawn in 12 cases (40%). No severe adverse events were observed and serum autoantibodies remained negative during the treatment of IFNα2a.

Conclusion:

IFNα2a is effective and relatively safe in refractory BU, with significant steroid- and immunosuppressant-sparing effects.