Should We Reconsider the Classification of Patients with Dry Eye Disease?

Assessment and safety of the new esthesiometer BRILL: Comparison with the Cochet-Bonnet Esthesiometer

BACKGROUND

Corneal sensitivity can decrease by several ocular conditions, such as dry eye or refractive surgery, which favor ocular epithelial lesions and is measured using an esthesiometer. The study's primary objective was to demonstrate the efficacy and safety of the non-contact esthesiometer BRILL, which delivers air pulses to the corneal surface to assess corneal sensitivity.

METHODS

A single-center, prospective, controlled pilot study was carried out in adult patients with healthy eyes and or with pathology. Corneal sensitivity measurements were made in triplicate for both eyes at three consecutive visits. The esthesiometer BRILL was used in all visits, and on the last visit, the contact esthesiometer Cochet-Bonnet was also used. The results of both devices were compared by transforming them into force values.

RESULTS

54 subjects with a mean age of 50.43 (SD 16.55, interval 18-87), 77.78% women, were included. Comparing the forces applied by both esthesiometers in the healthy eyes, in the eyes with pathology in all the groups, and in the dry eyes showed significant differences, p = 0.03603, p = 0.00614, and p = 0.0001, respectively.

CONCLUSION

The BRILL esthesiometer proved to be an effective and safe tool for non-contact assessment of corneal sensitivity with operator-independent repeatability. The measurements had a good agreement and comparable range with the Cochet-Bonet aesthesiometer measurements in healthy and dry eyes but with no interchangeable values. This portable device can help ophthalmologists and optometrists to diagnose eye pathologies that cause decreased corneal sensitivity and to assess the efficacy of therapy and disease progression.

Unsupervised Learning Based on Meibography Enables Subtyping of Dry Eye Disease and Reveals Ocular Surface Features

Purpose

This study aimed to establish an image-based classification that can reveal the clinical characteristics of patients with dry eye using unsupervised learning methods.

Methods

In this study, we analyzed 82,236 meibography images from 20,559 subjects. Using the SimCLR neural network, the images were categorized. Data for each patient were averaged and subjected to mini-batch k-means clustering, and validated through consensus clustering. Statistical metrics determined optimal category numbers. Using a UNet model, images were segmented to identify meibomian gland (MG) areas. Clinical features were assessed, including tear breakup time (BUT), tear meniscus height (TMH), and gland atrophy. A thorough ocular surface evaluation was conducted on 280 cooperative patients.

Results

SimCLR neural network achieved clustering patients with dry eye into six image-based subtypes. Patients in different subtypes harbored significantly different noninvasive BUT, significantly correlated with TMH. Subtypes 1 and 5 had the most severe MG atrophy. Subtype 2 had the highest corneal fluorescent staining (CFS). Subtype 4 had the lowest TMH, whereas subtype 5 had the highest. Subtypes 3 and 6 had the largest MG areas, and the upper MG areas of a person's bilateral eyes were highly correlated. Image-based subtypes are related to meibum quality, CFS, and morphological characteristics of MG.

Conclusions

In this study, we developed an unsupervised neural network model to cluster patients with dry eye into image-based subtypes using meibography images. We annotated these subtypes with functional and morphological clinical characteristics.

Impact of Plasma Rich in Growth Factors (PRGF) Eye Drops on Ocular Redness and Symptomatology in Patients with Dry Eye Disease

Background and Objectives: Dry eye disease (DED) is a common and very symptomatic pathology that affects normal daily activity. The aim of the study was to evaluate the efficacy of plasma rich in growth factors (PRGF) added to one routine treatment protocol for DED (artificial tears substitutes, lid hygiene, and anti-inflammatory therapy). Materials and Methods: Patients were divided into two groups of treatment: standard treatment group (n = 43 eyes) and PRGF group (n = 59). Patients' symptomatology (inferred from OSDI and SANDE questionnaires), ocular inflammation, tear stability, and ocular surface damage were analyzed at baseline and after 3 months of treatment. Results: OSDI test scores were significantly lower in both groups (p < 0.001). SANDE frequency test scores also improved statistically, with differences between groups (p = 0.0089 SANDE frequency and p < 0.0119 SANDE severity). There was a greater reduction in ocular redness (ocular inflammation) in the PRGF group (p < 0.0001) and fluorescein tear break-up time was significantly improved in the PRGF group (p = 0.0006). No significant changes were found in terms of ocular surface damage. No adverse events were obtained in either group. Conclusions: The addition of PRGF to the standard treatment of DED, according to the results obtained, proved to be safe and produced an improvement in ocular symptomatology and signs of inflammation, particularly in moderate and severe cases, when compared to standard treatment.

