Anti-adalimumab Antibodies in Patients with Non-infectious Ocular Inflammatory Disease: A Case Series

Risk factors for development of anti-adalimumab antibodies in non-infectious uveitis

Purpose

To evaluate risk factors associated with development of anti-adalimumab antibodies (AAA) in patients with non-infectious uveitis treated with adalimumab.

Methods

A retrospective, cross-sectional, case-control study was done evaluating patients with non-infectious uveitis treated with adalimumab for at least 12 months and have undergone testing for AAA levels. Demographics, clinical characteristics, grading of ocular inflammation, and previous and concomitant immunomodulatory therapy were assessed. Univariate and multivariate analysis were done to estimate odds ratio (OR) with 95% confidence intervals for the various risk factors.

Results

A total of 31 patients were included in the analysis, in which 12 patients who tested positive (Group 1) were matched with 19 patients who tested negative for AAA (Group 2). The groups differed significantly in terms of sex (female) (91.7% vs 52.6%, p = 0.046), presence of systemic disease (91.7% vs 42.1%, p = 0.008), and presence of anterior chamber inflammation at baseline (100% vs 63.2%, p = 0.026). A history of interruption in anti-TNF therapy prior to starting or restarting adalimumab was found to have an increased odds for development of AAA (OR 16.89 [2.92, 107.11], p = 0.008), as well as flare-ups (reactivation of disease) during adalimumab therapy (OR 6.77 [1.80, 61.80], p = 0.027). Weekly dosing of adalimumab was shown to decrease odds of AAA development (OR 0.34 [0.02, 0.70], p = 0.040), while concomitant anti-metabolite therapy was not shown to be a statistically significant protective factor (OR 2.22 [0.50, 9.96], p = 0.148).

Conclusions

History of interruption in anti-TNF therapy and flare during adalimumab were associated with development of AAA, while weekly dosing of adalimumab was protective against AAA. Identification of those with higher risk of developing AAA may guide in clinical decision making to optimize management for these patients.

Adalimumab for the Treatment of Non-Infectious Uveitis: A Real Life Experience

OBJECTIVE

To describe the efficacy and safety of adalimumab for the treatment of non-infectious uveitis (NIU) in four Uveitis Units from tertiary Spanish hospitals.

METHODS

Multicenter and retrospective clinical cohort study including all patients with NIU treated with adalimumab from January 2012 to October 2022 in four uveitis units was performed. Efficacy was measured with the number of relapses, ocular inflammation and reduction in immunosuppression and corticosteroid dosage before and after adalimumab use. We collected data regarding adverse effects and examined the immunogenicity of adalimumab.

RESULTS

One hundred and twenty-two patients (59% females), with a mean age of 48.6 years (SD = 14.8) accounting for 217 eyes were included. The majority (92.6%) were Caucasian. Uveitis analyzed were predominantly panuveitis (34.7%), bilateral (77.9%), acute (41.5%), and non-granulomatous (90%). Most of them were immune mediated (42.6%), and the main reason to initiate adalimumab was refractory disease (96.7%). The analysis was statistically significant due to the reduction in the number of immunosuppressive drugs as well as the dose of oral corticosteroids and the number of relapses during follow-up (p < 0.001). The decrease in ocular inflammation parameters and the improvement in visual acuity (p < 0.05) were also significant. There were no deaths due to the drug and only one reported case of serious infection. In total, 10.9% of 73 patients tested developed anti-adalimumab antibodies and 4.1% lupus-like.

CONCLUSIONS

We consider adalimumab as a leading drug in the treatment of NIU with high safety and efficacy.

Immunogenicity of Adalimumab in Patients with Non-Infectious- Uveitis: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

OBJECTIVE

To review the prevalence, incidence, and risk factors for developing anti-drug antibodies (AAA) in patients with non-infectious uveitis (NIU) treated with Adalimumab (ADA).

METHODS

A systematic literature search was performed on PubMed, EMBASE, Virtual Health Library, Cochrane, and medRxiv. Meta-analysis was performed using random effects.

RESULTS

Nine out of 2,373 studies were included. The prevalence of AAA in NIU patients treated with ADA was 9% (95% CI: 2% to 37%, I2 = 95% with a P<0.01), it was significantly higher in real-life scenarios (observational studies) than in clinical trials. The pooled incidence at 12 months was 27% (CI 95% 16%-42% I2 = 0%). Several factors have been associated with AAA generation in NIU patients, including the non-use of concomitant immunosuppressants, presence of autoimmune systemic disease, female gender, etc.

CONCLUSION

This study showed that AAA prevalence is higher in real-life scenarios compared to clinical trials. Further research is needed to elucidate the factors that trigger AAA generation in NIU patients.

Antidrug Antibodies to Tumor Necrosis Factor α Inhibitors in Patients With Noninfectious Uveitis

Importance

Tumor necrosis factor inhibitors (TNFis) can induce antidrug antibody (ADA) formation and loss of therapeutic response. However, the utility of ADA testing and the association between ADAs and treatment response in patients with noninfectious uveitis (NIU) is not well understood.

Objective

To assess the frequency of ADAs and their association with drug levels and clinical response in patients with NIU treated with adalimumab or infliximab.

Design, Setting, and Participants

This retrospective cross-sectional study included patients diagnosed with NIU who received adalimumab or infliximab and underwent testing for serum drug level and ADAs at the National Eye Institute from September 2017 to July 2021.

Exposures

Serum drug level testing with reflex testing for ADA levels was performed.

Main Outcomes and Measures

The main outcome was the association between drug levels and ADAs, clinical response, and concurrent antimetabolite use in patients treated with TNFis for NIU.

Results

Of 54 patients included in the study, 42 received adalimumab (mean [SD] age, 43.6 [19.6] years; 25 [59.5%] female) and 12 received infliximab (mean [SD] age, 42.7 [20.4] years; 7 [58.3%] male). In the adalimumab group, mean (SD) drug level was 9.72 (6.82) μg/mL, mean (SD) ADA level was 84.2 (172.9) arbitrary units/mL, and ADA frequency was 35.7% (15 of 42 patients). Mean drug level was lower in those with ADAs compared with those without ADAs (mean [SD], 2.8 [2.6] μg/mL vs 13.6 [5.2] μg/mL; difference: 10.8 μg/mL; 95% CI, 8.3-13.2 μg/mL; P < .001). There was a higher mean drug level with concurrent antimetabolite use compared with monotherapy (mean [SD], 11.0 [7.3] μg/mL vs 6.8 [4.5] μg/mL; difference: -4.2 μg/mL; 95% CI, -8.7 to 0.2 μg/mL; P = .06). Multivariable modeling showed that a 1-arbitrary unit increase in ADAs was associated with a -0.02 μg/mL (95% CI, -0.01 to -0.34 μg/mL) difference in mean drug level (P < .001). Favorable clinical response was associated with a threshold drug level above 2.7 μg/mL or an antibody level below 15.2 μg/mL. The mean (SD) drug level in the infliximab group was 27.02 (18.15) μg/mL, and no ADAs were detected.

Conclusions and Relevance

In this study, 35.7% of adalimumab-treated patients with NIU had ADAs. The presence of ADAs was associated with lower drug levels, and higher ADA levels were associated with increased risk of TNFi treatment failure. Although limited by the retrospective design, our results suggest that therapeutic drug monitoring may be considered among patients experiencing therapy failure to help exclude ADAs as a potential cause of treatment failure.