1
|
Nirbhavane P, Sharma G, Sharma R, Katare OP. Steroidal nanoformulations for the treatment of uveitis: potential, promises and future perspectives. Int Ophthalmol 2024; 44:58. [PMID: 38342799 DOI: 10.1007/s10792-024-03000-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/10/2023] [Accepted: 10/19/2023] [Indexed: 02/13/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Intraocular inflammation, commonly referred to as uveitis, is a prevalent ocular disease. The categorization of uveitis may be based on the prevailing anatomical site, which includes anterior, intermediate, and posterior uveitis. There exists a significant body of evidence indicating that T cells play a pivotal role in the pathogenesis of autoimmune uveitis. In addition to the presence of T cells, an elevation in levels of inflammatory cytokines and a reduction in regulatory cytokines were also noted. The primary pharmacological interventions for uveitis comprise of corticosteroids, methotrexate, anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) agents, anti-tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α) antibodies, and sirolimus. These medications offer prompt alleviation for inflammation. Nevertheless, prolonged administration of corticosteroids invariably leads to unfavorable adverse reactions. The traditional topical corticosteroids exhibit certain limitations, including inadequate transcorneal permeation and low corneal retention, leading to reduced ocular bioavailability. Consequently, there is a growing inclination towards the creation of innovative steroid drug delivery systems with the aim of reducing the potential for adverse effects, while simultaneously enhancing the drug's corneal permeation and retention. CONCLUSION This review is an attempt to compile all the research work done so far in this field and provides a brief overview of the global efforts to develop innovative nanocarrier-based systems for corticosteroids.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Gajanand Sharma
- University Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Panjab University, Chandigarh, 160014, India
| | - Rajeev Sharma
- Amity University, Gwalior, Madhya Pradesh, 474005, India
| | - O P Katare
- University Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Panjab University, Chandigarh, 160014, India
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Papaliodis GN, Rosner BA, Dreger KA, Fitzgerald TD, Artornsombudh P, Kothari S, Gangaputra SS, Levy-Clarke GA, Nussenblatt RB, Rosenbaum JT, Sen HN, Suhler EB, Thorne JE, Bhatt NP, Foster CS, Jabs DA, Pak CM, Ying GS, Kempen JH. Incidence of and Risk Factors for Cataract in Anterior Uveitis. Am J Ophthalmol 2023; 254:221-232. [PMID: 37414328 PMCID: PMC10528977 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajo.2023.06.021] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/09/2022] [Revised: 06/13/2023] [Accepted: 06/13/2023] [Indexed: 07/08/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE To estimate the incidence/risk factors for cataract in noninfectious anterior uveitis. DESIGN Retrospective multicenter cohort study (6 US tertiary uveitis sites, 1978-2010). METHODS Data were harvested by trained expert reviewers, using protocol-driven review of experts' charts. We studied cataract incidence-newly reduced visual acuity worse than 20/40 attributed to cataract; or incident cataract surgery-in 3923 eyes of 2567 patients with anterior uveitis. RESULTS Cataract developed in 507 eyes (54/1000 eye-years, 95% CI 49-59). Time-updated risk factors associated with cataract included older age (≥65 vs <18 years: adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] 5.04, 95% CI 3.04-8.33), higher anterior chamber cell grade (P(trend)=0.001), prior incisional glaucoma surgery (aHR 1.86, 95% CI 1.10-3.14), band keratopathy (aHR 2.23, 95% CI 1.47-3.37), posterior synechiae (aHR 3.71, 95% CI 2.83-4.87), and elevated intraocular pressure ≥30 vs 6-20 mm Hg (aHR 2.57, 95% CI 1.38-4.77). Primary acute (aHR 0.59, 95% CI 0.30-1.15) and recurrent acute (aHR 0.74, 95% CI 0.55-0.98) had lower cataract risk than chronic anterior uveitis. Higher-dose prednisolone acetate 1%-equivalent use (≥2 drops/day) was associated with >2-fold higher cataract risk in eyes with anterior chamber cell grades 0.5+ or lower but was not associated with higher cataract risk in the presence of anterior chamber cells of grade 1+ or higher. CONCLUSIONS Cataract complicates anterior uveitis in ∼5.4/100 eye-years. Several fixed and modifiable risk factors were identified, yielding a point system to guide cataract risk minimization. Topical corticosteroids only were associated with increased cataract risk when anterior chamber cells were absent or minimally present, suggesting their use to treat active inflammation (which itself is cataractogenic) does not cause a net increase in cataract incidence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- George N Papaliodis