Anti-Inflammatories in the Treatment of Dry Eye Disease: A Review

Inflammation is an important driver of dry eye disease (DED) pathogenesis. An initial insult that results in the loss of tear film homeostasis can initiate a nonspecific innate immune response that leads to a chronic and self-sustaining inflammation of the ocular surface, which results in classic symptoms of dry eye. This initial response is followed by a more prolonged adaptive immune response, which can perpetuate and aggravate inflammation and result in a vicious cycle of chronic inflammatory DED. Effective anti-inflammatory therapies can help patients exit this cycle, and effective diagnosis of inflammatory DED and selection of the most appropriate treatment are therefore key to successful DED management and treatment. This review explores the cellular and molecular mechanisms of the immune and inflammatory components of DED, and examines the evidence base for the use of currently available topical treatment options. These agents include topical steroid therapy, calcineurin inhibitors, T cell integrin antagonists, antibiotics, autologous serum/plasma therapy, and omega-3 fatty acid dietary supplements.

Management Strategies for Evaporative Dry Eye Disease and Future Perspective

Dry eye disease (DED) is a common disorder that remains challenging from a clinical perspective. Unstable or deficient tear film is a major factor contributing to DED and the inability to resolve the loss of tear film homeostasis that accompanies DED can result in a vicious circle of inflammation and treatment-refractory disease. Recently recognized as a multifactorial disease, the main etiological subtypes of DED are aqueous-deficient and evaporative which exist on a continuum, although evaporative dry eye (EDE) is the more frequent classification. Although attaining greater recognition in recent years, there is currently no consensus and no clear recommendation on how to manage EDE. Clarity on the early diagnosis and treatment of EDE may facilitate the avoidance of progression to chronic inflammation, permanent damage to the ocular surface, and treatment-refractory disease. The purpose of this review was to identify current best practice for management of EDE in order to help clinicians in providing accurate diagnosis and optimized treatment. We summarize recent literature considering the role of the lipid layer on tear film stability, the importance of its composition and of its dynamic behavior, and the link between its malfunction and the insurgence and maintenance of tear film-related diseases. We have provided an assessment of the best management of lipid-deficient EDE based upon an understanding of disease pathophysiology, while indicating the flow of current treatments and possible future evolution of treatment approaches. Lipid containing eye drops may be considered as a step closer to natural tears from artificial aqueous tears because they more closely mimic the aqueous and lipid layers and may be used in combination with other management approaches. As a next step, we recommend working with a wider expert group to develop full guidelines to enable patient-centered management of EDE. Key pointsDry eye is a multifactorial disease of variable presentation with the tendency to become a chronic disease for which it is essential to identify and treat the main pathogenic mechanisms involved and tailor the treatment to the individual patient.Early intervention is needed to prevent the vicious cycle of DED and may require a multi-faceted management approach.EDE is not just a problem of MGD but can be the result of anything affecting blinking, mucin spreading, aqueous layer volume and content.Lipid-containing eye drops may provide significant relief of symptoms by improving the lipid layer and its spreading ability and, as such, are an appropriate component of the overall management of lipid-deficient EDE; natural lipid-containing eye drops should be the preferred treatment.

A Practical Approach to Severity Classification and Treatment of Dry Eye Disease: A Proposal from the Mexican Dry Eye Disease Expert Panel

Dry eye disease (DED) has a higher prevalence than many important systemic disorders like cardiovascular disease and diabetes mellitus, representing a significant quality of life burden for the affected patients. It is a common reason for consultation in general eye clinics worldwide. Nowadays, the diagnostic and therapeutic approach at the high corneal and ocular surface specialty level should be reserved for cases of severe and chronic dry eye disease associated with systemic autoimmune diseases or complicated corneal and ocular surface pathologies. In such cases, the diagnostic and therapeutic approach is often complex, elaborate, time-consuming, and costly due to the use of extensive dry eye questionnaires, noninvasive electronic diagnostic equipment, and clinical laboratory and ancillary tests. However, other eye care specialists attend a fair amount of DED cases; therefore, its diagnosis, classification, and management should be simple, practical, achievable, and effective. Considering that many patients attending non-specialized dry eye clinics would benefit from better ophthalmological attention, we decided to elaborate a practical DED classification system based on disease severity to help clinicians discriminate cases needing referral to subspecialty clinics from those they could attend. Additionally, we propose a systematic management approach and general management considerations to improve patients' therapeutic outcomes according to disease severity.