- From the Department of Ophthalmology, Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary (G.N.P., J.H.K.), Boston, Massachusetts, USA; Department of Ophthalmology, Harvard Medical School (G.N.P., C.S.F., J.H.K.), Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
| | - Bernard A Rosner
- Channing Division of Network Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School (B.A.R.), Boston, Massachusetts, USA; Department of Biostatistics, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health (B.A.R.), Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Kurt A Dreger
- Department of Population, Family, and Reproductive Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health (K.A.D.), Baltimore, Maryland, USA; Department of Ophthalmology, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine (K.A.D., J.E.T., D.A.J.), Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Tonetta D Fitzgerald
- Scheie Eye Institute, Department of Ophthalmology, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine (T.D.F., N.P.B., G.-s.Y., s.k.), Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Pichaporn Artornsombudh
- Massachusetts Eye Research and Surgery Institution (P.A., S.K., C.S.F.), Waltham, Massachusetts, USA; Department of Ophthalmology, Somdech Phra Pinklao Hospital, Royal Thai Navy (P.A.), Bangkok, Thailand;; Department of Ophthalmology, King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital (P.A.), Bangkok, Thailand
| | - Srishti Kothari
- Scheie Eye Institute, Department of Ophthalmology, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine (T.D.F., N.P.B., G.-s.Y., s.k.), Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA; Massachusetts Eye Research and Surgery Institution (P.A., S.K., C.S.F.), Waltham, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Sapna S Gangaputra
- Vanderbilt Eye Institute, Vanderbilt University Medical Center (S.S.G.), Nashville, Tennessee, USA
| | - Grace A Levy-Clarke
- Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, West Virginia University (G.A.L.-C.), Morgantown, West Virginia, USA
| | - Robert B Nussenblatt
- Laboratory of Immunology, National Eye Institute, National Institutes of Health (R.B.N., H.N.S.), Bethesda, Maryland, USA
| | - James T Rosenbaum
- Department of Ophthalmology, Oregon Health and Science University (J.T.R., E.B.S.), Portland, Oregon, USA; Department of Medicine, Oregon Health and Science University (J.T.R.), Portland, Oregon, USA; Legacy Devers Eye Institute (J.T.R.), Portland, Oregon, USA
| | - H Nida Sen
- Laboratory of Immunology, National Eye Institute, National Institutes of Health (R.B.N., H.N.S.), Bethesda, Maryland, USA
| | - Eric B Suhler
- Department of Ophthalmology, Oregon Health and Science University (J.T.R., E.B.S.), Portland, Oregon, USA; Portland Veteran's Affairs Medical Center (E.B.S.), Portland, Oregon, USA
| | - Jennifer E Thorne
- Department of Ophthalmology, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine (K.A.D., J.E.T., D.A.J.), Baltimore, Maryland, USA; Department of Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins University Bloomberg School of Public Health (J.E.T., D.A.J.), Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Nirali P Bhatt
- Scheie Eye Institute, Department of Ophthalmology, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine (T.D.F., N.P.B., G.-s.Y., s.k.), Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - C Stephen Foster
- Department of Ophthalmology, Harvard Medical School (G.N.P., C.S.F., J.H.K.), Boston, Massachusetts, USA; Massachusetts Eye Research and Surgery Institution (P.A., S.K., C.S.F.), Waltham, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Douglas A Jabs
- Department of Ophthalmology, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine (K.A.D., J.E.T., D.A.J.), Baltimore, Maryland, USA; Department of Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins University Bloomberg School of Public Health (J.E.T., D.A.J.), Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Clara M Pak
- University of Rochester School of Medicine & Dentistry (C.M.P.), Rochester, New York, USA; MCM Eye Unit, MyungSung Christian Medical Center (MCM) General Hospital and MyungSung Medical School (J.H.K., C.M.P.), Addis Ababa, Ethiopia
| | - Gui-Shuang Ying
- Scheie Eye Institute, Department of Ophthalmology, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine (T.D.F., N.P.B., G.-s.Y., s.k.), Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - John H Kempen
- From the Department of Ophthalmology, Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary (G.N.P., J.H.K.), Boston, Massachusetts, USA; Department of Ophthalmology, Harvard Medical School (G.N.P., C.S.F., J.H.K.), Boston, Massachusetts, USA; MCM Eye Unit, MyungSung Christian Medical Center (MCM) General Hospital and MyungSung Medical School (J.H.K., C.M.P.), Addis Ababa, Ethiopia; Department of Ophthalmology, Addis Ababa University School of Medicine (J.H.K.), Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Senthil MP, Simon S, Constable PA. A review of patient-reported outcome measures used in uveitis. Surv Ophthalmol 2023; 68:225-240. [PMID: 36395825 DOI: 10.1016/j.survophthal.2022.11.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/14/2022] [Revised: 09/13/2022] [Accepted: 11/09/2022] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