The Subtle Role of Para-inflammation in Modulating the Progression of Dry Eye Disease

In patients with DED, the continuous stimuli induced by excessive or persistent cold fiber sensors and overstimulation of nociceptors, as well as tear hyperosmolarity induced by evaporative stress, induce a transitory protective adaptation response called para-inflammation to restore ocular surface homeostasis. This mild subclinical inflammatory status (a type of hormetic response) can become chronic if the stimuli or tissue malfunction is present for a sustained period, causing persistent symptoms and damage to ocular surface epithelia.We review the mechanisms that characterize the transition from para-inflammation to a persistent inflammatory status of the ocular surface, including accumulation of biological waste and damaged/dysfunctional proteins, which, in normal conditions, are eliminated by autophagy, activation of the inflammasomes, and what is currently known about their role in DED pathogenesis. Furthermore, we analyze current treatments that can modulate the inflammatory response of the ocular surface and speculate about new possible therapies to treat para-inflammation.

The role of KPI-121 0.25% in the treatment of dry eye disease: penetrating the mucus barrier to treat periodic flares

The tear film, which includes mucins that adhere to foreign particles, rapidly clears allergens and pathogens from the ocular surface, protecting the underlying tissues. However, the tear film’s ability to efficiently remove foreign particles during blinking can also pose challenges for topical drug delivery, as traditional eye drops (solutions and suspensions) are cleared from the ocular surface before the drug can penetrate into the conjunctival and corneal epithelium. In the past 15 years, there has been an increase in the development of nanoparticles with specialized coatings that have reduced affinity to mucins and are small enough in size to pass through the mucus barrier. These mucus-penetrating particles (MPPs) have been shown to efficiently penetrate the mucus barrier and reach the ocular surface tissues. Dry eye disease (DED) is a common inflammatory ocular surface disorder that often presents with periodic flares (exacerbations). However, currently approved immunomodulatory treatments for DED are intended for long-term use. Thus, there is a need for effective short-term treatments that can address intermittent flares of DED. Loteprednol etabonate, an ocular corticosteroid, was engineered to break down rapidly after administration to the ocular surface tissues and thereby reduce risks associated with other topical steroids. KPI-121 is an ophthalmic suspension that uses the MPP technology to deliver loteprednol etabonate more efficiently to the ocular tissues, achieving in animal models a 3.6-fold greater penetration of loteprednol etabonate to the cornea than traditional loteprednol etabonate ophthalmic suspensions. In clinical trials, short-term treatment with KPI-121 0.25% significantly reduced signs and symptoms of DED compared with its vehicle (placebo). Recently approved KPI-121 0.25%, with its novel drug delivery design and ease of use, has the potential to effectively treat periodic flares of DED experienced by many patients.

Updated definition and classification of dry eye disease: Renewed proposals using the nominal group and Delphi techniques

The aim of our research was to obtain expert consensus for updated definition and classification of dry eye disease using formal methodology. The nominal group technique (NGT) involved a steering committee of four ophthalmologists began with collection of ideas followed by group discussion. The ideas were collated, refined, and voted upon. The main characteristics considered, each with different degrees of severity in types I, II, and III, were the ability or not of the ocular surface to re-equilibrate itself, frequency of symptoms, presence of inflammation, epithelial alterations, and possible alterations in the quality of vision. This was followed by three rounds of a "mini-Delphi" involving an expert panel of 13 ophthalmologists, with the last round including all 17 ophthalmologists. Consensus in the final round of voting (⩾75% of votes) was reached on the definition of dry eye disease and on criteria for its classification in three forms. Type I is a transient and reversible form with subclinical inflammation, possible epithelial alterations, and occasional alterations in vision. Type II is a recurrent form characterized by a reduced ability to re-equilibrate the ocular surface, frequent symptoms and alterations in vision with clinically-evident inflammation, and clear evidence of epithelial alterations. Type III is a chronic form with inability to re-equilibrate the ocular surface and accompanied by clinically-evident and chronic inflammation, persistent epithelial alterations, and frequent alterations in quality of vision. The vast majority of patients with dry eye disease can be easily classified into one of these three forms. Dry eye disease definition was updated accordingly.