We review patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) used to evaluate the quality of life (QoL) in uveitis and provide a quality assessment of the psychometric properties of the PROMs, making it easier to choose the best questionnaire for uveitis. Our review included 158 articles. A total of 98 PROMs were used to measure QoL in uveitis and the National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire 25 (NEI VFQ -25) was the most frequently used PROM in these studies. There were 5 uveitis-specific PROMs, but they were meant for either birdshot choroidopathy or cytomegalovirus retinitis or paediatric uveitis. There are no PROMs developed explicitly for the more common, anterior uveitis, intermediate uveitis, panuveitis, and chronic uveitis. The uveitis-specific PROMs performed better in our quality assessment criteria compared to other PROMs. However, these PROMs were constructed using traditional classical test theory and have not been assessed using the modern family of psychometric assessment methods such as Rasch analysis. As new therapeutic modalities for uveitis such as the new biological agents and steroid implants, continue to evolve, a comprehensive PROM will be increasingly valued in clinical trial settings to compare the effects of treatments from the patient's perspective.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mallika Prem Senthil
- College of Nursing and Health Sciences, Caring Futures Institute, Flinders University, Bedford Park, South Australia, Australia.
| | - Sumu Simon
- University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Paul A Constable
- College of Nursing and Health Sciences, Caring Futures Institute, Flinders University, Bedford Park, South Australia, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Pasquali TA, Toyos MM, Abrams DB, Scales DK, Seaman JW, Weissgerber G. Topical Ocular Anti-TNFα Agent Licaminlimab in the Treatment of Acute Anterior Uveitis: A Randomized Phase II Pilot Study. Transl Vis Sci Technol 2022; 11:14. [PMID: 35704329 PMCID: PMC9206391 DOI: 10.1167/tvst.11.6.14] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose Licaminlimab is a new anti-TNFα antibody fragment for topical ocular application. This phase II study assessed the tolerability, treatment effect, and pharmacokinetics of licaminlimab in acute anterior uveitis (AAU). Methods In this multicenter, randomized, parallel-group, double-masked study, 43 adult patients with non-infectious AAU and Standardization of Uveitis Nomenclature (SUN) anterior chamber (AC) cell score of 2+ or 3+ were randomized (3:1 ratio) to licaminlimab (60 mg/mL, 8 drops/day for 15 days, 4 drops/day for 7 days, then matching vehicle for 7 days) or dexamethasone eye drops (8 drops/day for 15 days, tapering to 1 drop/day over 14 days). The primary efficacy end point was clinical response (≥2-step decrease in AC cell grade at day 15). A treatment effect was considered as established if the lower limit of the 95% posterior interval of the responder rate was >30%. Serum levels of licaminlimab were determined. Results The day 15 response rate for licaminlimab was 56%; the lower bound of the 95% credible interval was 40% (i.e. >30%), demonstrating a treatment effect according to prespecified criteria. By day 4, 36% of licaminlimab-treated patients were responders; 76% had an AC cell grade of 0 on ≥1 post-treatment visit. The day 15 dexamethasone response rate was 90% (no inferential between-arm comparison was planned). Both treatments were well-tolerated. Intraocular pressure increased from baseline with dexamethasone but not licaminlimab. Licaminlimab was undetectable in serum in most patients. Conclusions Licaminlimab is the first biologic demonstrated to have a treatment effect on an intraocular condition with topical ocular application. The trial met its primary objective and the observed responder rate for licaminlimab was 56.0%. Ocular administration of licaminlimab was well-tolerated in adult subjects with AAU for up to 35 days.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - David K Scales
- Retina and Uveitis Consultants of Texas, San Antonio, TX, USA
| | - John W Seaman
- Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation, Fort Worth, TX, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
Panda BB, Nanda A, Swain SC. Therapeutic Efficacy of Difluprednate 0.05% Versus Prednisolone Acetate 1% in Controlling Inflammation and Macular Oedema Following Phacoemulsification: An Optical Coherence Tomography-Based Study. Cureus 2021; 13:e14673. [PMID: 34055520 PMCID: PMC8146159 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.14673] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/05/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Topical corticosteroids have been the cornerstone in the management of postoperative inflammation following cataract surgery. Due to potential side effects of the older topical steroids like prednisolone acetate and dexamethasone or betamethasone, newer potent steroids preparation like difluprednate, loteprednol or fluorometholone are now being used at lesser dose and frequency to control inflammation. There is scanty literature on the efficacy of these drugs in preventing inflammation and macular oedema in the Indian population. PURPOSE The purpose of this study was to compare the efficacy of difluprednate 0.05% against prednisolone 1% eye drops for control of inflammation following phacoemulsification. The adverse effects of both drugs were also evaluated in this retrospective study. METHODS This retrospective cohort study included 181 patients operated for age-related cataracts by a single surgeon at a tertiary referral eye hospital between December 2018 and March 2019. Patients received either difluprednate 0.05% emulsion (n=90 eyes) or prednisolone acetate 1% (n=91 eyes) after phacoemulsification with the same brand intraocular lens (IOL) and same phaco machine. The topical medication was initiated one day postoperatively and continued for six weeks in tapering dosage. Pain score (Visual Analogue Scale, VAS), conjunctival hyperemia, anterior chamber (AC) cell grading, corneal oedema, central retinal thickness, subclinical cystoid macular oedema (SCME), intraocular pressures (IOP) and best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) were examined after one week and six weeks of cataract extraction. Results: There was no statistically significant difference observed with regards to pain score (no pain in any patients after six weeks), conjunctival hyperemia (no hyperemia in any patients after six weeks), AC inflammation (no reaction in any patients), central retinal thickness (234.44 ± 35.75µ vs. 234.8 ± 34.99µ, p-value 0.946), SCME (16.67% vs. 13.19%, p-value 0.511), IOP (16.8 vs. 15.47 mmHg, p-value 0.101) and BCVA (BCVA 6/6 in 57.7% vs. 70.32%, p-value >0.05) between both groups. The mean change in IOP in both the groups at one week (0 ± 4.4 vs. 1.87 ± 3.54, p-value 0.0007) and six weeks (-0.01 ± 5.53 vs. 1.88 ± 4.01, p-value 0.004) was significant. Conclusion: Both the groups were equivalent with regards to their therapeutic efficacy in controlling postoperative inflammation and restoration of vision following phacoemulsification.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bijnya B Panda
- Ophthalmology, Srirama Chandra Bhanja Medical College and Hospital, Cuttack, IND
| | - Ashok Nanda
- Ophthalmology, Kar Vision Eye Hospital, Bhubaneswar, IND
| | - Suresh C Swain
- Ophthalmology, Srirama Chandra Bhanja Medical College and Hospital, Cuttack, IND
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Musleh MG, Bokre D, Dahlmann-Noor AH. Risk of intraocular pressure elevation after topical steroids in children and adults: A systematic review. Eur J Ophthalmol 2019; 30:856-866. [PMID: 31668084 DOI: 10.1177/1120672119885050] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Topical steroids may induce a rise in intraocular pressure. The risk may increase with prolonged use, high frequency of administration, young age, higher ocular penetrance and higher anti-inflammatory potency. We aimed to study this relationship by comparing published rates of intraocular pressure elevation following administration of topical steroids and compared the risk of higher versus lower dosage regimes, high- versus low-potency/penetration steroids and adults versus children. Data sources used were Ovid Embase, Ovid Medline, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Web of Science, Scopus, CINHAL Plus and LILACS. Eligible studies were randomised controlled trials of topical steroids versus any other topical steroid, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, placebo or vehicle, or a different mode of administration administered for 7 days or longer that reported intraocular pressure elevation from baseline as >10, 6-15 or >15 mm Hg in adults or children. Risks of bias were reviewed using the GRADE quality approach. Data were extracted into the software package, RevMan, Version 5 (Cochrane Collaboration). In total, 43 studies were included. Meta-analysis was not possible. Topical steroids of lower anti-inflammatory potency, and with reduced intraocular penetration, are associated with reduced incidence of intraocular pressure elevation. A comparison of data in children and adults is limited by the use of different reporting systems. The principal obstacle to meta-analysis is the different reporting systems used to categorise intraocular pressure elevation. We recommend future studies should report intraocular pressure elevation >10 mm Hg from baseline to allow meta-analysis of data.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Desta Bokre
- Joint Library of Ophthalmology, Moorfields Eye Hospital and UCL Institute of Ophthalmology, London, UK
| | - Annegret H Dahlmann-Noor
- NIHR Biomedical Research Centre, Moorfields Eye Hospital and UCL Institute of Ophthalmology, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|